中国国有企业民营化前后的绩效对比分析

本文对中国国有企业民营化前后的绩效进行对比分析，样本为在1999—2005年实施私有化发行的公司。本文从盈利能力、产出水平和运营效率三个方面衡量上市公司的绩效表现。研究结果表明：（1）国有企业私有化发行后的盈利能力（总资产收益率、净资产收益率和销售利润率）整体上是下降的。（2）国有企业私有化发行后的产出水平（实际销售额）得到很大提升。（3）国有企业私有化发行后的运营效率（劳动生产率）得到一定程度的改善。本文的研究有助于利益相关者理解国企私有化发行在中国的效果，并为评估中国国企改革提供理论和实证基础。     

东西方国有企业体制变革的文化比较研究

西方国有企业的发展从"凯恩斯革命"大量国有化的兴盛时代,到出现私有化浪潮的国有企业衰退,发生这样的变革有其经济、政治、社会等的因素,但最根本的还是文化背景的影响.本文就西方国有企业的变革及支撑国有企业管理体制背后的文化根源进行了比较研究,进而知道中国进行国有企业改革不能照搬西方各国的国有管理体制,我们要从中国实情出发,在了解中国传统文化的基础上,融合西方的文化,达到企业或社会的和谐发展.     

深化国有企业改革的几个问题

中国经济改革已经进入了攻坚阶段,攻坚的目标之一是深化国有企业改革。为了促使国有企业改革深化,有许多问题需要研究和解决。1.国有企业能不能搞好搞活?我的回答是,又能又不能。例如英国的国有企业,可以说通过私有化搞好搞活了。但是苏联的国有企业一直到苏联解体也没有搞好搞活。俄罗斯实行私有化,至今也未能把国有企业搞好搞活。可见,私有化也不是改革国有企业的灵丹妙药,更不是唯一的道路。也有先没有把国有企业搞好搞活后来搞得比较好的。如东德,和西德合并后两年国有企业也没有搞好,但是现在情况比较好了。因此,我的结论是,国有企     

存量国企改革:走出改革误区,创新改革范式

本文通过提出存量国企的概念、分析存量国企弊端和仍然存在的问题,重新设计未来国企改革的新范式——渐进式全面私有化改革,并对今后国有企业改革提供了几点建议,认为国有企业改革最终应落到全面私有化的路径上去,最大限度的发挥市场经济"看不见的手"的作用。     

西方国家国有企业的一般功能

西方国家国有企业的一般功能中共中央党校经济学部陈江生８０年代以来，西方舆论对国有企业“私有化”的谈论颇多，甚至认为私有化已形成一个世界性的浪潮，似乎国有企业已该寿终正寝。但事实却是，“私有化”并没能消灭国有企业，充其量只是对国有企业进行一番结构调整。...     

张维迎：国企是中国成长的障碍

近日，北京大学光华管理学院原院长、教授张维迎表示，国有企业已成为未来中国成长的最主要的障碍之一。张维迎称，未来几年，中国在经济领域上要做三件事情，一是国有企业的私有化；二是土地的私有化；三是金融的自由化。     

国际

日本邮政公社正式变身“私企“从10月1日开始,136年来一直作为国有企业运营的日本邮政公社正式开始实行私有化,摇身变为一家拥有24万名员工的巨大私企--日本邮政集团。     

国有企业私有化动因研究评介

本文首先对近年来取得的国有企业私有化动因研究成果进行了梳理,然后对国有企业私有化动因理论进行了综合评析,最后指出了今后尚待研究的若干问题。     

国企改革不能消解国有企业

在对国有企业的认识上,社会上存在着一些诸如"功能错位论"、"产权低效论"、"与其私下里腐败不如出卖"等似是而非的观点.迫切需要明辨是非,防止国企改革发生变异,防止变成实际上消解国有企业和私有化的浪潮.     

土地私有化，是中国农民的出路吗？

3月17日经济学家张维迎公开表示：未来几年，中国在经济领域上要做三件事情，一是国有企业的私有化：二是土地的私有化；三是金融的自由化。他同时表示：“中国有大量资产，但并未变成资本。中国的城市化是以剥夺土地所有权的办法来进行，因此造成了矛盾、不公现象。”     

“温 良 恭 俭 让”

选自于:<论语·学而> 解读:人要学会温和、善良、恭谨、简朴、谦让.即:做人一定要有美好的德行.其实这正也是自古以来的做人之本.     

经纪人、交易员、律师和间谍

金融危机过后，“华尔街阴谋论”逐渐盛行起来，可惜都是臆测居多，缺乏真凭实据。而本书的作者以真实的访谈入手，揭出CIA等情报机构与华尔街银行合作的种种细节，可谓匠心独具。     

Assessing black progress: employment,occupation, earnings,income, poverty

Farley discusses changes in employment, occupation, earnings, income, and poverty among US blacks. Among black men, there has been a persistent rise in unemployment since 1960. By the early 1980s, 1 black man out of 8 had dropped out of the labor force, compared to 1 in 20 white men. Some contend that many black men lack the skills to be employed or have personal habits and criminal records which make them unacceptable to employers. Others believe that the expansion of federal welfare programs offers attractive alternatives to men who have limited earnings potential. Still others stress that blacks are concentrated within cities, while the growth of employment is occurring in suburbs. Among those blacks over age 54, labor force participation has declined because of improved Social Security benefits, better private pensions, and the greater availability of Supplemental Security Income. The employment of young blacks compared to whites has deteriorated since 1960. For both races, there has been a steady rise in the employment of women. The recent increases, however, have been great for whites. By the early 1980s, white women caught up with black women in terms of employment. Unlike the indicators of employment itself, there is unambiguous evidence that the occupational distribution of employed blacks has been upgraded and is gradually becoming similar to that of whites. Findings from many studies show that blacks once earned much less than similar whites, but this racial difference has declined among men and has nearly disappeared among women. The proportion of blacks impoverished fell sharply in the 1960s, reaching a minimum of 30% in the early 1970s. Since the early 1970s, blacks have made few gains. The proportion impoverished actually increased and the ratio of black-to-white family income declined. The fact that the earnings of black males are no longer rising faster than those of whites and that there is no longer a migration from southern farms to cities plays a role, but changes in family structure are also important. At all dates, poverty rates have been high and income levels low in families headed by women. In 1984, for example, 52% of the black families with a woman as head of household were below the poverty line, compared to 15% of the black married-couple families. While similar trends are occurring in white families, there has been a sharper increase in the proportion of blacks living in these female-maintained families which have high poverty rates.