Topological upper limits of mixed Nash equilibria

Our purpose in this article is to prove that given any integer n ≥ 2 and any non-empty compact Polish spaces S ₁, ..., S _n , if for any u ∈ C( S ₁ × ... × S _n , R) ⁿ , we denote by MNE(u) the set of mixed Nash equilibria of (S ₁, ..., S _n , u), then MNE(u) is a non-empty compact subset of P(S ₁) × ... × P(S _n ) and if u ^k → u in C(S ₁ × ... × S _n , R) ⁿ as k → ∞, then lim sup _{k → ∞} MNE (u ^k ) MNE(u). The author would like to thank the referee for offering critical comments on this paper.     

Remarks on the application of statistical games to technological development forecasting

This work presents the probability of determining a quantitative forecast of technological development S(t) defined by a set m of parameters S⁽¹⁾(t),S⁽²⁾(t),…,S^(m)(t), based on statistical game theory. Assuming that the coordinates S⁽ⁱ⁾(t) (i = 1, 2,…,m) of a forecasted vector S(t) are stochastic processes with given probabilistic characteristics, a formula of a function forecasting the value of a coordinate S⁽ⁱ⁾(t) of this vector can be obtained. This formula permits to determine a vector of forecasts _τT(x) of technological development S(t) at a given moment t = τ+T.     

Balanced Contributions Axiom in the Solution of Cooperative Games

In a gamevin characteristic function form, suppose the Banzhaf value ψ is used to pay a coalitionSalready formed. Then coalitionSno longer receivesv(S); instead it receivesR^ψ(S) = ∑_{i ∈ S}ψ_i(v_s), wherev_Sdenotes the subgame of coalitionS. Surprisingly, the Shapley value of this new game Sh(N, R^ψ) is equal to the Banzhaf value ofv. In this paper we establish a similar result for all values satisfying balanced contributions axiom. Additionally, we introduce player's weights to obtain the corresponding result in the nonsymmetric case.Journal of Economic LiteratureClassification Number: C71     

More pessimism than greediness: a characterization of monotone risk aversion in the rank-dependent expected utility model

Summary. This paper studies monotone risk aversion, the aversion to monotone, mean-preserving increase in risk (Quiggin [21]), in the Rank Dependent Expected Utility (RDEU) model. This model replaces expected utility by another functional, characterized by two functions, a utility function u in conjunction with a probability-perception function f. Monotone mean-preserving increases in risk are closely related to the notion of comparative dispersion introduced by Bickel and Lehmann [3,4] in Non-parametric Statistics. We present a characterization of the pairs (u,f) of monotone risk averse decision makers, based on an index of greediness G _u of the utility function u and an index of pessimism P _f of the probability perception function f: the decision maker is monotone risk averse if and only if . The index of greediness (non-concavity) of u is the supremum of taken over . The index of pessimism of f is the infimum of taken over 0 < v < 1. Thus, , with G _u = 1 iff u is concave. If then , i.e., f is majorized by the identity function. Since P _f = 1 for Expected Utility maximizers, forces u to be concave in this case; thus, the characterization of risk aversion as is a direct generalization from EU to RDEU. A novel element is that concavity of u is not necessary. In fact, u must be concave only if P _f = 1.Received: 10 April 2001, Revised: 18 November 2003, JEL Classification Numbers: D81. Correspondence to: Michéle CohenAlain Chateauneuf, Michéle Cohen, Isaac Meilijson: We are most grateful to Mark Machina, Peter Wakker and two anonymous referees for very helpful suggestions and comments.     

Transitive measurable utility

This paper continues a study of theories of preferences under risk that do not use the independence axiom of the von Neumann-Morgenstern theory. Unlike its predecessor, it assumes that preferences are transitive. The effects of transitivity are noted in two representations of preferences. The first, which also uses continuity and dominance axioms, involves a function u on a set P of probability measures for which u(p) > u(q) if and only if p is preferred to q. Although u might be nonlinear, it has other features of a von Neumann-Morgenstern linear utility function. The second representation has linear functions u and w on P, with w strictly positive except perhaps at preference-extreme measures—where it might vanish, such that u(p) w(q) > u(q) w(p) if and only if p is preferred to q. A symmetry axiom along with the axioms for the first representation are necessary and sufficient for the second representation.     

Market equilibrium with heterogeneous recursive-utility-maximizing agents

Summary The paper by C. Ma [1] contains several errors. First, statement and proof of Theorem 2.1 on the existence of intertemporal recursive utility function as a unique solution to the Koopmans equation must be amended. Several additional technical conditions concerning the consumption domain, measurability of certainty equivalent and utility process need to be assumed for the validity of the theorem. Second, the assumptions for Theorem 3.1 need to be amended to include the Feller's condition that, for any bounded continuous functionf C(S × ⁿ ₊), (f(S_t+1, )¦s_t =s) is bounded and continuous in (s, ). In addition, for Theorem 3.1, the pricep, the endowmente and the dividend rate as functions of the state variables S are assumed to be continuous.The Feller's condition for Theorem 3.1 is to ensure the value function to be well-defined. This condition needs to be assumed even for the expected additive utility functions (See Lucas [2]). It is noticed that, under this condition, the right hand side of equation (3.5) in [1] defines a bounded continuous function ins and. The proof of Theorem 3.1 remains valid with this remark in place.A correct version of Theorem 2.1 in [1] is stated and proved in this corrigendum. Ozaki and Streufert [3] is the first to cast doubt on the validity of this theorem. They point out correctly that additional conditions to ensure the measurability of the utility process need to be assumed. This condition is identified as conditionCE ₄ below. In addition, I notice that, the consumption space is not suitably defined in [1], especially when a unbounded consumption set is assumed. In contrast to what claimed in [3], I show that the uniformly bounded consumption setX and stationary information structure are not necessary for the validity of Theorem 2.1.I would like to thank Hiroyuki Ozaki and Peter Streufert for pointing out correctly some mistakes made in the original article. Comments and suggestions from an anonymous referee are gratefully appreciated. Financially support from SSHRC of Canada is acknowledged.     

Numerical representation of intransitive preferences on a countable set

Let > be a preference relation on a countable set X. We prove that if > is acyclic (that is, has irreflexive transitive closure), then there exists a mapping u of X into $\text{R}$ such that x > y entails u(x)>u(y). We also give a simple proof of a representation theorem of Fishburn when > is an interval order.     

Exact equivalence of instrumental variable estimators in an error component structural system

The paper establishes an equivalence result in the context of anm-equation error component structural system, whose disturbances have the usual three-component structure, and whose equations feature explanatory variables of the formz _i, z_t andz _it; the latter vary (respectively) only over individuals, only over time, and over both. Under the stochastic specification assumed, it is shown that the alternative instrumental variables (IV) estimators commonly used in the special cases of this system are all equivalent (numerically identical); the result is a generalization of the equivalences established previously for the special cases. In the single equation (m=1) context, the equivalence requires that the IV set contain variables of the formz _i and/orz _t, and further, in numbers determined by the ranks of (respectively) the individuals-mean and time-mean matrices of the instruments. If such an IV set is common to all equations, the equivalence also holds for the system under joint estimation. The result is used to recommend a couple of estimators for use in panel data, on grounds of computational simplicity.This is a revision of the December 1990 draft with the same title, and is a substantial revision of the April 1990 version entitled: Analysis of an error component structural system. This revision has benefited from comments received from a referee and a editor of this journal. I came to know from an anonymous reader that the equivalence criterion developed in my 1990 a article, used here and the two earlier versions, was infact obtained previously in an unpublished paper by Balestra (1988). Balestra's paper, which was made available to me by Badi Baltagi at the time of this revision, and subsequently by Balestra, considers the equivalence of ^b, ^c and one other estimator which differs from our ^a. Errors, if any, are my responsibility.     

Public-good valuation and intra-family allocation

I derive values of marginal changes in a public good for two-person households, measured alternatively by household member i’s willingness to pay (WTP) for the good on behalf of the household, WTP _i (H), or by the sum of individual WTP values across family members, WTP(C). Households are assumed to allocate their resources in efficient Nash bargains over private and common household goods. WTP _i (H) is then defined by trade-offs between the public good and the household good, and WTP(C) by trade-offs of between the public good and private goods. WTP _i (H) is found to be higher (lower) than WTP(C) when member i has a relatively high (low) marginal valuation of the public good, but tends on average to equal WTP(C). As a consequence, individuals tend to represent households correctly on average when questioned about the household’s WTP for a public good, even when they are purely selfish and answer truthfully. Adding all members’ WTP answers on behalf of the household then leads to double counting. Pure and paternalistic altruism (the latter attached to consumption of the public good) move each member’s WTP on behalf of the household closer to the true sum of individual WTP, but only paternalistic altruism raises this sum.      

Recursive preferences and balanced growth

We study a class of utility functions that are defined recursively by an aggregator W(x,y) where u_t=W(c_t,u_t+1). In single-agent economies it is known that a sufficient condition for the existence of a balanced growth path is that utility should be homogenous of degree γ. In the context of a multi-agent economy we show that this restriction implies that either a balanced growth equilibrium fails to exist or all agents have the same constant discount factor. We suggest a generalization of recursive preferences wherein the intertemporal utility function is time dependent. Within this class we establish that there may exist a balanced growth equilibrium even if agents are different.     

On relationships between numerical representations of interval orders and semiorders

The extent to which continuous numerical representations of interval orders are unique is considered. Apair of continuous, real-valued functions, <u, v>, represents an interval order, <X, >>, provided that for x, y ϵ X, x > y if and only if u(x) > v(y). Relationships which necessarily hold between any two such numerical representations are presented and a method by which one continuous representation can be derived from another is described. Similar considerations are made for special forms of continuous numerical representations of semiorders.     

On disequilibrium savings and public consumption

Conclusions A particular aspect of the present paper is the introduction of specific policy measures for the government, whose behavior on the goods market was described in earlier work as purely exogenous, like in Malinvaud. In our context, the government appears as an active economic agent, acting at absorbing any excess supply or reducing any excess demand on the goods market. Though this behavior may look somewhat arbitrary, it has the advantage to force the state of the economy towards a SME if combined with natural endogenous behavior of the other agents! Furthermore, it does not contradict observed policies through which governments stimulate or restrain economic activity via purchases or fiscal and monetary policies. Perhaps alternative policies, like direct actions on the labor market by supplying (non-productive) jobs or unemployment compensations, could have done as well: this remains an open door for further research. The preceding feature also contrasts with the recent work done by V. Böhm (1978) in a macroeconomic set up. In this paper, he studies the stability of stationary Keynesian unemployment or stationary repressed inflation states but without imposing a particular policy on the government. Comparing his work with ours, it is easily verified that if the government would keep its consumption at the levelg ^*, the SME would be stable if the economy starts out in Keynesian unemployment and unstable if the economy starts out in repressed inflation, confirming Böhm's result.Our analysis is related to an earlier work of Archibald and Lipsey (1958), dealing with the adjustment of the economy to a Stationary Equilibrium after a change in real balances. The Quantity Theory of Money postulates that along a SME, a change in the price and the wage rate from (p,w) to (p,w) leads to an adjustment in the level of stationary money holdings from m_i ^* to m_i ^*, m_i ^*=_i ^* (p,w). In this paper, Archibald and Lipsey suggest that the economy follows a sequence of temporary market equilibria: Starting from a change in real balances,prices adjust at each period through a tâtonnement process so as to match supply and demand. Our paper proposes an alternative path: At each period,quantities adjust through a tâtonnement process at constant prices.This paper is a revised version of CORE Discussion Paper 7701. We wish to thank Paul Champsaur, Jacques Drèze, Werner Hildenbrand and Reinhard John for stimulating discussions. We are grateful to Volker Böhm for valuable comments and criticisms.Research supported by the Fonds National Belge de la Recherche Scientifique.     

Some results on “an income fluctuation problem”

A consumer at each period, given the income available, y, has to decide how much to consume and save. If he consumes c ? 0 units he gets u(c) units of satisfaction or utility, and if x = y ? c ? 0 is the amount saved then the available income in the next period is rx + ω^k, where ω^k is a random variable, and r is an interest factor that is assumed to be known with certainty. Infinite time horizon problems are considered, and it is shown that if 0 < δr < 1, where 0 < δ < 1 is a discount factor, then the limiting policy is optimal. Questions about the behavior of the stock level, such as boundness, are considered, and an example is given that shows that the stock level might converge almost surely to infinity. Finally an economic explanation is given.     

Tiebout equilibria in local public good economies with spillovers

This paper analyzes the effects of spillovers on the equilibrium population distribution across jurisdictions in a local public good economy with free mobility. Spillovers are parametrized by a matrix [α_ij] where α_ij ∈ [0, 1]. When spillovers are symmetric and close to 0 or 1 (pure local public goods and pure public goods), all equilibrium jurisdiction structures are symmetric. However, any population distribution can be sustained in equilibrium for some value of the spillover parameter α. In the class of utility functions with additive externalities, we identify the unique family of utility functions for which equilibria are symmetric except for an isolated value of α. This is a class of utility functions which are linear in the public good and a power function of the private good, u(c, γ) = − A(1 − c)^β + γ. With this specification of utility, we show that an increase in α results in a more fragmented equilibrium population distribution, and that when spillovers are asymmetric and large, a jurisdiction which is more centrally located (i.e. benefits more from the public goods provided in other jurisdictions) has a larger population in equilibrium.     

Anonymous sequential games: Existence and characterization of equilibria

Summary In this paper we consider Anonymous Sequential Games with Aggregate Uncertainty. We prove existence of equilibrium when there is a general state space representing aggregate uncertainty. When the economy is stationary and the underlying process governing aggregate uncertainty Markov, we provide Markov representations of the equilibria.Table of notation Agents' characteristics space ( ) - A Action space of each agent (aA) - Y Y = x A - Aggregate distribution on agents' characteristics - (X) Space of probability measures onX - C(X) Space of continuous functions onX - _X Family of Borel sets ofX - State space of aggregate uncertainty ( ) - x _t=1 aggregate uncertainty for the infinite game - = (₁,₂,...,_t,...) - ^{t t} (₁, ₂,..., _t) - L₁(^t,C ×A),v _t Normed space of measurable functions from ^t toC( x A) - 8o(^t,( x A)) Space of measurable functions from ^tto( x A) - X^t X^t= x _s=1 ^t X - _X ^t Borel field onX ^t - v Distribution on - v_t Marginal distribution of v on ^t - v(^t)((¦^t)) Conditional distribution on given ^t - v^t(^s)(v_t(¦^s)) Conditional distribution on ^t given ^s (wheres) - _t Periodt distributional strategy - Distributional strategy for all periods =(₁,₂,...,_t,...) - _t Transition process for agents' types - ( _t,^t,y)(P _t+1(, _t , ^t ,y)) Transition function associated with _t - u _t Utility function - V _t (, a, , ^t) Value function for each collection (, a, , ^t ) - W _t (, , ^t ) Value function given optimal action a - C() Consistency correspondence. Distributions consistent with and characteristics transition functions - B() Best response correspondence (which also satisfy consistency) - E Set of equilibrium distributional strategies - x _t=1 ( ^t , (x A)) - S Expanded state space for Markov construction - (, a, ) Value function for Markov construction - P( _t ^* , _t y)(P(, _t ^* , _t , _y )) Invariant characteristics transition function for Markov game We wish to acknowledge very helpful conversations with C. d'Aspremont, B. Lipman, A. McLennan and J-F. Mertens. The financial support of the SSHRCC and the ARC at Queen's University is gratefully acknowledged. This paper was begun while the first author visited CORE. The financial support of CORE and the excellent research environment is gratefully acknowledged. The usual disclaimer applies.     

Uniqueness of Positive Fixed Points for Increasing Concave Functions on : An Elementary Result

The square root function has a unique positive fixed point. This function has the following properties: it is strictly increasing and strictly concave, with f(0) = 0, and there are points a ≥ 0 and b ≥ 0 such that f(a) ≥ a and f(b) ≤ b. It is shown that any function from ⁿ to ⁿ satisfying these properties has a unique positive fixed point. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Number: C62.     

Price characterization of stable allocations in exchange economies with externalities

A pure exchange economy where the consumers have utility functions U_i(v₁(x₁),…, v_m(x_m)) for i = 1,…, m and where x_j is the consumption of consumer j, is studied. U_i may be nonincreasing or nondecreasing in v_j for j ≠ i. i is said to be nonbenevolent or nonmalevolent towards j, accordingly.An allocation is stable if no coalition can redistribute what it receives in the allocation to get an allocation which is preferred, given the consumptions of the consumers in the complementary coalition. Results concerning the relation among the Paretooptimal, stable and equilibrium allocations (under different definitions of equilibrium) are given. In particular, it turns out that in case every consumer is non-benevolent towards every other consumer, the classical results, concerning the relation between Paretooptimal allocations and equilibrium allocations, can be generalized in a satisfactory way.     

Numerical Computation of Equilibrium Bid Functions in a First-Price Auction with Heterogeneous Risk Attitudes

We use numerical methods to compute Nash equilibrium (NE) bid functions for four agents bidding in a first-price auction. Each bidderi is randomly assigned:r _i [0,r _max], where 1 –r _i is the Arrow-Pratt measure of constant relative risk aversion. Eachr _i is independently drawn from the cumulative distribution function (·), a beta distribution on [0,r _max]. For various values of the maximum propensity to seek risk,r _max, the expected value of any bidder's risk characteristic,E (r _i ), and the probability that any bidder is risk seeking,P (r _i > 1), we determine the nonlinear characteristics of the (NE) bid functions.     

Zero-sum condition: A necessary and sufficient condition for a transitive voting system

A simple and quick way to ascertain whether or not any given majority voting system can always produce a transitive social preference orderings without imposing any restriction on the distribution of diverse individual preference orderings is to examine whether all individual voting (preference) vectors satisfy the Addition Rule or not. This conclusion was obtained by first reformulating the voting mechanism into that of a linear mapping from T^m defined by q = Σp_i. It was found that the subset P of T that can accommodate all possible individual preference ordering profiles and such that every sum vector q = Σ p_i of its member vectors p_i is contained in T can be expressed as P = {p: p∈ T, s(p) = 0}. It was also pointed out that this is equivalent to the requirement that all individual preference (voting) functions must satisfy the Addition Rule. Finally, Borda's Rule and Saposnik's Contributive Rule were shown to be examples of transitive voting rules which satisfy these necessary and sufficient conditions.     

Budget preferences and direct utility

This paper extends a result of Sakai, who presented conditions for indirect preferences from which a utility function can be deduced if demand is single valued. It will be shown that—adding a “partial Lipschitz condition”—Sakai's theorem can be extended to multi-valued demand. Our result follows from the extension of a theorem of Hurwicz and Richter, who have shown that, under certain hypotheses on demand correspondences, an upper semicontinuous utility function f exists, so that the set of utility maximal elements μ_f(B) is contained in the choice set h(B) for every budget B. By our partial Lipschitz condition h(B) ?- μ_f(B) also follows.