风险投资税收政策的国际比较及借鉴

为了促进风险投资业的发展，发达国家在税收制度、税收目标、税收优惠、限制条件、避免重复征税等方面都采取了适应本国风险投资发展情况的税收政策，并产生了积极的效果。相比之下，我国风险投资税收政策存在着一系列问题，严重制约了风险投资业的发展。因此，必须建立风险投资税收制度。确立规模化和群体化的税收目标，加大优惠力度，辅以相应限制条件，克服重复征税现象。     

我国促进风险投资发展的税收政策选择

20世纪80年代末以来,我国风险投资业快速发展,税收政策对风险投资业中的各个环节产生影响,而现行促进风险投资发展的税收政策还存在一定缺陷与不足,因此根据现实要求完善我国促进风险投资发展的税收政策,具有十分重要的理论和现实意义.本文首先对风险投资的理论内涵进行了初步阐述,继而分析了税收政策对风险投资的影响,最后针对风险投资行业税收政策现存问题提出了改进建议     

中小高科技企业对相关税收政策的反映

中心高科技企业产品的研发过程分为三代，即维护开发、研发。研发环节的人员素质最高，薪酬也最高。     

促进风险投资事业发展的税收政策探讨

我国风险投资事业至今尚处于初始阶段，无法独立支撑高新技术企业的发展。其发展障碍在财税政策上表现为：政府扶持风险投资方式单一，缺乏必要的间接扶持的财税政策。本文主要从现行税制对风险投资的不适应性，调整税制的必要性，以及如何调整税制以扶持和促进我国风险投资事业的发展等方面进行研究和探讨。一、 我国现行税制对风险投资的不适应风险投资事业的高风险性与传统投资相比处于不利地位。各发达国家为了吸引投资者加大对风险投资事业的投资，都对风险投资实施优惠的税收政策。而我国现行的税收政策却不利于风险投资事业的发展，…     

关于完善我国风险投资税收政策体系的研究

风险投资在一国科技进步和经济发展中起着非常重要的作用,对风险投资给予税收支持尤为必要。本文剖析了我国风险投资业发展的总体趋势,总结了支持风险投资发展的税收政策现状,指出了其存在的深层次矛盾:对风险投资持有时间的税收激励不利于长期投资,税收优惠对风险投资的前端投资引导激励不足,风投机构税负不均衡,合伙制风投发展缓慢,对个人投资者的税收激励不够。     

税收激励创投:五大基本精神

2007年2月15日,财政部和国家税务总局联合发布了《关于促进创业投资企业发展有关税收政策的通知》.《税收政策通知》的实施会对我国创业投资业发展产生什么样的影响?体现了哪些精神     

风险投资的策略有哪些变化?

风险投资在2007年第二季度表现如何?清科集团总裁兼首席执行官倪正东有一个评价,他说:"在刚刚走过的2007年第二季度,中国创业投资活动激增,无论是投资基金的募集还是投资的额度都达到了振奋人心的新峰值,成为中国创业投资产业史上一个新的里程碑.     

走出去的最优税筹——境外所得税抵免制度对中国企业境外投资架构的影响及对策

从国际税收筹划角度,就125号文对中国企业境外控股架构的影响进行解析,可以帮助企业对境外投资进行更有效的筹划和安排。     

Legality and venture capital exits

This paper introduces an analysis of the impact of Legality on the exiting of venture capital investments. We consider a sample of 468 venture-backed companies from 12 Asia-Pacific countries, and these countries' venture capitalists' investments in US-based entrepreneurial firms. The data indicate IPOs are more likely in countries with a higher Legality index. This core result is robust to controls for country-specific stock market capitalization, MSCI market conditions, venture capitalist fund manager skill and fund characteristics, and entrepreneurial firm and transaction characteristics. Although Black and Gilson (1998) [Black, B.S., Gilson, R.J., 1998. Venture capital and the structure of capital markets: banks versus stock markets. Journal of Financial Economics 47, 243–77] speculate on a central connection between active stock markets and active venture capital markets, our data in fact indicate the quality of a country's legal system is much more directly connected to facilitating VC-backed IPO exits than the size of a country's stock market. The data indicate Legality is a central mechanism which mitigates agency problems between outside shareholders and entrepreneurs, thereby fostering the mutual development of IPO markets and venture capital markets.     

How venture capital works

The popular mythology surrounding the U.S. venture-capital industry derives from a previous era. Venture capitalists who nurtured the computer industry in its infancy were legendary both for their risk taking and for their hands-on operating experience. But today things are different, and separating the myths from the realities is crucial to understanding this important piece of the U.S. economy. Today's venture capitalists are more like conservative bankers than the risk takers of days past. They have carved out a specialized niche in the capital markets, filling a void that other institutions cannot serve. They are the linch-pins in an efficient system for meeting the needs of institutional investors looking for high returns, of entrepreneurs seeking funding, and of investment bankers looking for companies to sell. Venture capitalists must earn a consistently superior return on investments in inherently risky businesses. The myth is that they do so by investing in good ideas and good plans. In reality, they invest in good industries--that is, industries that are more competitively forgiving than the market as a whole. And they structure their deals in a way that minimizes their risk and maximizes their returns. Although many entrepreneurs expect venture capitalists to provide them with sage guidance as well as capital, that expectation is unrealistic. Given a typical portfolio of ten companies and a 2,000-hour work year, a venture capital partner spends on average less than two hours per week on any given company. In addition to analyzing the current venture-capital system, the author offers practical advice to entrepreneurs thinking about venture funding.     

Firm-level implications of early stage venture capital investment — An empirical investigation

We analyze the impact of venture capital finance on growth and innovation of young German firms. On the basis of statistical matching procedures we confirm findings that venture-funded firms have a higher number of patent applications than those in the control group. However, these are obtained even before the venture capitalists' investment, hence venture capitalists choose firms with demonstrated innovative output. After investment, the number of firms' patents does not differ significantly anymore, however their growth rates are significantly larger. This suggests that the higher innovativeness of venture-funded firms is due to the selection process of the venture capitalist prior to the funding rather than to the venture funding itself. Venture capitalists seem to focus rather on commercialization of existing innovations and growth of the firm.     

风口是风险投资的陷阱

中国投资协会股权和创业投资专业委员会（简称“创投委”）二届一次理事扩大会议前不久召开。创投委原联席会长、青普旅游首席创始人、首席战略官、著名投资人王功权发表演讲,他认为：风险投资是有情怀、有使命的资本,这种资本比较谦卑,改变了过去资本的居高临下主导了很多事情甚至左右很多事情的状态,它谦卑地躲在创业者和知识智慧后面,推动以创业者为主导的以人为本的、以智慧为主导的创业行动。     

Asset liquidity and venture capital investment

We examine the relationship between asset market liquidity and venture capital (VC) investment and find that it is inverted U-shaped. Asset liquidity and VC investment are positively related for low levels of asset liquidity but negatively related for higher levels of asset liquidity. We also document evidence that VC firms with more industry experience invest more in a liquid asset market than those without industry experience or with significant experience in other industries. Portfolio companies obtained their first investment in a liquid asset market are less likely to exit successfully; however, given a successful exit, they prefer to exit through mergers and acquisitions rather than going public.     

Government venture capital and cross-border investment

We use data on venture capital investments from 26 countries from 1998–2013. We investigate the following questions: Do domestic government sponsored venture capital funds augment or curtail domestic private venture capital funds from cross-border investment? Do government sponsored venture capital funds attract or repel foreign private venture capital investment? The results show that a preponderance of mixed-structured over pure-structured government venture capital investment has a crowding-in effect overall: it attracts domestic and international private venture capital to the domestic venture capital market while simultaneously increasing total private venture capital investment. In contrast, a preponderance of pure-government over mixed-government venture capital fund investment repels foreign private venture capital investment (has a crowding out effect). We find that both these effects are more pronounced for domestic rather than foreign private venture capital and that the attraction effect is stronger than the repulsion effect.     

做风险投资,IBM的理念

IBM这样描绘公司的风险投资战略:公司风险战略大多集中在金融投资领域,而IBM却采取了一种与众不同的互惠战略,即将关系置于直接投资之上的战略.目前,该战略正结出丰硕的成果:大的风险投资公司正逐渐了解IBM的愿景和战略并看到由其投资公司变为其组合公司从而创造利润的大好机遇;创业者们正获取IBM的技术技能、市场渠道,从而为其自身解决方案获得更高的信誉度和有效性.