边界组织与国家创新体系中的知识流动

以国家创新体系理论为基础,从边界组织概念出发,对边界组织的结构形式和特征进行了阐述。对国家创新体系中的知识层次与知识形态进行了分析,并以此为基础,深入探讨了知识流动障碍,提出了以边界组织为基础的知识流动框架。     

双重性企业边界浅析

长期以来,学者对企业边界的研究视角始终放在企业的规模上,对企业边界的复杂变动情况难以做出合理的解释.本文认为,企业的边界具有两重性:一是由土地、劳动、资本等有形资源决定的规模边界,二是由知识、技术等无形资源决定的能力边界.能力边界是企业边界的核心属性,它的变动决定了规模边界的变动方向.     

组织嵌入对新移民知识员工跨区域流动意愿影响研究

将组织嵌入理论引入我国新移民知识员工跨区域流动的新研究情境中,从组织嵌入视角探讨影响新移民知识员工跨区域流动的内在动因。研究表明,组织嵌入经典的3个维度（联结、匹配和牺牲）可以再细分为7个子维度;基于关系和时间积累的联结对新移民知识员工跨区域流动意愿有显著负向影响;个人与工作、团队、组织的匹配有助于减弱新移民知识员工的跨区域流动意愿;与工作直接相关的牺牲或与工作无直接相关的牺牲都会增加新移民知识员工跨区域流动的顾虑,降低他们的跨区域流动概率。     

论风险投资企业与传统企业资源配置方式的差异

本文从企业资源配置的角度出发,针对风险投资企业与传统企业在资源配置目的、主体等几个方面的差异,分析风险投资企业在资源优化配置方面的独特性,对风险投资高收益本质进行了一定的探讨。     

企业同质性假设、异质性假设和企业资源的获取

企业作为一个生产经营单位,不具有实现生产经营活动所需的全部资源.因而,企业必须通过某种形式从外部获取一定的资源,而获取资源的方式和企业的性质相关.新古典经济学及交易费用理论在企业同质性假设下,认为所得资源具有可交易性,企业获取所有资源的方式完全是通过市场交易.而企业能力理论在企业异质性假设下,认为形成企业核心能力的关键性资源是非交易的,不能通过市场取得,因而资源的获取主要是通过网络组织实现资源的跨企业流动.     

基于关键资源的企业边界分析

随着企业性质的变迁,传统企业边界理论越来越显示出其局限性。对企业边界理论进行了回顾分析,从经济学的角度,将企业边界定义为企业所控制的关键资源及通过它分享剩余的范围,并用这一定义分析目前企业边界现状及其在企业经营管理中的运用。     

企业边界变迁的产业组织演化

交易成本理论从成本角度分析企业边界形成与变迁,企业能力理论则采用比较利益的方法从收入角度分析.短期中,如果企业能力有很大的差异,交易成本降低,位于价值链中上下游的企业将趋于专业化生产;如果企业能力均匀分布,交易成本降低,对专业化生产没有影响.长期中,企业能力、交易成本、企业边界形成互动循环的演化机制,并且在竞争过程中实现自然选择,引起产业组织演化.     

论网络投资企业与传统企业资源配置方式的差异

本文从企业资源配置的角度出发，针对风险投资企业与传统企业在资源配置目的、主体等几个方面的差异，分析风险投资企业在资源优化配置方面的独特性，对风险投资高收益本质进行了一定的探讨。     

企业边界理论及其对我国的借鉴意义

企业边界问题是企业理论中的焦点问题之一。各种边界理论都对企业边界即企业规模的决定机制进行了论述．但都存在一定的不足。文章主要论述规模经济理论、交易费用理论、资源与能力理论等企业边界理论的内涵和不足．着重阐述我国企业如何借鉴企业边界理论进行企业改革,以此推动我国的经济改革和提高企业在国际市场上的竞争能力。     

基于高管流动的跨企业知识转移研究述评

随着市场经济的发展和成熟,高层管理者跨企业流动的现象已屡见不鲜,高层管理者的跨企业流动对流出企业和流入企业都具有至关重要的影响。高层管理者的流动,对我国知识管理实践提出了挑战,这一现象已经引起学术界的高度关注。基于高管流动的跨企业边界的知识转移,已成为企业获取管理性知识资源、提高企业竞争力的重要途径之一。文章对当前本领域的关键研究议题及其相关理论进展,进行了整理、归纳和评述,并进一步探讨了当前研究的局限和研究方向。通过本文的研究,可以为企业有效利用外聘高层管理者的经验和知识,提供科学的理论指导。     

知识经济条件下企业边界消失观的论据评判

近年来,不少学者在论证知识经济条件下企业和市场之间边界模糊性的问题时,得出企业边界不存在的结论,并从而否认知识经济条件下研究企业边界的意义。同时,以企业边界的存在为基本假设前提的交易成本经济学作为研究企业边界的主流理论,却未能对企业边界不存在观给予正面的回应。针对这种研究现象,对知识经济条件下企业边界不存在观的主要论据进行评判是必要的。     

Oligarchs,political regime changes,and firm valuation1

This paper examines the impact of a regime shift on the valuation of politically powerful oligarch firms. Focusing on the Yeltsin–Putin regime shift in Russia, we find that the valuations of oligarch‐controlled firms are significantly higher under the Putin regime than under the Yeltsin regime after controlling for industry and time effects. The findings suggest that the increasing cost of extracting private benefits outweighs the reduction in the value of political connections following the political regime change. The results are also consistent with changes in the risk of state expropriation. Our results indicate that effects driven by the political regime change complement the traditional view that increased ownership concentration improved the performance of Russian oligarch firms.     

Technology and the firm

The globalization of the economy is a process driven by the enterprise. As enterprises form networks of alliances they tend to create huge oligopolistic structures on a global scale. Although these global enterprises are not subject to national norms, it is evident that a new alliance is growing up between the enterprise and the state. In the context of fierce international competition, enterprises need the support of the state, which is able to ensure that its 'national champions' enjoy optimum conditions for development; in return, successful enterprises are the state's best guarantee of national independence. But through this alliance the enterprise has acquired a totally new legitimacy, approaching that formerly reserved for the state, while the state finds itself engaged in global economic competition, which lacks adequate regulatory procedures. There is also a growing disassociation between globalized economic power on one hand, and political power conjned within national borders, on the other. There is a need to formulate a new regulatory framework, in order to overcome a situation where actors representing particular interests impose their own rules on actors representing the public interest. Such a framework would encourage the emergence of a transnational civilian society able to mobilize itself in the face of global economic, technological and environmental problems.     

Technology and the firm

The globalization of the economy is a process driven by the enterprise. As enterprises form networks of alliances they tend to create huge oligopolistic structures on a global scale. Although these global enterprises are not subject to national norms, it is evident that a new alliance is growing up between the enterprise and the state. In the context of fierce international competition, enterprises need the support of the state, which is able to ensure that its 'national champions' enjoy optimum conditions for development; in return, successful enterprises are the state's best guarantee of national independence. But through this alliance the enterprise has acquired a totally new legitimacy, approaching that formerly reserved for the state, while the state finds itself engaged in global economic competition, which lacks adequate regulatory procedures. There is also a growing disassociation between globalized economic power on one hand, and political power conjned within national borders, on the other. There is a need to formulate a new regulatory framework, in order to overcome a situation where actors representing particular interests impose their own rules on actors representing the public interest. Such a framework would encourage the emergence of a transnational civilian society able to mobilize itself in the face of global economic, technological and environmental problems.     

知识互补性视角下跨组织协同创新知识配置研究

通过收集小米手机产业链协同成员的知识特征数据,运用形式概念分析方法得出其合作成员的知识背景及关联特征。然后,对小米手机产业链知识模块进行互补性划分,配置各模块形成 “小米4”系列手机产品的知识网络,并对配置效果进行了评价。     

Does macro-economy have any effect on firm investment-cash flow sensitivities?

We conduct an empirical study on Chinese listed firms’ investment-cash flow sensitivities in different stages of the macroeconomic cycle during 1993–2004, and find that macro-economy has a significant effect on investment-cash flow sensitivities. When economic slowdown occurred between 1998 and 2001, sample firms reduced working capital substantially to maintain some necessary investment level of fixed assets, that is, firms stabilized fixed assets investment by adjusting working capital. However, the sensitivity coefficients of fixed assets investment to cash or sales revenue were not systematically higher in the depressed stage than in the booming stage.      

Complementarities of human capital and information technology: small businesses,emerging economy context and the strategic role of firm resources

How information technology (IT) may complement other key firm resources such as human capital is a question that has drawn increasing attention from scholars and practitioners. Answers to this question are crucial for small businesses in today’s environment. These businesses face a growing demand for IT usage at the same time that they typically can count only on limited resources. This has become a common situation that is particularly critical for small businesses operating in developing countries with emerging economies. We develop propositions and test them with a dataset of service small businesses in an emerging economy. We find that the use of IT services is positively related to firm productivity and that this relationship is positively moderated by entrepreneurs’ management education. Our findings indicate that firm productivity is associated with a combination of human and technology resources.     

Cooperative research and the firm

This paper models cooperative R & D involving the university, the government, and the firm, using a linear programming format to determine the optimal cooperative structure or, “Who does what?” Both prime and dual are discussed. Sensitivity and simulation techniques are discussed as analytical tools to evaluate the effect of uncertainty and returns to scale on the optimal mix or structure of cooperative R & D. The value of the approach is both heuristic and analytical. Some problems and limitations of the approach are discussed briefly.     

The effect of crises on firm exit and the moderating effect of firm size

The liability of smallness assumption suggests that smaller firms face higher exit risks. However, does it apply during crises? We show that during downturns size reduces firms’ exit risk by less; the hazard rate increases more rapidly in size.