河源源城产业转移园：奋楫扬帆新征程 创新驱动展雄篇

河源源城产业转移园(以下简称转移园)由深圳市大鹏新区、河源市源城区政府于2007年1月签订正式协议共同建立,2008年6月被省政府认定为省级产业转移工业园。2014年6月,深圳市大鹏新区正式与源城区结对帮扶,园区更名为深圳大鹏(河源源城)产业转移工业园。转移园规划面积17.69平方公里,现已开发面积约7.4平方公里,累计投入开发建设资金约25亿元,园区内建有企业服务中心、公共服务中心、劳动培训中心、科技孵化器、人才驿站、创业孵化基地等较为完善的基础配套设施。     

立足高起点 谋求新跨越——奋进中的东阳经济开发区

东阳经济开发区成立于1992年，1994年8月经省政府批准为省级经济开发区。2008年3月，东阳市委．市政府对开发区管理体制进行调整，调整后的开发区下辖城北工业新区、白云商贸园区、江北高新产业园区，行政区域包括白云街道、江北街道、六石街道，辖区面积203．43平方公里，其中城市规划区范围75平方公里。     

长寿经开区:打造国家新型工业化产业示范基地

正国家级长寿经济技术开发区,位于重庆市主城"1小时经济圈"东部的长寿区,紧邻重庆两江新区,距重庆主城核心区50余公里,长江穿境而过,拥有公路、铁路、水路等立体交通网络,区位优势明显。园区规划面积80平方公里,已开发40平方公里。重点发展新材料新能源、生物医药、电子信息、装备制造、钢铁冶金五大主导产业,先后荣获"国家新材料高新技术产业化示范基地""国家新型工业化产业示范基地""国家级知识产权     

重庆两江新区成立

继上海浦东新区和天津滨海新区之后，中国国家级新区重庆两江新区于2010年6月18日挂牌成立。两江新区位于重庆市主城区长江以北、嘉陵江以东，包括江北区、渝北区、北碚区三个行政区部分区域和国家级经济技术开发区、高新技术开发区和两路寸滩内陆保税港区，规划面积1200平方公里，其中可开发建设面积550平方公里。     

重庆经济技术开发区

重庆经济技术开发区于1993年4月经国务院批准设立,是中国西部地区第一个国家级经济技术开发区,由正在开发建设的北部园区(北部新区经开园)和已经建成的南部园区两大部分组成。北部园区(北部新区经开园)规划面积88．7平方公里,位于重庆市渝北区鸳鸯街道和礼嘉镇,距重庆江北国际机场约6公里,距重庆市最大的火车客     

张江核心园:经济发展园区开发创新集聚三加速

1992年7月,国家级高新区——上海市张江高科技园区开园,面积约25平方公里.1999年,上海市委、市府实施"聚焦张江"战略.2006年,上海高新技术产业开发区更名为上海张江高新技术产业开发区,上海市张江高科技园区成为核心园.2011年11月,上海市政府批准在张江高科技园区的基础上扩大范围,张江园区总面积扩大为75.9平方公里.主要包括上海市张江高科技园区北区和中区、张江南区、康桥工业区、上海国际医学园区、合庆工业园区、张江光电子产业园和银行卡产业园.     

南京江北新区召开动员大会 高质量推进自贸区建设

<正>9月2日下午,南京江北新区召开高质量推进中国(江苏)自由贸易试验区南京片区建设动员大会。南京市委常委、江北新区党工委专职副书记罗群作动员讲话。罗群指出,高质量推动自贸区建设,是新区深入落实多重国家战略、加快培育东部沿海地区率先转型发展新增长极的重大机遇,是新区助力提升南京省会城市功能和首位度、推动"强富美高"新江苏建设的重要抓手,是新区高质量建设"三区一平台"、率先实现基本现代化的重点举措。新     

贯彻新发展理念 构建新发展格局 全力推动江北新区高质量发展走在前列

南京江北新区作为江苏省唯一的国家级新区,自成立以来,紧紧围绕“三区一平台”战略定位,“增长极”和“试验田”功能日益凸显。2021年作为“十四五”开局之年,南京江北新区围绕党建引领、创新发展、产业为先、生态宜居等各方面,不断打造高质量发展的现代化新主城。围绕新起点寻找新突破,迈入新阶段开创新局面。2022年是党的二十大召开之年,南京江北新区将全力做到三个“走在前列”：在对接、融入、落实国家战略上走在前列;在完整准确全面贯彻新发展理念、推动高质量发展上走在前列;在改革开放和体制机制创新上走在前列。具体做到几个方面：突出创新引领,着力塑造自主可控产业标杆;深化改革开放,致力构筑内外循环重要节点;完善城市功能,聚力推动生活品质持续提升;提升治理效能,努力打造美丽江苏“新区样板”。     

重庆经济技术开发区

<正>重庆经济技术开发区(以下简称"经开区")于1993年经国务院批准设立,是重庆首个、西部首批国家级开发区。经开区首次创业时规划区域位于南岸区,面积9.6平方公里。2001年经调整,开始形成一区两园格局,分别是位于南岸区的南园和北部新区的北园,并在原北部新区设置了83.7平方公里的拓展区。经过17年的快速发展,顺利完     

江苏发展大会“金陵故乡行”专场活动在江北新区举行

<正>5月21日上午,江苏发展大会"金陵故乡行"专场活动在江北新区举行。南京市长蓝绍敏,市委常委、江北新区党工委专职副书记罗群,市委常委、统战部部长华静,副市长冉华、蒋跃建,市政府秘书长翁国玖,新区领导陈潺嵋出席活动。蓝绍敏以"一封家书"的形式向与会嘉宾推介了南京的现状和未来发展方向。他表示,南京的新变化,概括起来就是"一二三四五,南京迈大     

Openness,Lobbying, and Provision of Infrastructure

Casual empirical evidence suggests that infrastructure provision is higher in economies that are open to world trade. We develop a model of imperfect competition to show that open economies are likely to provide more infrastructure than closed economies. If infrastructure is financed by taxing a producer lobby, the open economy will overprovide while the closed economy will underinvest; an open economy approaches optimal provision when this lobby group is small in size. If financing of infrastructure is done by taxing the whole population, the closed-economy outcome may be preferred relative to that of the open economy.     

Modeling and predicting the development of the CES of Russia,Belarus, Kazakhstan,and Ukraine

The paper describes new approaches to the prediction of integration processes in the post-Soviet space and to the macroeconomic evaluation of the integration effect with the use of a cross-country model of structural interactions.     

Estimating the determinants of supply of computing, problem-solving, communication, social, and teamworking skills

We investigate the sources of supply of several core skills,using an innovative approach to skills measurement that involvesadapting a job analysis methodology and applying it in a surveycontext. We then estimate the determinants of skills supplyusing a production function model. The main findings are: (i)prior education and work experience have generally positivebut diminishing marginal impacts on skills, consistent withthe earnings function literature; (ii) off-the-job trainingis productive of most types of skill, while on-the-job trainingis effective for the generation of problem-solving and team-workingskills. Both types of training are transferable from previousemployers; (iii) more education enhances the development ofcomputing skills at work, but with respect to other core skills,less educated workers make up for their lower education throughmore work-based learning; (iv) there is a strong associationbetween the presence of some new or flexible organisation characteristicsand both the level and growth of all types of skills. We argueoverall that the contribution of work-based learning to skillsdevelopment is more important than normally allowed for in theskills policy discourse.     

六朝商人诗及所反映的商品经济

六朝商人诗含以商人为题者、商人所写者、不以商人为题而实写商人者、借叙事抒情而涉及商人者等四种类型，其传递出的信息是：1．商人社会地位的变化；2．城市商业畸形繁荣；3．封建政权不抑富商巨贾，抑商、贱商主要针对中小商人，这为研究六朝的商人和商业提供了有力的佐证。     

ASEAN FTA,distribution of income,and globalization

This paper examines the impact of Free Trade Agreements on income distribution within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and between the members and their trading partners outside ASEAN. The study uses a Computable General Equilibrium model, a modified version of the 57 sector, 87 country, Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) integrated model of national input–output tables, version-6.2 (2001 database) with its reserve matrix facility, to simulate income distribution results as an outcome of certain parameter changes that appear in intra and inter regional trade.Within ASEAN, trade liberalization will stimulate the output of each country within the region according to their comparative advantage. Since trade liberalization tends to increase output of capital-intensive goods more than labor-intensive goods, the less-developed countries within the region tend to get smaller benefits compared to other member countries. In addition, the physical means of production tend to gain more relative to the gains of labor from the FTAs. This tends to widen the income gap between high-income and low-income households within ASEAN.Comparing ASEAN and the developed non-ASEAN countries, an FTA within ASEAN tends to reduce the returns to labor of the developed non-member countries and narrow the income gap between ASEAN, as a whole, and those rich countries since capital-intensive products of developing countries are often labor-intensive goods of developed countries.