论林业在建设生态文明中的作用

建设生态文明是人类历史发展的必然。作为建设生态文明的重要基础和主要载体,林业具有不可替代的核心作用。以党的十七大精神为指引,全面推进现代林业建设,努力构建完善的林业生态体系、发达的林业产业体系和繁荣的生态文化体系,是建设生态文明赋予林业的重大历史使命。     

林业生态文化对林业改革发展的推动力研究

林业生态文化是政府主导下发挥生态生产力效能、市场引导下实现林业经济社会科学发展、人本理念要求下弘扬生态文明的文化,对林业改革与发展具有重要的导向作用、约束作用、凝聚作用和激励作用。发展现代林业,必须要构建推动林业改革的政府生态文化体系、市场生态文化体系和人文生态文化体系,实现林业建设的科学发展。     

关于林业生态环境保护的若干哲学思考

党的十八大报告提出大力推进生态文明建设,林业生态环境保护是现代林业的重要组成部分,在中国特色社会主义生态文明建设方面发挥着巨大的作用。我国在大力发展林业经济的同时,必须加强林业生态环境保护。因此,思考林业生态环境保护的哲学基础,深入分析林业生态环境保护存在的问题,并提出相应的解决对策,有利于丰富林业生态环境保护的理论研究。     

现代林业与生态经济林业理论和实践

试述现代林业的含义;浅释生态经济林业理论与推进现代林业建设的意义;通过分析中国森林生产力状况提出存在的矛盾,试论发展林业的主战场、由中央直接管理全国林业企业局、和建立集约化经营森林的制度与措施等发展森林生产力的意见。     

加快生态林业建设 争创国家森林城市

介绍了山西省阳泉市林业实践探索经验。为推进阳泉市国家园林城市、国家卫生城市、国家环保模范城市的创建步伐,当前乃至今后一段时期阳泉市的林业工作目标是:提升城乡绿化水平,创建国家森林城市;全力筹备全省造林绿化现场会,充分展示山城独特的绿化风貌;推进林权制度改革,促进现代林业发展;推进林权制度改革,促进现代林业发展;开展林木绿地认养,推进生态文明建设;加强森林资源管护,确保绿色银行安全;开展碳汇林业捐资,动员社会各界造林。     

加快林业改革发展 推进生态文明建设

林业作为生态文明建设的基础，在生态文明建设中扮演着重要角色。省委十二届七次全会作出了《关于推进生态文明建设的决定》，绍兴市委六届九次全会审议通过了《关于推进生态文明建设的实施意见》，贯彻落实省委的《决定》和市委的《意见》，林业部门必须创业创新，扎实工作，着力推进“森林绍兴”建设，努力谱写生态文明建设新篇章。     

习近平生态文明思想指引林业高质量发展

梳理长期以来中国共产党出台的一系列巩固林业生态建设发展的理论基础和制度保障,把握为新时代生态文明建设思想提供理论源泉与实践基础的政策举措,深刻理解习近平生态文明思想中蕴含的林业高质量发展的核心要义：深入开展植树造林,满足人民绿色诉求;坚持产业绿色发展,助推林业生态惠民;推动林业高质量发展,提升生态文明水平。在此基础上,探讨以习近平生态文明思想指引林业高质量发展的实践路径：科学推进国土绿化,精准提升森林质量;打通“两山”的转化路径,推动林业产业强链扩群;全面深化林业改革,为林业高质量发展注入新动力;实施“林业走出去”战略,促进国内国际双循环;搭建林业科技服务平台,用科技创新撬动林业生产力。     

《林业经济》征稿启事

2009年6月22～23日召开的中央林业工作会议,对于进一步解放和发展农村社会生产力,发展现代林业,建设生态文明,推动科学发展,意义重大而深远。为贯彻落实中央林业工作会议精神,推进我国的生态文明建设,推动农村新一轮土地改革,更好地加快林业改革与发展,《林业经济》拟在如下方面组     

履行建设生态文明重大使命 推进现代林业又好又快发展

"生态环境良好"是十七大确定的全面建设小康社会的新目标。生态差距是我国与发达国家的最大差距, 生态建设是实现科学发展最艰巨的任务。为此必须增强使命感与责任感, 精心谋划林业工作。必须坚持把建设生态文明作为现代林业建设的战略目标, 坚持解放思想、深化改革、强化森林经营, 把兴林富民作为现代林业建设的根本宗旨, 积极推进林业生态、经济、文化三大体系建设, 全力推进现代林业又好又快发展, 履行好建设生态文明的重大使命。     

践行科学发展 推动现代林业 建设生态文明

近年来，在市委、市政府的高度重视下，在国家林业局、省林业厅的具体指导下，宁波林业以科学发展观为指针，紧紧围绕建设生态文明和实现林业现代化的目标，发展生态林业，提升效益林业，构建和谐林业，已初步建成林业生态体系、林业产业体系和林业生态文化体系。全市现有山地面积688．8万亩，森林蓄积量1090万立方米，森林覆盖率50．2％，林业总产值达到116亿元。     

国土资源与可持续发展

今天 ,我向大家介绍一下我国国土资源的有关情况 ,并与大家一起学习中央关于国土资源管理的重要指示精神。我的介绍分为三个部分 :一是对国土资源重要地位和作用的认识 ;二是对国土资源面临严峻形势的分析 ;三是保护和合理利用国土资源的对策。一、国土资源的重要地位和作用自然资源包括土地资源、矿产资源、海洋资源、水资源、森林资源、草原资源、生物资源、气候资源、能源资源及自然景观旅游资源等十多种。社会生产离不开资源 ,无论生产创造的财富属于哪一个门类 ,其起始点都必定是自然资源。任何一个国家 ,其经济发展的规模、速度以及稳…     

国土资源科技进步与可持续发展

本文探讨了国土资源科技进步与可持续发展的关系 ,科技进步实现我国现阶段可持续发展的途径 ,对可持续发展的未来进行了展望 ,并提出了若干结论和建议。     

保障抗震救灾粮油质量安全的实践与体会

<正>"5·12"特大地震,给四川省粮食系统造成了重大人员伤亡和巨额经济损失,全省21个市州、148个县(市、区)、618个企业遭受了不同程度的破坏和损失,造成的直接和间接经济损失达到140亿     

江苏省地质环境管理改革发展的目标与路径

江苏省现阶段的主要地质环境问题是由自然因素和人为因素造成和引发的。多年来,江苏省地质环境管理取得了很大成绩,但也存在不少问题。新时期加强地质环境管理要根据江苏省的实际,不断深化认识,健全法制,明确责任,突出重点,拓宽地质环境管理思路;要从政府、企业和社会三方面着手,构建保障社会科学发展的地质环境管理新机制,全面推进地质环境管理改革,为江苏省现代化建设"两个率先"的宏伟目标服务。     

Similarities and dissimilarities between the EU agricultural and rural development model and Romanian agriculture. Challenges and perspectives

The main aims of this study are to highlight the differences and the similarities between the European model of agricultural and rural development, and the state of play in the Romanian agricultural sector. Statistically speaking, the agricultural sector's indicators of the past two decades place Romania outside the family picture of the EU countries, with very slight resemblances, and very strong discrepancies between their economic, technical, and institutional characteristics. At present, competition-wise, farming and farmers in Romania are still strongly disfavoured in relation to their competitors in the old EU Member States. In Romania, the economic and institutional mechanisms have most often been devised to the disadvantage of agricultural production, by claiming that subsistence farming would be the sustainable way, and by channelling the added value to other sectors. An option to continue the agricultural policies of the past decades and to abandon the national support lent to agriculture would be particularly risky through its unpredictable and incalculable social and economic effects.     

Land use planning and health and well-being

This paper is concerned with the relationship between the planning of settlements and health. It gives a brief introduction to the issues before summarising the evidence in relation to a range of topics, concluding with some more speculative thoughts on likely future findings.Modern planning was invented in response to inhumane living conditions in 19th century cities. But in the last century the connection was lost. Only now, with concerns over climate change and obesity, is there beginning to be the realisation that the physical environment is an important determinant of health.The paper uses a particular model of this relationship based on eco-system and health determinants theories to structure the review of evidence. The review covers: lifestyle choices in relation to physical activity and diet, mental well-being and community, the local economy and income, health inequalities and strategic land use transport planning, pollution and urban form, and finally impacts on global ecology.There is now a growing consensus that while personal factors are critical in determining health, the urban environment exacerbates or mitigates health and well-being outcomes.The level of active travel (walking and cycling) and outdoor recreational activity is strongly affected by accessibility to local facilities. Access to green, natural environments, and to local social networks, are factors in mental well-being. The wider sub-regional pattern of housing, economic development, land use and transport is a determinant of social exclusion and therefore health inequalities. It also affects health-damaging pollution, adaptability in the face of climate change and the level of carbon dioxide emissions.We have literally been building unhealthy conditions into many of our towns and cities. But comparisons with the best cities in Europe indicate that it is possible to reverse the less desirable trends. Success depends, however, on more radical policies of local authority control over land and finance than any political party has yet advocated. It also requires collaboration between the full range of powerful public and private organizations that influence the built environment.Future research is likely to further strengthen these conclusions. It will become much more obvious that planning for health and well-being is not only the NHS, but about creating a health-promoting physical, social and economic environment.