Non-Linear Value-at-Risk

Value-at-risk methods which employ a linear ("delta only") approximationto the relation between instrument values and the underlyingrisk factors are unlikely to be robust when applied to portfolioscontaining non-linear contracts such as options. The most widelyused alternative to the delta-only approach involves revaluingeach contract for a large number of simulated values of theunderlying factors. In this paper we explore an alternativeapproach which uses a quadratic approximation to the relationbetween asset values and the risk factors. This method (i) islikely to be better adapted than the linear method to the problemof assessing risk in portfolios containing non-linear assets,(ii) is less computationally intensive than simulation usingfull-revaluation and (iii) in common with the delta-only method,operates at the level of portfolio characteristics (deltas andgammas) rather than individual instruments.     

Risk Management for Linear and Non-Linear Assets: A Bootstrap Method with Importance Resampling to Evaluate Value-at-Risk

Many empirical studies suggest that the distribution of risk factors has heavy tails. One always assumes that the underlying risk factors follow a multivariate normal distribution that is a assumption in conflict with empirical evidence. We consider a multivariate t distribution for capturing the heavy tails and a quadratic function of the changes is generally used in the risk factor for a non-linear asset. Although Monte Carlo analysis is by far the most powerful method to evaluate a portfolio Value-at-Risk (VaR), a major drawback of this method is that it is computationally demanding. In this paper, we first transform the assets into the risk on the returns by using a quadratic approximation for the portfolio. Second, we model the return’s risk factors by using a multivariate normal as well as a multivariate t distribution. Then we provide a bootstrap algorithm with importance resampling and develop the Laplace method to improve the efficiency of simulation, to estimate the portfolio loss probability and evaluate the portfolio VaR. It is a very powerful tool that propose importance sampling to reduce the number of random number generators in the bootstrap setting. In the simulation study and sensitivity analysis of the bootstrap method, we observe that the estimate for the quantile and tail probability with importance resampling is more efficient than the naive Monte Carlo method. We also note that the estimates of the quantile and the tail probability are not sensitive to the estimated parameters for the multivariate normal and the multivariate t distribution. The research of Shih-Kuei Lin was partially supported by the National Science Council under grants NSC 93-2146-H-259-023. The research of Cheng-Der Fuh was partially supported by the National Science Council under grants NSC 94-2118-M-001-028.     

Diversification and Value-at-Risk

A pervasive and puzzling feature of banks’ Value-at-Risk (VaR) is its abnormally high level, which leads to excessive regulatory capital. A possible explanation for the tendency of commercial banks to overstate their VaR is that they incompletely account for the diversification effect among broad risk categories (e.g., equity, interest rate, commodity, credit spread, and foreign exchange). By underestimating the diversification effect, bank’s proprietary VaR models produce overly prudent market risk assessments. In this paper, we examine empirically the validity of this hypothesis using actual VaR data from major US commercial banks. In contrast to the VaR diversification hypothesis, we find that US banks show no sign of systematic underestimation of the diversification effect. In particular, diversification effects used by banks is very close to (and quite often larger than) our empirical diversification estimates. A direct implication of this finding is that individual VaRs for each broad risk category, just like aggregate VaRs, are biased risk assessments.     

Market capitalization and Value-at-Risk

The potential of economic variables for financial risk measurement is an open field for research. This article studies the role of market capitalization in the estimation of Value-at-Risk (VaR). We test the performance of different VaR methodologies for portfolios with different market capitalization. We perform the analysis considering separately financial crisis periods and non-crisis periods. We find that VaR methods perform differently for portfolios with different market capitalization. For portfolios with stocks of different sizes we obtain better VaR estimates when taking market capitalization into account. We also find that it is important to consider crisis and non-crisis periods separately when estimating VaR across different sizes. This study provides evidence that market fundamentals are relevant for risk measurement.     

Bias of a Value-at-Risk estimator

We develop the analytical second-order bias of a Value-at-Risk estimator based on an ARCH(1) volatility specification when the parameters are estimated by the method of quasi maximum likelihood. We show that the bias results from two sources: assumption on the distribution of the standardized residuals and the parameter estimation error.     

Simulation-based Value-at-Risk for nonlinear portfolios

Value-at-risk (VaR) has been playing the role of a standard risk measure since its introduction. In practice, the delta-normal approach is usually adopted to approximate the VaR of portfolios with option positions. Its effectiveness, however, substantially diminishes when the portfolios concerned involve a high dimension of derivative positions with nonlinear payoffs; lack of closed form pricing solution for these potentially highly correlated, American-style derivatives further complicate the problem. This paper proposes a generic simulation-based algorithm for VaR estimation that can be easily applied to any existing procedures. Our proposal leverages cross-sectional information and applies variable selection techniques to simplify the existing simulation framework. Asymptotic properties of the new approach demonstrate faster convergence due to the additional model selection component introduced. We have also performed sets of numerical results that verify the effectiveness of our approach in comparison with some existing strategies.     

Backtesting Value-at-Risk: A Duration-Based Approach

Financial risk model evaluation or backtesting is a key partof the internal model's approach to market risk management aslaid out by the Basle Committee on Banking Supervision. However,existing backtesting methods have relatively low power in realisticsmall sample settings. Our contribution is the exploration ofnew tools for backtesting based on the duration of days betweenthe violations of the Value-at-Risk. Our Monte Carlo resultsshow that in realistic situations, the new duration-based testshave considerably better power properties than the previouslysuggested tests.     

Optimal Insurance Design Under a Value-at-Risk Framework

This study designs an optimal insurance policy form endogenously, assuming the objective of the insured is to maximize expected final wealth under the Value-at-Risk (VaR) constraint. The optimal insurance policy can be replicated using three options, including a long call option with a small strike price, a short call option with a large strike price, and a short cash-or-nothing call option. Additionally, this study also calculates the optimal insurance levels for these models when we restrict the indemnity to be one of three common forms: a deductible policy, an upper-limit policy, or a policy with proportional coinsurance. JEL Classification No: G22     

Analytical Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall under regime-switching

It is well known that the use of Gaussian models to assess financial risk leads to an underestimation of risk. The reason is because these models are unable to capture some important facts such as heavy tails and volatility clustering which indicate the presence of large fluctuations in returns. An alternative way is to use regime-switching models, the latter are able to capture the previous facts. Using regime-switching model, we propose an analytical approximation for multi-horizon conditional Value-at-Risk and a closed-form solution for conditional Expected Shortfall. By comparing the Value-at-Risks and Expected Shortfalls calculated analytically and using simulations, we find that the both approaches lead to almost the same result. Further, the analytical approach is less time and computer intensive compared to simulations, which are typically used in risk management.     

Dynamic factor Value-at-Risk for large heteroskedastic portfolios

We propose a methodology that can efficiently measure the Value-at-Risk (VaR) of large portfolios with time-varying volatility and correlations by bringing together the established historical simulation framework and recent contributions to the dynamic factor models literature. We find that the proposed methodology performs well relative to widely used VaR methodologies, and is a significant improvement from a computational point of view.     

Nonlinear portfolio selection using approximate parametric Value-at-Risk

As the skewed return distribution is a prominent feature in nonlinear portfolio selection problems which involve derivative assets with nonlinear payoff structures, Value-at-Risk (VaR) is particularly suitable to serve as a risk measure in nonlinear portfolio selection. Unfortunately, the nonlinear portfolio selection formulation using VaR risk measure is in general a computationally intractable optimization problem. We investigate in this paper nonlinear portfolio selection models using approximate parametric Value-at-Risk. More specifically, we use first-order and second-order approximations of VaR for constructing portfolio selection models, and show that the portfolio selection models based on Delta-only, Delta–Gamma-normal and worst-case Delta–Gamma VaR approximations can be reformulated as second-order cone programs, which are polynomially solvable using interior-point methods. Our simulation and empirical results suggest that the model using Delta–Gamma-normal VaR approximation performs the best in terms of a balance between approximation accuracy and computational efficiency.     

Forecasting liquidity-adjusted intraday Value-at-Risk with vine copulas

We propose to model the joint distribution of bid-ask spreads and log returns of a stock portfolio by using Autoregressive Conditional Double Poisson and GARCH processes for the marginals and vine copulas for the dependence structure. By estimating the joint multivariate distribution of both returns and bid-ask spreads from intraday data, we incorporate the measurement of commonalities in liquidity and comovements of stocks and bid-ask spreads into the forecasting of three types of liquidity-adjusted intraday Value-at-Risk (L-IVaR). In a preliminary analysis, we document strong extreme comovements in liquidity and strong tail dependence between bid-ask spreads and log returns across the firms in our sample thus motivating our use of a vine copula model. Furthermore, the backtesting results for the L-IVaR of a portfolio consisting of five stocks listed on the NASDAQ show that the proposed models perform well in forecasting liquidity-adjusted intraday portfolio profits and losses.     

Nonparametric Inference of Value-at-Risk for Dependent Financial Returns

The article considers nonparametric estimation of value-at-risk(VaR) and associated standard error estimation for dependentfinancial returns. Theoretical properties of the kernel VaRestimator are investigated in the context of dependence. Thepresence of dependence affects the variance of the VaR estimatesand has to be taken into consideration in order to obtain adequateassessment of their variation. An estimation procedure of thestandard errors is proposed based on kernel estimation of thespectral density of a derived series. The performance of theVaR estimators and the proposed standard error estimation procedureare evaluated by theoretical investigation, simulation of commonlyused models for financial returns, and empirical studies onreal financial return series.     

Enhancing Insurer Value Using Reinsurance and Value-at-Risk Criterion

The quest for optimal reinsurance design has remained an interesting problem among insurers, reinsurers, and academicians. An appropriate use of reinsurance could reduce the underwriting risk of an insurer and thereby enhance its value. This paper complements the existing research on optimal reinsurance by proposing another model for the determination of the optimal reinsurance design. The problem is formulated as a constrained optimization problem with the objective of minimizing the value-at-risk of the net risk of the insurer while subjecting to a profitability constraint. The proposed optimal reinsurance model, therefore, has the advantage of exploiting the classical tradeoff between risk and reward. Under the additional assumptions that the reinsurance premium is determined by the expectation premium principle and the ceded loss function is confined to a class of increasing and convex functions, explicit solutions are derived. Depending on the risk measure's level of confidence, the safety loading for the reinsurance premium, and the expected profit guaranteed for the insurer, we establish conditions for the existence of reinsurance. When it is optimal to cede the insurer's risk, the optimal reinsurance design could be in the form of pure stop-loss reinsurance, quota-share reinsurance, or a combination of stop-loss and quota-share reinsurance.     

Style analysis and Value-at-Risk of Asia-focused hedge funds

In this paper we identify risk factors for Asia-focused hedge funds through a modified style analysis technique. Using an Asian hedge fund index, we find that Asian hedge funds show significant positive exposures to emerging equity markets. For both a static and rolling period style analysis, our model provides a high explanatory power for returns of the considered hedge fund index. We further conduct a Value-at-Risk analysis using the results of a rolling window style analysis as inputs. Our findings suggest that the considered parametric models outperform a simple historical simulation that is purely based on past return observations.     

Reduction of Value-at-Risk bounds via independence and variance information

We derive lower and upper bounds for the Value-at-Risk of a portfolio of losses when the marginal distributions are known and independence among (some) subgroups of the marginal components is assumed. We provide several actuarial examples showing that the newly proposed bounds strongly improve those available in the literature that are based on the sole knowledge of the marginal distributions. When the variance of the joint portfolio loss is small enough, further improvements can be obtained.     

Evaluating Interest Rate Covariance Models Within a Value-at-Risk Framework

A key component of managing international interest rate portfoliosis forecasts of the covariances between national interest ratesand accompanying exchange rates. How should portfolio managerschoose among the large number of covariance forecasting modelsavailable? We find that covariance matrix forecasts generatedby models incorporating interest-rate level volatility effectsperform best with respect to statistical loss functions. However,within a value-at-risk (VaR) framework, the relative performanceof the covariance matrix forecasts depends greatly on the VaRdistributional assumption, and forecasts based just on weightedaverages of past observations perform best. In addition, portfoliovariance forecasts that ignore the covariance matrix generatethe lowest regulatory capital charge, a key economic decisionvariable for commercial banks. Our results provide empiricalsupport for the commonly used VaR models based on simple covariancematrix forecasts and distributional assumptions.     

Value-at-Risk computation by Fourier inversion with explicit error bounds

The Value-at-Risk of a delta–gamma approximated derivatives portfolio can be computed by numerical integration of the characteristic function. However, while the choice of parameters in any numerical integration scheme is paramount, in practice it often relies on ad hoc procedures of trial and error. For normal and multivariate t-distributed risk factors, we show how to calculate the necessary parameters for one particular integration scheme as a function of the data (the distribution of risk factors, and delta and gamma) in order to satisfy a given error tolerance. This allows for implementation in a fully automated risk management system. We also demonstrate in simulations that the method is significantly faster than the Monte Carlo method, for a given error tolerance.     

Forecasting Value-at-Risk using high frequency data: The realized range model

Current studies on financial market risk measures usually use daily returns based on GARCH type models. This paper models realized range using intraday high frequency data based on CARR framework and apply it to VaR forecasting. Kupiec LR test and dynamic quantile test are used to compare the performance of VaR forecasting of realized range model with another intraday realized volatility model and daily GARCH type models. Empirical results of Chinese Stock Indices show that realized range model performs the same with realized volatility model, which performs much better than daily models.