奥硝唑治疗滴虫性阴道炎的临床疗效分析

目的探讨奥硝唑治疗滴虫性阴道炎的效果.方法回顾分析在来宾市人民医院治疗的滴虫性阴道炎的患者,随机抽取其中的120例患者作为研究对象,将患者平均分为两组观察A组与观察B组,观察A组的患者给予奥硝唑进行治疗,而观察B组的患者给予甲硝唑进行治疗.结果治疗后比较观察A组效果明显优于观察B组,两组比较差异显著,P〈0.05,有统计学意义,观察A组的不良反应比观察B组不良反应少,两组比较差异显著P〈0.05,有统计学意义.结论奥硝唑治疗滴虫性阴道炎的效果明显优于甲硝唑,奥硝唑治疗该病起效快且疗程短,效果显著.     

奥硝唑治疗滴虫性阴道炎患者的临床疗效及对细胞因子变化的影响

目的：探讨奥硝唑治疗滴虫性阴道炎患者的临床疗效及对细胞因子变化的影响。方法选取2012年10月至2014年10月收治的60例滴虫性阴道炎患者资料，按随机数字表法将其分为奥硝唑组与甲硝唑组，各30例，分别使用奥硝唑与甲硝唑治疗。比较两组患者的临床疗效及细胞因子的变化情况。结果奥硝唑组患者总有效率为93.3%，明显高于甲硝唑组的70.0%，且镜检结果表明奥硝唑组患者治疗后阴道分泌物中滴虫数明显低于甲硝唑组，差异均有统计学意义（均P＜0.05）；治疗后，两组患者阴道分泌液中的IL-2、IL-8、IL-13水平均明显降低，奥硝唑组患者治疗后的IL-8及IL-13水平的变化值均明显高于甲硝唑组，差异均有统计学意义（均P＜0.05）。结论采用奥硝唑治疗滴虫性阴道炎临床疗效明显，可有效降低阴道分泌物中细胞因子的水平。     

硝呋太尔制霉素阴道软胶囊联合奥硝唑片治疗滴虫性阴道炎的临床疗效

目的探讨硝呋太尔制霉素阴道软胶囊联合奥硝唑片治疗滴虫性阴道炎的临床疗效。方法共90例患者,随机将其分为治疗组45例和对照组45例,两组均给予基础治疗,对照组再予以奥硝唑片治疗,治疗组在对照组治疗基础上给予硝呋太尔制霉素阴道软胶囊治疗,治疗7 d。结果经1个疗程治疗后,治疗组患者总有效率为93.3%,对照组患者总有效率为80.0%,治疗组治疗效果优于对照组（P〈0.05）。结论硝呋太尔制霉素阴道软胶囊联合奥硝唑片治疗滴虫性阴道炎效果较好。     

奥硝唑治疗滴虫性阴道炎的效果观察

目的探讨奥硝唑治疗滴虫性阴道炎(TV)的效果。方法将226例TV患者随机均分为观察组和对照组,分别给予奥硝唑与甲硝唑治疗,观察两组患者的疗效及安全性。结果观察组患者总有效率为98.2%,明显高于对照组的80.5%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者治疗期间均未见明显不良反应。结论奥硝唑治疗TV疗效肯定,安全性好。     

滑肠通便片联用健胃益肠宁治疗慢传输型便秘的成本-效果分析

目的评价滑肠通便片联用健胃益肠宁治疗慢传输型便秘的有效性和经济性。方法将114例慢传输型便秘患者作为研究对象随机分为三组,分别给予滑肠通便片联用健胃益肠宁(A组)、酚酞片(B组)、聚乙二醇4000散(C组)治疗两周,记录三组患者用药后的临床治疗效果及成本-效果分析情况,并进行比较。结果 A组患者药物成本为87.96元,高于B组的4.20元、C组的63.56元;A组总有效率为73.68%,也明显高于B组的31.58%、C组的47.37%;而A组成本-效果比为568.62,明显低于B组的1061.43、C组的832.93,B、C组相对于A组的增量成本-效果比分别为198.95、92.74,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论滑肠通便片联用健胃益肠宁治疗慢传输型便秘的理想方案,疗效显著,且具有经济性。     

复方甲硝唑阴道栓治疗滴虫性阴道炎预后分析及成本探讨

目的探讨复方甲硝唑阴道栓治疗滴虫性阴道炎的临床治疗效果及治疗成本。方法选择我院2011年1月～2012年1月收治的滴虫性阴道炎患者84例,随机分成两组,治疗组采用复方甲硝唑阴道栓进行治疗,对照组采用甲硝唑进行治疗,对比分析两组治疗效果,并应用药物经济学方法对治疗成本进行探讨。结果治疗组总有效率高于对照组,复发率低于对照组,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。复方甲硝唑阴道栓的药物成本为48元,治疗费用适中。结论采用复方甲硝唑阴道栓治疗滴虫性阴道炎具有显著效果,该治疗方法治疗效果较好,安全性高,复发率低等优点,治疗成本适中,临床值得进行推广。     

带量集中采购前后氨氯地平和厄贝沙坦治疗原发性高血压的经济性对比

目的比较带量集中采购(简称集采)前后氨氯地平和厄贝沙坦抗高血压的疗效和经济性。方法选取2021年1—11月于曲靖市第二人民医院门诊就诊的原发性高血压患者1047例作为研究对象,予以苯磺酸氨氯地平片者为A组229例、厄贝沙坦片者为B组263例、集采苯磺酸氨氯地平片者为C组264例、集采厄贝沙坦片者为D组291例。比较集采前后4组的抗高血压疗效、成本-效果,并进行敏感性分析。结果A组与集采A组、B组与集采B组治疗有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);集采A组、集采B组的成本-效果比(CER)和增量成本-效果比(ICER)显著优于A组、B组(P<0.05);假设药品费用下降10%,其他费用不变,进行敏感性分析,结果与成本-效果分析结果一致。结论氨氯地平和厄贝沙坦集采前后的降压效果无显著差异,但集采氨氯地平和厄贝沙坦的经济性更优,为优选方案。     

不同抗菌药物对幽门螺杆菌感染合并消化性溃疡的治疗效果及对微生物菌群的影响

目的探讨不同抗菌药物对幽门螺杆菌(Hp)感染合并消化性溃疡的治疗效果及对微生物菌群的影响。方法选取2021年1月至2022年10月葫芦岛市中心医院收治的400例Hp感染合并消化性溃疡患者作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其分为A、B、C、D组,每组100例。所有患者均采用抗菌药物+艾司奥美拉唑+枸橼酸铋钾治疗,其中A组患者予以左氧氟沙星+呋喃唑酮,B组患者予以甲硝唑+阿莫西林,C组患者予以阿莫西林+呋喃唑酮,D组应用克拉霉素+阿莫西林。比较4组患者临床疗效、炎症因子水平、肠道微生物菌群变化、不良反应及Hp清除率。结果D组治疗有效率高于A、B、C组(P<0.05),但A、B、C组治疗有效率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后4组患者白细胞介素-2(IL-2)水平升高,D组高于A、B、C组,C组高于A、B组,C反应蛋白(CRP)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平降低,D组低于A、B、C组,C组低于A、B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但A、B组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后4组患者乳酸杆菌、双歧杆菌以及类杆菌水平升高,D组高于A、B、C组,C组高于A、B组,大肠杆菌及粪肠球菌水平降低,D组低于A、B、C组,C组低于A、B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但A、B组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。4组均无严重不良反应发生,A、C、D组不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但B组不良反应发生率高于A、C、D组(P<0.05);D组Hp清除率高于A、B、C组(P<0.05),但A、B、C组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论Hp感染合并消化性溃疡采用两种抗生素+艾司奥美拉唑+枸橼酸铋钾治疗具有一定临床疗效,但应用克拉霉素+阿莫西林作为抗菌药物进行治疗疗效更显著,能够有效降低患者炎症因子水平,改善肠道菌群结构,提升Hp清除率,且安全性较高。     

替勃龙片联合甲硝唑栓治疗老年性阴道炎的临床疗效

目的探讨替勃龙片联合甲硝唑栓治疗老年性阴道炎的临床效果。方法共96例患者,随机分为治疗组48例和对照组48例,两组均给予基础治疗,对照组再予甲硝唑栓治疗,治疗组在对照组治疗基础上给予替勃龙片口服治疗,治疗7 d为1个疗程。结果经治疗1个疗程后,治疗组患者总有效率为91.7%,对照组患者总有效率为79.2%,治疗组优于对照组（P〈0.05）。结论替勃龙片联合甲硝唑栓治疗老年性阴道炎效果理想。     

3种质子泵抑制剂联合氟哌噻吨美利曲辛治疗功能性消化不良的成本-效果分析

目的评价艾普拉唑、埃索美拉唑、雷贝拉唑3种质子泵抑制剂（PPI）联合氟哌噻吨美利曲辛（黛力新）治疗功能性消化不良的成本-效果,为临床制定合理用药方案。方法抽取2011年功能性消化不良病例119例随机分为A、B、C三组,三组患者均予黛力新片2片,早晨及中午各服1片。A组45例给予艾普拉唑5mg,早餐前1片,B组40例给予埃索美拉唑20mg,早餐前1片,C组34例给予雷贝拉唑10mg,早餐前1片,三组疗程均为28d。各组结果运用药物经济学原理进行成本-效果分析。结果 A、B、C三组治疗功能性消化不良的有效率分别为95.5%、92.5%、91.2%,三组间无显著性差异（P〉0.05）;成本-效果比（C/E）分别为7.67元、6.06元、6.83元。结论 3种方案治疗功能性消化不良有效率及不良反应发生率无显著性差异,但从药物经济学角度考虑,B组方案较佳。     

不同剂型硝苯地平治疗高血压的药物经济学评价

目的评价抗高血压药硝苯地平临床常用三种不同剂型治疗高血压的临床效果和经济效益。方法选择90例高血压病患者随机分为三组,每组30例,分别口服硝苯地平普通片、缓释片和控释片治疗,并进行药物经济学分析。结果服药8周后各组患者血压均有明显下降,其中普通片、缓释片和控释片治疗高血压总有效率分别为93.33%、93.33%、96.66%,不良反应发生率分别为10.0%、6.6%、0.0%,成本-效果比分别为0.02、0.40、2.96,控释片相对于普通片的增量成本-效果比为85.43。结论硝苯地平缓释片虽其消费成本不是最低,但服法简单,副作用较少,综合评价是硝苯地平临床常用三种剂型治疗高血压的最佳剂型,特别适用于基层医院。     

A cost-utility analysis of adjunctive treatment with newer antiepileptic drugs in the UK

Summary

A recent review found that economic assessment of epilepsy treatment relies largely on hypothetical modelling of outcomes and combining these with resource and cost data from different sources. Prospective evaluations combining cost studies with outcome assessments are lacking. However, such a prospective observational study has been carried out previously, but only partially reported. We present a comprehensive cost-utility analysis of adjunctive newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) based on observational data from that study, and assess the uncertainty of the results using bootstrapping.

A total of 125 patients with intractable epilepsy were recruited. Each patient was about to start treatment with a new adjunctive AED [clobazam, (non-proprietary) gabapentin (Neurontin®, Parke-Davis, UK), lamotrigine (Lamictal®, GlaxoSmithKline, UK), topiramate (Topamax®, Janssen-Cilag, UK), or vigabatrin (Sabril®, Aventis Pharma, UK)]. Patients completed semi-structured interviews on resource use, side effects, and the EuroQol EQ-5D. Patients were followed up for 6 months. Patient-specific cost and utility data were analysed separately for each AED on an intent-to-treat basis. Uncertainty in the estimated incremental cost-utility ratios was quantified using the non-parametric bootstrap method, and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were calculated.

At 6 months, 78 patients were still on their prescribed drug. Only topiramate and vigabatrin patients showed an increase in EQ-5D scores, and therefore dominated

other AEDs. Topiramate had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £7,869/QALY compared with vigabatrin, and had more than a 50% chance of being optimal if the ceiling ratio was above £10,000/QALY.

Observational studies provide a valuable source of information for the economic evaluation of AEDs. In this study non-parametric bootstrapping was used to confirm the cost-effectiveness of adjunctive topiramate for patients with refractory epilepsy.     

阿仑磷酸钠片联合唑来膦酸注射液治疗骨质疏松症患者的药物经济学评价

目的探讨阿仑磷酸钠片联合唑来膦酸注射液治疗骨质疏松症的成本-效果。方法选取2016年12月至2018年2月于阜新市中医医院骨伤科治疗的138例骨质疏松症患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,每组69例。对照组给予阿仑磷酸钠片治疗,观察组在对照组治疗基础上采用唑来膦酸注射液治疗,比较两组患者治疗效果,并进行成本-效果分析。结果观察组治疗有效率为97.10%,显著高于对照组的75.36%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,与对照组比较,观察组患者腰椎骨、股骨颈和Ward’s三角区骨密度水平显著提高(P<0.05),血清Ca2+、骨特异性碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、降钙素(HCT)水平显著提高(P<0.05),成本-效果比提高(P<0.05),不良反应发生率降低(P<0.05)。结论阿仑磷酸钠片联合唑来膦酸注射液治疗可明显提高骨质疏松症患者疗效,调节骨密度,有助于骨代谢指标恢复,但其成本也较高。     

自拟中药方剂养胃汤加减治疗慢性萎缩性胃炎患者的疗效

目的探讨自拟中药方剂养胃汤加减治疗慢性萎缩性胃炎患者的疗效。方法选取2018年11月至2019年11月营口市中医院收治的100例慢性萎缩性胃炎患者作为研究对象,随机分为胃复春片组与联合用药组,各50例。胃复春片组给予胃复春片,联合用药组在对照组治疗基础上采用自拟中药方剂养胃汤加减治疗,比较两组中医证候积分,炎症介质及胃泌素-17(G-17)、胃蛋白酶原Ⅰ(PGⅠ)、胃蛋白酶原Ⅱ(PGⅡ)水平,一氧化氮(NO)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、丙二醛(MDA)水平及不良反应。结果治疗后联合用药组胃刺痛、胃脘胀满、食少纳呆、消瘦及乏力积分低于胃复春片组(P<0.05);治疗后,联合用药组CRP、TNF-α及IL-6水平低于胃复春片组(P<0.05),G-17、PGⅠ、PGⅡ高于胃复春片组(P<0.05);治疗后,联合用药组NO、SOD水平高于胃复春片组(P<0.05),MDA水平低于胃复春片组(P<0.05);两组不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论自拟中药方剂养胃汤加减治疗慢性萎缩性胃炎能有效缓解患者症状,减轻机体炎症反应,未增加不良反应发生率。     

红光治疗仪联合甲钴胺治疗中老年糖尿病周围神经病变患者的临床疗效

目的探讨红光治疗仪联合甲钴胺治疗中老年糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)患者的临床疗效。方法选取2018年1—12月于沈阳经济技术开发区人民医院内分泌科治疗的中老年DPN患者160例作为研究对象,按照治疗方法不同分为单纯红光治疗仪治疗组(A组)、甲钴胺治疗组(B组)、红光治疗仪联合甲钴胺治疗组(C组)、对照组(D组),每组40例。比较两组患者空腹血糖(FPG)、餐后2 h血糖(2hPBG)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、震动感觉阈值(VPT)、多伦多临床评分系统(TCSS)评分、治疗减分率。结果治疗后,C组的FPG、2hPBG、VPT水平均明显低于其他3组,SOD明显高于其他3组(P<0.05);B组的FPG、2hPBG水平均明显低于D组、A组(P<0.05);A组的FPG、2hPBG水平均明显低于D组(P<0.05)。治疗后与A、B、D 3组比较,C组TCSS评分明显降低(P<0.05);A组与B组TCSS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),A组与B组TCSS评分均明显低于D组(P<0.05)。治疗减分率A组为17.48%,B组为18.64%,C组为31.24%,D组为8.37%,C组治疗减分率明显高于其他3组(P<0.05)。结论运用红光治疗仪联合甲钴胺治疗中老年DPN疗效显著,与单纯红光治疗仪、甲钴胺治疗比较优势明显,可显著改善DPN患者的临床症状。     

Cost-effectiveness of currently recommended direct-acting antiviral treatments in patients infected with genotypes 1 or 4 hepatitis C virus in the US

Objective: This study compared the cost-effectiveness of direct-acting antiviral therapies currently recommended for treating genotypes (GT) 1 and 4 chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients in the US.

Methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis of treatments for CHC from a US payer’s perspective over a lifelong time horizon was performed. A Markov model based on the natural history of CHC was used for a population that included treatment-naïve and -experienced patients. Treatment alternatives considered for GT1 included ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir?+?dasabuvir?±?ribavirin (3D?±?R), sofosbuvir?+?ledipasvir (SOF/LDV), sofosbuvir?+?simeprevir (SOF?+?SMV), simeprevir?+?pegylated interferon/ribavirin (SMV?+?PR) and no treatment (NT). For GT4 treatments, ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir?+?ribavirin (2D?+?R), SOF/LDV and NT were compared. Transition probabilities, utilities and costs were obtained from published literature. Outcomes included rates of compensated cirrhosis (CC), decompensated cirrhosis (DCC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver-related death (LrD), total costs, life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Costs and QALYs were used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.

Results: In GT1 patients, 3D?±?R and SOF-containing regimens have similar long-term outcomes; 3D?±?R had the lowest lifetime risks of all liver disease outcomes: CC =?30.2%, DCC = 5.0?%, HCC = 6.8%, LT =?1.9% and LrD =?9.2%. In GT1 patients, 3D?±?R had the lowest cost and the highest QALYs. As a result, 3D?±?R dominated these treatment options. In GT4 patients, 2D?+?R had lower rates of liver morbidity and mortality, lower cost and more QALYs than SOF/LDV and NT.

Limitations: While the results are based on input values, which were obtained from a variety of heterogeneous sources—including clinical trials, the findings were robust across a plausible range of input values, as demonstrated in probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: Among currently recommended treatments for GT1 and GT4 in the US, 3D?±?R (for GT1) and 2D?+?R (for GT4) have a favorable cost-effectiveness profile.     

盐酸普拉克索联合多巴丝肼片对帕金森病患者治疗效果、不良反应及生命质量的影响

目的探讨盐酸普拉克索联合多巴丝肼片对帕金森病患者治疗效果、不良反应及生命质量的影响。方法选取2016年2月至2019年2月大连市中心医院神经内二科收治的帕金森病患者60例作为研究对象,依据治疗方法不同分为盐酸普拉克索联合多巴丝肼片治疗组(联合治疗组,n=30)和单独多巴丝肼片治疗组(单独治疗组,n=30),比较两组患者的帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)评分、临床疗效、不良反应发生情况、生命质量。结果治疗前,两组患者UPDRSⅠ、UPDRSⅡ、UPDRSⅢ、UPDRSⅣ、总UPDRS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,两组患者的UPDRSⅠ、UPDRSⅡ、UPDRSⅢ、UPDRSⅣ、总UPDRS评分均显著降低,且联合治疗组患者的UPDRSⅠ、UPDRSⅡ、UPDRSⅢ、UPDRSⅣ、总UPDRS评分均显著低于单独治疗组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。联合治疗组患者治疗有效率90.0%(27/30)显著高于单独治疗组70.0%(21/30)(P<0.05),不良反应发生率13.3%(4/30)显著低于单独治疗组26.7%(8/30)(P<0.05)。联合治疗组患者生命质量高比例63.3%(19/30)显著高于单独治疗组26.7%(8/30)(P<0.05),生命质量低比例6.7%(2/30)显著低于单独治疗组40.0%(12/30)(P<0.05),但两组患者生命质量中比例30.0%(9/30)、33.3%(10/30)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论盐酸普拉克索联合多巴丝肼片对帕金森病患者治疗效果较单独使用多巴丝肼片好,不良反应少,生命质量高。     

Economic evaluation for the US of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine in the treatment of metastatic pancreas cancer

Background: Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (NAB-P?+?GEM) and FOLFIRINOX have shown superior efficacy over gemcitabine (GEM) in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDA). Although the incremental clinical benefits are modest, both treatments represent significant advances in the treatment of a high-mortality cancer. In this independent economic evaluation for the US, the aim was to estimate the comparative cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of these three regimens from the payer perspective.

Methods: In the absence of a direct treatment comparison in a single clinical trial, the Bucher indirect comparison method was used to estimate the comparative efficacy of each regimen. A Markov model evaluated life years (LY) and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained with NAB-P?+?GEM and FOLFIRINOX over GEM, expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness (ICER) and cost-utility ratios (ICUR). All costs and outcomes were discounted at 3%/year. The impact of parameter uncertainty on the model was assessed by probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

Results: NAB-P?+?GEM was associated with differentials of +0.180 LY and +0.127 QALY gained over GEM at an incremental total cost of $25,965; yielding an ICER of $144,096/LY and ICUR of $204,369/QALY gained. FOLFIRINOX was associated with differentials of +0.368 LY and +0.249 QALY gained over GEM at an incremental total cost of $93,045; yielding an ICER of $253,162/LY and ICUR of $372,813/QALY gained. In indirect comparison, the overall survival hazard ratio (OS HR) for NAB-P?+?GEM vs FOLFIRINOX was 0.79 (95%CI?=?0.59–1.05), indicating no superiority in OS of either regimen. FOLFIRINOX had an ICER of $358,067/LY and an ICUR of $547,480/QALY gained over NAB-P?+?GEM. Tornado diagrams identified variation in the OS HR, but no other parameters, to impact the NAB-P?+?GEM and FOLFIRINOX ICURs.

Conclusions: In the absence of a statistically significant difference in OS between NAB-P?+?GEM and FOLFIRINOX, this US analysis indicates that the greater economic benefit in terms of cost-savings and incremental cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios favors NAB-P?+?GEM over FOLFIRINOX.     

中医体质辨识结合六味地黄汤治疗老年性阴道炎患者的临床效果

目的探讨中医体质辨识结合六味地黄汤治疗老年性阴道炎患者的临床效果。方法选取2017年6月至2018年6月沈阳市大众医院收治的老年性阴道炎患者104例作为研究对象,随机分为对照组和观察组,每组52例。对照组采用常规治疗方法,观察组在常规治疗基础上采取中医体质辨识结合六味地黄汤的治疗方法。比较两组的治疗效果,以及治疗前后症状体征改善情况、阴道健康状况。结果观察组治疗有效率为96.15%,高于对照组的73.08%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗前症状体征积分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,观察组带下量(0.93±0.19)分、白带异味(0.65±0.24)分、阴道灼热(0.63±0.20)分、外阴瘙痒(0.71±0.25)分,低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗前阴道健康积分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,观察组阴道黏膜(1.01±0.38)分、阴道湿润(0.95±0.33)分、阴道弹力(1.32±0.34)分、阴道pH值(0.67±0.36)分、阴道清洁度(0.54±0.25)分,低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在老年性阴道炎的治疗中,采取中医体质辨识结合六味地黄汤的治疗方法,能够提高治疗有效率,改善症状体征及阴道健康,临床效果显著。