宏观行为经济学和宏观经济行为

在20世纪60年代末期,人们对经济学家工作的描述有一个转变。在那以前,微观经济理论通常被认为是分析以利润最大化厂商和效用最大化消费者为基础的完全竞争一     

行为货币经济学研究进展

随着行为经济学和行为金融学不断融入货币经济学研究中,行为货币经济学开始发展并逐渐成为新的研究热点。本文在R9theli的研究范式下对货币经济学文献中有关行为学原理的理论和实证研究进行文献综述,对重点文献进行系统梳理和概括。从20世纪晚期的一系列实证研究出发,本文探讨了经典经济学和行为货币金融学如何提出新的创见,并从行为学的角度审视货币发展史、价格粘性和通胀预期相关理论。本文进而介绍了行为经济学如何嵌入货币经济学,提出了哪些主要的方法和思路。此外,本文也在货币需求理论和多种货币函数的基础上,综述了实验货币经济学,包括"学习预测"实验和货币实验室实验。货币实验室实验的发展为捕捉货币经济学中的行为因素提供了更多可能性,货币实验室实验已经开始应用于货币政策中,行为货币经济学为货币政策目标的制定和货币工具的选择提供了新的思路。     

宏观经济感知、货币政策与微观企业投融资行为

本文基于中国上市公司年报文本信息,首次构建了中国微观企业宏观经济感知指数,并通过一个三期理论模型阐释货币政策在不同宏观经济感知情形下如何影响微观企业投融资行为.实证分析表明,当央行实施积极货币政策时,对宏观经济感知更乐观的企业更积极地响应政策刺激,表现为投融资行为增加.进一步将宏观经济感知指数分解为预期指数和回顾指数,分析结果表明:宏观经济感知指数的影响主要由反映企业未来预期的宏观经济预期指数引致,而反映历史信息的宏观经济回顾指数则没有显著影响.区分企业所有制的结果还表明,持有积极宏观经济感知的民营企业仅在积极货币政策状态下增加投资和提高杠杆率,而宏观经济感知对国有企业投融资行为的作用则未受货币政策状态影响.     

萧条经济学与萧条时期的经济学

本文对新古典经济学在这场全球经济危机中所起的作用进行了一次系统的清算和理论与历史的反思,探讨了新古典经济学铸成如此大错的理论和历史渊源。文章认为,新古典经济学的完美理性和完善市场假定在经济理论和政策实践中的误导作用,对这场百年不遇的全球金融危机负有不可推卸的责任,并指出经济学走出困境的根本出路在于按现实世界的本来面目来理解、分析和描述世界。     

资本市场迅猛发展对宏观经济的影响及对策

近年来,我国资本市场有了长足的发展,资本市场对宏观经济的影响日益深化,宏观经济出现了证券化率高与间接融资率高并存、资本市场发展吸引国际流动性资本进入、通货膨胀与人民币升值并存、股市与楼市出现“跷跷板”关系、流动性过剩与资金流出并存等特点。针对宏观经济新特点,实现宏观经济稳健发展的对策为：以资本市场发展促进实体经济发展;实行平衡的财政政策;实施有弹性的货币政策;提高最低工资和健全社会保障体系;改变政府政绩考核指标。     

当代激进经济学和新古典经济学——对谢尔曼关于当代激进经济学分析的评介

从本质上说,激进经济学家是马克思主义经济学家。激进经济学家是同居于正统地位的新古典经济学家完全不同的,他们强调历史的、制度的和跨学科的分析。激进经济学家强调资本主义矛盾产生于资本主义基本制度。激进经济学家反对资本主义全球化,但却不能正确认识市场经济对发展中的社会主义经济的重要意义。     

欺诈行为的经济学分析

欺诈行为的经济学分析曹玉俊李怀祖目前我国市场交易中发生了严重的欺诈行为，制售假冒伪劣产品、故意拖欠债务、不履行合同义务、随意违反市场规则等。欺诈行为破坏市场秩序、阻碍市场交易，是市场经济的大敌。处于市场经济初期的世界各国都曾发生过欺诈行为，我国转型期...     

过渡经济学的回顾与反思

一、从改革经济学到过渡经济学 在社会主义经济中引入市场机制的思想虽然有了近百年的历史,对传统计划经济的改革实践也从20世纪50年代初南斯拉夫探索自治社会主义起就开始了,但是,严格意义上的过渡经济学却只有十多年的历史。20世纪90年代以前的改革与90年代以     

Macroeconomics and Credit Markets

The extent to which freedom should prevail continues to be a lingering question in the economic discipline. The article focuses on how freedom is conceptualized. The question addressed is whose freedoms are being served through economic self-governance. The profit seeking microeconomic objective of capitalists, as addressed by Karl Marx, must lead to structural change resulting in unemployment. But unemployment has disastrous social costs. So the promotion of freedom for capitalists comes at a high cost toward society. Thus it is argued that the concept of freedom is itself a paradox. Freedom itself must be constrained to be viable.     

Walras' Law and Keynesian Macroeconomics

This paper examines the claim that Keynesian models violate Walras' law. Walras' law is founded in the logic of exchange. Standard statements misrepresent it, as it pertains to a monetary economy. Keynesian models are consistent with Walras' law once this misrepresentation is corrected. The law holds for both notional and effective demands. It also holds in unconstrained Walrasian equilibria, constrained Walrasian equilibria, and constrained non-Walrasian equilibria. The latter corresponds to a Keynesian conception of equilibrium: markets need not clear, but agents expectations must be fulfilled.     

Issues in Macroeconomics

This is a study of the nature of internal diversity within liberal and collaborative market economies. Based on large scale comparative survey data, we assess the extent to which specific clusters of practices are associated with specific varieties of capitalism. Given that recent literature has pointed to internal diversity within specific national contexts, we explore the nature of internal diversity within both liberal and collaborative market economies, and what makes each variety of capitalism distinct. We find that more than one cluster of practices is indeed likely to be encountered in a particular national context, but that this diversity was bounded: only a limited number of alternative paradigms are likely to emerge and persist. The survey findings not only shed light on the nature of this internal diversity, but also reveal the fact that liberal and collaborative markets remain distinct, with the rights accruing to employees being more deeply embedded in a wide cross section of firms within the latter.     

A Value-Added Approach to Macroeconomics

Focusing on the “value-added” approach to computing Gross National Product encourages students to see their role as a producers, rather than only as consumers. It also offers an alternative approach the distribution of income between labor and capital from that provided by marginal productivity theory.