Potential “Savings” of Medicare: The Analysis of Medicare Advantage and Accountable Care Organizations

Medicare faces significant financial challenges because of rising health care costs. In response, Medicare reform efforts have been testing various payment and service delivery models, including accountable care organizations (ACOs), aiming to reduce expenditures while preserving or enhancing the coordination of quality care. The idea behind ACOs is to form an organizational network to coordinate all care for Medicare beneficiaries and in so doing, at least theoretically, improve quality of care and hopefully reduce medical costs. The purpose of this research is to apply Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to assess the potential savings of Medicare obtainable through optimally efficient implementation of ACOs and Medicare Advantage plans. DEA comparisons across plans achieve this purpose by identifying which Medicare plans operate relatively more efficiently and which are inefficient, and additionally, for inefficient plans, the DEA analysis generates target levels of “inputs” and “outputs” required to bring the plan into efficient operation. Knowing sources of inefficiency can also provide insights into Medicare reform, such as Medicare privatization and innovation models. Our results show that Medicare Advantage plans are more efficient in reducing health expenditures but incur higher administrative costs. Health expenditure savings can also be achievable by promoting government-sponsored managed Medicare such as ACOs. Finally, compared to the profit efficiency of Medicaid managed care plans, Medicare Advantage should have the potential for more Medicare market penetration from the supply (insurer) side.     

Medicare Secondary Payer--liability of alleged tortfeasors. Mason v. American tobacco company

The Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) statute does not provide individuals whose medical costs have been paid for by Medicare with a right of recovery against alleged tortfeasors (wrongdoers). Tobacco companies are not self-insured primary plans under the MSP statute because they have no existing contractual obligation to pay the health care costs of those injured by smoking.     

Medicare retiree drug subsidy compliance considerations

Employers and plan sponsors have struggled with many issues associated with Medicare's retiree drug subsidy program. Recent reviews of employer methods for collecting the subsidy from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) identified significant gaps that would affect the subsidy payment and create issues in case of an audit. In fact, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) has placed audits of employer retiree drug subsidy processes in its work plans for 2006 and 2007. This article discusses areas that employers must address now to avoid significant long-term financial and compliance problems in the future.     

The impact of consumer inattention on insurer pricing in the Medicare Part D program

The Medicare Part D program relies on consumer choice to provide insurers with incentives to offer low‐priced, high‐quality pharmaceutical insurance plans. We demonstrate that consumers switch plans infrequently and search imperfectly. We estimate a model of consumer plan choice with inattentive consumers and show that high observed premiums are consistent with insurers profiting from consumer inertia. We estimate the reduction in steady state plan premiums if all consumers were attentive. An average consumer could save $1050 over three years; government savings in the same period could amount to $1.3 billion or 1% of the cost of subsidizing the relevant enrollees.     

Opening a dialog: communicating with retirees about Medicare+Choice.

In October 1998, the Health Care Financing Administration sent information to 38 million Medicare beneficiaries in five pilot states, consisting of a comprehensive handbook entitled Medicare and You. The purpose of the handbook is to clarify new options under Medicare+Choice to participants. Such clarification is bound to initiate contact by Medicare beneficiaries to former employers/unions. This article addresses employers' need to develop a communication strategy for beneficiaries and suggests a methodology and possible questions that may arise.     

The impact of health care reform on older workers, retirees and employers

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 impacts everyone who uses or pays for the health care system. Among the new law's effects will be changes in older workers' health care choices as they transition from full-time employees to part-time work or other jobs and, ultimately, to retirement, and the retiree health benefit choices facing their employers. This article reviews the major issues surrounding these changes, including those affecting retiree health benefits, benefits for Medicare-eligible retirees and health care options for older Americans not yet eligible for Medicare. The authors conclude that although employers will be reacting in 2010 and 2011 with regard to some issues surrounding FASB ASC 715-60 and the early retiree reinsurance program, employers should consider waiting to make major changes until regulations are issued and the health plans for active employees have been fully vetted.     

Medicare in the 21st century.

The authors provide an overview of the Medicare program in terms of how the current program operates, the current issues it faces that may shape possible options for reform, and the implications of these features and issues for employment-based health plans. Current issues include adoption of a premium support model, changes in the eligibility age for Medicare benefits, Medigap insurance, benefits covered and customer service.     

Medicare on the critical list. Understanding the etiology of the disease will help in the search for a cure.

Medicare, and its companion program Medicaid, came into being as part of Lyndon Johnson's Great Society. Their purpose was to provide the elderly with equal access to high-quality medical care. Though the goals were laudable, the magnitude of the costs and of the effects was unforeseen. As the two programs made medical care available to a large segment of the population, the demand grew. At the same time, private industry became more generous with its health insurance plans. Because of their emphasis on hospital care, the governmental and private industry plans helped push hospital prices up. Now that both sectors are finding the cost of medical care unacceptably high, Congress is proposing remedial legislation and corporations are trying alternative health care plans. These authors explore how well the maladies of Medicare may respond to the various cures that are being proposed.     

The Effects of Offering Health Plan Choice Within Employment-Based Purchasing Groups

Employers may offer employees a choice of health plans either to promote competition among plans or to better cater to employee preferences for different types of products. This article examines whether the relationship between the availability of choice and insurance costs and coverage are consistent with these models of employer behavior. The results indicate that employers who offer choice have lower average premiums, primarily because employees are enrolled in less generous plans, and cover a greater proportion of workers than those who do not. The results are consistent with employers offering choice to accommodate diverse worker preferences.     

Consumer-driven health plans: design features to promote quality improvement

The most prevalent form of consumer-driven health plans (CDHPs) presents risks in terms of the cost, quality and appropriate use of health care. This article identifies those risks and shows employers how they can reduce them without compromising the overall cost-control potential of CDHPs. A good CDHP strategy should work on both the demand and supply sides of the market.     

Prospects for account-based health plans under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Account-based health plans (ABHPs), which combine high-deductible plans with either health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs) or health savings accounts (HSAs), have gained popularity in recent years. Because there is growing evidence these plans are indeed engaging consumers and moderating cost increases, employers will need ABHP design options as they strive to bring costs under control in coming years. Some observers, however, are now concerned that benefits standards introduced by federal health care reform will undermine these plans, and many in the business community anticipate new health benefits mandates will drive up employers' total health care costs. The authors show that although the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) of 2010 includes numerous provisions that will likely increase costs for employers, the law also accommodates, and may even foster, HSAs and HRAs.     

Medicare+Choice--cost and funding issues for Medicare risk plans.

The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 contained the most important changes in Medicare since its inception in 1965. The most notable changes include Medicare+Choice, which includes existing Medicare risk programs. The author offers a brief summary of the history of Medicare and the changes that will impact employer/union service providers. Areas of discussion include typical Medicare risk benefit packages, a financial analysis of Medicare risk contractors and changes to risk contracting under the new law.     

The Budget Control Act implications for Medicare

The Budget Control Act of 2011 created a 12-member bipartisan congressional committee to develop proposed legislation aimed at reducing the federal deficit. When the committee failed to produce a bill, automatic across-the-board cuts were triggered that include cuts to Medicare. The Medicare cuts would be covered by reduced reimbursements to hospitals. If Congress does not vote to override the automatic cuts, they will take effect on Jan. 2, 2013.