商业银行向社会投资者转让贷款债权问题初探

商业银行向社会投资者转让贷款债权,是当前形势下商业银行处置不良贷款措施的创新,但对于此种债权转让的合法性,在理论上和实务操作上都存在争议.虽然银监会对此问题的批复可以指引债权转让工作,但在当前法律规定尚不明确的情况下,商业银行仍需注意相关法律风险.     

我国贷款转让市场研究(二):中国贷款转让业务的发展

<正>三、中国贷款转让业务的发展3.1我国贷款转让业务的发端在我国,信贷资产转让业务是商业银行业务领域中一项重要的金融创新。1998年7月,中国银行上海分行和广东发展银行上海分行签订了转让银行贷款债权的协议,这是国内第一笔贷款转让业务。2002年8月,中国人民银行批准民生银行开展贷款转让业务,随后民生银行上海分行率先与锦江财务公司开展了2亿元的贷款受让业务。2003年7月,中国银监会批准光大银行开办贷款转让业务。随后,贷款转让业务在我国银行间开展起来。国家开发银行成为积极开展贷款转让业务中的转出银行。从2002年国家开发银行以间接银团贷款的方式率先向民生银行转让20亿元贷款以来,国家开发银行已经与多家商业银     

贷款债权可否向社会投资者转让?

随着金融市场规模的急剧扩大和金融交易的日益繁杂,银行等金融机构在处理自身贷款债权或不良资产时,除通过资产管理公司等专门金融机构进行剥离和处置外,是否可以向非金融机构的社会投资者进行转让,以及如何转让,存在何种限制,是一个值得研究和探讨的问题。众所周知,债是民事主体之间最广泛而普遍存在的一种权利义务关系。伴随经济的发展,债权作为一种特殊标的的转让与交易的可能,逐渐形成了今天繁荣的金融及金融衍生品市场。法律制度的肯定和保护则为这一市     

商业银行抵销权相关法律问题探析

问题一:同一银行不同分支行之间是否可以行使抵销权《商业银行法》第22条规定:"商业银行分支机构不具有法人资格,在总行授权范围内依法开展业务,其民事责任由总行承担"。实践中,不少银行为了绕开这一抵销权主体上的法律障碍,往往通过"债权转让"的方式来行使抵销权。具体操作方式为:甲支行先将其对客户享有的贷款债权转让     

我国实施住房抵押贷款证券化的现实思考

为了分散金融机构在发放住房抵押贷款时面临的风险。国际上一种通用的方法是实行住房抵押贷款证券化。所谓住房抵押贷款证券化，就是把金融机构发放的住房抵押贷款转化为抵押贷款证券(主要是债券)，然后通过在资本市场上出售这些证券给市场投资者，以融通资金，并使住房贷款风险分散为由众多投资者承担。从本质上讲，发行住房抵押贷款证券是发放住房抵押贷款机构的一种债权转让行为．即贷款发放人把对住房贷款借款人的所有权利转让给证券投资者。     

房地产抵押贷款证券化的法律思考

一、住房抵押贷款证券化 住房抵押贷款证券化,是指商业银行等金融机构将其持有的住房抵押贷款债权转让给一家特别的专业机构(证券化机构),该机构以其收购的住房抵押贷款为基础而在资本市场上发行证券(主要是住房抵押贷款债券)的行为.     

我国住房抵押贷款支持证券定价模式的比较与选择

住房抵押贷款证券化(Mortgage—Backed Securi—ties,简称 MBS),就是把金融机构发放的住房抵押贷款转化为抵押贷款支持证券,然后通过在资本市场上出售给投资者,以融通资金,并使住房贷款风险分散为由众多投资者承担。从本质上讲,发行住房抵押贷款证券是发放住房抵押贷款机构的一种债权转让行为,即贷款发放人把对住房贷款借款人的     

关于在我国推行住房抵押贷款证券化的若干问题

住房抵押贷款证券化是指银行等金融机构将其所持有的个人住房贷款债权，转让给一家特别机构，该机构通过一定的形式(包括保险、公证等)打包成信用等级较高的证券后，在资本市场上销售给投资者，投资者从收到的贵币流量和有关利息中获利的行为。这一过程实质上是将银行的贷款资产在资本市场上转化为再流动资金。     

金融不良债权整体评估方法研究

有效加快处置金融不良资产是促进国民经济稳定、健康、持续发展的主要措施之一。目前各商业银行和资产管理公司都在加大处置力度 ,采取的主要方式是将一个地区、一个行业整体债权转让给境内外战略投资者 ,或建立资产池将不良资产证券化 ,在转让或证券化过程中 ,一个关键的问题是如何评估债权包资产的单户价值和整体价值 ?而传统的评估方法难以满足这项特殊的评估需要。本文将数理统计中多元回归分析方法运用到评估不良债权资产包中 ,通过举证阐述了评估过程 ,并进行了利弊分析     

最高额保证期间设定与法律风险考评

银行债权是各种债权中最脆弱的债权之一。因为,银行向借款人贷款是以完全单向先行让渡财产为基本特征的。正因如此,银行债权往往比一般债权更需要担保制度的保障。可以说,担保法律制度是银行债权安全的守护神。近段时间,因受邀为某商业银行主笔修订新版合同,泛阅了各商业银行的     

升值之言该如何听

自今年6月中国暗示将松动人民币汇率以来,人民币升值幅度仅为0．4％,这大大低于华盛顿的期待,因此,中美两国的关系日益紧张起来。随着失业率的膨胀,以及选举年即将到来,美国国会再一次将人民币汇率摆上了议事日程：9月6日,华盛顿两位高官为缓和中美关系前往北京,就人民币及其他重要问题进行高峰会晤,以期达成共识。     

商业银行如何应对利率市场化

最近,中国央行的利率政策传达出利率市场化步伐骤然加快的信号,沉浸在央行利率管制环境下的国内商业银行突然感到"利基"竞争的性质发生了重要变化。那么.在利率市场化环境下商业银行应采取怎样的风险偏好,才能使贷款定价覆盖风险溢价?这是银行管理者必须回答的问题。     

When to ally & when to acquire

Acquisitions and alliances are two pillars of growth strategy. But most businesses don't treat the two as alternative mechanisms for attaining goals. Consequently, companies take over firms they should have collaborated with, and vice versa, and make a mess of both acquisitions and alliances. It's easy to see why companies don't weigh the relative merits and demerits of acquisitions and alliances before choosing horses for courses. The two strategies differ in many ways: Acquisition deals are competitive, based on market prices, and risky; alliances are cooperative, negotiated, and not so risky. Companies habitually deploy acquisitions to increase scale or cut costs and use partnerships to enter new markets, customer segments, and regions. Moreover, a company's initial experiences often turn into blinders. If the firm pulls off an alliance or two, it tends to enter into alliances even when circumstances demand acquisitions. Organizational barriers also stand in the way. In many companies, an M&A group, which reports to the finance head, handles acquisitions, while a separate business development unit looks after alliances. The two teams work out of different locations, jealously guard turf, and, in effect, prevent companies from comparing the advantages and disadvantages of the strategies. But companies could improve their results, the authors argue, if they compared the two strategies to determine which is best suited to the situation at hand. Firms such as Cisco that use acquisitions and alliances appropriately grow faster than rivals do. The authors provide a framework to help organizations systematically decide between acquisition and alliance by analyzing three sets of factors: the resources and synergies they desire, the marketplace they compete in, and their competencies at collaborating.     

How to Tie Equity Compensation to Long-Term Results

Companies, investors, and regulators around the world are now seeking to tie executives' payoffs to long-term results and avoid rewarding executives for short-term gains. Focusing on equity-based compensation, the primary component of top executives' pay, the authors analyze how such compensation should best be structured to provide executives with incentives to focus on long-term value creation.
To improve the link between equity compensation and long-term results, the authors recommend that executives be prevented from unwinding their equity incentives for a significant time period after vesting. At the same time, however, the authors suggest that it would be counterproductive to require that executives hold their equity incentives until retirement, as some have proposed. Instead, the authors recommend that companies adopt a combination of "grant-based" and "aggregate" limitations on the unwinding of equity incentives.
Grant-based limitations would allow executives to unwind the equity incentives associated with a particular grant only gradually after vesting, according to a fixed, pre-specified schedule put in place at the time of the grant. Aggregate limitations on unwinding would prevent an executive from unloading more than a specified fraction of the executive's freely disposable equity incentives in any given year.
Finally, the authors emphasize the need for effective limitations on executives' use of hedging and derivative transactions that would weaken the connection between executive payoffs and long-term stock values that a well-designed equity arrangement should produce.     

NYSE execution quality subsequent to migration to hybrid

In October 2006, the NYSE began rolling-out phase three of a four-phase plan initiate its new Hybrid trading mechanism. The results show that this new trading platform introduced a much larger proportion of electronic transactions relative to floor auction transactions. This migration to electronic transactions is further evidenced by a mirror shift in price discovery from floor trades to trades marked for automatic electronic execution. In addition, the move to Hybrid trading introduced a significant decrease in inventory control costs, as well as a noticeable increase in trade persistence. Finally, the new trading platform has increased the speed with which orders are met, and has also decreased the proportion of executed shares which receive price improvement.

How to stop the race to the bottom

Standard tax multipliers are a widespread feature of fiscal equalization systems. A simple theoretical model shows that actual tax multipliers respond positively to changes in standard tax multipliers. This theoretical prediction is tested empirically using data on municipalities in Germany. A quasi-experiment in the state of North Rhine-Westphalia is exploited to identify the incentive effect. The empirical results confirm that local business tax policy is shaped by standard tax multipliers. They provide a straightforward practical tool to avoid a race to the bottom in local business tax rates.