Sraffa's path to Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. An interpretation

The present article provides a reconstruction of the path followedby Sraffa in the long journey (begun in the late 1920s) whichbrought him to his 1960 book. The starting point of Sraffa'sresearch was the formulation of his cost-price equations, whichsurprisingly enough appear to have been derived neither fromRicardo's theory of value, nor from Marx's ‘transformationof values into prices of production’, but rather fromMarx's reproduction schemes, published in volume II of Capital,to which Sraffa was almost certainly brought by his study ofMarx's interpretation of Physiocratic theory in volume I ofTheories of Surplus Value. The main device that Sraffa usedin his attempts to bring to light the existence of solutionsto his system and their properties, which basically meant buildinga consistent wage–profit–price relationship, wasthat of somehow cutting out the prices from this relationship.The paper shows that different routes were attempted by Sraffato achieve this end, and that the main influences on these attemptswere Ricardo and Marx, in particular Ricardo's corn-ratio theoryof profits, and the related conception of a maximum rate ofprofits. In the course of his research, Sraffa was helped bysome distinguished mathematicians, in particular Frank P. Ramseyand Abram S. Besicovitch. Of Ramsey's contribution there areimportant traces, but no more than traces, while ample recordsremain of the relationship between Sraffa and Besicovitch, andthey will play an important part in the story told in this paper.     

Hollander, de Vivo and the 'further evidence' for the corn model interpretation of Ricardo: a conspiracy of silence?

This paper reconsiders the debate between de Vivo and Hollanderover the ‘further evidence’ in favour of Sraffa's‘corn model’ interpretation of Ricardo in the lightof Torrens's Letter to Lord Liverpool (1816). It is argued thatthe Letter provides unique evidence of the influence on Torrensof Ricardo's Essay on Profits (1815); and that, contrary tode Vivo, the evidence is not that of a ‘corn model’influence. It is further argued that the manner in which theLetter has been dealt with is unsatisfactory. The shortcomingsin Hollander's position are traced to peculiarities in his long-standinginterpretation of the early Ricardo.     

Labour employed in production and labour commanded: a Ricardian conjecture

This paper explains the origin of some important ambiguitiesin the analysis of value and prices put forward by Smith inhis Wealth of Nations by considering the possibility that theyreflect a previous draft of the book where the quantity of labouremployed in production was indicated as the sole determinantof real price and exchange ratios. This conjecture is evidencedindirectly by the way in which Smith presented his own analysisat the end of Book I, Chapter IV; by some passages containedin Book I and Book II which suggest that the quantity of labouremployed in production should play a crucial role within theanalysis of exchangeable value; and by the important modificationsintroduced by Smith in Book I, Chapter VI, after the first editionof the Wealth of Nations was published.     

Some problems with the conception of the human subject in critical realism

The human subject plays a central role in the theory of socialreality developed by Tony Lawson in his book Economics and Reality.This theory relies on an account of human cognitive functioningthat distinguishes discursive from tacit knowledge. The presentpaper argues that Lawson's discussion of tacit knowledge inEconomics and Reality is underdeveloped in that it leaves unexploredthe notion of internalised knowledge. John Searle's work onmind, intentionality and the Background is reviewed and proposedas a solution to this problem.     

Keynes's Z function, heterogeneous output and marginal productivity

Keynes was adamant that the assumption of homogeneous outputand capital in macroeconomic theory is inadmissable. His aggregatesupply or Z function is a generalisation of Marshall's ordinarysupply function to take account of heterogeneous output, andis an essential element of the principle of effective demand.The ‘linear Z curve’ controversy can be attributedto Keynes's desire to demonstrate how his general monetary theoryof value and output encompasses the special case of Classicaltheory, including the marginal productivity theorem. The infamoussecond footnote on pages 55–6 of The General Theory canthereby be fully resolved.     

Hodgson on Hayek: a critique

In his book Economics and Evolution, Geoffrey Hodgson offersa detailed critique of F. A. Hayek's writings on cultural evolution.Certain aspects of Hodgson's treatment appear to be inaccurate.This paper criticises Hodgson's critique.     

Kornai and the vanguard mode of production

In introducing the political power structure into its appropriateplace in his theoretical analysis of 'actually existing socialism'(AES), Jnos Kornai's The Socialist System (1992) was not onlya 'comprehensive synthesis' of his earlier path-breaking studiesbut also qualitatively transformed that analysis. This articleexplores Kornai's presentation of AES as an organic system whose'genetic program' is the vanguard party in power, develops onthis basis the concepts of vanguard relations of productionand the 'specifically vanguard mode of production', and considersthe validity of inferences drawn from the experience of AES.     

'Let your science be human': Hume's economic methodology

This essay examines David Hume's economic methodology. The authorcharacterises Hume's understanding of human actions as interactionism.Its key point is that interactions generate the disinterestedview of ‘the spectator’ in the human mind. Humeapplies this idea of the disinterested spectator to the positionof social scientists in understanding social phenomena. ThusHume's approach to social science can be regarded as interpretive.The author also points out the difference between Hume's methodin social science and historical study. Considering this difference,the author argues that we should refer to Hume's social theoryrather than historical works in order to understand his economicmethodology.     

The market and exploitation in Marx's economic theory: a reinterpretation

Adopting the view that Marx's notion of 'commodity' has a widerreach than is usually supposed, and that it is this notion,rather than a 'labour theory of value' that is the cornerstoneof his economic theory, this paper shows that Marx's accountof capitalist exploitation is one that accords equal priorityto the production and market domains. Central to this demonstrationis an unorthodox explanation as to why Marx posits two alternativerules of prices in Capital.     

Marx's Theory of Ground Rent: A Critical Assessment

This critical essay provides the reader with an up-to-date assessmentof Marx's relatively neglected theory of absolute ground rentby bringing together in a coherent manner his scattered observationsand arguments contained primarily in Capital, Vol. III and Theoriesof Surplus Value, Vol. II. It also reviews the extant secondaryliterature which suggests that within Marx's theory of rentis an embryonic theory of monopoly from which scholars can drawimportant insights into the history of economic thought andthe workings of mature capitalism. The paper is organized asfollows. After an introductory section, Section II providesthe reader with an overview of Marx's theory of differentialrent and compares it to that of Ricardo, particularly Marx'sdiscussion of differential rent II and whether nature is productiveof exchange value. Section III discusses Marx's theory of absoluterent in light of recent criticisms by prominent scholars andsuggests that what determines whether rent is paid on the marginalland is not technical backwardness or lower productivity oflabor per se, but a social relation, viz., the monopoly createdby the private ownership of land. The last section summarizesthe main arguments and suggests some avenues for future research.     

Price expectations, capital accumulation and employment: Lindahl's macroeconomics from the 1920s to the 1950s

Erik Lindahl's approach to macroeconomics focused on the non-neutralityof monetary policy (in the short and the long run) and on thedenial of the existence of natural rates of interest and unemployment.From the 1920s until his death in 1960, Lindahl advocated theuse of norms for monetary policy to fight inflation and deflationprecisely because he would not rely on the market system's returnto natural rates. Making use of hitherto unexplored material,this paper analyses the development of Lindahl's thinking aboutprice level changes, investment and employment from the 1920sto the 1950s.