共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Grandinetti DA 《Medical economics》2000,77(6):102-4, 109, 113-4
2.
Chesanow N 《Medical economics》1998,75(6):126-30, 133-4, 137
3.
Murray D 《Medical economics》1996,73(10):168-70, 175-6
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Finger AL 《Medical economics》1997,74(21):105-6, 108, 113-7
9.
10.
11.
Pretzer M 《Medical economics》1995,72(7):92-3, 97-8, 100-1
12.
13.
Stevens C 《Medical economics》1992,69(9):168-72, 174-5
In the first two installments of our series, we gave you the details of reimbursement under the new Medicare fee schedule, and showed how to code evaluation-and-management services with the revised CPT system.* This issue, we'll tell what to expect from Medicare carriers as they teach and enforce the new payment rules. 相似文献
14.
15.
Jack Vromen 《International Review of Economics》2011,58(3):267-285
Neuroeconomics started off as a hybrid project. Two camps, behavioral economics in the scanner (BES) and Glimcher’s economics
of neural activity (ENA), could be clearly distinguished. The camps disagreed not only about substantive issues but also about
what neuroeconomics ultimately aims to accomplish. Recent developments suggest that the gap between the two camps is closing,
however. There is a growing consensus, it seems, about the brain areas in which the final stages of individual decision-making
occur and about relevant features of brain activity in these areas. BES and Glimcher’s ENA also seem to converge on the view
that the neuroeconomics’ ultimate aim is to contribute to the construction of a new utility theory with stronger predictive
power than standard expected utility theory. While the potential importance of an improved utility theory for economic theory
cannot be denied, however, it remains to be seen whether an improved utility theory is something economic theory needs most
badly or most urgently. Especially if economic theory is not ultimately interested in individual decisions, but in how aggregate
behavior responds to incentives, attention should not be limited to what happens inside the skulls of individuals. What happens
outside the individuals’ skulls, in the environments of individuals and in their interactions patterns, should also receive
due attention. 相似文献
16.
Stevens C 《Medical economics》1991,68(2):122-5, 130-2, 137-8
17.
Pretzer M 《Medical economics》1996,73(4):176-8, 183, 186-7 passim
18.
19.
20.
Azavedo D 《Medical economics》1992,69(8):50-4, 56, 58