浅析金融发展与经济增长的关系研究

在经济全球化的背景下我国市场经济实现了快速增长,对于影响经济增长以及经济增长所造成的影响的相关影响也逐渐增多.其中金融发展与经济增长之间的关系研究是影响我国金融业与经济正常健康发展的关键,深入研究两者的关系能够实现其相互作用,互相促进.文章主要就金融发展与经济增长的关系进行了研究,分析金融发展与经济增长的相互作用,并且提出了相关建议.     

浅析金融发展与经济增长的关系研究

在经济全球化的背景下我国市场经济实现了快速增长,对于影响经济增长以及经济增长所造成的影响的相关影响也逐渐增多.其中金融发展与经济增长之间的关系研究是影响我国金融业与经济正常健康发展的关键,深入研究两者的关系能够实现其相互作用,互相促进.文章主要就金融发展与经济增长的关系进行了研究,分析金融发展与经济增长的相互作用,并且提出了相关建议.     

宁波市金融发展与经济增长实证分析:1989～2004

研究金融发展对经济增长所起的作用,是客观认识金融在宁波市经济中的地位以及进一步促进金融发展的前提。本文通过对宁波市1989-2004年金融发展与经济增长关系的实证分析,探讨金融发展水平与经济增长之间的相关关系并得出相关结论。     

金融发展与经济增长的非线性关联研究——基于门限模型的实证检验

本文对Odedokun(1996)的理论模型进行了扩展,并利用多元门限模型对我国金融发展与经济增长之间的非线性关联进行了考察。实证结果表明金融发展和经济增长之间呈现出显著的非线性关联,这就否定了通常将两者关系设定为线性的研究模式。进一步的分析表明单纯在总量关系上讨论我国金融发展和经济增长关联性的意义并不明显,这启示我们在日后的研究中应该更加重视金融发展作用于经济增长的途径和机制问题。     

金融发展对经济增长影响的实证分析——以多民族集聚地区云南省为例

金融发展与经济增长之间的关系,一直存在着争议,通过采用计量经济学的相关方法,对多民族聚居地区云南省金融发展与经济增长数据进行ADF平稳性检验、协整检验,得出云南省金融发展与经济增长存在长期均衡关系,通过OLS回归测算出经济增长与金融发展的具体模型,发现云南省金融发展对经济增长具有促进作用,格兰杰非因果性检验表明云南省金融发展是经济增长变化的格兰杰原因,最后得出结论并提出相关政策建议。     

金融发展对经济增长的影响分析：基于中国数据的检验

金融是经济增长的主要推动力,金融发展对经济增长发挥了巨大的促进作用。但金融发展是一把双刃剑,它在促进金融发展进而促进经济增长的同时,也加剧了金融体系的脆弱性,而金融脆弱有可能引发经济危机并促使经济衰退。运用协整分析和格兰杰因果检验等方法,对我国金融发展与经济增长的关系进行实证分析,结果显示我国金融发展和经济增长之间存在着协整关系和单向的因果关系,金融发展是经济增长的格兰杰原因,而经济增长对金融发展的促进作用不显著。     

金融发展对新疆经济增长作用的实证分析

有关金融发展与经济增长关系的问题,在理论上和实证上的研究已为越来越多经济学家所关注。文章通过对金融在经济增长中的作用分析,发现金融发展与经济增长呈正相关关系,金融的适度发展是实现新疆经济最优增长的必要条件。     

中国区域金融发展与经济增长——基于具生产的OLG理论及面板数据的实证分析

基于具生产的OLG理论以及我国2001—2016年31个省、自治区、直辖市的动态面板数据,分别采用差分GMM和LSDVC回归方法,从整体和区域的角度分析金融发展水平与经济增长之间的关系,结果表明：（1）金融发展水平与经济增长之间存在显著滞后的非线性效应,即滞后的倒U型相关关系,这说明可以通过适度调控金融发展来加快经济增长速度;（2）在东北和西南地区,经济增长与金融发展水平之间的关系并不显著,这表明东北和西南地区的金融发展对经济增长没有起到实质性的促进作用,且更易出现“资金空转”问题。     

新疆经济增长、城镇化与金融支持的实证研究

文章利用VAR模型分析了新疆经济增长、城镇化和金融支持三者之间的关系。运用Johansen协整检验、脉冲响应函数检验等定量分析方法对三者之间的关系进行了实证分析。结果表明:新疆经济增长、城镇化和金融支持之间存在着长期稳定的均衡关系;经济增长与城镇化之间相互促进;经济增长与金融支持存在相互促进关系,但金融支持对经济增长的促进作用较弱;城镇化与金融支持不存在相互促进关系,两者之间没有形成良好的互动机制;经济增长、城镇化和金融支持三者之间存在动态相关。文章最后根据实证结果,提出促进新疆经济增长、推动城镇化进程和加深金融支持水平的政策建议。     

贵州省农村金融发展与农村经济增长关系的实证研究

城乡经济发展差异化问题一直以来都是贵州省关注的民生发展问题，本文从金融发展与经济增长关系的视角出发进行研究，发现贵州省农村金融与经济增长存在稳定的相关关系。然而要形成农村经济与金融的良性促进还需要进一步加速农村金融的发展。     

金融发展与农村经济增长关系研究的综述

金融发展与经济增长关系研究一直以来备受国内外学者的关注。为更全面研究金融发展对农村经济增长的促进作用,本文回顾了国外学者对金融发展与经济增长关系的研究,以及我国在此方面理论的创新。同时总结了金融发展与农村经济增长的实证研究,诸如相关指标设计和采用较新的计量方法对理论研究的检验等。     

金融发展与经济增长文献综述

对金融发展与经济增长的国内外研究进行了梳理。国外学者在理论和实证研究上都处于领先地位,并且他们的研究视野比较开阔,使用跨国数据比较多。中国学者在结合我国国情,对中国省域金融发展和经济增长的研究方面做了很多工作。但中国学者的理论研究比较薄弱,研究成果大部分停留在金融发展是否促进了经济增长层次,实证分析所用到的金融发展数据也基本局限于银行贷款,对证券市场稍有涉足,下一步的研究方向应该结合中国资本市场的发展提出有中国特色的金融发展理论。     

区域金融发展与经济增长关系实证研究——以山东省为例

区域金融发展与经济增长关系的实证是金融发展理论研究的深化。以山东省为研究区域,通过构建反映区域金融发展与经济增长全貌的指标体系,运用主成分分析、基于VAR系统的多重协整检验等计量方法和统计技术,可得到四组八个协整方程。实证结果表明:山东金融机构规模,股票市场发展,经济金融化综合水平与经济增长和投资之间均存在长期均衡关系,且为正相关;但金融机构低效率却影响了经济增长。对这一实证结果的经济解释,能够为山东进一步深化区域金融体制改革提供有益的启示。     

IFRS,financial development and income inequality: An empirical study using mediation analysis

Income inequality continues to be an issue of concern. Early work on economic development suggested that, as a country’s economy grows, incomes would rise and reduce any income disparities. However, there is growing evidence that as countries develop, income inequality actually worsens. Some studies argue that this is the result of financial development and the growth of the financial sector. Although there is a good deal of empirical research on the relationship between financial development and income inequality, there is no prior work that examines how accounting standards, in particular International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), might influence this relationship. This study examines the relationship of IFRS and financial development with income inequality using mediation analysis over the period from 1998 to 2018. The results indicate that the impact of IFRS on income inequality is mediated by financial development. Moreover, there is a direct relationship between IFRS and inequality.     

Debt,financial sector development and Asian economic growth

This special issue of Economic Systems includes four papers that broadly relate to the relationship between financial sector development and debt in the Asia-Pacific region. The motivation underlying the choice of the Asia-Pacific region in this special issue is due to the increasing importance that this region will play in powering future world economic growth. In addition, in recent times the focus has been upon the importance of equity and financial sector development, as opposed to debt. The world currently faces many economic imbalances and increasing importance is being placed in the Asia-Pacific upon the breadth and depth of bond markets in helping to restore equilibrium in the world economy. Debt influences corporate funding opportunities and may assist countries in achieving sustainable economic growth. These four papers contribute to our knowledge on the relationship between debt and financial sector development.     

Financial development and economic growth in Vietnam

By making use of a panel dataset that covers 61 provinces of Vietnam over the period 1997 to 2006, this paper examines the link between financial development and economic growth. Our analysis, which is based on endogenous growth theory, reveals that financial development has contributed to economic growth in Vietnam. We find that high ratio of credit to Gross Provincial Product (GPP) has accelerated economic growth in Vietnam. We also found a strong positive link between financial development and economic growth when alternative measures of financial development were used. The impact of foreign direct investment on economic growth will be stronger if more resources are invested in financial market development.     

Inflation,financial development,and growth: A trilateral analysis

A large body of evidence links financial development to economic growth, yet the channels through which inflation affects this relationship and its stability have been less thoroughly explored. We take an econometric and graphical approach to examining these channels, and find that higher levels of financial development, combined with low-inflation, are related to higher rates of economic growth, especially in lower income countries, but that financial development loses much of its explanatory power in the presence of high-inflation. In particular, small increases in the price level seem able to wipe out relatively large growth effects of financial deepening when the annual rate of inflation lies between 4% and 19%, whereas the operation of the finance–growth link is less affected by inflation rates above this range. Growth is generally much lower, however, in such high-inflation settings where financial development is typically repressed.     

Further evidence on finance-growth causality: A panel data analysis

This paper reassesses the causal relationship between financial development and economic growth. Using recently developed panel methods on a data set of 71 developed and developing countries over the period 1960-2004, our study confirms previous results of a bidirectional causality between finance and growth. In addition, we show significant differences among country groups when considering both long-run and short-run causality. While in low and middle income countries there is no supportive evidence of short-run causality between financial development and economic growth, in high income countries economic growth significantly affects financial development.     

经济增长与贷款增长因果关系的实证分析——基于湖北的数据

文中对湖北人民币贷款增长和经济增长的关系进行线性回归,以检验金融发展理论的核心指标之一贷款和经济增长相互促进的因果关系的结论是否适用于湖北,得出自改革开放以来,湖北的贷款和GDP存在着相互作用的因果关系,贷款在湖北国民经济增长中起着重要的推动作用。     

Financial development,portfolio investments and the real economy in Africa

According to the conservative view, capital flows enhance economic growth. Focussing on Africa’s real economy, this study investigates the linkage between portfolio investments and real sector growth, and whether financial sector development strengthens this association. The study covers 30 countries over the period 1990–2017. We adopt the Lewbel instrumental variable general method of moments (IV-GMM) two-step robust estimator, which relies on heteroscedasticity for identification, while dealing with instrument insufficiency, unavailability, endogeneity and omitted variable bias. We found that portfolio equity has no growth impact on Africa’s real sector. Debt flows deter the growth of the overall real sector as well as the manufacturing and industrial sectors, but have no impact on agriculture and service growth. We found that financial development does strengthen the positive association between capital flows and economic growth, but this is dependent on the type of sector and portfolio investment, as well as on the degree of financial development. We control for known determinants of economic growth.