研发团队关系冲突对组织公民行为的影响研究——基于领导信任的视角

本研究基于研发团队内部领导与下属之间以及同事之间的二元关系冲突,构建企业研发团队的关系冲突对团队组织公民行为的影响机制模型。研究发现,在研发团队内部,研发团队的关系冲突对团队组织公民行为有着负向效应;领导信任对团队组织公民行为有着正向预测作用;领导信任在研发团队领导与团队成员的关系冲突与组织公民行为之间具有中介作用,而在研发团队内部同事之间的关系冲突与组织公民行为的关系之间起着调节变量的作用。     

团队精神型领导与研发团队创新行为的关系——团队自省性和团队外部社会资本的影响

研发团队创新行为对企业获取竞争优势至关重要。以往研究相对忽略了精神性因素对团队创新行为的动力机制。文章借鉴创新成分理论和创造力系统理论,聚焦于精神性因素对团队创新行为的动力机制以及团队外部社会资本的调节效应。通过对106个研发团队329名研发团队成员数据的统计分析表明：团队精神型领导对团队创新行为具有显著正向影响;团队自省性在团队精神型领导和团队创新行为之间具有部分中介作用;团队外部社会资本调节了团队精神型领导对团队创新行为的正向影响,团队外部社会资本越高,团队精神型领导对团队创新行为的正向影响也越强,反之越弱。团队外部社会资本还调节了团队自省性在团队精神型领导和团队创新行为之间的中介效应,团队外部社会资本越高,团队精神型领导通过团队自省性的中介进而对团队创新行为的影响也越强,反之越弱。研究结论拓展了中国组织情景下精神型领导在团队层次的影响效应研究,也拓展了团队创新行为的精神性动力因素及其动力机制的实证研究。     

企业团队绩效考核与知识共享行为研究

本文以绩效考核分配公平感和团队氛围为中介变量,采用216份科技型企业调查问卷为样本数据,研究了企业团队绩效考核对知识共享行为的影响。实证分析结果表明:团队绩效考核对知识共享行为有显著的正向影响;绩效考核分配公平感在团队绩效考核与知识共享行为间起部分的中介作用;团队氛围在团队绩效考核与知识共享行为间起部分的中介作用。得到的管理启示是:团队成员的岗位不同,考核的标准应不同;科学合理的考核制度和分配制度能提升员工的工作满意度;良好的团队氛围能促进知识共享行为的产生;形成良好的知识共享氛围有助于提高员工的共享意识。     

员工道德认同与任务绩效：基于人际交换关系视角

区别于道德决策理论对道德认同影响个体行为的解释,本研究基于人际交换关系视角,探究领导-部属交换和团队-同事交换在道德认同影响任务绩效过程中的中介作用,并考察员工自我效能在以上关系中的调节作用。通过对343名企业员工开展两轮问卷调查,统计分析结果表明：（1）领导部属交换和团队-同事交换在道德认同与任务绩效之间起部分中介作用;（2）自我效能显著调节了领导-部属交换/团队-同事交换与任务绩效的关系;（3）自我效能显著调节了领导-部属交换/团队-同事交换在道德认同与任务绩效之间的中介作用。     

任务紧迫情境下情绪感染、组织结构与团队情绪的关系研究

从项目团队参与创新行为的情绪感染过程与情绪状态出发,对任务紧迫性下组织结构要素与团队情绪的关系进行研究,结果发现:任务紧迫情境下团队成员之间的情绪感染会对团队情绪带来影响,而组织结构的不同维度会在情绪感染和团队情绪之间起到一定的调节作用。     

基于SHRP的小型团队公民行为塑造机制研究

以组织信任和组织支持感为双重中介,在中国情境下研究支持性人力资源实践(SHRP)对小型团队的公民行为培育机理。通过构建SHRP与小型团队公民行为之间的结构方程模型,探讨及检验组织信任和组织支持感在前两者间的中介作用。研究结论表明,知识型企业应重视保障就业安全;鼓励知识共享的跨边界绩效管理;同时倡导小团队领导者的公民行为示范。     

任务自主性如何促进员工前摄行为? ——一个被调节的中介效应模型

工作场所中的员工前摄行为研究已经成为组织行为学领域的研究热点.本文探讨任务自主性、 超角色自我效能与支持性组织氛围影响员工前摄行为的作用机制,通过层级回归与bootstrap分析,研究结果发现:超角色自我效能在任务自主性与员工前摄行为之间具有部分中介作用.支持性组织氛围对超角色自我效能的中介作用具有调节效应,超角色自我效能对员工前摄行为的影响随着支持性组织氛围的增加而增加.     

冲突管理倾向对团队成员交换的影响-以人际信任为中介变量

本文通过对311个实际样本的调查,研究了合作性和竞争性冲突管理倾向对团队成员交换的影响,识别人际信任对冲突管理倾向和团队成员交换之间的中介作用。研究结果表明,合作性冲突管理倾向可以正向预测团队成员交换,竞争性冲突管理倾向可以负向预测团队成员交换,人际信任对冲突管理倾向和团队成员交换之间的关系起到完全中介作用。     

组织公民行为与企业团队凝聚力

凝聚力是现代企业组织生命力的重要组成部分,是组织基本行为保证的标志。凝聚力的强弱对组织的效率、执行力、长远发展以及团队成员的成长和发展都会产生重要影响。而组织公民行为是指企业团队成员所表现出来的,非正式的但对企业组织有积极影响的行为。因此,探讨分析组织公民行为对组织成员满意感及团队凝聚力影响具有重要的意义。     

组织公民行为与企业团队凝聚力

凝聚力是现代企业组织生命力的重要组成部分,是组织基本行为保证的标志。凝聚力的强弱对组织的效率、执行力、长远发展以及团队成员的成长和发展都会产生重要影响。而组织公民行为是指企业团队成员所表现出来的,非正式的但对企业组织有积极影响的行为。因此,探讨分析组织公民行为对组织成员满意感及团队凝聚力影响具有重要的意义。     

向上建言遭受同事消极对待：发生条件与机制研究

建言是促进组织发展的关键因素之一,然而组织中却能出现有员工向上建言被同事消极对待的现象。依据归因理论,文章构建了一个有调节的中介作用理论模型来分析这一现象。319名员工两时点问卷调查数据的分析结果很好地支持了该模型。研究发现:员工向上建言通过同事归因的中介作用间接正向影响该同事对自己的无礼行为,这种间接影响是否发生受到同事组织政治感的正向调节作用。具体而言,员工向上建言能被高政治感同事视为逢迎上司行为,并且这些同事会因为这种归因无礼对待建言员工。     

电子政务对预防行政腐败的优越性浅析

行政腐败是行政权力在运行中由于缺乏制约和监督而产生异化和失控的现象.随着信息技术不断发展而诞生的电子政务,为预防腐败提供了一种高科技的技术预防手段.通过这一手段的运用,可以强化对权力行使行为的监控、实现政务公开、推动政府体制、民主制度和组织机构的创新等形式,更能够制约权力、防止权力被滥用,从而有效遏止腐败,建设廉洁、高效的政府.     

Identifying emergence process of group panic buying behavior under the COVID-19 pandemic

The sudden COVID-19 caused frequent incidents of large-scale material panic buying, resulting in imbalance in supply and demand of goods and threatening social stability. It is of great significance to analyze the formation of group panic buying and help alleviate such action. This paper takes the panic buying phenomenon as the research target, quantifies the internal and external factors affecting individual buying behavior, restores the selection process of individual buying behavior, and constructs the emergence model of group panic buying behavior by using the idea of cluster dynamics. Through simulations, we find that: (1) The epidemic information intensity has a significant impact on the emergence of group rush buying behavior. (2) Government intervention plays a significant role in reducing the scale of group rush buying. Besides, the effects of intervention reach the best before people who do not participate in rush buying disappear. In addition, we also discuss the impact, limitations and future research directions.     

Sticks and Stones may Break Your Bones, but Words can Break Your Spirit: Bullying in the Workplace

Workplace bullying has a well-established body of research internationally, but the United States has lagged behind the rest of the world in the identification and investigation of this phenomenon. This paper presents a managerial perspective on bullying in organizations. The lack of attention to the concept of workplace dignity in American organizational structures has supported and even encouraged both casual and more severe forms of harassment that our workplace laws do not currently cover. The demoralization victims suffer can create toxic working environments and impair organizational productivity. Some methods of protecting your organization from this blight of bullying are proposed. Bullying has always been part of the human condition; history is rife with references to abuse of power and unnecessary or excessive force. The classic bully story is of Joseph and his brothers, a tale of envy and hostility. The refinement of bullying to include various forms of legally defined social harassment is a relatively late phenomenon, however, dating to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In the United States, bullying is not illegal, whereas it is illegal in many other countries. Bullying is not about benign teasing, nor does it include the off-color jokes, racial slurs, or unwelcome advances that are the hallmarks of legally defined harassment. Workplace bullying is the pattern of destructive and generally deliberate demeaning of co-workers or subordinates that reminds us of the activities of the schoolyard bully. Unlike the schoolyard bully, however, the workplace bully is an adult, usually (but not always) aware of the impact of his or her behavior on others. Bullying in the workplace, often tacitly accepted by the organizational leadership, can create an environment of psychological threat that diminishes corporate productivity and inhibits individual and group commitment. The two examples that follow will help to clarify the difference between harassment and bullying.     

Groups,responsibility, and risk taking in business organizations

Discussions of risk taking in the modern business organization frequently focus upon the behavior of individual moral agents. Here I attempt to identify some of the complexities of risk taking when it is a group phenomenon and to do so in such a way as to shed some light upon the ethics of group risk taking in business organizations. Gregory Mellema is Professor of Philosophy at Calvin College, where he has taught eleven years. He received his Ph.D. in Philosophy at the University of Massachusetts (Amherst) and subsequently has completed an M.B.A. at the University of Michigan. He is the author of the forthcoming book, Individuals, Groups, and Shared Moral Responsibility, and has published articles in over a dozen journals, including Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, American Philosophical Quarterly, Philosophia, and Philosophical Studies.     

企业组织创新趋势探析

知识经济时代,企业组织创新呈现新的发展趋势,即分立化、柔性化、集团化、网络化、扁平化和无边界化。当用市场手段组织生产的交易费用小于用层级制手段组织生产的交易费用时,企业组织就趋于分立化,分立化有横向分立和纵向分立两种形式;柔性化是企业具有参与国际竞争、对意外的变化不断反应以及适时根据可预期变化的意外结果进行调整的能力,与组织的可塑性密切相关;集团化是指竞争主体由单个企业转向企业集团,竞争则主要靠综合实力;网络化和扁平化是就组织结构而言,它减少了中间层次,缩短了信息和知识的传递过程,扩大了管理幅度;无边界化是部门间的边界模糊化,而使组织的整体功能得以提高。     

威权型领导是否会引发员工的越轨行为？来自心理契约违背和个体自尊的解释

较之此前的越轨行为，数字经济发展背景下的越轨行为呈现出与数据结合、损害更为严重的特点。基于情感事件理论，文章通过344份企业员工数据，探讨威权型领导对员工越轨行为的作用机制和边界条件，验证了心理契约违背的中介作用，以及个体自尊的调节作用。结果表明：个体自尊既可以调节威权型领导与员工心理契约违背之间的关系，也可以调节心理契约违背与员工越轨行为之间的关系。当个体自尊水平较高时，威权型领导对心理契约违背的正向影响增强，而心理契约违背对员工越轨行为的正向影响减弱。研究结果拓展了对威权型领导影响效应的认识，为理解威权型领导与员工越轨行为的关系提供了新的视角，推动了个体自尊动态研究的发展，并为企业实践提供参考。     

Changing an Organization's Culture Under New Leadership

Turning around and changing an organization's culture does not happen by chance. The purpose of this paper is to offer insights into what is needed for an organization to successfully transform itself from a culture and experience that does not support individual ethical behavior. The recent bond trading scandal at Salomon Brothers will be used to demonstrate that a successful ethical turnaround does not just happen spontaneously. In particular, we argue that new leadership, altering policies, structure, behavior, and beliefs are paramount to successfully change to an organizational culture that supports ethical behavior. Schein's five primary mechanisms available to leaders for embedding and reinforcing culture will be used to systematically analyze efforts to change Salomon Brothers' culture.     

组织支持感对组织公民行为影响的研究

组织支持感用于表示员工对组织是否重视和关注他们的幸福感的感受,组织公民行为是个人角色之外的有益于组织的利他行为,有助于员工的团队合作,发掘每个人的工作潜能,提高组织的生产力和管理效率。研究表明,员工越是感受到来自组织的支持,就越多地表现公民行为。通过提升组织支持感可以提高员工的组织公民行为,上级支持能够有效地提高组织支持感而促进组织公民行为的提高。如果管理者希望员工表现更多的组织公民行为,就应对员工提供更多的组织支持。     

A Longitudinal Analysis of Satisfaction with Group Work

Satisfaction with group work is an important and frequently studied phenomenon that often determines whether a new tool, technology, or method is successfully implemented in an organization. We report on a longitudinal study of small groups which used regression to model how satisfaction with the process, outcome, and group evolves over multiple sessions as a function of performance measures and prior satisfaction levels. The results indicated that current performance contributed less to satisfaction as the study proceeded and by the end of the study period satisfaction with the process and outcomes were determined almost exclusively by prior satisfaction levels. In general, the conclusions were dependent on the point in time at which the analysis was conducted and on the object of satisfaction under consideration. The results highlight the importance of longitudinal studies, rather than one-shot approaches, for understanding individual satisfaction with group work.