共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
2.
4.
据港府近日公布的统计数据显示,今年第一季度香港经济仅增长0.4%,呈进一步放慢的迹象,是两年半以来表现最差的一个季度。港府发言人表示,香港外围经济环境严峻,特别是欧债危机尚未解决,令香港出口表现疲弱。港府统计,第一季度香港整体出口下跌超过5%。虽然内部需求维持强劲,尤其是私人消费上升5.6%,但未能抵消出口转差的影响。 相似文献
5.
6.
消除经济过热,把我国过高的经济增长速度降为较适当水平(十三届五国全会进一步明确为5%到6%),是我国“治理整顿”的一项重要目标。然而,如何进行速度调整,却是我们目前所面临的一大难题。对此,笔者拟对日本的成功经验作一简单介绍,以求对我们有所借鉴。 相似文献
7.
8.
中共十七大报告一改以前投资、消费、出口的排列顺序而为消费、投资、出口,消费排到了第一位,消费将成为拉动我国经济增长的首驾“马车”。这是转变我国经济发展方式的重要举措之一.体现了以人为本的科学发展观,因此,我们一定要在实际工作中推动消费从疲软走向强劲,真正发挥首驾“马车”拉动经济增长的强大作用。 相似文献
9.
作为拉动经济的"三驾马车"之一,"消费"在我国经济复苏的过程中一直相对滞后。仅靠投资"单腿独行",消费和出口原地踏步甚至倒退,使得经济复苏的质量明显不高。 相似文献
10.
11.
12.
中国隐含能出口的就业效应分析 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
进出口贸易伴随着物质和能量的流动。随着中国出口规模的不断上升,隐含能出口给中国带来的能源环境影响日益受到重视。大量能源的隐性出口是否为我国带来了合理的利益是评价隐含能出口是否值得的关键。本文利用投入产出技术分析了1997年、2002年以及2007年中国隐含能出口的就业效应,结果发现中国隐含能出口的就业效应随时间下降,从而揭示了在现有的发展模式下,我国出口贸易对就业增加的贡献在不断弱化,而加剧我国能源环境压力的作用却越来越明显。 相似文献
13.
中国蔬菜出口日本的增长效应分析 总被引:7,自引:0,他引:7
本文采用恒定市场份额分析方法对十几年来中国向日本出口蔬菜的数据进行实证分析,发现竞争力是中国向日本出口蔬菜持续增长的主要影响因素,但是近几年竞争效应在逐渐减弱。进口国的需求效应对出口的增长也有较大作用,应根据进口市场的需求状况安排出口产品结构。结构效应由对出口的阻碍作用逐渐转变为促进作用,但是作用很小。 相似文献
14.
15.
Leonid V. Azarnert 《Open Economies Review》2014,25(4):797-807
This article presents a Ricardian model of trade with learning-by-doing to study the effect of barriers to trade in products with low growth potential on the long-run economic growth. The model shows that, when elasticity of demand for the product with a lower learning potential is lower than unitary, a reduction in the tariff imposed on this product, may shift the demand toward the product with a higher learning potential, thus enhancing economic growth in the exporter economy. Therefore, the current trend of reduction in tariffs on agricultural exports not only generates a positive welfare effect in the short run, but may similarly be beneficial for developing economies in the long run, since it also increases their incentive to develop sectors with higher growth potential. 相似文献
16.
This paper examines the relationship between exports, foreign direct investment, and firm productivity. Using longitudinal
panel data on Japanese firms, it is found that the most productive firms engage in exports and foreign direct investment,
medium productive firms engage in either exports or foreign direct investment, and the least productive firms focus only on
the domestic market. Moreover, exports and foreign direct investment appear to improve firm productivity once the productivity
convergence effect is controlled for. Firms that retain a presence in foreign markets, either by exports or foreign direct
investment, show the highest productivity growth, which contributes to improvements in national productivity.
JEL no. F10, F20, D21 相似文献
17.
18.
19.
Alka Chadha 《World development》2009,37(9):1478-1483
This paper studies the product cycle and neo-technology theories of trade in the context of generic pharmaceuticals. It analyzes the export performance of 131 Indian pharmaceutical firms for the period 1989–2004. The results indicate that technology proxied by foreign patent rights has a positive impact on exports. This suggests that developing countries with innovation skills for process innovations are capable of penetrating international markets in the later stages of the product cycle by using patents, which were the barriers to trade in the early stages of the product cycle. 相似文献
20.
Exports,Product Differentiation and Knowledge Spillovers 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Empirical studies on aggregate export behavior have recently emphasized the role played by innovation as the main force driving
product differentiation and competitiveness for developed countries. These studies treat foreign innovation as a variable
that affects negatively national export shares. We incorporate the impact of foreign innovation in a standard new trade theory
model and find that, if knowledge spillovers exist, foreign knowledge accumulation could even have a positive effect on national
exports. We then test the model using aggregate export data for a set of 21 OECD economies and find that the foreign stock
of knowledge affects exports positively for the less advanced countries in the sample and negatively for the G7 economies.
JEL Classification Numbers: F12, O31, C22, C23 相似文献