A Bayesian estimator for stochastic frontier models with errors in variables

A Bayesian estimator is proposed for a stochastic frontier model with errors in variables. The model assumes a truncated-normal distribution for the inefficiency and accommodates exogenous determinants of inefficiency. An empirical example of Tobin??s Q investment model is provided, in which the Q variable is known to suffer from measurement error. Results show that correcting for measurement error in the Q variable has an important effect on the estimation results.     

Estimation of stochastic frontier models based on multimodel inference

In most empirical studies, once the best model has been selected according to a certain criterion, subsequent analysis is conducted conditionally on the chosen model. In other words, the uncertainty of model selection is ignored once the best model has been chosen. However, the true data-generating process is in general unknown and may not be consistent with the chosen model. In the analysis of productivity and technical efficiencies in the stochastic frontier settings, if the estimated parameters or the predicted efficiencies differ across competing models, then it is risky to base the prediction on the selected model. Buckland et al. (Biometrics 53:603?C618, 1997) have shown that if model selection uncertainty is ignored, the precision of the estimate is likely to be overestimated, the estimated confidence intervals of the parameters are often below the nominal level, and consequently, the prediction may be less accurate than expected. In this paper, we suggest using the model-averaged estimator based on the multimodel inference to estimate stochastic frontier models. The potential advantages of the proposed approach are twofold: incorporating the model selection uncertainty into statistical inference; reducing the model selection bias and variance of the frontier and technical efficiency estimators. The approach is demonstrated empirically via the estimation of an Indian farm data set.     

Estimation and testing of stochastic frontier models using variational Bayes

We show how a wide range of stochastic frontier models can be estimated relatively easily using variational Bayes. We derive approximate posterior distributions and point estimates for parameters and inefficiency effects for (a) time invariant models with several alternative inefficiency distributions, (b) models with time varying effects, (c) models incorporating environmental effects, and (d) models with more flexible forms for the regression function and error terms. Despite the abundance of stochastic frontier models, there have been few attempts to test the various models against each other, probably due to the difficulty of performing such tests. One advantage of the variational Bayes approximation is that it facilitates the computation of marginal likelihoods that can be used to compare models. We apply this idea to test stochastic frontier models with different inefficiency distributions. Estimation and testing is illustrated using three examples.     

Confidence statements for efficiency estimates from stochastic frontier models

This paper is an empirical study of the uncertainty associated with technical efficiency estimates from stochastic frontier models. We show how to construct confidence intervals for estimates of technical efficiency levels under different sets of assumptions ranging from the very strong to the relatively weak. We demonstrate empirically how the degree of uncertainty associated with these estimates relates to the strength of the assumptions made and to various features of the data.     

On the distribution of estimated technical efficiency in stochastic frontier models

We consider a stochastic frontier model with error ε=v−u$\epsilon =v-u$, where v$v$ is normal and u$u$ is half normal. We derive the distribution of the usual estimate of u,E(u|ε)$u,E\left(u\right|\epsilon )$. We show that as the variance of v$v$ approaches zero, E(u|ε)−u$E\left(u\right|\epsilon )-u$ converges to zero, while as the variance of v$v$ approaches infinity, E(u|ε)$E\left(u\right|\epsilon )$ converges to E(u)$E\left(u\right)$. We graph the density of E(u|ε)$E\left(u\right|\epsilon )$ for intermediate cases. To show that E(u|ε)$E\left(u\right|\epsilon )$ is a shrinkage of u towards its mean, we derive and graph the distribution of E(u|ε)$E\left(u\right|\epsilon )$ conditional on u$u$. We also consider the distribution of estimated inefficiency in the fixed-effects panel data setting.     

Stochastic frontier models with threshold efficiency

This paper proposes a tail-truncated stochastic frontier model that allows for the truncation of technical efficiency from below. The truncation bound implies the inefficiency threshold for survival. Specifically, this paper assumes a uniform distribution of technical inefficiency and derives the likelihood function. Even though this distributional assumption imposes a strong restriction that technical inefficiency has a uniform probability density over [0, θ], where θ is the threshold parameter, this model has two advantages: (1) the reduction in the number of parameters compared with more complicated tail-truncated models allows better performance in numerical optimization; and (2) it is useful for empirical studies of the distribution of efficiency or productivity, particularly the truncation of the distribution. The Monte Carlo simulation results support the argument that this model approximates the distribution of inefficiency precisely, as the data-generating process not only follows the uniform distribution but also the truncated half-normal distribution if the inefficiency threshold is small.     

Estimation of inefficiency in stochastic frontier models: a Bayesian kernel approach

We propose a kernel-based Bayesian framework for the analysis of stochastic frontiers and efficiency measurement. The primary feature of this framework is that the unknown distribution of inefficiency is approximated by a transformed Rosenblatt-Parzen kernel density estimator. To justify the kernel-based model, we conduct a Monte Carlo study and also apply the model to a panel of U.S. large banks. Simulation results show that the kernel-based model is capable of providing more precise estimation and prediction results than the commonly-used exponential stochastic frontier model. The Bayes factor also favors the kernel-based model over the exponential model in the empirical application.

     

Modeling dependence in two-tier stochastic frontier models

The two-tier stochastic frontier model has seen widespread application across a range of social science domains. It is particularly useful in examining bilateral exchanges where unobserved side-specific information exists on both sides of the transaction. These buyer and seller specific informational aspects offer opportunities to extract surplus from the other side of the market, in combination also with uneven relative bargaining power. Currently, this model is hindered by the fact that identification and estimation relies on the potentially restrictive assumption that these factors are statistically independent. We present three different models for empirical application that allow for varying degrees of dependence across these latent informational/bargaining factors.

     

On the accuracy of bootstrap confidence intervals for efficiency levels in stochastic frontier models with panel data

We study the construction of confidence intervals for efficiency levels of individual firms in stochastic frontier models with panel data. The focus is on bootstrapping and related methods. We start with a survey of various versions of the bootstrap. We also propose a simple parametric alternative in which one acts as if the␣identity of the best firm is known. Monte Carlo simulations indicate that the parametric method works better than the␣percentile bootstrap, but not as well as bootstrap methods that make bias corrections. All of these methods are valid␣only for large time-series sample size (T), and correspondingly none of the methods yields very accurate confidence intervals except when T is large enough that the identity of the best firm is clear. We also present empirical results for two well-known data sets.      

Estimation of the two-tiered stochastic frontier model with the scaling property

The two-tiered stochastic frontier model has enjoyed success across a range of application domains where it is believed that incomplete information on both sides of the market leads to surplus which buyers and sellers can extract. Currently, this model is hindered by the fact that estimation relies on very restrictive distributional assumptions on the behavior of incomplete information on both sides of the market. However, this reliance on specific parametric distributional assumptions can be eschewed if the scaling property is invoked. The scaling property has been well studied in the stochastic frontier literature, but as of yet, has not been used in the two-tier frontier setting.     

Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models

Previous studies of the so-called frontier production function have not utilized an adequate characterization of the disturbance term for such a model. In this paper we provide an appropriate specification, by defining the disturbance term as the sum of symmetric normal and (negative) half-normal random variables. Various aspects of maximum-likelihood estimation for the coefficients of a production function with an additive disturbance term of this sort are then considered.     

Goodness of fit tests in stochastic frontier models

In this paper we discuss goodness of fit tests for the distribution of technical inefficiency in stochastic frontier models. If we maintain the hypothesis that the assumed normal distribution for statistical noise is correct, the assumed distribution for technical inefficiency is testable. We show that a goodness of fit test can be based on the distribution of estimated technical efficiency, or equivalently on the distribution of the composed error term. We consider both the Pearson χ ² test and the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. We provide simulation results to show the extent to which the tests are reliable in finite samples.     

Model uncertainty and efficiency measurement in stochastic frontier analysis with generalized errors

Journal of Productivity Analysis - Advanced efficiency measurement methods usually fall within Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA), Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), or their derivatives. Although...     

Estimation and inference in parametric deterministic frontier models

In this paper we consider parametric deterministic frontier models. For example, the production frontier may be linear in the inputs, and the error is purely one-sided, with a known distribution such as exponential or half-normal. The literature contains many negative results for this model. Schmidt (Rev Econ Stat 58:238–239, 1976) showed that the Aigner and Chu (Am Econ Rev 58:826–839, 1968) linear programming estimator was the exponential MLE, but that this was a non-regular problem in which the statistical properties of the MLE were uncertain. Richmond (Int Econ Rev 15:515–521, 1974) and Greene (J Econom 13:27–56, 1980) showed how the model could be estimated by two different versions of corrected OLS, but this did not lead to methods of inference for the inefficiencies. Greene (J Econom 13:27–56, 1980) considered conditions on the distribution of inefficiency that make this a regular estimation problem, but many distributions that would be assumed do not satisfy these conditions. In this paper we show that exact (finite sample) inference is possible when the frontier and the distribution of the one-sided error are known up to the values of some parameters. We give a number of analytical results for the case of intercept only with exponential errors. In other cases that include regressors or error distributions other than exponential, exact inference is still possible but simulation is needed to calculate the critical values. We also discuss the case that the distribution of the error is unknown. In this case asymptotically valid inference is possible using subsampling methods.     

Nonparametric least squares methods for stochastic frontier models

When analyzing productivity and efficiency of firms, stochastic frontier models are very attractive because they allow, as in typical regression models, to introduce some noise in the Data Generating Process . Most of the approaches so far have been using very restrictive fully parametric specified models, both for the frontier function and for the components of the stochastic terms. Recently, local MLE approaches were introduced to relax these parametric hypotheses. In this work we show that most of the benefits of the local MLE approach can be obtained with less assumptions and involving much easier, faster and numerically more robust computations, by using nonparametric least-squares methods. Our approach can also be viewed as a semi-parametric generalization of the so-called “modified OLS” that was introduced in the parametric setup. If the final evaluation of individual efficiencies requires, as in the local MLE approach, the local specification of the distributions of noise and inefficiencies, it is shown that a lot can be learned on the production process without such specifications. Even elasticities of the mean inefficiency can be analyzed with unspecified noise distribution and a general class of local one-parameter scale family for inefficiencies. This allows to discuss the variation in inefficiency levels with respect to explanatory variables with minimal assumptions on the Data Generating Process.     

On maximum likelihood estimation of stochastic frontier production models

The iterative algorithm suggested by Greene (1982) for the estimation of stochastic frontier production models does not necessarily solve the likelihood equations. Corrected iterative algorithms which generalize Fair's method (1977) and solve the likelihood equations are derived. These algorithms are compared with the Newton method in an empirical case. The Newton method is more time saving than these algorithms.     

Simple tests of alternative specifications in stochastic frontier models

Previous work on stochastic production frontiers has generated a family of models, of varying degrees of complexity. Since this family is nested (in the sense that the more general models contain the less general), we can test the restrictions that distinguish the model. In this paper we provide tests of these restrictions, based on the results of estimating the simpler (restricted) models. Some of our tests are LM tests. However, in other cases the LM test fails, so we provide alternative simple tests.     

Properties of technical efficiency estimators in the stochastic frontier model

This paper considers the disturbance specification ε = v ? u of the stochastic frontier model. For v distributed zero-mean normal and u half normal or exponential, we evaluate the population correlation coefficients between u and three estimators of u, E(u|ε) and two linear estimators, for various values of the signal-to-noise ratio.     

Estimating efficiency effects in a panel data stochastic frontier model

Journal of Productivity Analysis - This paper proposes a panel data based stochastic frontier model which accommodates time-invariant unobserved heterogeneity along with efficiency effects. The...     

Likelihood ratio tests for model selection of stochastic frontier models

An important issue when conducting stochastic frontier analysis is how to choose a proper parametric model, which includes choices of the functional form of the frontier function, distributions of the composite errors, and also the exogenous variables. In this paper, we extend the likelihood ratio test of Vuong, Econometrica 57(2):307–333, (1989) and Takeuchi’s, Suri-Kagaku (Math Sci) 153:12–18, (1976) model selection criterion to the stochastic frontier models. The most attractive feature of this test is that it can not only be used for testing a non-nested model, but also still be applicable even when the general model is misspecified. Finally, we also demonstrate how to apply this test to the Indian farm data used by Battese and Coelli, J Prod Anal 3:153–169, (1992), Empir Econ 20(2):325–332, (1995) and Alvarez et al., J Prod Anal 25:201–212, (2006).