The choice of efficiency benchmarking metric in evaluating firm productivity and viability

Journal of Productivity Analysis - The Debreu–Farrell measure of technical efficiency is widely used to benchmark firm performance. A limitation of this measure is that it is orientation...     

Axiomatic foundations of efficiency measurement on data-generated technologies

We assess the ability of three well-known technical efficiency indexes, the Debreu-Farrell index, the Färe–Lovell index, and the Zieschang index, to satisfy the Färe–Lovell axioms and continuity axioms (for technologies as well as input quantities) on the class of technologies generated by standard mathematical-programming methods of measuring efficiency: data envelopment analysis (DEA) and free-disposal-hull (FDH) analysis. Our principal conclusions are that (a) restriction to these data-based technologies adds continuity in input quantities to the properties satisfied by the Färe–Lovell and the Zieschang indexes (thus eliminating a salient advantage of the Debreu–Farrell index), but (b) none of the indexes satisfies all Färe–Lovell axioms (nor all continuity axioms) on either DEA or FDH technologies, and hence (c) trade-offs among the indexes remain. These findings provide motivation for the search for an index that does satisfy these axioms on DEA and FDH technologies.     

Lower bound of cost efficiency measure in DEA with incomplete price information

The conventional cost efficiency model assumes that all the input prices are fixed and known exactly at each decision making unit. In practice, however, exact knowledge of prices is difficult and prices may be subject to variations over very short periods of time. In this paper, we develop a new DEA model, which can be transformed into a special case of bi-level linear program, to calculate the lower bound of CE efficiency from the pessimistic viewpoints based on the shortcomings of the existing approaches. As the input (price) cone of the pessimistic CE model tightens, the objective function converges to the traditional Farrell cost efficiency measure. Numerical examples are used to demonstrate the proposed approach and compare the results with those obtained with the existing approaches.     

Revisiting the decomposition of cost efficiency for non-homothetic technologies: a directional distance function approach

In the early 1980’s Kopp and Diewert proposed a popular method to decompose cost efficiency into allocative and technical efficiency for parametric functional forms based on the radial approach initiated by Farrell. We show that, relying on recently proposed homogeneity and duality results, their approach is unnecessary for self-dual homothetic production functions, while it is inconsistent in the non-homothetic case. By stressing that for homothetic technologies the radial distance function can be correctly interpreted as a technical efficiency measure, since allocative efficiency is independent of the output level and radial input reductions leave it unchanged, we contend that for non-homothetic technologies this is not the case because optimal input demands depend on the output targeted by the firm, as does the inequality between marginal rates of substitution and market prices—allocative inefficiency. We demonstrate that a correct definition of technical efficiency corresponds to the directional distance function because its flexibility ensures that allocative efficiency is kept unchanged through movements in the input production possibility set when solving technical inefficiency, and therefore the associated cost reductions can be solely—and rightly—ascribed to technical-engineering-improvements. The new methodology allowing for a consistent decomposition of cost inefficiency is illustrated resorting to simple examples of non-homothetic production functions.     

The operating efficiency of financial holding and nonfinancial holding banks—Epsilou‐based measure metafrontier data envelopment analysis model

Previous bank efficiency studies assumed that the same efficient frontier system exists in different types of banks, but the conventional radial data envelopment analysis (DEA) model slacks are not counted in efficiency scores, and nonradial DEA models do not consider radial features. This paper develops an Epsilou‐based measure meta‐DEA approach for measuring the efficiencies and technology gaps of different bank types. The results are as the follows: The average efficiency and technology gaps of nonfinancial holding banks are better than those of financial holding banks. The nonfinancial holding banks are more efficient than financial holding banks in investment and other income.     

Families of linear efficiency programs based on Debreu’s loss function

Gerard Debreu introduced a well known radial efficiency measure which he called a ??coefficient of resource utilization.?? He derived this scalar from a much less well known ??dead loss?? function that characterizes the monetary value sacrificed to inefficiency, and which is to be minimized subject to a normalization condition. We use Debreu??s loss function, together with a variety of normalization conditions, to generate several popular families of linear efficiency programs. Our methodology also can be employed to generate entirely new families of linear efficiency programs.     

Efficiency aggregation with enhanced Russell measures in data envelopment analysis

In aggregation for data envelopment analysis (DEA), a jointly determined aggregate measure of output and input efficiency is desired that is consistent with the individual decision making unit measures. An impasse has been reached in the current state of the literature, however, where only separate measures of input and output efficiency have resulted from attempts to aggregate technical efficiency with the radial measure models commonly employed in DEA. The latter measures are “incomplete” in that they omit the non-zero input and output slacks, and thus fail to account for all inefficiencies that the model can identify. The Russell measure eliminates the latter deficiency but is difficult to solve in standard formulations. A new approach has become available, however, which utilizes a ratio measure in place of the standard formulations. Referred to as an enhanced Russell graph measure (ERM), the resulting model is in the form of a fractional program. Hence, it can be transformed into an ordinary linear programming structure that can generate an optimal solution for the corresponding ERM model. As shown in this paper, an aggregate ERM can then be formed with all the properties considered to be desirable in an aggregate measure—including jointly determined input and output efficiency measures that represent separate estimates of input and output efficiency. Much of this paper is concerned with technical efficiency in both individual and system-wide efficiency measures. Weighting systems are introduced that extend to efficiency-based measures of cost, revenue, and profit, as well as derivatives such as rates of return over cost. The penultimate section shows how the solution to one model also generates optimal solutions to models with other objectives that include rates of return over cost and total profit. This is accomplished in the form of efficiency-adjusted versions of these commonly used measures of performance.     

Statistical Approaches for Non‐parametric Frontier Models: A Guided Tour

A rich theory of production and analysis of productive efficiency has developed since the pioneering work by Tjalling C. Koopmans and Gerard Debreu. Michael J. Farrell published the first empirical study, and it appeared in a statistical journal (Journal of the Royal Statistical Society), even though the article provided no statistical theory. The literature in econometrics, management sciences, operations research and mathematical statistics has since been enriched by hundreds of papers trying to develop or implement new tools for analysing productivity and efficiency of firms. Both parametric and non‐parametric approaches have been proposed. The mathematical challenge is to derive estimators of production, cost, revenue or profit frontiers, which represent, in the case of production frontiers, the optimal loci of combinations of inputs (like labour, energy and capital) and outputs (the products or services produced by the firms). Optimality is defined in terms of various economic considerations. Then the efficiency of a particular unit is measured by its distance to the estimated frontier. The statistical problem can be viewed as the problem of estimating the support of a multivariate random variable, subject to some shape constraints, in multiple dimensions. These techniques are applied in thousands of papers in the economic and business literature. This ‘guided tour’ reviews the development of various non‐parametric approaches since the early work of Farrell. Remaining challenges and open issues in this challenging arena are also described. © 2014 The Authors. International Statistical Review © 2014 International Statistical Institute     

Theory and Application of Directional Distance Functions

In 1957 Farrell demonstrated how cost inefficiency could be decomposed into two mutually exclusive and exhaustive components: technical and allocative inefficiency. This result is consequence of the fact that—as shown by Shephard—the cost function and the input distance function (the reciprocal of Farrell's technical efficiency measure) are dual to each other. Similarly, the revenue function and the output distance function are dual providing the basis for the decomposition of revenue inefficiency into technical and allocative components (see for example, Färe, Grosskopf and Lovell (1994)). Here we extend those results to include the directional distance function and its dual, the profit function. This provides the basis for defining and decomposing profit efficiency. As we show, the output and input distance functions (reciprocals of Farrell efficiency measures) are special cases of the directional distance function. We also show how to use the directional distance function as a tool for measuring capacity utilization using DEA type techniques.     

Shadow Price Approach to Total Factor Productivity Measurement: With an Application to Finnish Grass-Silage Production

This paper explores an intermediate route between the Fisher and the Malmquist productivity indexes so as to minimize data requirements and assumptions about economic behavior of production units and their production technology. Assuming quantity data of inputs and outputs and the behavioral hypothesis of allocative efficiency, we calculate the exact value of the Fisher ideal productivity index using implicit shadow prices revealed by the choice of input–output mix. The approach is operationalized by means of a nonparametric data envelopment analysis (DEA) model. Empirical application to Finnish grass silage farms suggests that the Malmquist and the Fisher productivity indices yield similar results when averaged over firms, but there can be major differences in the results of the two approaches at the level of individual firms.     

Combining PCA With DEA to Improve the Evaluation of Project Performance Data: A Taiwanese Bureau of Energy Case Study

This article proposes a new method of project performance evaluation, by which project performance data can be better understood. This article combines principal component analysis (PCA) and data envelopment analysis (DEA) to enhance the efficiency of decision‐making units more accurately. The data used was based on energy projects promoted by the Bureau of Energy at the Ministry of Economic Affairs in Taiwan. The results of this article show that by combining PCA and DEA in evaluating the performance of energy projects, there was an improved evaluation of projects over simply using DEA data alone.     

Environmental efficiency measurement and the materials balance condition

The materials balance condition is a fundamental adding up condition, which essentially says that: “what goes in must come out”. In this paper we argue that a number of the recently developed methods of incorporating pollution measures into standard productive efficiency models may be inconsistent with this fundamental condition. We propose an alternative method that involves the incorporation of the materials balance concept into the production model in a similar manner to which price information is normally incorporated. This produces a new environmental efficiency measure that can be decomposed into technical and allocative components, in a similar manner to the conventional cost efficiency decomposition. The approach is illustrated with the case of phosphorus emission on Belgian pig-finishing farms, using data envelopment analysis (DEA) methods. Our results indicate that a substantial proportion of nutrient pollution on these farms can be abated in a cost reducing manner.     

基于DEA分析法的港口物流效率测评研究

港口物流效率测评对于研究港口经营活动具有重要的意义,是衡量港口竞争能力以及经济效应的重要指标。文章将从宏观层面以及微观层面,并运用非参数化方法中的DEA方法对港口的物流效率进行测评。在宏观层面上运用DEA方法分析港口腹地产业与交通体系的投入量对港口吞吐量产生的影响;在微观层面采用DEA方法分析港口相关生产投入与产出指标来判定港口生产技术与规模的有效性。文章的研究价值在于,通过分析港口各种要素投入与产出的有效性可以测评出港口物流效率的实际水平状况,为港口未来的建设和发展提供决策依据,避免资源的重复建设和盲目投入。     

A new methodology to measure efficiencies of inputs (outputs) of decision making units in Data Envelopment Analysis with application to agriculture

This paper aims at developing a new methodology to measure and decompose global DMU efficiency into efficiency of inputs (or outputs). The basic idea rests on the fact that global DMU's efficiency score might be misleading when managers proceed to reallocate their inputs or redefine their outputs. Literature provides a basic measure for global DMU's efficiency score. A revised model was developed for measuring efficiencies of global DMUs and their inputs (or outputs) efficiency components, based on a hypothesis of virtual DMUs. The present paper suggests a method for measuring global DMU efficiency simultaneously with its efficiencies of inputs components, that we call Input decomposition DEA model (ID-DEA), and its efficiencies of outputs components, that we call output decomposition DEA model (OD-DEA). These twin models differ from Supper efficiency model (SE-DEA) and Common Set Weights model (CSW-DEA). The twin models (ID-DEA, OD-DEA) were applied to agricultural farms, and the results gave different efficiency scores of inputs (or outputs), and at the same time, global DMU's efficiency score was given by the Charnes, Cooper and Rhodes (Charnes et al., 1978) [1], CCR78 model. The rationale of our new hypothesis and model is the fact that managers don't have the same information level about all inputs and outputs that constraint them to manage resources by the (global) efficiency scores. Then each input/output has a different reality depending on the manager's decision in relationship to information available at the time of decision. This paper decomposes global DMU's efficiency into input (or output) components' efficiencies. Each component will have its score instead of a global DMU score. These findings would improve management decision making about reallocating inputs and redefining outputs. Concerning policy implications of the DEA twin models, they help policy makers to assess, ameliorate and reorient their strategies and execute programs towards enhancing the best practices and minimising losses.     

A multistage method to measure efficiency and its application to Japanese banking industry

When measuring technical efficiency with existing data envelopment analysis (DEA) techniques, mean efficiency scores generally exhibit volatile patterns over time. This appears to be at odds with the general perception of learning-by-doing management, due to Arrow [The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies 1964; 154–73]. Further, this phenomenon is largely attributable to the fundamental assumption of deterministic data maintained in DEA models, and to the difficulty such models have in incorporating environmental influences. This paper proposes a three-stage method to measure DEA efficiency while controlling for the impacts of both statistical noise and environmental factors. Using panel data on Japanese banking over the period 1997–2001, we demonstrate that the proposed approach greatly mitigates these weaknesses of DEA models. We find a stable upward trend in mean measured efficiency, indicating that, on average, the bankers were learning over the sample period. Therefore, we conclude that this new method is a significant improvement relative to those DEA models currently used by researchers, corporate management, and industrial regulatory bodies to evaluate performance of their respective interests.     

The examination of pseudo-allocative and pseudo-overall efficiencies in DEA using shadow prices

The original Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models developed by Charnes et al. (Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444, 1978), Banker et al. (Manag Sci 30:1078–1092, 1984) were both radial models. These models and their varied extensions have remained the most popular DEA models in terms of utilization. The benchmark targets they determined for inefficient units are primarily based on the notion of maintaining the same input and output mixes originally employed by the evaluated unit (i.e. disregarding allocative considerations). This paper presents a methodology to investigate allocative and overall efficiency in the absence of defined input and output prices. The benchmarks determined from models based on this methodology will consider all possible input and/or output mixes. Application of this methodology is illustrated on a model of the financial intermediary function of a bank branch network.     

A cross-national comparison and taxonomy of DEA-based hospital efficiency studies

This paper provides the first taxonomy of hospital efficiency studies that uses data envelopment analysis (DEA) and related techniques. We provide a systematic review of 79 such studies published from 1984–2004 that represent 12 countries. Only studies written in English are considered. A cross-national comparison reveals significant differences with respect to important study characteristics such as type of DEA model selected and choice of input and output categories. Compared with US studies, European efforts are more likely to measure allocative rather than technical efficiency, use longitudinal data, and use fewer observations. We take a longitudinal perspective that illustrates the life cycle of this research, as well as its diffusion across disciplines. Our taxonomy can be used by policy makers and researchers to review past, and assemble new, DEA models.     

Efficiency measurement for general network systems: a slacks-based measure model

Journal of Productivity Analysis - Traditional radial DEA models treat DMUs as black boxes, whose internal structures are ignored, and measure input and output changes proportionally. On the other...     

The Use of Data Envelopment Analysis with Probabilistic Assurance Regions for Measuring Hospital Efficiency

This paper uses Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) for an estimation of the cost efficiency of 70 Danish hospitals. The analysis relates to a cost function based on 483 outputs in combination with a set of probabilistic assurance regions defined by the cost distributions for each output. It is demonstrated that the probabilistic assurance region approach allows for (i) a frontier estimation in the full output space, i.e., no fixed aggregation is required, and (ii) a controlling of the variation in heterogeneity of the output clusters, in casu Diagnosis Related Groups. The likelihood of the estimated efficiency score for a given hospital can be measured based on the sensitivity of the score w.r.t. the probability levels used in the specification of confidence intervals for the probabilistic assurance regions.     

The impact of corporate governance on state-owned and non-state-owned firms efficiency in China

The purpose of this paper is to expand the literature on the corporate governance of transition economies by analyzing the relationship between corporate governance and productive efficiency in China's publicly listed manufacturing industry firms. We use the principal component analysis and the hybrid meta-frontier DEA model, separating inputs into radial inputs that change proportionally and non-radial inputs that change non-proportionally to measure the technical efficiency and technology gap ratios of publicly listed Chinese firms in different manufacturing industries during 2010–2013. The input variables are the net value of fixed assets, staff number, and the characteristics of the corporate governance system, while the output variables are gross revenue and total profit. The empirical result shows that inefficiency due to corporate governance is the main reason for lower efficiency in most manufacturing firms. For the technology gap ratio (TGR), the metal and mineral and the machinery, equipment and instrument are the two highest efficient sectors, whereas the paper and allied products sub-industry has the lowest efficiency during 2010–2013. In addition, the ratio of state-owned firms whose inefficiency is mainly caused by corporate governance to total state-owned firms is greater than that of non-state-owned firms in each year. The TGR analysis shows that the efficiency performance of non-state-owned firms is greater than state-owned firms.