Pricing vulnerable options with jump risk and liquidity risk

Review of Derivatives Research - In this paper, we consider vulnerable options with jump risk and liquidity risk. In the proposed framework, we allow discontinuous changes in the information...     

Pricing of swaps with default risk

In this paper, I study the valuation of interest rate and currency swaps with default risk under the contingent claim analysis framework. I demonstrate that the traditional approach of pricing swap contracts as exchanges of loans underestimates the value of such contracts to the counterparty with higher credit rating and exaggerates the credit spread required to guard against default risk. Numerical simulations show that the swap rate is not sensitive to counterparty credit rating: for a ten year interest rate swap, a one hundred basis point increase in counterparty bond yield spread results in only about one basis point increase in the swap rate. (JEL G10, G12, G13)This paper is based on Chapter 2 of my Ph.D. dissertation at Yale University. I would like to thank my dissertation committee, Kenneth French, Roger Ibbotson, and Jonathan Ingersoll, Jr. (chairman), for helpful advice and guidance. I would also like to thank Keny Back, Richard Lindsey, N. R. Prabhala, Ming Huang, Marti Subrahmanyam, three anonymous referees and especially Bob Jarrow, the editor, for helpful comments and suggestions. Any errors that remain are solely mine. This paper won the 1996 Trefftzs Award for best student paper from the Western Finance Association.     

Pricing inflation-indexed derivatives with default risk

Inflation-indexed derivatives with default risk are modeled using the jump-diffusion processes in the Heath–Jarrow–Morton’s (HJM) [(1992). “Bond Pricing and the Term Structure of Interest Rates: A New Methodology for Contingent Claim Valuation.” Econometrica 60: 77–105] framework. A four-factor HJM model is proposed by incorporating an exogenous intensity function into a foreign currency analogy under the three-factor HJM model proposed by Jarrow and Yildirim [(2003). “Pricing Treasury Inflation Protected Securities and Related Derivatives Using a HJM Model.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 38: 337–358]. The proposed model improves the valuation accuracy of zero-coupon inflation-indexed swaps (IIS) through calibrating the model to swap market data. In addition, the valuation formulas of year-on-year IIS and caps with default risk are derived.     

Pricing jump risk with utility indifference

This paper is concerned with option pricing in an incomplete market driven by a jump-diffusion process. We price options according to the principle of utility indifference. Our main contribution is an efficient multi-nomial tree method for computing the utility indifference prices for both European and American options. Moreover, we conduct an extensive numerical study to examine how the indifference prices vary in response to changes in the major model parameters. It is shown that the model reproduces ‘crash-o-phobia’ and other features of market prices of options. In addition, we find that the volatility smile generated by the model corresponds to a zero mean jump size, while the volatility skew corresponds to a negative mean jump size.     

Pricing electricity risk by interest rate methods

We address a method for pricing electricity contracts based on the valuation of the ability to produce power, which is considered as the true underlying factor for electricity derivatives. This approach shows that an evaluation of free production capacity provides a framework where a change-of-numeraire transformation converts the electricity forward market into the common settings for money market modelling. Using the toolkit of interest rate theory, we derive explicit option pricing formulas.     

Pricing Black-Scholes options with correlated credit risk

This paper presents an improved method of pricing vulnerable Black-Scholes options under assumptions which are appropriate in many business situations. An analytic pricing formula is derived which allows not only for correlation between the option's underlying asset and the credit risk of the counterparty, but also for the option writer to have other liabilities. Further, the proportion of nominal claims paid out in default is endogenous to the model and is based on the terminal value of the assets of the counterparty and the amount of other equally ranking claims. Numerical examples compare the results of this model with those of other pricing formulas based on alternative assumptions, and illustrate how the model can be calibrated using market data.     

Pricing catastrophe risk in life (re)insurance

What is the catastrophe risk a life insurance company faces? What is the correct price of a catastrophe cover? During a review of the current standard model, due to Strickler, we found that this model has some serious shortcomings. We therefore present a new model for the pricing of catastrophe excess of loss cover (Cat XL). The new model for annual claim cost C is based on a compound Poisson process of catastrophe costs. To evaluate the distribution of the cost of each catastrophe, we use the Peaks Over Threshold model for the total number of lost lives in each catastrophe and the beta binomial model for the proportion of these corresponding to customers of the insurance company. To be able to estimate the parameters of the model, international and Swedish data were collected and compiled, listing accidents claiming at least twenty and four lives, respectively. Fitting the new model to data, we find the fit to be good. Finally we give the price of a Cat XL contract and perform a sensitivity analysis of how some of the parameters affect the expected value and standard deviation of the cost and thus the price.     

Pricing errors and estimates of risk premia in factor models

In this paper, we consider the effect of the theoretical pricing error in the arbitrage pricing model on estimates of risk premia implied by the model. Under arbitrage pricing, the pricing error satisfies a strong bounding condition where for an infinite set of assets, the sum of squared pricing errors is bounded. We characterize the pricing error in terms of orders of probability and estimate an expected returns model which allows for pricing errors less than order one in probability. The principal finding of the paper is that misspecification of the pricing error and misspecification of the factor structure has no effect on the bias or mean squared error of the dominant risk premium. This implies that an exact form of arbitrage pricing can be used to estimate risk premia.     

Pricing and hedging European options with discrete-time coherent risk

The aim of the paper is to provide as explicit as possible expressions for upper/lower prices and for superhedging/subhedging strategies based on discrete-time coherent risk measures. This is done on three levels of generality. For a general infinite-dimensional model, we prove the fundamental theorem of asset pricing. For a general multidimensional model, we provide expressions for prices and hedges. For a wide class of models, in particular, including GARCH, we give more concrete formulas, a sufficient condition for the uniqueness of a hedging strategy, and a numerical algorithm.      

Pricing and risk of swing contracts in natural gas markets

Review of Derivatives Research - Motivated by the growing importance of swing contracts in natural gas markets, this article extends the literature on commodity price modelling as well as valuation...     

Pricing and hedging basis risk under no good deal assumption

We consider the problem of explicitly pricing and hedging an option written on a non-exchangeable asset when trading in a correlated asset is possible. This is a typical case of incomplete market where it is well known that the super-replication concept provides generally too high prices. We study several prices and in particular the instantaneous no-good-deal price (see Cochrane and Saa-Requejo in J Polit Econ 108(1):79–119, 2001) and the global one. We show numerically that the global no-good-deal price can be significantly higher that the instantaneous one. We then propose several hedging strategies and show numerically that the mean-variance hedging strategy can be efficient.     

Pricing of the currency risk in the Canadian equity market

Based on a three-factor international capital asset pricing model, we examine whether the world market, the local market and the currency risks are priced in the Canadian equity market. The analysis presented in this paper is based on data collected from 2003 to 2010. As the dataset also includes the period of global financial crisis, we examine the issue of risk pricing in the full sample as well as in before and after global financial crisis periods. Unlike most existing studies, the empirical results presented in this paper are based on (i) the quasi maximum likelihood estimation (QMLE) based multivariate GARCH-in-Mean specification and (ii) the generalized method of moments (GMM) techniques. Our empirical analysis based on weekly data on 58 largest Canadian firms indicates that the currency as well as the local and the world market risks are priced in the Canadian equity market. This result holds for all exchange currency rates proxies and in all sample periods. We find that the price of the world market, the local market and the currency risks is time-varying and the Canadian equity market is partially segmented.     

Pricing the risk of recovery in default with absolute priority rule violation

This paper proposes a simple approach to infer the risk-neutral density of recovery rates implied by the prices of the debt securities of a firm. The proposed approach is independent of modeling default arrival rates and allows for the violation of absolute priority rule. The paper demonstrates that a new statistic, the adjusted relative spread, captures risk-neutral recovery information in debt prices. Interest rates and firm tangible assets are shown to be significant determinants of the price of recovery. An application illustrates the pricing of credit derivatives written on the realized recovery rate.     

Pricing of time-varying liquidity risk in Finnish stock market: new evidence

Using two recently developed illiquidity measures, we estimate a conditional version of liquidity-adjusted capital asset pricing model (LCAPM), which allows for a time-varying decomposition of the total illiquidity premium into a level component and three risk components. The total estimated annualized illiquidity premium for the Finnish equities during 1997–2015 is 1.13–1.90% depending on the illiquidity measure. Of the three systematic liquidity risk components, risk arising from hedging of wealth shocks is the most important followed by commonality in liquidity risk, whereas flight to liquidity risk is not significantly priced in the Finnish stock market. Our results show that the liquidity risk is time varying, therefore the models estimating the risk-return relationship should address the issue of conditionality.     

Pricing the term structure of inflation risk premia: Theory and evidence from TIPS

In this paper, we study inflation risk and the term structure of inflation risk premia in the United States' nominal interest rates through the Treasury Inflation Protection Securities (TIPS) with a multi-factor, modified quadratic term structure model with correlated real and inflation rates. We derive closed form solutions to the real and nominal term structures of interest rates that drastically facilitate the estimation of model parameters and improve the accuracy of the valuation of nominal rates and TIPS prices. In addition, we contribute to the literature by estimating the term structure of inflation risk premia implied from the TIPS market. The empirical evidence using data from the period of January 1998 through October 2007 indicates that the expected inflation rate, contrary to data derived from the consumer price indices, is very stable and the inflation risk premia exhibit a positive term structure.     

Pricing Weather Derivatives Using the Indifference Pricing Approach

Abstract

This paper adopts an incomplete market pricing model–the indifference pricing approach–to analyze valuation of weather derivatives and the viability of the weather derivatives market in a hedging context. It incorporates price risk, weather/quantity risk, and other risks in the financial market. In a mean-variance framework, the relationship between the actuarial price and the indifference price of weather derivatives is analyzed, and conditions are obtained concerning when the actuarial price does not provide an appropriate valuation for weather derivatives. Conditions for the viability of the weather derivatives market are examined. This paper also analyzes the effects of partial hedging, natural hedges, basis risk, quantity risk, and price risk on investors’ indifference prices by examining the distributional impacts of the stochastic variables involved.     

最大化你的定价权

根据最新的一项全球调研表明,只有35%的公司认为它们有足够的定价权来保证其产品能获得合适的定价;其余65%的公司认为它们没有将其产品定价到应该的高度,这意味着它们不得不接受利润缩水25%的现实。那些不具定价权的公司往往将责任推卸到外部因素,如激进的竞争对手和严苛的客户。但是,根据该调     

战略定价思与行

顾客价值对于保证公司的盈利无疑是非常重要的,需要引起公司高层管理者的重视。同时,销售、市场、运营和财务要通力合作。     

存款保险定价研究:期权定价法和预期损失定价法的进展

合理的存款保险定价可有效减少道德风险和逆向选择问题。本文梳理了国内外关于存款保险定价的两种主要方法——期权定价法和预期损失定价法及其最新发展情况。期权定价法的核心是将存款保险看作存款保险机构以银行资产为标的发行的一份看跌期权,之后学者从股利发放、监管宽容、系统性风险等多个角度进行拓展。预期损失定价法主要根据边际损失与边际保费收入相等来进行保费厘定,以探寻如何通过更科学的方法更精确地测量银行的预期损失。此外,本文讨论了存款保险定价方法对我国的启示。