项目团队管理创新推动技术创新

知识创新技术创新是目前最受关注的问题。技术创新引领了技术进步。同时技术创新与管理创新是相辅相成的。项目团队的建设对科技进步与科技创新,起着推动激励的作用。项目团队的运行必须在单位可控的范围内。项目团队的管理模式是既要调动团队积极性,提供其相对宽松的条件,最大程度的发挥团队的主观能动性强的特点;又要有效的减少创新风险,避免走弯路,保障技术创新的有序发展。本文借鉴了一下目前运行成功的项目团队的管理方法,介绍了相关关键节点,希望对别的项目团队的运行工作起到一定的借鉴作用。     

中交哈大高速铁路施工团队管理与激励的研究

本文的研究方法和结论能够提升中交哈大项目团队的经营业绩,成功实现中交集团内部及外部的有效沟通,促使中交集团机构重组的顺利完成。本文的相关研究成果与结论不仅对中交哈大高速铁路施工项目团队管理及激励机制的建设和完善有借鉴作用,而且对于其他建筑施工企业的项目团队管理也具有一定的参考作用。     

"项目团队建设与管理"调查问卷报告分析研究

根据项目团队建设与管理的实际经验,采取调查问卷方式研究探讨"项目团队建设与管理"实践中可能出现的问题和有效措施,总结比较实用的经验和教训,为项目团队建设与管理的工作提供借鉴与参考.     

工程项目管理团队建设

团队建设是影响工程项目顺利进行的关键因素。一个高效的团队会给项目带来巨大的成功,所以优秀的团队是企业的宝贵财富,其团队精神也会对企业的管理产生积极影响。项目团队是按照一定制度、体系而组成的具有凝聚力的团体,并通过团队中每个人的共同努力,来实现项目的共同目标。主要对工程项目管理中的团队建设的原则及特点进行分析,并给出了提高团队建设高效性的方法。     

浅谈建设单位工程项目的管理点

<正>工程项目管理是对工程项目实施进行的计划、组织、指挥、协调和控制的管理活动,是一个团队合作力量的体现。一个工程的建设是建设、施工、监理、勘察、设计等相关单位相互协作、相互配合的成果。建设单位如何建立一支技术、管理过硬的项目管理团队,如何有效对施工单位、监理单位进行管理便成为建设方管理好工程项目的重点工作。一、如何建立一支高素质的项目管理团队建设单位作为工程项目的牵头人,在项目建设中起到决定性的指挥、协调作用,所以只有合理地建立一个有权威、有组织能力、效率高的项目团队,才能很好地进行项目管理。     

创业团队的最佳结构模式

为什么成功的创业管理能将分歧和冲突转变为正面决策？团队创业的成功率并不比个人创业高，其主要原因不外乎两点：一是团队失败于决策分歧；二是团队困于利益冲突。有效的创业团队管理要解决决策分歧和利益冲突的问题，而这有赖于创业团队找到适合的结构模式。创业团队管理的特殊之处 创业团队的管理不同于工作团队的管理。对于大多数企业内的工作团队来说，如研发团队、销售团队和项目团队等，因为人员和岗位稳定性相对较高，人们习惯性地将重点放在过程管理上，注重通过建设沟通机制、决策机制、互动机制和激励机制等发挥集体智慧，实现优势互补，提升绩效。     

IT项目管理中的团队建设

IT项目管理中的团队建设是项目管理活动能否顺利开展的重要基础.在国际竞争日趋激烈及经济全球化的环境下,怎样提高IT项目管理中团队建设的实效性、科学性、全面性,是摆在广大实践工作者和理论工作者前面的一个比较新的课题.本文系统的对IT项目管理团队建设存在的问题进行探讨,旨在提出IT项目管理团队建设的基本对策和思路.     

SJ公司溯源防窜系统项目管理及质量控制

有效的项目管理是提高项目质量的关键。全文首先阐述了项目管理及一般方法,然后以SJ溯源防窜项目为例,从团队建设、成本控制以及进度管理三个方面分析了项目管理理论在实践中的应用。     

论建筑施工企业项目团队文化建设——以四川公路桥梁建设集团有限公司大桥分公司为例

项目团队,是建筑施工企业项目管理活动的实施主体,当前,建筑施工企业在项目管理和团队建设方面,还存在诸多问题.特别是大中型建筑施工企业,陈旧管理模式已严重阻碍项目优质团队的打造和经营绩效的实现.本文主要对建筑施工企业项目管理和团队文化建设进行了探讨.     

校区改扩建项目代建管理研究——以东南大学无锡国际校区项目为例

项目代建管理方作为项目建设的牵头方，是项目建设的核心，也是项目建设的主要责任主体。由于每个建设项目的目标、体量、造价、功能性质不同，根据每个项目特点，要在项目建设的前期和实施过程中制定不同的项目建设思路和项目建设方案，做好项目代建管理。这既考验项目建设团队的专业能力水平，也是项目建设成功与否的关键。     

Project success and project team management: Evidence from capital projects in the process industries

Efficient project execution is a key business objective in many domains and particularly so for capital projects in the process industries, but existing project management research gives little direction about how project team factors influence three important capital project outcomes: cost, schedule, and operability. After an extensive cross-disciplinary review of the general team and project management literatures, we constructed and tested a theoretically based, five-dimensional model of organizational context, project team design, project team leadership, project team processes, and project outcome factors. We examined the model by means of an empirical study of 56 newly completed capital projects executed by 15 Fortune 500 companies in the process industries. The results indicate the value of disaggregating project outcomes for research purposes. Different bundles of project team factors were found to drive project cost, schedule, and operability. Project team efficacy, cross-functional project teams, autonomous project team structure, and virtual office usage were the strongest predictors of project cost effectiveness. Continuity of project leadership, cross-functional project teams, and project manager incentives were the strongest predictors of project construction schedule. In contrast, clear project goals and an office design to facilitate effective communication were the main predictors of plant operability. Implications of these findings for researchers and project practitioners are discussed. One major practical implication of our findings is that project managers need to clearly focus and prioritize their goals for each project so they can adopt the appropriate bundles of project team practices that will facilitate their goal achievement.     

建筑工程质量事故的原因分析及其对策

建筑工程中的质量问题一直困扰建筑施工团队。因此,基于建筑工程质量事故的原因,对症下药,探讨出应对工程质量问题的有效对策势在必行。     

Team leader experience in improvement teams: A social networks perspective

In this research, we disentangle the relationship between several key aspects of a team leader's experience and the likelihood of improvement project success. Using the lens of socio-technical systems, we argue that the effect of team leader experience derives from the social system as well as the technical system. The aspects of team leader experience we examine include team leader social capital (a part of the social system) and team leader experience leading projects of the same type (a part of the technical system).We examine four different, yet related, dimensions of a team leader's social capital, which we motivate based on the social networks literature. One dimension, team leader familiarity, suggests that social capital is created when team leaders have experience working with current team members on prior improvement projects, and that such social capital increases the likelihood of improvement project success. We develop three additional dimensions, using social network analysis (SNA), to capture the idea that the improvement team leader's social capital extends beyond the current team to include everyone the leader has previously worked with on improvement projects. Contrasting our SNA-based dimensions with team leader familiarity enables us to better understand the impact of a team leader's social capital both inside and beyond the team. We also examine the effect of a team leader's experience leading prior projects of the same type, and consider the extent to which organizational experience may moderate the impact of both team leader social capital and same-type project experience.Based on analysis of archival data of six sigma projects spanning six years from a Fortune 500 consumer products manufacturer, we find that two of our SNA-based dimensions of team leader social capital, as well as experience leading projects of the same type, increase the likelihood of project success. In addition, we show that organizational experience moderates the relationship between team leader same-type project experience and project success. However, this is not the case for the relationship between the dimensions of team leader social capital and project success. These results provide insights regarding how dimensions of team leader experience and organizational experience collectively impact the operational performance of improvement teams.     

价值团队在环境工程项目中的组织设计研究

价值工程是一种研究如何以最低寿命周期成本实现产品或工程项目基本功能的方法。论文探讨了环境工程价值团队的组织形式、团队成员的选择和组成等组织设计问题,以助于价值工程在环境工程项目中有效地运行。     

Autonomy and teamwork in innovative projects

The use of teams that incorporate autonomy in their designs continues to be an important element of many organizations. However, prior research has emphasized projects with mostly routine tasks and has assumed that autonomy resides primarily with a team leader. We investigate how two aspects of team autonomy are related to teamwork quality, a multifaceted indicator of team collaboration (Hoegl & Gemuenden, 2001). Specifically, we hypothesize that team‐external influence over operational project decisions is negatively related to teamwork quality, while team‐internal equality of influence over project decisions is positively related to teamwork quality. Testing our hypotheses on responses from 430 team members and team leaders pertaining to 145 software development teams, results support both predictions. Acknowledging the possible benefits of certain types of external influence (e.g., constructive feedback), the findings demonstrate that team‐external managers of innovative projects should generally refrain from interfering in team‐internal operational decisions. Likewise, the study shows that all team members should share decision authority, recognizing that their contributions to team discussion and decision making may well differ given differences in experience and expertise. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

论海外业务项目管理

由于受跨地域性等因素影响,要在海外开展项目开发并取得较好的经济效益,必须有优秀的项目管理团队及科学、有效的管理方式。文章从管理团队、项目前期考察、管理方式选择等方面阐述如何做好海外业务项目管理工作,为企业做好海外项目管理,拓展海外市场提供了参考。     

合作项目内部风险的研究

在中国实施合作项目面临着高度不确定的环境和项目的内、外风险。项目的内部风险主要来自项目的参与各方 ,项目组可以通过有效措施来降低它的发生概率。本文针对中国经济过渡时期的特点 ,建议了一套适合项目内部风险评估的方法 ,推荐了某些评估风险事件的相关图表 ,为实施中国合作项目的风险管理提供依据和参考     

A multicriteria decision framework for governance of PPP projects towards sustainable development

The lack of a suitable decision framework for the governance of public-private partnership (PPP) projects in Africa, especially Ghana, is a major setback to project success, retarding sustainable development. This study develops a hierarchical decision framework for prioritizing project governance factors and their relationships using the Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method. We employ 30 experts to evaluate two main PPP governance factors and eleven subfactors. We found that contractual governance factors of PPP are more prominent than noncontractual ones for sustainable PPP projects. However, noncontractual governance factors have the highest net effect on contractual factors. Again, policy diffusion is the contractual factor with the highest net effect, while best practice team norm is the noncontractual factor with the highest net effect. Additionally, effective risk allocation is the most prominent contractual subfactor of PPP, while effective communication of project information is the most prominent noncontractual governance factor. The results imply that PPP project managers should improve governance factors for the sustainable development of PPP projects in Africa. However, they should emphasize the prominent and high net effect governance factors but not wholly disregard the less prominent ones.     

项目管理成熟度模型在制造企业中的运用

目前,项目管理这门优化的管理技术已运用到了制造企业的组织运营中。而项目管理成熟度模型作为对项目管理能力的有效评估工具,有必要在制造企业的项目管理中得到推广和运用。本文通过介绍项目管理成熟度模型的概念和等级,从制造企业的角度,阐述了在制造企业中应用项目管理成熟度模型的必要性,并简要提出了项目管理成熟度模型在制造企业项目管理中的应用步骤。     

How Project Manager–Project Owner Interaction Can Work Within and Influence Project Risk Management

Inherent interest conflicts between a project management team and project owner are often neglected in project risk management. Risk management by the project management team basically focuses on project short‐term survival, or project success toward handover to the customer, while for the project owner, strategic success should be more important. To see how this takes place in and influences real projects, seven large projects were studied, and interaction in project risk management between the project owners and project management team was examined for each project. The study revealed that the main focus in the studied projects was on operational risks, even within the project owner's set of high‐priority risks.