厦门港全方位打造东南沿海航运中心

2006年以来,厦门港投入巨资建设深水泊位、国际旅游客运码头、五通海空联运码头和深水航道等,全方位打造港口城市品牌.厦门港口管理局规划建设处资料显示:2006年厦门港全年计划投资25.24亿元,建设项目27个,其中码头建设项目17个,航道建设项目3个,其他配套项目7个;2006年,厦门港累计完成投资26.51亿元,用于港口基础设施建设.目前,海沧、嵩屿、招银港区部分深水码头相继完工投产,"海上高速公路"--航道建设已进入冲刺阶段,国际旅游客运码头和五通海空联运码头已经完工.     

适应船舶大型化趋势厦门港打造深水港区

2007年4月20日,在厦门港引航员的引领下,马士基旗下的"爱玛·马士基"PS集装箱船成功靠泊其与厦门港务控股集团共同投资建设的厦门港嵩屿港区1#集装箱泊位,成为该泊位试投产接卸的第一艘集装箱船舶.这不仅标志着厦门港已融入了全球航运专业化、大型化主流,成为全球集装箱航运网络的重要节点,更验证了在船舶大型化时代,厦门港与国际航运商合资建设、经营港口已成为一种必然的模式.     

厦门港口资源整合显效应

2006年初,招商局集团(香港)有限公司、厦门港务集团、漳州开发区三方联手打破行政区划的限制,实施厦门湾港口经济大合作.厦门港八大港区实施一体化管理.这是福建省为加快海峡西岸经济区建设而采取的一项战略举措,旨在加速厦门湾港口资源整合和综合开发,改善厦门港集疏运条件,进一步发挥厦门龙头港口对整个海峡西岸经济区发展乃至全国内地纵深腹地的辐射效应.     

年轻的唐山港

1.唐山港在迅速崛起 1993年唐山港更名为京唐港,2005年9月10日起,唐山港的港名将重新使用.唐山港将下设两个港区,一个是现在的京唐港,更名为京唐港区,另一个是正在建设的曹妃甸港区.     

厦漳10大港区明确功能定位

日前,跨厦漳两市的《厦门港总体规划(修编)》(以下简称规划)已编制完成,厦门3个港区及漳州7个港区都有明确的定位。该规划已上报福建省交通运输厅和福建省发改委审核,预计今年上半年上报交通运输部审批。据介绍,厦门港的目标定位是发展成集装箱运输为主、散杂货为辅的国际航运枢纽港,同时优化调整各港区     

厦门港整合资源以做大做强海沧港区为中心

福建省委、省政府已确定将厦门作为海峡西岸航运中心，厦门港如何整合现有资源、加快发展，成为摆在厦门市面前的一个重要课题。厦门市市长刘可清在带队调研厦门市港口物流业现状时提出，厦门港发展势头强劲，必须抓好机遇，抓紧谋划，以做大做强海沧港区为中心，为厦门港海西航运中心地位的确立提供条件。     

海西物流迎来发展暖春

物流业频传发展喜讯 说到海西物流业面临的跨越式发展，不得不提的三件大事就是——5月6日上午9时，厦门港海天码头，“兴云”轮满载集装箱缓缓离港，这标志着厦门一台中集装箱直达班轮实现首航。该航线是第一条厦门、台中两港点对点的直达航线，航程仅需10小时，且为定期班轮，构建了海峡两岸最近的两个城市之间集装箱直达通道。     

发展厦门港集装箱国际中转业务

2001年，厦门港被确定为我国沿海主枢纽港之一。在“十一五”规划中，厦门市提出力争2010年港口吞吐量1亿吨以上、集装箱年吞吐量1000万标箱的远景目标。因此，发展集装箱国际中转运输业务，无疑是厦门港未来发展的方向和新的经济增长点之一。     

厦门港区、保税区一体化模式探讨

港区、保税区一体化(简称港、区一体化)是我国设立保税区的各城市政府的努力方向,旨在通过港、区一体化,实现城市经济特别是开放型经济的更大发展。厦门港、区一体化是指利用保税区临港设立的特殊区位条件,把保税区、港区连成一片,使保税区的政策功能扩大到港区,港区的范围延伸     

优化曹妃甸港区船舶航路的探讨

唐山港曾妃甸港区自2005年12月开始,由2个25万吨级、年乔吐能力3000万吨的开敞式矿石泊位起步,到如今发展成为拥有59个生产泊位、年吞吐量超过3亿吨规模的港口。随着港口规模的扩大．来港船舶数量激增,现有港区的航路越来越难以满足船舶航行安全和港口效率的要求。笔者结合自身的工作经验,试对优化曹妃甸港区船舶航路进行一些探讨。     

“温 良 恭 俭 让”

选自于:<论语·学而> 解读:人要学会温和、善良、恭谨、简朴、谦让.即:做人一定要有美好的德行.其实这正也是自古以来的做人之本.     

经纪人、交易员、律师和间谍

金融危机过后，“华尔街阴谋论”逐渐盛行起来，可惜都是臆测居多，缺乏真凭实据。而本书的作者以真实的访谈入手，揭出CIA等情报机构与华尔街银行合作的种种细节，可谓匠心独具。     

Assessing black progress: employment,occupation, earnings,income, poverty

Farley discusses changes in employment, occupation, earnings, income, and poverty among US blacks. Among black men, there has been a persistent rise in unemployment since 1960. By the early 1980s, 1 black man out of 8 had dropped out of the labor force, compared to 1 in 20 white men. Some contend that many black men lack the skills to be employed or have personal habits and criminal records which make them unacceptable to employers. Others believe that the expansion of federal welfare programs offers attractive alternatives to men who have limited earnings potential. Still others stress that blacks are concentrated within cities, while the growth of employment is occurring in suburbs. Among those blacks over age 54, labor force participation has declined because of improved Social Security benefits, better private pensions, and the greater availability of Supplemental Security Income. The employment of young blacks compared to whites has deteriorated since 1960. For both races, there has been a steady rise in the employment of women. The recent increases, however, have been great for whites. By the early 1980s, white women caught up with black women in terms of employment. Unlike the indicators of employment itself, there is unambiguous evidence that the occupational distribution of employed blacks has been upgraded and is gradually becoming similar to that of whites. Findings from many studies show that blacks once earned much less than similar whites, but this racial difference has declined among men and has nearly disappeared among women. The proportion of blacks impoverished fell sharply in the 1960s, reaching a minimum of 30% in the early 1970s. Since the early 1970s, blacks have made few gains. The proportion impoverished actually increased and the ratio of black-to-white family income declined. The fact that the earnings of black males are no longer rising faster than those of whites and that there is no longer a migration from southern farms to cities plays a role, but changes in family structure are also important. At all dates, poverty rates have been high and income levels low in families headed by women. In 1984, for example, 52% of the black families with a woman as head of household were below the poverty line, compared to 15% of the black married-couple families. While similar trends are occurring in white families, there has been a sharper increase in the proportion of blacks living in these female-maintained families which have high poverty rates.