骂人者刘邦

左手铁沙掌,右手棉花套,刘邦把“天下”这个陀螺转得轻松自如中国的历代皇帝里,刘邦的语言风格独树一帜。见到秦始皇出巡的威仪,刘邦很羡慕:“奶奶的,做这样的男人,挺好。”面对同样的场景,他后来的对手项羽说得干脆利落:“彼可取而代之。”刘邦没有项羽勇敢,但是要比项羽从容得多。他总是被当时的民间精英们推着走,结果就走到了项羽的前面。     

一场领导人的战争

一位朋友说“看看刘邦和项羽两位领导人的气度和用人吧。”楚霸王项羽骁勇善武．但独断冲动．打的是个人英雄仗．汉武帝刘邦智勇不及．但心胸宽大知人善任．能用天下英才．打的是团队仗。     

大话地产营销三十六计:走不走,是个判断题!

正按照11月5日的浙报传媒地产研究院的信息,如果说6月杭州有43个楼盘亏损或疑似亏损,那么现在这个亏损面已经扩大到100个以上!楚汉之际,项羽兵临函谷关,听说刘邦已先行一步攻破咸阳,并打算做关中王,项羽大怒,发令攻破函谷关,屯兵新丰鸿门,决定发兵攻打刘邦。这时候,项羽有军队四十万,     

成语背后有故事

在浩瀚的历史长河中,炎黄子孙创造了璀璨的文明。成语作为历史的缩影、语言的精华,处处闪烁着智慧的光芒。阅读成语故事、了解成语典故是学习历史文化的极佳途径。这里,笔者结合史实略举四例,和大家聊一聊成语背后的故事。群策群力秦朝末年,项羽、刘邦争夺天下。刘邦最初没有项羽兵将     

刘项原来是匹夫——从影视剧《西楚霸王》说开去

近年来影视界的编导们争相拍摄有关楚汉相争的西楚霸王的戏,不外乎是歌颂刘邦、项羽如何的神勇过人、气吞山河,如何的英雄盖世建立不朽的霸业!总之,是顶天立地、扭转乾坤、左右历史进程的人!由此,使我想起毛泽东同志曾经借用一位古人的话来评价刘邦、项羽,他说:刘项原来是匹夫!     

刘邦与诸葛亮用人之道的比较

刘邦与诸葛亮都是中华民族历史上杰出的政治人物。刘邦打败项羽,建立了西汉政权;诸葛亮亦辅佐刘备,形成魏、蜀、吴三国鼎立之势。作为封建政治家,他们都懂得功成名就离不开人才,但在用人制度和用人方法上,他们又有许多相同点和不同点,很值得我们后人借鉴。首先,刘邦与诸葛亮都能做到任人唯贤,知人善     

汉初三杰之一韩信的致命弱点

韩信是中国古代著名的常胜将军。他被汉王刘邦拜为大将之后，单独率领一支军队，出奇兵，打硬仗，连灭魏、赵、代、燕、齐等国，最后率部与刘邦于垓下合围项羽，使刘邦能够得以获胜。由此。刘邦在夺取天下后对群臣说：“连军百万之众，战必胜。攻必取。吾不如韩信”，将其与张良、萧何并称为“三杰”。     

企业成功的关键在于用人

对于企业领导人来说,最重要的是用人。汉高祖刘邦在总结战胜项羽的经验时说:“夫运筹帷幄之中,决胜于千里之外,吾不如子房;镇国家,抚百姓,给馈馕,不绝粮道,吾不如萧何;连百万之军,战必胜,攻必取,吾不如韩信。此三者,皆人杰也,吾能用之,此吾所以取天下也。项羽有一范增,而不能用,此其所以为吾擒也”。刘邦的话足以说明知人善任对于领导者的重大作用。三国时期的政治家。军事家诸葛亮在《举措》     

张良的创新思维

汉高祖刘邦原是秦时一乡间小吏，无任何凭借，不像项羽等人有显赫的家世。他能够崛起于草莽之间，除了有萧何为他掌管后方，韩信、樊哙、周勃等为其冲锋陷阵之外，更重要的是他有一个能够运筹帏幄之间、决胜千里之外的头号智囊张良。在最困难的时候，刘邦总是问张良：“为之奈何？”张良智计百出，总能给出最睿智最有效的建议。刘邦则对其言听计从...     

刘邦战胜项羽的奥秘

任何一场巨大的历史风暴,总会涌现出大量的各种类型的杰出人才,各个政治集团的胜负成败,在很大程度上取决于这些人才的投向与沉浮。在煊赫且暂短的秦王朝覆灭后,在群雄逐鹿中涌现出了刘邦、项羽两大军事政治集团,经过残酷而富有戏剧性的搏战,     

Statistical Regularity and Free Will: L.A.J. Quetelet and P.A. Nekrasov

In the 19th century, causes of empirically observed stability of averages in settings relating to human behaviour were a topic of intense discussion in western Europe. This followed an extensive study of empirical stability by the founder of modern statistics (and of the International Statistical Institute) L.A.J. Quetelet, published in 1835, in what he called "Social Physics". The eminent mathematician of strong probabilistic and philosophical inclination and Russian Orthodox religious belief, P.A. Nekrasov, took up and modified Quetelet's Social Physics in 1902, with (social) independence seen as prime cause of statistical regularity. Our paper focuses on the role free will plays in the statistical writings of Quetelet and of Nekrasov. The work of the latter has remained little known in general, mainly for politico-ideological reasons.     

J. A. Hobson and British Imperialism

A bstract . John A. Hobson made a significant contribution in his economic. social And political analysis of British imperialism. His views on the two leading political imperial issues ofthe 1880s and early 1900s—the schemes for imperial federation and imperial preference —are examined. Hobson discussed such topics with a substantial degree of balance and objectivity, chough he had strong personal feelings on the matters. Since historians of thought have neglected the discussion of imperial copies by Hobson s contemporary economists, Hobson's ideas are considered in relation Co those of ocher economists writing in the period, 1870-1914, including W. J. Ashley. W. Cunningham. H. Fawcett. R. Giffen. W. A. S. Hewins. A. Marshall and J. S. Nicholson. Hobson emerges as the most comprehensive and sophisticated of the group, even chough his ideas appear somewhat muddled.     

Offshoring and reshoring: U.S. insights and research challenges

The phenomenon of reshoring to the U.S. has received wide attention ever since it became a political platform for U.S. politicians during the last presidential election. The economic downturn, a heightened emphasis on sustainability, and increasing customer expectations for flexibility and improved cost performance drove firms to re-consider the appropriate “shoring” decision. The intent of this research note is to add a U.S.-centric perspective to the “shoring” debate.     

Ranking and weak consistency in the A.H.P. context

The actual ranking of a set of alternatives is obtainable in a simple way assuming that the matrixA of pairwise comparisons isr-transilive. We show that, in some cases of inconsistency, the weights assigned to the alternatives by means of some well-known methods, suggested by the A.H.P., do not agree with the ranking. Further we introduce a condition, theweak consistency ofA, that ensures the mentioned methods provide weights according with the ranking.