Asymptotic distribution of the sup-Wald statistic under specification errors

Consider a simple structural break model where y_t=α₁+β₁f(x_t)+u_t for t≤k₀ and y_t=α₂+β₂f(x_t)+u_t for t>k₀. The timing of break and the structural parameters are unknown. Suppose the true functional form of the regressor f(·) is misspecified as g(·). We do not place too many restrictions on the functional forms of f(·) and g(·). A frequently encountered example in economics is that the true model is measured in level, but we estimate a log-linear model, i.e. when f(x_t)=x_t and g(x_t)=log(x_t) For any f(·) and g(·), we derive a nonstandard limiting null distribution of the sup-Wald test statistic under some very general regularity conditions. Monte Carlo simulations support our findings.     

A characterization of quasi-concave functions

This paper provides a simple and short proof that the following two properties are equivalent under ▽f(x) ≠ 0: (A) ▽f(x) h = 0 implies h^T▽²f(x) h ? 0 for any x; (B) f(x¹) ? f(x⁰) implies f(tx¹ + (1?t)x⁰) ?f(x⁰) for 0? t ? 1.     

Transitive measurable utility

This paper continues a study of theories of preferences under risk that do not use the independence axiom of the von Neumann-Morgenstern theory. Unlike its predecessor, it assumes that preferences are transitive. The effects of transitivity are noted in two representations of preferences. The first, which also uses continuity and dominance axioms, involves a function u on a set P of probability measures for which u(p) > u(q) if and only if p is preferred to q. Although u might be nonlinear, it has other features of a von Neumann-Morgenstern linear utility function. The second representation has linear functions u and w on P, with w strictly positive except perhaps at preference-extreme measures—where it might vanish, such that u(p) w(q) > u(q) w(p) if and only if p is preferred to q. A symmetry axiom along with the axioms for the first representation are necessary and sufficient for the second representation.     

A new test for D-stability

A sufficient condition for D-stability of an n × n matrix A is the existence of a positive diagonal matrix P such that PA + A′P is negative definite. The search for P is replaced by solving a convex minimization problem.     

Min, Max, and Sum

This paper provides characterization theorems for preferences that can be represented by U(x₁, …, x_n)=min{x_k}, U(x₁, …, x_n)=max{x_k}, U(x₁, …, x_n)=∑ u(x_k), or combinations of these functionals. The main assumption is partial separability, where changing a common component of two vectors does not reverse strict preferences, but may turn strict preferences into indifference. We discuss applications of our results to social choice. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Numbers: C0, D1, D6.     

Saddle points of Hamiltonian systems in convex Lagrange problems having a nonzero discount rate

Problems are studied in which an integral of the form ∫₀^+∞L(k(t),k(t))e^?ptdt is minimized over a class of arcs k: [0, +∞) → Rⁿ. It is assumed that L is a convex function on Rⁿ × Rⁿ and that the discount rate ? is positive. Optimality conditions are expressed in terms of a perturbed Hamiltonian differential system involving a Hamiltonian function H(k, q) which is concave in k and convex in q, but not necessarily differentiable. Conditions are given ensuring that, for ? sufficiently small, the system has a stationary point, in a neighborhood of which one has classical “saddle point” behavior. The optimal arcs of interest then correspond to the solutions of the system which tend to the stationary point as t → +∞. These results are motivated by questions in theoretical economics and extend previous work of the author for the case ? = 0. The case ? < 0 is also covered in part.     

Majority committees

Suppose an m-member committee is to be selected by a set of voters from a set X of M > m nominees. If A is an m-member committee, and if as many voters prefer A to B as prefer B to A for every other committee B of m nominees, then A is a majority committee of size m. Although the existence of majority nominees (m = 1) has been extensively analyzed, little attention has been given to conditions that imply the existence of majority committees of size m ? 2. Known restrictions on voters' preferences on X that guarntee the existence of a majority nominee could be applied directly to voters' preferences on m-member committees. However, this definitional exercise lacks intuitive appeal, and a different approach is taken in this paper. The paper presumes that profiles of voters' preferences on X are either dichotomous or single peaked. Both cases ensure the existence of a majority nominee. Independence-monotonicity assumptions are then used to connect voters' preferences on X to their preferences on committees of equal size. Although these assumptions guarantee the existence of majority committees when m = 1 and when m = M ? 1, they do not generally do so when 1 < m < M ? 1. The latter observation motivates additional restrictions on profiles. In the dichotomous case, we consider profiles in which all voters have the same number k of nominees in their preferred subsets, and show that this restriction guarantees the existence of a majority committee of size m for 1 < m < M ? 1 only when k = 1 or k = M ? 1. In the single-peaked case, we consider profiles in which all voters have the same most-preferred (peak) nominee, and prove that this guarantees the existence of a majority committee of size m for every m between 1 and M ? 1.     

On relationships between numerical representations of interval orders and semiorders

The extent to which continuous numerical representations of interval orders are unique is considered. Apair of continuous, real-valued functions, <u, v>, represents an interval order, <X, >>, provided that for x, y ϵ X, x > y if and only if u(x) > v(y). Relationships which necessarily hold between any two such numerical representations are presented and a method by which one continuous representation can be derived from another is described. Similar considerations are made for special forms of continuous numerical representations of semiorders.     

On the investment implications of bankruptcy laws

Axiomatic analysis of bankruptcy problems reveals three major principles: (i) proportionality (PRO), (ii) equal awards (EA), and (iii) equal losses (EL). However, most real life bankruptcy procedures implement only the proportionality principle. We construct a noncooperative investment game to explore whether the explanation lies in the alternative implications of these principles on investment behavior. Our results are as follows (i) EL always induces higher total investment than PRO which in turn induces higher total investment than EA; (ii) PRO always induces higher egalitarian social welfare than both EA and EL in interior equilibria; (iii) PRO induces higher utilitarian social welfare than EL in interior equilibria but its relation to EA depends on the parameter values (however, a numerical analysis shows that on a large part of the parameter space, PRO induces higher utilitarian social welfare than EA).     

A progress report on Kelly's majority conjectures

LetC(m, n) be the proportion of n-voter profiles on m alternatives that have a majority winner. Jerry Kelly conjectured that C(m, n) > C(m + 1, n) for m ? 3 and n = 3 and n ? 5, and C(m, n) > C(m, n + 2) for m ? 3 and n ? 3. We prove these for special cases.     

Cheap talk in games with incomplete information

The paper studies Bayesian games which are extended by adding pre-play communication. Let Γ be a Bayesian game with full support and with three or more players. The main result is that if players can send private messages to each other and make public announcements then every communication equilibrium outcome, q, that is rational (i.e., involves probabilities that are rational numbers) can be implemented in a sequential equilibrium of a cheap talk extension of Γ, provided that the following condition is satisfied: There exists a Bayesian Nash equilibrium s in Γ such that for each type t_i of each player i the expected payoff of t_i in q is larger than the expected payoff of t_i in s.     

How to gamble against all odds

We compare the power of betting strategies (aka martingales) whose wagers take values in different sets of reals. A martingale whose wagers take values in a set A is called an A-martingale. A set of reals B anticipates a set A, if for every A-martingale there is a countable set of B-martingales, such that on every binary sequence on which the A-martingale gains an infinite amount at least one of the B-martingales gains an infinite amount, too.We show that for two important classes of pairs of sets A and B, B anticipates A if and only if the closure of B contains rA, for some positive r. One class is when A is bounded and B is bounded away from zero; the other class is when B is well ordered. Our results generalize several recent results in algorithmic randomness and answer a question posed by Chalcraft et al. (2012).     

A recursion relation for the probability of the paradox of voting

For alternatives x_i, i = 1,…, m, giving rise to m! linear preference orderings of which one is selected independently by each of N voters, a recursion relation is developed which expresses the probability that x_i is the Condorcet winner when there are N voters in terms of the probability of this event when there are N ? 1 voters. Hence the probabilities of the paradox of voting when N is odd, and of Condorcet indecision when N is even may be obtained. The relationship holds for any set of probabilities, or culture, governing the selection of the preference orderings by the voters.     

Budget preferences and direct utility

This paper extends a result of Sakai, who presented conditions for indirect preferences from which a utility function can be deduced if demand is single valued. It will be shown that—adding a “partial Lipschitz condition”—Sakai's theorem can be extended to multi-valued demand. Our result follows from the extension of a theorem of Hurwicz and Richter, who have shown that, under certain hypotheses on demand correspondences, an upper semicontinuous utility function f exists, so that the set of utility maximal elements μ_f(B) is contained in the choice set h(B) for every budget B. By our partial Lipschitz condition h(B) ?- μ_f(B) also follows.     

Monotonicity of bargaining solutions with respect to the disagreement point

We investigate whether the best known solutions to the bargaining problem respond appropriately to certain changes in the disagreement point d, for a fixed feasible set. If d_i increases, while for each j ≠ i, d_j remains constant, then these solutions recommend an increase in agent i's payoff, in agreement with intuition. However, the stronger requirement that agent i be the only one to gain is not generally met.     

Justifiable preferences

We characterize preferences over acts that can be represented by a utility function and a multiple-prior, such that an act f is preferred to act g if there is a prior under which the expected utility induced by f is higher than that induced by g. These preferences are referred to as justifiable preferences. We further introduce a generalized model of ambiguity that involves a collection of multiple-priors, namely, multiple multiple-priors and incorporate Bewley?s Knightian model in justifiability: f is preferred to g if, according to at least one set of priors, f is unanimously preferred to g.     

A note on the fundamental theorem of exact aggregation

If individual i's demands for a commodity are a function of prices, p, income M_i and a vector of attributes A_i, then aggregate demand is

This paper derives the necessary and sufficient conditions of f_i, F and a system of functions g_k(M₁,…,M_N,A₁,…,A_N) symmetric in the M's and A's such that F can be written in the form F(p, g, (M₁,…,M_n,A₁,…,A_N),…, g_n(M₁,…,M_n,A₁,… ,A_n)) for all values of its arguments.     

Recursive preferences and balanced growth

We study a class of utility functions that are defined recursively by an aggregator W(x,y) where u_t=W(c_t,u_t+1). In single-agent economies it is known that a sufficient condition for the existence of a balanced growth path is that utility should be homogenous of degree γ. In the context of a multi-agent economy we show that this restriction implies that either a balanced growth equilibrium fails to exist or all agents have the same constant discount factor. We suggest a generalization of recursive preferences wherein the intertemporal utility function is time dependent. Within this class we establish that there may exist a balanced growth equilibrium even if agents are different.     

Numerical representation of intransitive preferences on a countable set

Let > be a preference relation on a countable set X. We prove that if > is acyclic (that is, has irreflexive transitive closure), then there exists a mapping u of X into $\text{R}$ such that x > y entails u(x)>u(y). We also give a simple proof of a representation theorem of Fishburn when > is an interval order.     

Bayes prediction density and regression estimation — A semiparametric approach

This paper is concerned with the Bayes estimation of an arbitrary multivariate density,f(x), x ? R ^k. Such anf(x) may be represented as a mixture of a given parametric family of densities {h (x¦θ)} with support inR ^k, whereθ (inR ^d) is chosen according to a mixing distributionG. We consider the semiparametric Bayes approach in whichG, in turn, is chosen according to a Dirichlet process prior with given parameterα. We then specialize these results whenf is expressed as a mixture of multivariate normal densitiesΦ (x¦Μ, λ) whereΜ is the mean vector and λ is the precision matrix. The results are finally applied to estimating a regression parameter.