知识共享对企业技术创新能力的影响分析

知识共享是知识管理的核心，企业通过知识共享，运用集体的智慧提高其应变能力和创新能力。但由于企业内外部环境的日益复杂以及知识共享过程中出现的各种不确定因素，从而阻碍了企业技术创新能力的发挥。本文分析了知识共享中态度、主观规范、自我效能对企业技术创新能力的影响。对这个问题的研究，能有效地帮助企业提升企业技术创新能力、构建技术创新能力体系。     

中国企业核心能力的现状与提升路径

企业的持续竞争优势离不开核心能力,核心能力是企业在竞争中获胜的关键。中国大多数企业缺乏核心能力。培育和提升企业核心能力的途径主要有：制度创新、确立与核心能力培育发展方向相适合的企业发展战略、加强知识管理、开展技术创新活动、企业购并。     

基于企业最佳实践知识管理能力的竞争优势构建

企业的最佳实践知识管理是一个企业提升组织经营业绩和创新能力的有效方法之一．也是企业核心能力的组成部分。最佳实践知识管理能力由最佳实践审计-收集能力、最佳实践知识提炼-转换能力、最佳实践知识共享-应用能力组成。最佳实践知识管理是标杆管理的重要方式．通过该方式有利于企业在模仿中创新、持续改进流程、提升组织学习能力，从而有利于竞争优势的获得。     

基于模糊数学方法的员工知识共享能力的评估

在当今知识社会中,知识管理受到越来越多企业的关注,是企业能否保持和创造竞争优势的关键,而作为知识管理最核心的内容——知识共享更是重中之重。现今关于知识共享的研究大都局限在从组织和个人两方面来促进知识共享顺利进行,但没有一个较好的评价体系。如何对员工知识共享能力进行正确的评估关系到企业知识共享乃至知识管理的成败。     

基于核心竞争力视角的知识管理问题研究

经济全球化背景下,企业竞争优势的来源已从有形的土地、设备和资本等转移至增值能力高、模仿难度大、动态性强的知识,知识管理已成为提升企业核心竞争力的一种有效的战略途径。文章从企业核心竞争力的角度来研究战略性的知识管理,分析了知识管理对企业核心竞争力的影响以及强化知识管理的主要战略思路,为企业知识管理并应用知识获取持续的竞争优势提供一种思维模式。     

刍议企业技术创新与知识管理的关系

成功企业的关键就在于形成了以技术创新为基础的核心竞争力。企业的竞争优势和核心竞争力的源泉都是通过技术创新来实现的，而技术创新很大程度上取决于对技术知识的管理。接下来的问题是，技术创新的起点和落脚点究竟在哪里？企业怎样做才能推动技术创新的顺利进行呢？本篇通过对技术知识的创新、管理的内涵和外延进行剖析，分析知识管理与技术创新关系：以及通过对知识的统一管理论证了统一、动态的知识管理才是技术创新持续进行的根本保证。     

浅析知识管理中人力资本对企业核心竞争力影响

随着竞争的日益加剧和环境的迅速变革,知识管理在企业竞争中的作用不断增加,成为人们日益关注的问题。文章通过分析知识管理、人力资本、企业核心竞争力三者的内在联系,为企业如何通过人力资本提高企业知识管理能力,促进企业核心竞争力的提高提供一些参考。     

基于知识管理的现代企业核心能力塑造

知识经济时代的到来使知识成为一种稀缺资源,企业的核心能力来源于企业所拥有的知识。而企业核心能力的隐性知识特性,使得对隐性知识的管理成为提升企业核心能力的关键。     

加强知识员工管理与绩效考核研究

知识员工是组织知识和技术创新的承担者,是企业核心竞争力的主要贡献者。组织如何有效地利用企业自身的人力资本,充分发挥知识员工的创新能力和核心竞争力,获取长久的竞争优势,成了企业发展的关键因素。文章针对目前我国企业在知识员工管理上的问题,提出了知识员工管理的一些建议。     

塑造知识共享的企业文化

在知识经济时代，公司的兴衰更多地取决于技术创新能力，这种能力的基础是公司对知识的掌握程度，知识在公司的传播速度，知识转化为产品的广度。因此，提高企业员工的知识水平已经成为竞争中的迫切要求。要达到这个目的，知识共享是至关重要的。知识共享涉及重要信息资产的识别、捕捉、存储、提取和交流。但是，在     

The dark side of knowledge transfer: Exploring knowledge leakage in joint R&D projects

Knowledge leakage refers to loss of technological knowledge intended to stay within a firm׳s boundaries and may cause a “weakened state” in which a focal firm loses its competitive advantage and industry position. Based on multiple case studies of knowledge leakage in joint research and development (R&D) projects in large firms in Sweden, this paper makes two contributions. First, in contrast to the uni-dimensional dyadic leakage process assumed in the literature, we find that the knowledge leakage process is multi-dimensional and exists in three varieties: i) a process whereby an external party assimilates knowledge from a focal firm, ii) a process whereby an external party assimilates knowledge from another external party, and iii) a process whereby the focal firm uses knowledge already shared with an external party in such a way that it becomes sensitive. Second, where the prior literature suggests that core knowledge must be protected from leakage, we find that some core knowledge can leak without negative effects, whereas some knowledge, being non-core to a focal firm, can have severe negative effects. These insights provide novel theoretical implications and new insights into how firms can manage knowledge leakage in practice.     

企业集群与技术创新

企业集群的技术创新具有互惠共生性、资源共享性、协同竞争性、地方结网性的特征。它通过获取技术创新资源人力资源、资金和知识的优势与整合资源的优势来获取创新优势。     

Encouraging organizational performance through the influence of technological distinctive competencies on components of corporate entrepreneurship

Firms’ technological distinctive competencies (TDCs) help CEOs to confront their reality based on technological knowledge to achieve and exploit competitive advantage by encouraging the different dimensions of corporate entrepreneurship (innovation, new business venturing, proactiveness and self-renewal). The main purpose of this paper is thus to highlight how companies that strive to improve technological competencies within the firm achieve higher organizational performance through different components of corporate entrepreneurship and their interrelationships. This study seeks to fill this research gap by analyzing theoretically and empirically how TDCs enhance innovation, new business venturing and proactiveness and their interrelationships to achieve self-renewal and thus improve firms’ organizational performance. The methodology used is LISREL analysis. We test the model with data from 201 Spanish organizations. Our research contributes theoretical and empirical arguments on the value of TDCs to the organization, arguments that are especially important because organizations sometimes fail to achieve sustainable competitive advantage due to their limited understanding of the relationships between these strategic variables.     

Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance

Building on knowledge management and innovation capability theories, this paper aims to reveal the mechanisms of collaborative innovation processes by investigating the complex relationships among critical factors influencing firm's innovation performance in supply chain networks. Using hierarchical Multiple Regression (MR) and Moderated Multiple Regression (MMR) methods, results from a survey of 236 firms in China indicated that there are significant positive relationships between collaborative innovation activities, knowledge sharing, collaborative innovation capability, and firm's innovation performance. Moreover, it is expected that knowledge sharing plays a partial mediating role in the relationships between collaborative innovation activities and firm's innovation performance. Collaborative innovation capability exhibited a moderating effect on collaborative innovation activities - innovation performance relationship. These results contribute to collaborative innovation process management by offering a nuanced conceptualization of the collaborative innovation - performance relationship in supply chain networks.     

Agglomeration in an innovative and differentiated industry with heterogeneous knowledge spillovers

This paper introduces an agent-based simulation model to study the technological development, the economic performance of firms and the evolution of agglomerations in a differentiated industry. The analysis is based on the interaction and behavior of firms, which might share knowledge but at the same time are competitors on the goods markets. Firms do not only compete with quantities they can also introduce process and product innovations. The level of knowledge of a firm describes the capabilities to perform innovations. Knowledge can be accumulated by investing in R&D and by knowledge spillover, which depend on geographical and technological proximity. Simulation runs show that there is an incentive to agglomerate in young industries and that geographical proximity enhances innovation, especially the number of product innovations.      

Standardization efforts: The relationship between knowledge dimensions,search processes and innovation outcomes

We explore how a standardization effort (i.e., when a firm pursues standards to further innovation) involves different search processes for knowledge and innovation outcomes. Using an inductive case study of Vanke, a leading Chinese property developer, we show how varying degrees of knowledge complexity and codification combine to produce a typology of four types of search process: active, integrative, decentralized and passive, resulting in four types of innovation outcome: modular, radical, incremental and architectural. We argue that when the standardization effort in a firm involves highly codified knowledge, incremental and architectural innovation outcomes are fostered, while modular and radical innovations are hindered. We discuss how standardization efforts can result in a second-order innovation capability, and conclude by calling for comparative research in other settings to understand how standardization efforts can be suited to different types of search process in different industry contexts.     

以知识为基础的企业理论的产生及其演进过程

以知识为基础的企业理论的理论渊源在于对企业竞争优势内生的考察,并依次经历资源决定论、能力决定论的理论演进过程,它强调企业竞争优势源于企业的默会知识。这一观点不仅对解释和预期企业行为提供了核心概念,而且对指导企业提升竞争优势的实践具有管理学意义。     

企业内默会知识共享激励机制构成要素研究

企业内默会知识的共享能够为知识运用、知识创新和企业竞争优势的形成奠定重要基础。但是,默会知识并不能自然地实现共享,只有在员工、制度和企业层面形成一定的知识共享驱动力,才能推动知识在企业内的扩散、转移和共享。这种驱动力的形成需要在企业内建立良好的激励机制,激励机制构成要素的完善程度直接影响员工间默会知识共享的驱动力和实际效果。默会知识共享的激励机制可以从企业文化、薪酬机制、知识管理、信息技术、创新等主要要素方面予以构建。     

An empirical study on the correlation between knowledge management capability and competitiveness in Taiwan’s industries

There have been dramatic changes in business enterprise management since Internet technology has been widely applied. Worldwide network users can share all kinds of knowledge through the Internet. Knowledge has currently become a main part of manufacturing resources and a prerequisite for success in the production environment. Competitiveness and the resulting rewards can be obtained by taking advantage of knowledge management (KM) and intensive learning. This empirical study validates the relationship between knowledge management capability and competitiveness in Taiwan’s industries. This research shows the impact of knowledge management capability on competitiveness. A hypothesis test and theoretical model are proposed in this study.