基于利益相关者理论的企业社会责任和企业绩效文献研究综述

通过对利益相关者理论、社会责任模型和社会责任与企业绩效关系相关文献的梳理研究表明:由于社会责任的涵义和内容在学术界尚不统一,因而在文献研究中社会责任和企业绩效的关系不能得到一致的结论;随着学界对社会责任和企业绩效研究的深入,丰富和统一社会责任的涵义、完善社会责任评价标准应成为未来文献研究的方向;加强实证研究的理论框架基础才能弥补研究中的漏洞。     

基于利益相关者视角的企业社会责任分析

由于"股东至上理论"不再适应企业发展的需要,而"利益相关者者理论"越来越流行。首先介绍利益相关者理论,然后从这个视角具体分析企业的社会责任,得出结论:企业应正确处理好与各个利益相关者之间的关系,树立正确的社会责任观,使公司治理更加完善。     

基于利益相关者理论的企业社会责任对财务绩效的影响

本文以利益相关者理论为基础,将社会责任划分为八个方面分别对企业财务绩效的影响进行了分析,从而寻找企业社会责任与财务绩效的关系。     

社会责任成本与企业绩效——基于利益相关者理论角度

企业社会责任成本是企业因履行社会责任而产生的支出。那么企业社会责任成本与企业价值相关性是否存在相关性,就取决于企业社会责任是否对企业价值存在影响这一问题出发。本文站在利益相关者的角度,对此问题进行了阐述,利益相关者管理不仅提高了企业绩效,也使企业在解决失业、环境保护等过去普遍认为应由政府负责解决的社会问题方面发挥着越来越重要的作用。     

基于利益相关者理论的企业社会责任实证研究综述

本文简要回顾了企业社会责任规范性研究重要的理论成果——基于利益相关者理论的社会责任观;并分析了以此为基础的企业社会责任实证研究现状,探讨未来研究方向。     

企业社会责任及利益相关者界定

近年来，企业社会责任成为一个热点话题。企业社会责任要求企业在实现股东利益的同时关注期它利益相关者。本文从企业社会责任理论入手，在研究企业与各利益相关群体关系的基础上，分析界定企业的利益相关者。     

基于利益相关者视角的企业社会责任信息披露探索

20世纪90年代以来,随着全球性企业社会责任运动的蓬勃发展,人们对企业履行社会责任更加关注,人们要求企业越来越多地披露社会责任信息。文章从利益相关者的角度,分析了不同利益相关者对企业社会责任信息披露的需求动因,最后提出企业社会责任信息披露的框架内容。     

利益相关者与企业社会责任的建立

随着当前企业社会问题频繁的出现,企业是否应该履行社会责任再一次成为国内外研究的重点,本文依据利益相关者的相关理论分析了企业履行社会责任的现状,并根据利益相关者理论拟构建适合我国企业的社会责任指标体系。     

基于利益相关者视角的企业社会责任评价研究

企业社会责任是社会文明进步的产物,很多企业都把社会责任看成是回馈社会的担当。基于利益相关者视角对企业参与社会责任的评价指标体系进行了深入分析,利用层析分析法对企业参与社会责任进行了定量研究,对不同企业参与社会责任的贡献做出具体比较,有利于推动更多的企业积极承担社会责任,并作为企业的形象宣传。     

企业社会责任与企业财务绩效关系述评

企业社会责任已经成为理论界与实业界关注的一个的焦点,有关企业社会责任与企业财务绩效关系的研究也成为学术研究的热点。近年来,该领域出现了大量的研究成果,其中许多成果昭示着未来颇有价值的研究领域,但未能形成统一的理论研究框架,为此,将从利益相关者理论做出尝试,以期为后人深入研究该领域提供一个新视觉。     

商务模式对企业社会责任与企业绩效关系的影响

如何协调解决经济目标与社会目标的利益冲突,实现两者的统一,是我国企业面临的现实问题。本文运用内容分析法,通过对四个中国上市家电企业的多案例研究,发现商务模式对企业社会责任与企业绩效冲突与否起到关键性的作用。当企业采取共享型商务模式时,企业社会责任活动有利于提升企业绩效;反之,当企业采取非共享型商务模式时,企业社会责任与企业绩效就会出现冲突。     

The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics

The relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and business ethics (BE) is both a practical and theoretical issue. Unlike the traditional way of clarifying the relationship through identifying and comparing the extant definitions of the two terms, this study addresses and compares CSR and BE from three perspectives (basic concepts, academic fields, and social movements) in two analytical dimensions (in practice and in theory). This study indicates that: The relationship between the concept of CSR and BE is different from either the relationship between CSR as an academic field and BE as another academic field or the relationship between CSR as a movement and BE as another movement; within the relationships of the two concepts, fields and movements, the relationship between them in practice is different from that in theory; and CSR and BE are neither totally independent nor one of mutual inclusion, rather, they have similarities and differences.     

The Research on the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Common Prosperity

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and common prosperity have the consistency of philosophy and goal. In the process of delivering CSR, enterprises can merge their tangible and intangible assets to realize a positive cycle of sustainable development and common prosperity. Enterprises can also open up space for both commercial and social value by integrating altruism with self-interest, public welfare with utilitarianism, cost with capital, and today's developmentwith tomorrow's development. Indeed, the unification of commercial value and social value can extend pathways to common prosperity and improve common prosperity. By way of the super CSR, enterprises can spread the wealth of their culture and values to society through material products, ethical products, and intergenerational inheritance based on the high compatibility of enterprise high-dimensional culture, enterprise craftsmanship, and enterprise civilizations. They can thus play a leading role in promoting the ethical wealth of the whole of society. Public and private enterprises should maximize their respective advantages in promoting common prosperity of society for realizing the common progress of the people, and should strike a balance between efficiency and fairness.     

企业社会责任与财务绩效关系研究综述

20世纪90年代起,企业社会责任与利益相关者在理论与实证检验方面呈现出相互整合的趋势。本文通过探析企业社会责任与利益相关者缘何走向理论结合,分别基于利益相关者整体视角与利益相关者分维度视角,对国内外企业社会责任与财务绩效关系的实证研究进行回顾与总结,并在此基础上提出了未来的研究方向。     

The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: An Application of Quantile Regression

This study empirically examines the relationship between a firm’s fulfilling of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and performance. We developed a CSR index (CSRI) to quantitatively evaluate CSR, which consists of four dimensions measuring a firm’s contributions to the economy, society, environment, and corporate governance, respectively. With data from publicly-listed firms in Taiwan during the period of 2004–2009, results of quantile regression show that fulfilling CSR has a significantly positive impact on firm performance, and that the impact in a more profitable firm tends to be significantly greater than that in a less profitable firm. Specifically, when a firm is more profitable, its management would be more willing to implement CSR. The implication is that a firm could pursue better performance while serving as a good corporate citizen.     

企业信用与企业社会责任

企业社会责任的内涵目前在国际社会没有达成共识,它是根据企业在社会中面临的突出问题及与社会、利益相关者的博弈而不断变化的。从企业基本性质和利益相关者角度分析,其基本内涵是经济责任与法律责任。就目前我国企业面临的突出问题而言,应更强调经济责任与法律责任,也就是信用责任。企业信用是企业社会责任的基本内容,是落实企业社会责任的有效手段,我国建立信用机制必须大力发挥大众、政府、企业家和法制的力量。     

企业社会责任与贸易壁垒研究

文章结合国际贸易法学和公司治理学两种范式探讨了企业社会责任运动中出现的"贸易壁垒化"倾向,比较分析了"绿色贸易壁垒"、"蓝色贸易壁垒"两种主要形式对发展中国家及整个国际贸易自由化产生的消极影响。我国"入世"后,为应对新近出现的"蓝色贸易壁垒",政府和企业需要借鉴以往GATT/WTO框架内应对"绿色贸易壁垒"的立法和司法经验。     

Board Attributes,Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy,and Corporate Environmental and Social Performance

In this paper, we draw on insights from theories in the management and corporate governance literature to develop a theoretical model that makes explicit the links between a firm’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) related board attributes, its board CSR strategy, and its environmental and social performance. We then test the model using structural equation modeling approach. We find that the greater the CSR orientation of the board (as measured by the board’s independence, gender diversity, and financial expertise on audit committee), the more proactive and comprehensive the firm’s CSR strategy, and the higher its environmental and social performance. Moreover, we find this link to be endogenous and self-reinforcing, with superior CSR performers tending to further strengthen their board CSR orientation. This result while positive is also suggestive of the widening of the gap between the leads and laggards in CSR. Therefore, the question arises as to how ‘leaders’ are using their superior CSR competencies seen by many scholars as a source of corporate (at times unfair) competitive advantage. Stakeholders of corporations therefore need to be cognizant of this aspect of CSR when evaluating a firm’s CSR activities. Policy makers also need to be cognizant of these concerns when designing regulation in this field.     

企业履行社会责任与营销绩效的实证分析

本文主要利用上海证券交易所发布的上市公司财务数据对企业履行社会责任与营销绩效的关系进行实证分析,增加了数据分析的可靠性,避免采用问卷调查带来数据分析的不可靠性。本文通过分析得出企业履行社会责任与营销绩效存在正相关关系。