城市基础设施投融资研究综述及对农村的启示

城市基础设施投融资体制改革无论从理论上还是实践上都取得了一定的成功经验,这对农村基础设施投融资改革有重要的指导作用。农村应结合自身实际情况,通过制度创新、政策创新、投融资模式创新和政府管理创新推进自身基础设施投融资改革。     

城市大型公共基础设施项目的融资问题

随着我国经济的蓬勃发展,对公共基础设施的需求也呈现高速增长。但是,国家的基建资金有限,单纯的国家财政投入显然不能满足需求增长。而公共财政的改革又使建设资金更趋紧张。对于较大规模的基建工程,因关系重大仍采用单纯的财政投入加银行贷款。其实,从经济学和公共财政角度上看,多元投资主体介入是必要的和必然的。     

基础设施性质与基础设施项目投融资模式关系研究

文章首先整理基础设施概念及内涵,接着在基础设施项目的国民经济评价、财务评价、社会评价及环境影响评价的基础上,综合分析了基础设施项目经营性与公共性的程度.然后,就具体项目融资模式进行基本介绍,具体分析了各种投融资模式的性质特点.最后得出项目投融资模式与基础设施项目经营性与公共性的程度的对应关系,此关系模型为政府基础设施投融资决策提供了直观的理论参考意义.     

论我国公用港口基础设施投融资体制的构建

文章从我国港口基础设施的分类入手,着眼于我国公用港口基础设施的投融资问题,从当前我国公用港口基础设施的投融资主体和投融资方式两个角度分析了我国公用港口基础设施投融资体制的现状,指出了其所存在的主要问题,并借鉴国外港口基础设施投融资体制的成功经验提出了解决这些问题的具体建议。     

What India Can Learn from China and Vice Versa

A partial convergence of the Indian and Chinese growth models is likely. Judging from China's experience, sustaining India's impressive economic performance of recent years will require a significant further opening of its economy (externally and internally), higher savings and investments, especially in physical infrastructure and social services, and stronger labor absorption in the modern sectors. The base of India's current economic boom - software, IT-related services and high-end manufacturing - is narrow compared to China's. Poor performance in agriculture is responsible for still significant poverty in many parts of rural India. Bilateral India-China ties, including trade and investment, are increasing rapidly and could help to bring about the structural economic changes India needs. Through its exports to China, India is becoming linked to global supply chains centered on China. The notion that India-China relations are, or are bound to become, fundamentally antagonistic, held by many in the USA, is mistaken and potentially dangerous.     

国外基础设施投融资体制改革研究

进入20世纪80年代以来,全球大多数国家都在积极探索和推进基础设施的投融资体制改革,各国的实践充分证明,这是一次投融资能力扩张与效率增进的历史性变革。其中有很多成功做法和宝贵经验值得我们学习和借鉴。文章将对国外基础设施投融资体制改革的动因、改革历程、主要做法及经验等进行全面系统的梳理和总结,希望通过这种研究能对我国当前市场经济条件下城市基础设施投融资体制改革有所启迪和借鉴。     

提高我国基础设施项目投融资风险管理的对策

文章针对我国基础设施建设投融资在体制与机制和项目融资风险管理中存在的问题,提出了提高我国基础设施建设融资项目风险管理的具体措施.     

日本土地区画整理融资立法以及对中国的启示

中国建设用地整理融资滞后制约了建设用地整理的整体效益与规模,相关立法是规范、保障建设用地融资的基本要件。日本土地区画整理融资立法在规范体例、融资组织结构确立和融资模式设定上的经验,可为中国建设用地整理融资立法予以借鉴。应健全相关立法体系,确立符合国情的多元复合型建设用地整理融资结构,完善建设用地整理融资机构的职能。     

中印经济之比较(英文)

The rapidly unfolding success stories of China and India are perhaps the best things tohave happened in the development realm over the last half a century or so. Otherwise, thepost-war development literature had, for most of the time, to talk only about the little Asiantigers while China and India provided attractive sites for dissertations on poverty.The fact that these two new stars of the developing world are neighbors adds to theinterest. It is hard to avoid a comparison between the two.…     

基础设施投融资运作模式：由政策性国企生发

组建国有政策性投融资企业作为基础设施建设的投融资主体,是目前各地在基础设施投融资的市场化改革进程中普遍采用的模式。该模式在运行过程中面临制度性缺陷和行为能力不足等障碍。应采取落实主体地位、决策过程前移、市场化拓展、项目投资合理退出等措施加以完善。     

城市基础设施建设投融资模式创新的基本思路

在国家宏观经济调控的条件下,城市基础设施投融资模式创新显得尤为重要。本文从政府融资平台的视角,对后金融危机时代城市基础设施投融资模式进行探讨,认为通过基础设施融资租赁、产权权益证券化、股权转让来盘活存量基础设施的融资模式;通过土地融资、发行中票和短期融资券、PPP或FPI等运营方式,以及发行产业基金、吸引保险资金等融资模式相结合的策略,对于加快城市基础设施建设具有较强的推动作用。     

中印城市化比较研究

通过中印城市化基础、城市化动力、城市化演进以及城市化进程中政府作用四个方面的比较,结合国际经验,在现有数据基础上对比分析两国城市化过程中的异同点,提出中印两国可以相互借鉴城市化经验、取长补短走出一条更为合理的城市化之路的政策建议。     

Analyzing the Dynamic Relationships between Physical Infrastructure,Financial Development and Economic Growth in India

This paper investigates the dynamic relationships between physical infrastructure, financial development and economic growth in the case of India, using the autoregressive distributed lag and the Toda–Yamamoto causality approach for the period 1980 to 2016. A physical infrastructure index and a financial development index are constructed using the principal component analysis. The empirical results suggest that physical infrastructure has a positive effect on economic growth both in the long run and short run, whereas financial development, although significant, has a weak impact on economic growth. The causality test supports a bidirectional causal relationship between infrastructure development and economic growth, while it finds unidirectional causation running from economic growth to financial development. As India is aiming for higher growth for a sustained period, our results suggest that there is a need for government intervention in expanding the physical infrastructure and this, in turn, could lead to economic growth as well as financial sector development.     

论中国与印度的经济合作

中印两国同为发展中大国,两国加强经济合作具有重要意义。近年来,中印经济合作取得了显著的成就,但仍存在一些问题与不足。中印两国应当继续保持高层互访,加强民间交流,推动贸易多样化,扩大双边贸易额,加强经贸协作的制度化建设,在可持续发展方面开展合作与交流,使双边经济合作进一步深入发展。     

中国光伏产业投融资研究进展

从投融资视角,对我国光伏产业投融资问题及其背后的原因进行总结,发现中国光伏产业投融资主要存在产业链部分环节融资富余或缺乏、投融资工具单一且市场集中、项目融资模式创新难以进入光伏领域等问题。在此基础上,归纳出解决中国光伏产业投融资问题在政策优化和融资创新两个方面的对策。最后,展望了中国光伏产业投融资领域的研究方向,需要从全产业链角度,研究光伏产业融资创新产品绩效、产业链投融资政策优化和协同。     

基础设施产业基金的可行性及运作模式探析

城镇化进程加快,使基础设施需求巨大,与此同时,法规日趋完善、投资理性日益增强,且社会资金充裕,这些都为设立基础设施产业基金提供了良好外部环境和基础。设立基础设施产业基金一方面可解决部分财政资金压力．同时对降低系统性金融风险、促进理性投资具有积极意义。此类基金运作涵盖“募、投、管、退”全过程,应加强收益结构设计、策略选择、风险控制、增值服务、退出模式安排。差异化、专业化、强化投后管理将是基础设施产业基金的发展方向。     

中印投资环境比较研究及前景展望

本文分别从客观市场环境和政府营造环境两方面比较了中印现阶段的投资环境并对两国未来投资环境改进提出了具体建议。现阶段两国投资环境各有优劣,未来谁的投资环境更好取决于谁能更快更好地改革自己的不足。     

Trade Specialization in Latin America: The Impact of China and India

This paper examines the extent to which the growth of China and India in world markets is affecting the patterns of trade specialization in Latin American (LA) economies. We construct a measure of Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) by 3-digit ISIC sector, country, and year. This RCA accounts for both imports and exports. The empirical analyses explore the correlation between the RCAs of LA and the two Asian economies. Econometric estimates suggest that the specialization pattern of LA—with the exception of Mexico—has been moving in opposite direction to the trade specialization pattern of China and India. Labor-intensive sectors (both unskilled and skilled) probably have been negatively affected by the growing presence of China and India in world markets, while natural resource and scientific knowledge intensive sectors have probably benefited from China and India’s growth since 1990. JEL no.  F10, F14