股权激励对上市公司的影响及投资策略分析

本文探讨了我国上市公司实施股权激励的环境条件，分析了股权激励对管理层、股东影响的内在机制，分析了实施股权激励对上市公司价值和业绩的影响。对股权激励类上市公司上涨因素的定量化分析显示，其上涨与公司现有的各项财务指标没有必然联系，而与公司的市场地位、行业发展趋势和关联交易之间存在明显的关系。本文认为，我国上市公司已基本具备实施股权激励的环境条件，实施股权激励有利于解决管理层和股东利益一致性问题，通过价值转移和价值创造，持续、有效地促进上市公司价值和业绩的提高，从而有效推动上市公司股价的上升，给投资者以强有力的信心和巨大的投资机会。     

Meeting the evolving corporate reporting needs of government and society: arguments for a deliberative approach to accounting rule making

We review ways in which corporate reporting might be useful for the government's management of the macro economy and for society's needs for more comprehensive reporting of corporate social and environmental performance. We highlight the constitutive as well as the representational nature of corporate reporting and how accounting subtlety impacts the culture and focus of governments, societies and corporations. Prominent examples are the ways accounting encourages financialisation and fails to account for externalities and the environment. While many proposals for the reform of corporate reporting emphasise more standards and rules, we suggest that what is needed instead are different rules, brought about by a more deliberative approach. A move to deliberation, however, requires that accountants highlight the pervasive but often subtle impacts of accounting.     

Bridging Sustainability and Finance: The Value Driver Adjustment Approach

Even though most large corporations view sustainability considerations and concerns as having the potential to affect their revenue and profits, and studies have shown that sustainability can affect stock returns, investors and corporate managers continue to struggle to incorporate such concerns into their financial decision‐making. As a consequence, the valuation effects of sustainability issues are not fully reflected in either the valuation of companies by investors or in capital investment decisions by corporate managers. The author argues that sustainability can be integrated into both of these kinds of financial decision‐making by linking it to business models, competitive positions, and value drivers using what the author calls a “value‐driver adjustment” (VDA) approach. The basic idea is simple: material sustainability issues affect business models and competitive positions, which in turn affect the company's value drivers—notably, sales, margins, and capital. The VDA approach explicitly considers these linkages by taking three steps: (1) identifying a company's material sustainability issues; (2) analyzing how these issues are expected to affect the company's business model and competitive position; and (3) quantifying the effects of such changes in business model and competitive position on the company's value drivers, including its cost of capital. In the first part of the article, the author provides an investor perspective that shows how sustainability can be integrated into investment decisions by asset managers. There he explains how and why ESG integration has so far failed to become mainstream, and what needs to be done to make it successful. The second part of this article takes the corporate perspective and shows how sustainability can be linked to value drivers using much the same ingredients as in asset management, but slightly different tools that can help corporate managers incorporate sustainability concerns into strategy and operations, including the finance function. And in closing, the author brings together corporate and investor perspectives while showing how sustainability programs can be used to make the relationship between companies and their shareholders both stronger and longer‐lasting.     

企业会计机构与董事会或最高管理层关系研究——企业会计内部相对独立性问题

本文在界定企业董事会或最高管理层关系的基础上,分别从会计本质特征、公司治理结构、内部控制实施要求等方面进行相应基本理论分析与考察,提出企业会计内部相对独立性观点。本文的研究对于正确处理企业会计机构与董事会或最高管理层关系、充分发挥会计职能作用、保证会计准则等法规制度贯彻执行、提高会计信息质量、制约会计舞弊等方面有重要的理论与实践意义。     

证券交易所竞争上市公司资源研究综述

本文把证券交易所上市资源竞争看成是证券交易所、企业和投资者三方间的博弈，并从证券交易所间竞争的途径与方法、企业的上市选择、投资者选择证券交易所以及证券交易所竞争产生的影响等方面归纳总结国内外学者的研究成果，希望能给国内学者进一步深入研究提供参考，同时给我国证券交易所应对上市资源竞争和企业上市选择提供借鉴。     

The Purpose of the Firm,Valuation, and the Management of Intangibles

This article provides a different way of thinking about, and responding to, four important issues that confront most public companies. First, in articulating the overarching corporate purpose, the author suggests a middle ground between shareholder value maximization and stakeholder theory that aims to achieve the end result of value maximization while taking a “holistic” view that meets most of the demands of stakeholder advocates. As described by the author, there are four critical steps for management and boards in creating such companies: (1) communicating a vision of the company and its purpose to employees as well as investors (and other key outsiders); (2) organizing to survive and prosper through efficiency and innovation; (3) working continuously to develop win‐win relationships with stakeholders and other companies; and (4) taking care of the environment and future generations. Second, in thinking about the corporate purpose and how to evaluate success in achieving it, managements and boards need a valuation model that provides a clear and insightful connection between long‐term corporate performance and market valuation, and how both might be expected to change as the firm matures. A strong case is presented for the life‐cycle valuation model, widely used by money management organizations, in which a company's projected cash flows reflect an expected “fade” in both economic returns on capital and reinvestment rates. The potential uses of this model are illustrated using lifecycle corporate performance data for 3M during the past 50 years. Third, in an effort to capture the value of innovation and investment in intangible assets, the author presents an alternative to the accounting approach of capitalizing and amortizing such assets that attempts to capture their expected future benefits by using more favorable forecasts of long‐term fade rates. Fourth, the author shows how incorporating Life‐cycle Reviews for each of a company's business units as part of its Integrated Reporting could improve management's resource allocation decisions, help build a shareholder base of long‐term investors, and provide management with the support and confidence to resist Wall Street's excessive emphasis on quarterly earnings.     

上市公司自愿性信息披露影响因素研究

自愿性信息披露对于增强投资者系统性保护、提升上市公司治理水平具有重要意义。本文以深市样本公司数据为基础，按上市公司战略性信息、非财务主要信息和财务信息三类信息披露指数，考察公司规模、财务杠杆、经理层持股、公司盈利、外资股、审计费用对于我国上市公司自愿性信息披露的影响。研究表明，我国上市公司在自愿性信息披露方面缺乏充分的内在动机和完善的外在激励机制，自愿性信息披露行为尚侍进一步地系统性规范。     

R&D AND CAPITAL MARKETS

The substantial growth of R&D expenditures over the last two decades, together with the continuous substitution of knowledge (intangible) capital for physical (tangible) capital in corporate production functions, has elevated the importance of R&D in the performance of business enterprises. At the same time, however, the evaluation of corporate R&D activities by investors is seriously hampered by antiquated accounting rules and insufficient disclosure by corporations. Despite the fact that the expected benefits of R&D stretch over extended periods of time, corporate investments in R&D are immediately written off in financial reports, leaving no trace of R&D capital on balance sheets and causing material distortions of reported profitability. After a brief review of statistics documenting the growth and economic importance of corporate R&D in the U.S., the article presents a comparison of R&D disclosure regulations among industrialized nations that shows U.S. rules to be the least flexible in allowing management discretion in how they measure and report R&D. Next the author surveys the large and growing body of empirical research on R&D, which provides strong testimony to the substantial contribution of R&D to corporate productivity and shareholder value. Moreover, despite widespread allegations of stock market “short termism” throughout the 1980s and early '90s, the research indicates “unequivocally” that capital markets consider investments in R&D as a significant value-increasing activity. But if investors clearly demonstrate a willingness to take the long view of R&D, there is also evidence of undervaluation of some R&D-intensive companies—particularly those with low profitability—as well as other potential costs to corporations and investors stemming from inadequate public information about R&D. To help correct the reporting biases and distortions of R&D, the author offers some suggestions for investors and analysts that follow R&D-intensive companies. In particular, he proposes (1) adjustment of reported data to reflect the capitalization and amortization of (instead of expensing) corporate R&D and (2) the use of various quantitative measures for gauging research capabilities and output, including citations of the firm's patents and measures indicating the share of current revenues coming from products developed within recent years.     

后股改时代划拨国有股充实养老保险基金探讨

2006年是中国证券市场制度变革年，伴随股权分置问题的解决，证券市场进入了后股改时代。在“人口老龄化”趋势下，作为基本养老保险制度之本的养老保险基金正面临着严重的财务危机。本文分析了我国基本养老保险基金的收支现状，预测了基金的收支缺口，探讨了划拨国有股充实养老保险基金的必要性、紧迫性及操作设想。     

公司治理对上市公司估值的影响分析

本文在分析公司治理机制的基础上,将影响公司治理的各个因素进行量化,通过构建上市公司估值模型,对公司治理影响估值进行实证分析.本文的结论是,公司治理对上市公司估值的影响很大;治理结构完善的公司,其估值水平相对较高,反之亦反之.     

Delaware Public Benefit Corporations: Widening the Fiduciary Aperture to Broaden the Corporate Mission

As a past practitioner of corporate law in Delaware for 26 years who remains convinced that the for‐profit corporation remains the best vehicle for raising and allocating private capital, the author nevertheless also believes that the stockholder primacy model that currently animates corporate fiduciary principles is too narrow. In the excerpts from his new book that make up this article, the author describes the “benefit corporation,” which introduces a corporate governance model based on stakeholder principles. This model encompasses a more complete recognition of the complex interdependencies between all aspects of a global society, and of the responsibility of corporations to reflect those interdependencies in their decision‐making. Although initially a skeptic, the author now believes that benefit corporation law offers an important opportunity for companies to align the interests of their investors with those of their stakeholders in a potentially value‐increasing way that is discouraged by traditional corporate law. State legislatures began authorizing benefit corporations in 2010, and they are now available in 32 U.S. jurisdictions. Over 3,000 benefit corporations have been formed. What's more, they are raising capital from traditional funders, including venture capitalists, and at least one benefit corporation has already gone public. As the author says in closing, “the stakeholder governance model facilitated by benefit corporations provides a clear path to a future of shared value creation, and some investors and corporations have started down that path.”     

投资者权益保护的若干问题探讨

本文首先阐述了投资者权益保护的十大基本原则，在此基础上分析了投资者利益保护中应妥善处理的几个关系。文中就投资者权益保护的价值问题进行了探讨，结合1990年代以来国外学者对投资者保护进行的大量实证研究，逐一论述了投资者保护对上市公司价值、证券市场发展、金融稳定和经济增长等方面的正面作用。     

股票增值权激励有效吗

股票增值权是上市公司对管理层实施激励的重要做法，在我国大型国有控股境外上市公司中普遍采用。本文以中国石化为研究对象，对实施股票增值权计划后的公司财务绩效、治理机制与管理层代理成本、股票市场反应等作了实证检验。本文认为，股票增值权计划对公司财务绩效提升、治理机制改善具有一定的积极正面效应；股票增值权在等待期结束后的开始行权年度激励效果最大；股票市场对股票增值权的行权存在着过度反应。最后本文提出了改进股票增值权激励的政策建议。     

对高等职业技术学院学生进行企业文化教育的探析

高等教育中很多专业都是直接为企业培养人才,在高职教育中的"校企联合,订单培养的办学模式中,学校与企业的对接表现得更为直接。如何在学生上岗前就培养学生所需要的企业文化素质,使学生较快地融入企业实践活动,为社会培养大批合格的"实用型"技术人才,是高等教育中亟待解决的问题。笔者认为企业文化教育是学校教育与企业生产、服务、技术、管理实际相结合的重要契合点,本文阐述了对高等院校学生进行文化素质教育过程中如何吸纳企业文化元素,并对如何正确有效的实施企业文化教育提出了一些初步的想法。     

资产价格泡沫与虚拟经济发展及影响分析

本文认为，由于货币进入或退出虚拟经济领域会引起整个经济体内货币数量的重新分配，虚拟经济部门开始起着调节货币流的功能。因此，虚拟资产价格的暴涨和暴跌都会对实体经济中的货币数量造成重大影响。本文就虚拟经济对经济增长、就业和居民持有资产结构变化等三个关系指标，分析了我国虚拟经济发展状况及其对我国经济生活的实际影响，指出虚拟经济的发展和运行情况不但与企业、居民的经济生活息息相关，而且也是政策制定者不可忽视的领域。     

国有控股上市公司MBO的绩效变动成因分析

本文以16家国有控股上市公司为样本，研究MBO对公司绩效的影响。研究发现，MBO对经营性现金流产生了积极的正向作用，但对其余财务指标的影响并不显著。本文认为，导致MBO对公司绩效影响不显著的主要原因是，资本市场基础性制度缺陷诱使管理层追求“制度性套利空间”的动因强化，MB0部分收购模式的固有缺陷引发管理层“内部人控制”问题恶化，以及MBO制度约束导致管理层行为扭曲。     

Employer branding: Attracting and retaining talent in financial services

This study develops and investigates a framework for better understanding employer branding. More specifically, the overall purpose is to provide a deeper understanding on how employer branding is used to attract and retain talent. An extensive literature review leads to a proposed conceptual framework focusing on two key research questions: How can the relationship between corporate branding, internal branding and employer branding in service industries be described? And, How can the role of corporate values in delivering the brand promise be described? A qualitative, case study approach is used to collect data from a financial services company in Sweden. The data collected and analyzed reveals that the areas of employer, internal and corporate branding are not mutually exclusive, but instead an intertwined collection of branding issues that together form the corporation’s core values. All of this together is what allows the corporation to in turn deliver its brand(s) promise to several stakeholder groups.     

Responsible Investors: Who They Are,What They Want

This article by a long‐time partner in Domini Social Investments, a well‐known socially responsible investment firm, begins by describing four different approaches that institutional investors have currently adopted as they account for environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations in their investment decisions: (1) the incorporation of internationally accepted ESG norms and standards (as set forth in, for example, the FTSE4Good Indexes); (2) the use of industry‐specific ESG ratings and rankings (such as those used for the Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes); (3) the integration of ESG considerations into stock valuation (as advocated, for example, in the Principles of Responsible Investment); and (4) the identification of companies whose business models successfully address the most pressing societal needs (often referred to as “impact investing”). The article then seeks to answer the question: what corporate ESG programs and policies can be most effectively used by managers seeking to attract institutional investors using these different approaches? The author describes three kinds of corporate ESG programs. In one approach, corporate managers focus on strengthening relations with non‐investor stakeholders, including employees, the environment, and local communities. In the second approach, corporations seek to create “shared value” by emphasizing products and services that help address society's most pressing needs. The third approach focuses on identifying and addressing the firm's industry‐specific ESG performance indicators (KPIs) that are most material to stockholders and other stakeholders. Given institutional investors' growing commitment to the incorporation of ESG concerns, corporate managers should understand the range of investors' approaches to ESG and how to account for them in their strategic planning. At the same time, they are encouraged to develop comprehensive ESG policies and goals, devote adequate resources to their implementation, and communicate efforts effectively to these investors and to the public.     

Ansatzpunkte zur Messung der Reputation von Versicherungsunternehmen

The RQ (Reputation Quotient’) is successfully used for many years for measuring corporate reputation of top companies on an international level. To benefit from benchmarking opportunities it might make sense that also insurance companies in Germany will use the RQ. On the other hand, the results of an empirical study in Germany give reason to believe that an industry-specific measurement concept is advantageous, and especially more valid. Together with some empirical results of the RQ 2004 study as well as results of an empirical study in the German insurance market the author presents both concepts, and pleas for an integrated approach. Such a RQI approach (Reputation Quotient Insurances’) combines analyses on an overall level, industry level and single company level.