Forecasting realized volatility of agricultural commodities

We forecast the realized and median realized volatility of agricultural commodities using variants of the heterogeneous autoregressive (HAR) model. We obtain tick-by-tick data on five widely-traded agricultural commodities (corn, rough rice, soybeans, sugar, and wheat) from the CME/ICE. Real out-of-sample forecasts are produced for between 1 and 66 days ahead. Our in-sample analysis shows that the variants of the HAR model which decompose volatility measures into their continuous path and jump components and incorporate leverage effects offer better fitting in the predictive regressions. However, we demonstrate convincingly that such HAR extensions do not offer any superior predictive ability in their out-of-sample results, since none of these extensions produce significantly better forecasts than the simple HAR model. Our results remain robust even when we evaluate them in a Value-at-Risk framework. Thus, there is no benefit from including more complexity, related to the volatility decomposition or relative transformations of the volatility, in the forecasting models.     

Improving the realized GARCH’s volatility forecast for Bitcoin with jump-robust estimators

This study employs the realized GARCH (RGARCH) model to estimate the volatility of Bitcoin returns and measure the benefits of various scaled realized measures in forecasting volatility. Empirical results show that considerable price jumps occurred in the Bitcoin market, suggesting that a jump-robust realized measure is crucial to estimate Bitcoin volatility. The RGARCH model, especially the one with tri-power variation, outperforms the standard GARCH model. Additionally, the RGARCH model with jump-robust realized measures can provide steady forecasting performance. This study is timely given that the CME may release a Bitcoin option product and our results are relevant to option pricing     

Volatility forecasting and microstructure noise

It is common practice to use the sum of frequently sampled squared returns to estimate volatility, yielding the so-called realized volatility. Unfortunately, returns are contaminated by market microstructure noise. Several noise-corrected realized volatility measures have been proposed. We assess to what extent correction for microstructure noise improves forecasting future volatility using a MIxed DAta Sampling (MIDAS) regression framework. We study the population prediction properties of various realized volatility measures, assuming i.i.d$i.i.d$. microstructure noise. Next we study optimal sampling issues theoretically, when the objective is forecasting and microstructure noise contaminates realized volatility. We distinguish between conditional and unconditional optimal sampling schemes, and find that conditional optimal sampling seems to work reasonably well in practice.     

The role of implied volatility in forecasting future realized volatility and jumps in foreign exchange,stock, and bond markets

We study the forecasting of future realized volatility in the foreign exchange, stock, and bond markets from variables in our information set, including implied volatility backed out from option prices. Realized volatility is separated into its continuous and jump components, and the heterogeneous autoregressive (HAR) model is applied with implied volatility as an additional forecasting variable. A vector HAR (VecHAR) model for the resulting simultaneous system is introduced, controlling for possible endogeneity issues. We find that implied volatility contains incremental information about future volatility in all three markets, relative to past continuous and jump components, and it is an unbiased forecast in the foreign exchange and stock markets. Out-of-sample forecasting experiments confirm that implied volatility is important in forecasting future realized volatility components in all three markets. Perhaps surprisingly, the jump component is, to some extent, predictable, and options appear calibrated to incorporate information about future jumps in all three markets.     

Forecasting risk measures using intraday data in a generalized autoregressive score framework

A new framework for the joint estimation and forecasting of dynamic value at risk (VaR) and expected shortfall (ES) is proposed by our incorporating intraday information into a generalized autoregressive score (GAS) model introduced by Patton et al., 2019 to estimate risk measures in a quantile regression set-up. We consider four intraday measures: the realized volatility at 5-min and 10-min sampling frequencies, and the overnight return incorporated into these two realized volatilities. In a forecasting study, the set of newly proposed semiparametric models are applied to four international stock market indices (S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average, Nikkei 225 and FTSE 100) and are compared with a range of parametric, nonparametric and semiparametric models, including historical simulations, generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH) models and the original GAS models. VaR and ES forecasts are backtested individually, and the joint loss function is used for comparisons. Our results show that GAS models, enhanced with the realized volatility measures, outperform the benchmark models consistently across all indices and various probability levels.     

Modeling spot rate using a realized stochastic volatility model with level effect and dynamic drift☆

This paper proposes a class of realized stochastic volatility model based on both various realized volatility measures and spot rate. It applies the realized stochastic volatility model (Takahashi, Omori, & Watanabe, 2009, and Koopman & Scharth, 2013) to the spot rate model with dynamic drift and level effect setups (RSVL). A jointly approximated maximum likelihood procedure is used to estimate this model. The simulation results show that the RSVL model can be consistently estimated and noise-and-jump-robust realized volatility measures improve the accuracy of the estimation. This study empirically investigates the Chinese interbank repo market with RSVL model, which manifested the advantage of taking the level effect and nonlinear drift into consideration. The noise-and-jump-robust realized volatility measures (e.g. subsample realized volatility and threshold pre-average realized volatility) decrease the volatility fitting error. The nonparametric testing suggests that the RSVL model with noise-and-jump-robust realized volatility measures has more power on forecasting excess kurtosis and fat tails and predicting dynamics of higher order autocorrelations.     

Forecasting stock market volatility: Can the risk aversion measure exert an important role?

In this paper, we predict realized volatility of stock return by utilizing time-varying risk aversion based on a simple linear autoregressive model. Our in-sample results suggest that time-varying risk aversion have significant impact for stock return volatility. In terms of out-of-sample forecasting performance, the empirical results indicate that the incorporation of time-varying risk aversion in the benchmark model can yield more accurate stock return volatility forecasts. Notably, the out-of-sample forecasting results confirm that our conclusions are robust when we apply alternative lag orders and alternative prediction evaluation periods. Finally, we study links between the prediction ability of time-varying risk aversion and the volatility of other stock indices and two kinds of crude oil, and find that the new predictor can effectively strengthen forecasting performance in most case. In view of the importance of volatility risk in the asset pricing process, our research is of great significance for financial asset participants.     

Forecasting global equity market volatilities

Motivated by a common belief that the international stock market volatilities are synonymous with information flow, this paper proposes a parsimonious way to combine multiple market information flows and assess whether cross-national volatility flows contain important information content that can improve the accuracy of international volatility forecasting. We concentrate on realized volatilities (RV) derived from the intra-day prices of 22 international stock markets, and employ the heterogeneous autoregressive (HAR) framework, along with two common diffusion indices that are constructed based on the simple mean and first principal component (PC) of the 22 stock market RVs, to forecast future volatilities of each market for 1-day, 1-week, and 1-month ahead. We provide strong evidence that the use of the cross-national information reflected by the simple and parsimonious common indices enhances the predictive accuracy of international volatilities at all forecasting horizons. Alternative volatility measures, estimation window sizes, and forecasting evaluation tests confirm the robustness of our results. Finally, our strategy of constructing common diffusion indices is also feasible for international market jumps.     

The role of oil futures intraday information on predicting US stock market volatility

This study investigates the role of oil futures price information on forecasting the US stock market volatility using the HAR framework. In-sample results indicate that oil futures intraday information is helpful to increase the predictability. Moreover, compared to the benchmark model, the proposed models improve their predictive ability with the help of oil futures realized volatility. In particular, the multivariate HAR model outperforms the univariate model. Accordingly, considering the contemporaneous connection is useful to predict the US stock market volatility. Furthermore, these findings are consistent across a variety of robust checks.     

异质金融市场驱动的已实现波动率计量模型

本文根据金融高频数据的典型特征和异质市场假说,首次提出了异质市场驱动因素的分层结构,并借此构建了已实现波动率的HAR-L-M计量模型。模拟分析显示出该模型的合理性和优越性,样本内、外预测都说明HAR-L-M模型优于现有已实现波动率HAR模型和ARFIMA模型。最后的实证分析结果显示,中国市场的异质程度要强于美国证券市场,同时个股更容易受多种异质驱动因素的影响,个股稳定性要比股指差。     

A novel cluster HAR-type model for forecasting realized volatility

This paper proposes a cluster HAR-type model that adopts the hierarchical clustering technique to form the cascade of heterogeneous volatility components. In contrast to the conventional HAR-type models, the proposed cluster models are based on the relevant lagged volatilities selected by the cluster group Lasso. Our simulation evidence suggests that the cluster group Lasso dominates other alternatives in terms of variable screening and that the cluster HAR serves as the top performer in forecasting the future realized volatility. The forecasting superiority of the cluster models are also demonstrated in an empirical application where the highest forecasting accuracy tends to be achieved by separating the jumps from the continuous sample path volatility process.     

Overnight stock returns and realized volatility

The information flow in modern financial markets is continuous, but major stock exchanges are open for trading for only a limited number of hours. No consensus has yet emerged on how to deal with overnight returns when calculating and forecasting realized volatility in markets where trading does not take place 24 hours a day. Based on a recently introduced formal testing procedure, we find that for the S&P 500 index, a realized volatility estimator that optimally incorporates overnight information is more accurate in-sample. In contrast, estimators that do not incorporate overnight information are more accurate for individual stocks. We also show that accounting for overnight returns may affect the conclusions drawn in an out-of-sample horserace of forecasting models. Finally, there is considerably less variation in the selection of the best out-of-sample forecasting model when only the most accurate in-sample RV estimators are considered.     

Forecasting the realized volatility of Energy Stock Market: A multimodel comparison

The realized volatility forecasting of energy sector stocks facilitates the establishment of corresponding risk warning mechanisms and investor decisions. In this paper, we collected two different energy sector indices and used different methods, namely principal component analysis (PCA) and sparse principal component analysis (SPCA), to extract features, and combined LSTM and GRU to construct 12 different models. The results show that the SPCA-LSTM model we constructed has the best forecasting performance in the realized volatility forecasting of energy indices, and SPCA has better forecasting results than PCA in the feature extraction stage. The results of the robustness test indicate that our results are robust.     

Forecasting volatility with time-varying leverage and volatility of volatility effects

Predicting volatility is of primary importance for business applications in risk management, asset allocation, and the pricing of derivative instruments. This paper proposes a measurement model that considers the possibly time-varying interaction of realized volatility and asset returns according to a bivariate model to capture its major characteristics: (i) the long-term memory of the volatility process, (ii) the heavy-tailedness of the distribution of returns, and (iii) the negative dependence of volatility and daily market returns. We assess the relevance of the effects of “the volatility of volatility” and time-varying “leverage” to the out-of-sample forecasting performance of the model, and evaluate the density of forecasts of market volatility. Empirical results show that our specification can outperform the benchmark HAR–GARCH model in terms of both point and density forecasts.     

How does inter-industry spillover improve the performance of volatility forecasting?

This study aims to investigate whether introducing inter-industry spillover information into the GARCH-MIDAS model improves out-of-sample forecasting attempts. We explore the transmission of volatility across sectors, as well as the reliance on inter-industry business links. Our findings demonstrate strong cross-industry volatility spillovers that are related to the degree of the industry-to-industry trading linkage. We compare the out-of-sample volatility forecasting performance of the spillovers-information-incorporated GARCH-MIDAS model with that of the traditional GARCH model. The empirical results show that the GARCH-MIDAS model outperforms traditional GARCH models. Notably, we discover that good (bad) news is always transferred from the back end of the production process to the front end, meaning that economic growth (decline) is driven by consumption expansion (shrinkage).     

Predictive density estimators for daily volatility based on the use of realized measures

The main objective of this paper is to propose a feasible, model free estimator of the predictive density of integrated volatility. In this sense, we extend recent papers by Andersen et al. [Andersen, T.G., Bollerslev, T., Diebold, F.X., Labys, P., 2003. Modelling and forecasting realized volatility. Econometrica 71, 579–626], and by Andersen et al. [Andersen, T.G., Bollerslev, T., Meddahi, N., 2004. Analytic evaluation of volatility forecasts. International Economic Review 45, 1079–1110; Andersen, T.G., Bollerslev, T., Meddahi, N., 2005. Correcting the errors: Volatility forecast evaluation using high frequency data and realized volatilities. Econometrica 73, 279–296], who address the issue of pointwise prediction of volatility via ARMA models, based on the use of realized volatility. Our approach is to use a realized volatility measure to construct a non-parametric (kernel) estimator of the predictive density of daily volatility. We show that, by choosing an appropriate realized measure, one can achieve consistent estimation, even in the presence of jumps and microstructure noise in prices. More precisely, we establish that four well known realized measures, i.e. realized volatility, bipower variation, and two measures robust to microstructure noise, satisfy the conditions required for the uniform consistency of our estimator. Furthermore, we outline an alternative simulation based approach to predictive density construction. Finally, we carry out a simulation experiment in order to assess the accuracy of our estimators, and provide an empirical illustration that underscores the importance of using microstructure robust measures when using high frequency data.     

Forecasting extreme financial risk: A score-driven approach

This paper develops a new class of dynamic models for forecasting extreme financial risk. This class of models is driven by the score of the conditional distribution with respect to both the duration between extreme events and the magnitude of these events. It is shown that the models are a feasible method for modeling the time-varying arrival intensity and magnitude of extreme events. It is also demonstrated how exogenous variables such as realized measures of volatility can easily be incorporated. An empirical analysis based on a set of major equity indices shows that both the arrival intensity and the size of extreme events vary greatly during times of market turmoil. The proposed framework performs well relative to competing approaches in forecasting extreme tail risk measures.     

Realized volatility forecasting and market microstructure noise

We extend the analytical results for reduced form realized volatility based forecasting in ABM (2004) to allow for market microstructure frictions in the observed high-frequency returns. Our results build on the eigenfunction representation of the general stochastic volatility class of models developed byMeddahi (2001). In addition to traditional realized volatility measures and the role of the underlying sampling frequencies, we also explore the forecasting performance of several alternative volatility measures designed to mitigate the impact of the microstructure noise. Our analysis is facilitated by a simple unified quadratic form representation for all these estimators. Our results suggest that the detrimental impact of the noise on forecast accuracy can be substantial. Moreover, the linear forecasts based on a simple-to-implement ‘average’ (or ‘subsampled’) estimator obtained by averaging standard sparsely sampled realized volatility measures generally perform on par with the best alternative robust measures.     

Forecasting macroeconomic variables using collapsed dynamic factor analysis

We explore a new approach to the forecasting of macroeconomic variables based on a dynamic factor state space analysis. Key economic variables are modeled jointly with principal components from a large time series panel of macroeconomic indicators using a multivariate unobserved components time series model. When the key economic variables are observed at a low frequency and the panel of macroeconomic variables is at a high frequency, we can use our approach for both nowcasting and forecasting purposes. Given a dynamic factor model as the data generation process, we provide Monte Carlo evidence of the finite-sample justification of our parsimonious and feasible approach. We also provide empirical evidence for a US macroeconomic dataset. The unbalanced panel contains quarterly and monthly variables. The forecasting accuracy is measured against a set of benchmark models. We conclude that our dynamic factor state space analysis can lead to higher levels of forecasting precision when the panel size and time series dimensions are moderate.     

Forecasting exchange rate volatility using high-frequency data: Is the euro different?

We assess the performances of alternative procedures for forecasting the daily volatility of the euro’s bilateral exchange rates using 15 min data. We use realized volatility and traditional time series volatility models. Our results indicate that using high-frequency data and considering their long memory dimension enhances the performance of volatility forecasts significantly. We find that the intraday FIGARCH model and the ARFIMA model outperform other traditional models for all exchange rate series.