阿仑磷酸钠片联合唑来膦酸注射液治疗骨质疏松症患者的药物经济学评价

目的探讨阿仑磷酸钠片联合唑来膦酸注射液治疗骨质疏松症的成本-效果。方法选取2016年12月至2018年2月于阜新市中医医院骨伤科治疗的138例骨质疏松症患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,每组69例。对照组给予阿仑磷酸钠片治疗,观察组在对照组治疗基础上采用唑来膦酸注射液治疗,比较两组患者治疗效果,并进行成本-效果分析。结果观察组治疗有效率为97.10%,显著高于对照组的75.36%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,与对照组比较,观察组患者腰椎骨、股骨颈和Ward’s三角区骨密度水平显著提高(P<0.05),血清Ca2+、骨特异性碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、降钙素(HCT)水平显著提高(P<0.05),成本-效果比提高(P<0.05),不良反应发生率降低(P<0.05)。结论阿仑磷酸钠片联合唑来膦酸注射液治疗可明显提高骨质疏松症患者疗效,调节骨密度,有助于骨代谢指标恢复,但其成本也较高。     

绝经后骨质疏松并发骨关节炎患者采用骨化三醇联合阿仑膦酸钠治疗的疗效

目的 探讨骨化三醇联合阿仑膦酸钠对绝经后骨质疏松并发骨关节炎患者骨代谢及骨强度的影响。方法 选取2020年1月至2021年1月于安徽医科大学第一附属医院治疗的绝经后骨质疏松并发骨关节炎患者56例作为研究对象,按随机数字表法分为观察组与对照组,每组28例。对照组予以骨化三醇胶丸与维D钙咀嚼片口服,观察组患者在对照组用药基础上予以阿仑膦酸钠片口服治疗。治疗前及治疗12个月后检测两组患者腰椎骨密度（BMD）、股骨颈BMD及股骨颈屈曲应力比,酶联免疫吸附试验法检测骨代谢指标水平。并于治疗前、治疗6个月、12个月采用Lysholm膝关节评分评估两组患者膝关节功能。结果 治疗前两组患者各项观察指标比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。治疗12个月后观察组患者腰椎与股骨颈BMD较对照组明显升高,股骨颈屈曲应力比以及骨碱性磷酸酶、骨钙素水平显著降低,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。治疗6个月及12个月后观察组患者Lysholm膝关节评分均明显高于对照组（P<0.05）。结论 对于绝经后骨质疏松并发骨关节炎患者,骨化三醇联合阿仑膦酸钠治疗有助于改善骨强度与骨骼几何结构的稳定性,调节骨...     

唑来膦酸输注液与阿仑膦酸钠片预防骨质疏松性骨折的成本和收益比较

目的：研究唑来膦酸输注液与阿仑膦酸钠片预防骨质疏松性骨折的成本-效果和收益,并对其进行比较。方法：以相关文献为基础,考虑不同类型骨折治疗成本以及药物依从性的影响,计算唑来膦酸输注液与阿仑膦酸钠片预防骨质疏松性骨折的成本-效果和收益,并进行比较。结果：在不考虑依从性的前提下,对于最易发生的椎骨骨折,在有骨折史的研究对象中,唑来膦酸输注液预防组的有效率比阿仑膦酸钠片预防组高16.15%;在无骨折史的研究对象中,唑来膦酸输注液预防组的有效率比阿仑膦酸钠片预防组高22.33%。对于髋部骨折,在有骨折史的研究对象中,阿仑膦酸钠片预防组的有效率高于唑来膦酸输注液预防组1.2%;在无骨折史的研究对象中,二者无差别。对于前臂远端骨折,阿仑膦酸钠片预防组的有效率比唑来膦酸输注液预防组的高27.06%。两种药的用药成本非常接近,阿仑膦酸钠片年用药成本比唑来膦酸输注液仅高4.14%（157.2元）。对于55岁以上人群,二者收益非常接近,唑来膦酸输注液年人均平均收益比阿仑膦酸钠片高65.8～100.5元,约为三种骨折平均总成本的0.35%～0.54%。考虑依从性的影响,当依从性为70%～89%时,唑来膦酸输注液年人均平均收益比阿仑膦酸钠片高153.7～217.8元,约为三种骨折平均总成本的0.83%～1.17%;当依从性为20%～49%时,唑来膦酸输注液年人均平均收益比阿仑膦酸钠片高204.9～355.5元,约为三种骨折平均总成本的1.10%～1.90%。结论：对于55岁以上人群,阿仑膦酸钠片和唑来膦酸输注液两种药物的年使用成本和年人均收益比较接近,依从性对两种药物的收益之差影响较大。     

唑来膦酸治疗肺癌骨转移的临床观察

目的评价唑来膦酸治疗肺癌骨转移的临床效果。方法采用随机数字法抽选68例肺癌骨转移患者分为两组,甲组32例患者采用唑来膦酸治疗,乙组36例患者采用帕米膦酸二钠治疗,对比分析两组患者的治疗效果及不良反应。结果比较两组患者的治疗效果及不良反应情况,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论采用唑来膦酸治疗肺癌骨转移,其治疗效果与帕米膦酸二钠无明显差异,但前者使用方法更简单、易于患者接受。     

补肾养骨口服液联合唑来膦酸治疗骨质疏松症的疗效及其对骨代谢指标的影响

目的探讨经补肾养骨口服液联合唑来膦酸治疗骨质疏松症(OP)的临床疗效,并观察治疗后的骨代谢指标的变化情况。方法收集2015年7月至2016年10月收治的原发性OP患者共80例作为研究对象,依据入院顺序按照首位搭配的方式进行随机分组,分为对照组和观察组。对照组患者采用口服碳酸钙D3片联合唑来膦酸注射液治疗,观察组患者采用口服碳酸钙D3片、唑来膦酸注射液联合补肾养骨口服液治疗,两组患者共治疗1年。对比两组患者的疗效指标及骨代谢指标。结果在治疗前两组患者的骨痛评分及骨密度(BMD)对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);在治疗后,对照组患者的骨痛评分较治疗前出现下降(P<0.05),且观察组治疗后的骨痛评分较对照组下降更为明显(P<0.05);在治疗后,对照组患者的的腰椎L2-4、Neck区BMD较治疗前对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而观察组患者治疗后较治疗前腰椎L2-4、Neck区BMD较治疗前出现升高(P<0.05),且观察组腰椎L2-4、Neck区BMD较对照组升高(P<0.05);治疗前,两组患者的各项骨代谢指标对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),在治疗后对照组各项骨代谢指标较治疗前对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),在治疗后观察组BALP、h CT、β-CTX、DPD/Cr、TRACP-5b较治疗前出现改善(P<0.05),且较对对照组治疗后改善更为明显(P<0.05)。结论补肾养骨口服液联合唑来膦酸治疗原发性OP能有效改善骨代谢相关指标,提高临床疗效。     

唑来膦酸治疗恶性肿瘤骨转移疼痛的Meta分析

目的：以帕米膦酸二钠为对照,评价唑来膦酸治疗恶性肿瘤骨转移引起疼痛的临床疗效和安全性。方法：检索中国期刊全文数据库（CNKI）,鉴定有关临床对照试验（RCT和CCT）,采用RevMan4.1进行Meta分析。结果：共纳入24篇文献进行唑来膦酸有效性的Meta分析,17篇文献进行唑来膦酸安全性的Meta分析,7篇文献进行唑来膦酸平均起效时间的Meta分析,6篇文献进行唑来膦酸止痛维持时间的Meta分析。在有效性分析中,合并OR值为1.35（P〈0.004）,不良反应发生的合并OR值为0.78（P〈0.02）,平均起效时间合并的加权均数差为-0.39（P〈0.002）,止痛维持时间合并的WMD为3.37（P=0.21）。在敏感性分析中,得到了类似的结果。结论：与帕米膦酸二钠相比,采用唑来膦酸治疗恶性肿瘤骨转移疼痛更有效,不良反应更少,起效更快,但止痛维持时间没有显著性差异。     

放射性核素氯化锶联合唑来膦酸应用于乳腺癌骨转移患者中的效果

目的 探讨放射性核素氯化锶联合唑来膦酸应用于乳腺癌骨转移治疗中的效果。方法 选取2018年2月至2022年2月山东颐养健康集团淄博医院收治的70例乳腺癌骨转移患者作为研究对象,按治疗方式不同分为试验组与对照组,各35例。对照组采用唑来膦酸,试验组在对照组基础上予以放射性核素氯化锶,比较两组患者疼痛情况、肿瘤标志物、骨代谢指标水平及不良反应发生情况。结果 治疗后及第1次随访时两组数字评分法（NRS）评分与癌胚抗原（CEA）、糖类抗原125(CA125)、骨吸收指标Ⅰ型胶原羧基端肽β特殊序列（β-CTX）以及骨形成标志物总Ⅰ型胶原氨基端延长肽（TPINP）水平降低（P<0.05）,且试验组NRS评分与CEA、CA125、β-CTX以及TPINP水平低于对照组（P<0.05）;试验组不良反应发生率（28.57%）与对照组的不良反应发生率（20.00%）比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 在对乳腺癌骨转移患者进行治疗时采取放射性核素氯化锶联合唑来膦酸治疗方案,可有效缓解疼痛,降低肿瘤标志物水平,延缓癌细胞转移,改善病情。     

局部放疗联合唑来膦酸治疗骨转移癌痛41例临床分析

目的观察局部放疗联合唑来膦酸治疗骨转移癌痛的疗效。方法随机选择我院2010年1月~2013年11月收治的骨转移癌患者41例,局部放疗DT总量4000cGY/20f/4w,放疗前1d将唑来膦酸4mg溶入0.9%生理盐水100ml中,缓慢静脉滴注。结果 41例患者中,疼痛完全缓解(CR)28例,部份缓解(PR)8例,轻微缓解(MR)4例,无缓解(NR)1例,总有效率87.8%(36/41),毒副反应主要是乏力、恶心、呕吐、发热等,经对症处理后恢复。结论局部放疗与唑来膦酸联合治疗骨转移癌痛具有很好的临床疗效,能够显著预防患者发生病理性骨折等不良反应,且毒副反应较轻,具有良好的安全性,患者易于接受,值得在临床应用。     

注射用唑来膦酸治疗恶性肿瘤骨转移引起疼痛的成本-效果分析

目的：对唑来膦酸治疗恶性肿瘤骨转移引起的疼痛进行药物经济学评价。方法：根据随机、双盲双模拟临床试验获得的疗效结论,结合成本信息,以帕米膦酸二钠为对照,采用成本-效果分析模型进行药物经济学评价。结果：唑来膦酸的成本-效果比为28．54,而帕米膦酸二钠的成本效果比为34．58。结论：与帕米膦酸二钠相比,唑来膦酸治疗恶性肿瘤骨转移引起的疼痛具有更优的成本-效果,可以为临床节约卫生资源。     

老年股骨粗隆间骨折术后患者应用唑来膦酸联合碳酸钙D3治疗对髋关节功能及骨代谢指标的影响

目的 探讨老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者采用唑来膦酸联合碳酸钙D3治疗对髋关节功能及骨代谢指标的影响。方法选取2020年1月至2022年1月宜春市人民医院关节外科收治的70例老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者作为研究对象,按照随机抽签法分为观察组(n=35)与对照组(n=35)。对照组采用碳酸钙D3治疗,观察组在对照组基础上联合唑来膦酸治疗。比较两组术后骨折愈合时间,治疗前后Harris髋关节评分(HSS)、骨密度、钙磷代谢及骨形成标志物[骨碱性磷酸酶(BALP)、骨钙素(BGP)、Ⅰ型前胶原氨基末端前肽(PINP)]变化,观察两组不良反应发生情况。结果 观察组术后骨折愈合时间短于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后两组HSS较治疗前升高(P<0.05),且观察组高于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后两组股骨粗隆、股骨颈的骨密度较治疗前升高(P<0.05),且观察组高于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后两组血钙、磷水平较治疗前升高(P<0.05),且观察组高于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后两组BGP、PINP、BLAP水平高于治疗前(P<0.05),且观察组高于对照组(P<0.05)。两组均未发生严重不良反应。结论 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后采用唑来膦酸联合碳酸钙D3治疗,可促进骨折愈合,提升髋关节功能,增加骨密度,改善骨代谢水平,且安全性较高。     

Retrospective evaluation of the clinical benefit of long-term continuous use of zoledronic acid in patients with lung cancer and bone metastases

Abstract

Background:

For patients with bone metastases, skeletal-related events including fracture are common, can cause considerable morbidity, and may reduce overall survival (OS). This retrospective analysis assessed the effect of Zometa (zoledronic acid, ZOL), an intravenous bisphosphonate (IV-BP), on fracture risk and OS in patients with bone metastases from lung cancer (LC). (Zometa is a registered trademark of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, USA.)

Methods:

A claims-based analysis using commercial and Medicare Advantage data from >45 US managed-care plans was used to evaluate the association between fracture risk and treatment persistency (31–90, 91–180, 181–365, and ≥366 days) and follow-up duration in LC patients diagnosed with bone metastases between 01/01/2001 and 12/31/2006 and treated with ZOL or without (no IV-BP). Persistency was defined as the absence of a >45-day gap between ZOL treatments. Analysis of variance tests were used to compare follow-up duration, a proxy for OS, between ZOL persistency groups. The effect of time to treatment with ZOL was also assessed.

Results:

In 9874 LC patients with bone metastases (n?=?1090 ZOL; n?=?8784 no IV-BP) the unadjusted relative fracture risk was reduced by 40% with ZOL vs no IV-BP; fracture risk decreased consistently with increasing duration of ZOL treatment. Even short-term (31–90 days) ZOL significantly reduced fracture risk (47%) vs no IV-BP (p?=?0.005) with adjustment for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics. Delaying ZOL until after bone metastases were diagnosed significantly increased fracture risk (p?=?0.0017). For a sub-set of patients included in a survival analysis (n?=?550 ZOL; n?=?4512 no IV-BP), mortality was significantly lower (mean, 38.6 vs 46.8 deaths/100 person-years; p?=?0.038) in those treated with ZOL vs no IV-BP.

Limitations:

Interpretation of this claims-based analysis must be tempered by the inherent limitations of observational data, such as limited clinical information and the ability to control for prognostic factors.

Conclusions:

This retrospective analysis demonstrates that LC patients with bone metastases receiving ZOL had significantly reduced risk of fracture (p?=?0.005) and death (p?<?0.038) vs patients receiving no IV-BP. Longer ZOL persistency consistently yielded better outcomes, with ≥12 months’ treatment producing the greatest benefit.     

Cost effectiveness of zoledronic acid in the management of skeletal metastases in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients in France,Germany, Portugal,and the Netherlands

Abstract

Objective:

Zoledronic acid (ZOL) reduces the risk of skeletal related events (SREs) in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients with bone metastases. This study assessed the cost effectiveness of ZOL for SRE management in French, German, Portuguese, and Dutch HRPC patients.

Methods:

This analysis was based on the results of a randomized phase III clinical trial wherein HRPC patients received up to 15 months of ZOL (n?=?214) or placebo (n?=?208). Clinical inputs were obtained from the trial. Costs were estimated using hospital tariffs, published, and internet sources. Quality adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained were estimated from a separate analysis of EQ-5D scores reported in the trial. Uncertainty surrounding outcomes was addressed via univariate sensitivity analyses.

Results:

ZOL patients experienced an estimated 0.759 fewer SREs and gained an estimated 0.03566 QALYs versus placebo patients. ZOL was associated with reduced SRE-related costs [net costs] (?€2396 [€1284] in France, ?€2606 [€841] in Germany, ?€3326 [€309] in Portugal and ?€3617 [€87] in the Netherlands). Costs per QALY ranged from €2430 (Netherlands) to €36,007 (France).

Conclusions:

This analysis is subject to the limitations of most cost-effectiveness analyses: it combines data from multiple sources. Nevertheless, the results strongly suggest that ZOL is cost effective versus placebo in French, German, Portuguese, and Dutch HRPC patients.     

Assessment of zoledronic acid treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with bone metastases from genitourinary cancers

Abstract

Background:

Patients with bone metastases secondary to genitourinary (GU) cancer are at risk for skeletal-related events (SREs), including bone pain requiring palliative radiotherapy, fractures or surgery to bone, spinal cord compression, and hypercalcemia of malignancy. These SREs can be debilitating and potentially life-limiting. This study examined treatment practices and the association of treatment patterns with Zometa (zoledronic acid, ZOL), an intravenous bisphosphonate (IV-BP), with SREs and fractures. (Zometa is a registered trademark of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, USA.)

Methods:

Retrospective analysis of commercial and Medicare Advantage enrollment and medical claims data was performed to evaluate IV-BP use and SRE patterns in adult patients with GU cancers. Criteria included diagnosis of ≥1 bone metastasis and prostate cancer (PC), renal cell carcinoma (RCC), or bladder cancer (BlC) between January 2001 and December 2006; continuous healthcare plan enrollment for ≥6 months before the index date; and no evidence of prior IV-BP use. Patients were followed until disenrollment from the healthcare plan or December 2007.

Results:

Of 6347 patients (PC, n?=?4976; RCC, n?=?941; BlC, n?=?430; mean [standard deviation] age: 68.9 [11.1] years), only ～23% received ZOL. The mean time between diagnosis of bone metastasis and ZOL initiation was ～108 days. Among patients with PC, fracture risk was significantly smaller for ZOL vs no IV-BP (incidence rate ratio?=?0.70; p?<?0.001), and 2-year survival was significantly longer for ZOL-treated vs no IV-BP patients (p?=?0.007). Patients with longer persistency on ZOL had a smaller fracture risk than patients with shorter persistency. Sub-set analyses were not performed for RCC and BIC because the proportion of patients treated was too low.

Limitations:

Interpretation of this claims-based analysis must be tempered by the inherent limitations of observational data, such as limited and accurate available information, and unavailable information including clinical or disease-specific parameters.

Conclusions:

Intravenous BP therapy is not always received in patients with bone metastases secondary to GU cancers, and, when used, there are typically long time periods before treatment initiation. Without IV-BPs, PC patients have significantly larger risks of fracture and death compared with ZOL-treated patients, and benefits appear to be larger with increasing persistency on ZOL.     

红光治疗仪联合甲钴胺治疗中老年糖尿病周围神经病变患者的临床疗效

目的探讨红光治疗仪联合甲钴胺治疗中老年糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)患者的临床疗效。方法选取2018年1—12月于沈阳经济技术开发区人民医院内分泌科治疗的中老年DPN患者160例作为研究对象,按照治疗方法不同分为单纯红光治疗仪治疗组(A组)、甲钴胺治疗组(B组)、红光治疗仪联合甲钴胺治疗组(C组)、对照组(D组),每组40例。比较两组患者空腹血糖(FPG)、餐后2 h血糖(2hPBG)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、震动感觉阈值(VPT)、多伦多临床评分系统(TCSS)评分、治疗减分率。结果治疗后,C组的FPG、2hPBG、VPT水平均明显低于其他3组,SOD明显高于其他3组(P<0.05);B组的FPG、2hPBG水平均明显低于D组、A组(P<0.05);A组的FPG、2hPBG水平均明显低于D组(P<0.05)。治疗后与A、B、D 3组比较,C组TCSS评分明显降低(P<0.05);A组与B组TCSS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),A组与B组TCSS评分均明显低于D组(P<0.05)。治疗减分率A组为17.48%,B组为18.64%,C组为31.24%,D组为8.37%,C组治疗减分率明显高于其他3组(P<0.05)。结论运用红光治疗仪联合甲钴胺治疗中老年DPN疗效显著,与单纯红光治疗仪、甲钴胺治疗比较优势明显,可显著改善DPN患者的临床症状。     

Cost-effectiveness of denosumab vs zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with solid tumors and bone metastases in the United States

Abstract

Objective:

With increasing healthcare resource constraints, it has become important to understand the incremental cost-effectiveness of new medicines. Subcutaneous denosumab is superior to intravenous zoledronic acid (ZA) for the prevention of skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with advanced solid tumors and bone metastases. This study sought to determine the lifetime cost-effectiveness of denosumab vs ZA in this setting, from a US managed-care perspective.

Methods:

A lifetime Markov model was developed, with relative rate reductions in SREs for denosumab vs ZA derived from three pivotal Phase 3 trials involving patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), breast cancer, and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and bone metastases. The real-world SRE rates in ZA-treated patients were derived from a large commercial database. SRE and treatment administration quality-adjusted life year (QALY) decrements were estimated with time-trade-off studies. SRE costs were estimated from a nationally representative commercial claims database. Drug, drug administration, and renal monitoring costs were included. Costs and QALYs were discounted at 3% annually. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.

Results:

Across tumor types, denosumab was associated with a reduced number of SREs, increased QALYs, and increased lifetime total costs vs ZA. The costs per QALY gained for denosumab vs ZA in CRPC, breast cancer, and NSCLC were $49,405, $78,915, and $67,931, respectively, commonly considered good value in the US. Costs per SRE avoided were $8567, $13,557, and $10,513, respectively. Results were sensitive to drug costs and SRE rates.

Limitations:

Differences in pain severity and analgesic use favoring denosumab over ZA were not captured. Mortality was extrapolated from fitted generalized gamma function beyond the trial duration.

Conclusion:

Denosumab is a cost-effective treatment option for the prevention of SREs in patients with advanced solid tumors and bone metastases compared to ZA. The overall value of denosumab is based on superior efficacy, favorable safety, and more efficient administration.     

Retrospective database analysis of the effect of zoledronic acid on skeletal-related events and mortality in women with breast cancer and bone metastasis in a managed care plan

Abstract

Background:

Bone metastases are common in patients with advanced breast cancer, and place patients at risk for skeletal-related events (SREs) including pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, hypercalcemia of malignancy, and the need for radiotherapy and/or surgery to bone. These SREs are associated with reduced survival and quality-of-life. The nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates Zometa (zoledronic acid, ZOL) and Aredia (pamidronate disodium, PAM) reduce SRE risk in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer. This database analysis compared SRE and mortality rates in a real-life setting in women with breast cancer receiving ZOL and PAM, and assessed long-term ZOL benefit.

Methods:

A retrospective, claims-based analysis was conducted using commercial and Medicare Advantage data from >45 US managed-care plans. Eligible adult patients had diagnoses for breast cancer and bone metastasis between 01/01/01 and 12/31/06, continuous enrollment in the health plan, and no evidence of bone metastasis or intravenous bisphosphonate (IV-BP) use for 6 months before their first ZOL or PAM infusion. Patients were followed until disenrollment (including mortality) or end of the analysis period (12/31/07). Persistency was defined as absence of a >45-day gap between IV-BP treatments.

Results:

Of 8757 patients (mean age, 58.1 [SD 12.4] years), ～ 30% were treated with ZOL, 15% with PAM, and 55% with no IV-BP. Patients treated with ZOL had a moderately lower incidence of SREs (mean, 36.2 vs 40.0 SREs/100 person-years; p?=?0.0707) and significantly lower mortality (mean, 6.5 vs 11.2 deaths/100 person-years; p?<?0.001) compared with PAM-treated patients. Longer persistency with ZOL was associated with lower risk of fracture and all SREs (trend-test p?=?0.0076 and p?=?0.0200, respectively).

Limitations:

Interpretation of this claims-based analysis must be tempered by the inherent limitations of observational data, such as imbalances in patient populations and the potential for bias in treatment selection.

Conclusions:

This analysis suggests that fewer than half of breast cancer patients with bone metastases receive IV-BPs. Longer persistence with ZOL was associated with lower SRE risk, and ZOL-treated patients had longer survival and a non-significant trend toward fewer SREs compared with PAM.     

瑞舒伐他汀与替格瑞洛联合用药方案治疗非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者的临床效果及不良反应

目的探讨瑞舒伐他汀与替格瑞洛联合用药方案治疗非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者的临床效果及不良反应。方法选取2018年1月至2019年7月沈阳积水潭医院收治的70例非ST段抬高型ACS患者作为研究对象,依据随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,每组35例。对照组采用替格瑞洛治疗,观察组采用瑞舒伐他汀与替格瑞洛联合用药方案治疗,比较两组临床疗效、心肌损伤指标、炎症介质水平、不良反应发生率。结果观察组治疗有效率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组肌酸激酶同工酶、肌钙蛋白水平低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组炎症介质水平、不良反应发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论瑞舒伐他汀与替格瑞洛联合用药方案治疗非ST段抬高型ACS临床效果显著,不仅可以改善临床相关指标、心肌损伤,还可减轻炎症反应,且不良反应发生率低。     

利福平与左氧氟沙星联合治疗复治涂阳肺结核患者的临床效果

目的探讨含利福平与左氧氟沙星的抗结核方案用于复治涂阳肺结核中的临床效果。方法选取2017年4月至2019年5月锦州市传染病医院收治的66例复治涂阳肺结核患者作为研究对象,按随机数字表法将其分为对照组与观察组,各33例。对照组行含利福平的抗结核方案,观察组行含利福平与左氧氟沙星的抗结核方案,对两组治疗结果进行比较。结果观察组空洞闭合时间、痰菌消除时间较对照组短(P<0.05);观察组治疗有效率为90.91%,较对照组69.70%高(P<0.05);观察组治疗后30 min、1 h、2 h的利福平血药浓度与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组不良反应发生率为15.15%,与对照组12.12%比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论含利福平与左氧氟沙星的抗结核方案用于复治涂阳肺结核中效果理想,可缩短空洞闭合及痰菌消除时间,提高临床疗效,促进患者快速康复,且不会对利福平血药浓度造成影响,不良反应较少。