企业社会责任对企业绩效的影响研究

以2013-2015年高新技术企业的数据为样本,研究企业社会责任对企业财务绩效和经营绩效的影响.研究结果表明:企业积极承担社会责任能够直接促进企业的经营绩效提升,但对财务绩效的提高没有显著影响.最后,根据分析结果,提出了促进企业转变履行社会责任的意识,积极履行企业社会责任相关建议.     

国际社会更加关注企业社会责任

前不久,由联合国全球契约学术委员会,国际标准化委员会、国际商业领袖论坛、世界经济论坛、欧洲雇主委员会、世界企业社会责任协会、欧盟企业伦理协会、欧洲企业伦理学会发起的国际企业伦理与企业社会责任论坛在纽约举行,来自全球129个国家及国际组织的411名政府官员、专家学者、企业家等代表出席了会议。世界著名企业文化大师、美国麻省理工学院教授沙因的学生、前联合国秘书长     

企业社会责任与和谐社会的构建

构建社会主义和谐社会涉及到各个社会组织的社会责任,其中企业的社会责任在整个社会组织的责任体系中占有重要地位,发挥着重要作用。文章从企业社会责任的概念和内容出发,分析了我国企业履行社会责任的现状并提出加强企业履行社会责任的对策,从而为建设我国社会主义和谐社会做出应有的贡献。     

Perceptions of students university of corporate social responsibility

The findings of this article bring knowledge about the understanding of corporate social responsibility from the university students’ perception and their values’ structure in a cross cultural high education context. Primary data collected via a survey in Business Schools at Universities of Spain, Poland and Bulgaria and multivariate analysis evidence that both the values’ structure and university students’ CSR perception are influenced by cross cultural factors. In this High Education context and according to Schwartz’s values theory and the Triple Bottom line, the study reveals different value profiles by gender and nationality and diverse attitudes to CSR perception across these European countries. The result approached is important for organizations to assure the success of strategic purposes implicit on social corporate initiatives.     

中国企业社会责任评价研究综述

企业社会责任评价研究日渐成为国内普遍关注的热点。文章从评价指标体系、评价方法、企业社会责任的实证研究等方面出发,综述了国内企业社会责任评价研究现状,并对存在的问题进行了分析。     

基于多层面的企业社会责任行动实施动因的研究

企业是一个多层面系统,不同的因素会对其行为产生不同的影响,认识这些因素对于理解企业行动原因有一定帮助。基于此,文章从宏观环境、企业组织和管理者三个层面上分析了影响企业社会责任行动的因素。认为在这些影响因素共同作用下,企业开展社会责任行动存在不同的动因,并表现出不同的行动类型,这将有助于更好地理解该行动的实际意义。     

The relationships among corporate social responsibility,corporate image and economic performance of high-tech industries in Taiwan

The economic development of high-tech industries in Taiwan focuses on IC design, opt electrics, semiconductors, computer science and telecommunication. It is necessary for business to understand the relations and significance of the economic performance to take the responsibility and keep a positive corporate image, thus they can earn more admiration and trust from customers. How do they take the social responsibility to improve their corporate image and create the economic performance, and finally reach the top one of the whole world? This study discusses the subject concerning the continuing development of business and relevant issues stated above. We found that 68.1% of high-tech industries in Taiwan are in accordance with business ethics and norms of conduct. Businesses take their responsibility practically by participating in public welfare activities. The more responsibilities they fulfill; the better image they have. High-tech industries should target the social responsibility as their first goal and secondly improve their corporate image to increase the economic performance.     

Corporate hyperlink network relationships in global corporate social responsibility system

This study analyzed the hyperlink (co-link) network structure among companies in global Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) system. This study measured network variables such as density and centrality, including degree centrality, eigenvector centrality, closeness, and betweenness. The results indicated that European companies had relatively central roles in the global CSR system. In addition the higher performing companies are more active their CSR practices. Also, the results revealed that the industrial type of companies was not significantly associated with its CSR practices.     

日本企业社会责任及其给我国的启示

日本的企业社会责任外延广泛而内涵缺乏,并且深受日本文化的影响,其推动力主要来自于政府、企业、媒体和非政府组织、民众四个方面。日本企业社会责任落后于欧美,但在亚洲仍然处于领先地位,值得我国学习借鉴。建立适合国情的企业社会责任体系,推动企业、政府、媒体、非政府组织和民众在发展CSR上的通力协作,以建立标准化体系为方向是我国CSR发展的可行之策。     

我国企业社会责任报告解读与评析

本文对我国内资企业发布的36份社会责任报告进行了评析,指出了我国企业社会责任报告体系的不足之处,并提出了若干建议,以促进我国企业社会责任报告体系的不断完善。     

现代企业文化建设对强化企业社会责任的作用

在现代企业的管理工作中,文化建设具有重要的意义,而且是强化企业社会责任感的先决条件。文章从现代企业管理学的角度出发,简要分析了文化建设对强化企业社会责任的作用。     

Corporate social responsibility and corporate performance: a quantile regression approach

This paper investigates the impact of corporate social responsibility activities on corporate performance. In view of the inconsistent empirical findings in the literature, and the limitations of least squares regressions, we adopt a quantile regression method to fill this gap in the literature. An important finding is that the sensitivity of a company’s performance to its engagement in corporate social responsibility activities does not vary with the quantile location of the firm’s performance level, and the engagement in corporate social responsibility activities has a significant positive relation with corporate performance across all quantiles. This study argues that undertaking corporate social responsibility leads to greater financial returns than the related costs. Therefore, this study concludes that engaging in corporate social responsibility is beneficial for firms, and thus worth implementing.     

Factors of internal corporate social responsibility and the effect on organizational commitment

Internal corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become an essential part of organizations' social responsibility. Yet, to date, CSR's internal dimension has been widely neglected in the literature. This paper empirically explores the concept of internal CSR and its relationship to employees' affective and normative organizational commitment. For conceptualizing internal CSR, seven factors are theoretically derived based on social exchange theory. The research model is initially tested through a pre-test consisting of 386 respondents from a German company active in the renewable energy sector. The main survey is carried out in an international pharmaceutical company, resulting in 2081 employee responses. The results reveal that the relevant factors constituting internal CSR are present and that the latter has a strong effect on employees' affective organizational commitment and a comparatively low effect on normative organizational commitment. Furthermore, a mediating role of affective on normative organizational commitment is detected.     

Powerful CEOs and employee relations: evidence from corporate social responsibility indicators

In this paper, we investigate whether powerful CEOs who dominate the top management team exhibit positive or negative behavior towards their employees. Somewhat surprisingly, we find that CEO power as evidenced by high pay disparity between the CEO and top management, results in positive Employee Relations as measured by the KLD Statistics. We also find that CEO power affects the individual categories of Employee Involvement as well as Employee Health and Safety, indicating that pay disparity positively effects Employee Relations on a number of measures. However, the strong positive relationship is not found when the CEO holds the dual role of Chairman. In addition, neither measure tests positive for union relations, although high profitability, as measured by industry adjusted Return on Assets, appears to permit firms to have positive relations with employees on a number of different measures.     

The ethics of ‘going green’: the corporate social responsibility debate

A significant proportion of authors of green business texts proposes that managers should be the instigators and guardians of a societal change towards sustainable development. There is the notion of managerial duty towards the environment. This paper attempts to unravel the implications of this call for managerial eco‐heroism. The reason that this unravelling is important is that there is a growing body of evidence suggesting that win–win situations – the ‘low hanging fruit’ – are progressively becoming less apparent for many firms. This implies a conflict between profitability and environmental performance. This translates into a (perhaps familiar) scenario for business: one greener option is more expensive, and the financial gains associated with it are insufficient to justify it on the grounds of profitability – ‘going green’ then means losing potential profits. A neoclassical and a socio‐economic perspective are provided as foundations for managerial reasoning. Even though the corporate social responsibility debate is not resolved, it is nonetheless of importance, not least because environmentally proactive managers might intend to increase social well‐being but actually reduce it through their green decision‐making. Thus the real‐world applicability of the positions adopted by the opposing philosophical schools is analysed. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.