W. H. Hutt (1899–1988): Free Markets and Social Justice

W.H. Hutt reaffirmed the principles of classical economics and classical liberalism and, by applying them to urgent issues he observed in the world around him, he demonstrated the contemporary relevance of freedom and competitive institutions. A wide‐ranging critique of Keynes was founded upon a classical analysis of the labour market, while his trenchant opposition to apartheid advanced along economic and political paths. Hutt questioned the justice of the accumulation of wealth from the exploitation of monopoly power over generations. In all of these respects there are affinities between Hutt's thought and that of ‘Bleeding Heart Libertarians’.     

服务型领导对团队绩效的影响:—个调节—中介模型的构建

本文基于文献和理论梳理,构建了服务型团队领导对团队绩效影响的调节—中介模型,研究模型表明:(1)服务型领导与团队绩效显著正相关;(2)服务型团队文化和团队工作满意度分别在服务型领导影响团队绩效的过程中起中介作用,并且服务型团队文化和团队工作满意度之间存在相互促进的关系;(3)团队差序氛围调节了服务型领导与团队绩效之间通过团队工作满意度的间接关系,形成了被调节的中介,对于差序氛围比较浓重的团队,这一间接关系相对较强,反之则较弱;(4)团队差序氛围调节了服务型领导与团队绩效之间通过服务型团队文化的间接关系,形成了被调节的中介,对于差序氛围比较浓重的团队,这一间接关系相对较强,反之则较弱.     

The Vortex of Rights: ‘Right to the City’ at a Crossroads

The right to the city concept has recently attracted a great deal of attention from radical theorists and grassroots activists of urban justice, who have embraced the notion as a means to analyze and challenge neoliberal urbanism. It has, moreover, drawn considerable attention from United Nations (UN) agencies, which have organized meetings and outlined policies to absorb the notion into their own political agendas. This wide‐ranging interest has created a conceptual vortex, pulling together discordant political projects behind the banner of the right to the city. This article analyzes such projects by reframing the right to the city concept to foreground its roots in Marxian labor theory of value. It argues that Lefebvre's formulation of the right to the city — based on the contradiction between use value and exchange value in capitalist urbanism — is invaluable for analyzing and delineating contradictory urban politics that are pulled into the vortex of the right to the city. Following Lefebvre's lead in such an analysis, however, reveals certain limitations of Lefebvre's own account. The article therefore concludes with a theoretical proposition that aims to open up space for further critical debate on the right to the city.