共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
收益法因其最具资产的本质属性且其理论和方法体系最具成熟,因而是资产评估中最科学性的一种方法。由于其参数的不确定性因素最多,主观性最强,且不能经过市场验证,因而其评估结果也是在实践中最难得到资产交易双方认同的一种方法。所以,准确把握参数确定的规律,是增强资产交易双方信心的关键。 相似文献
2.
运用资产评估手段,合理确定专利资产价值对于专利资产的创造、运用、保护和管理具有重要意义。然而,专利资产评估方法的理论研究相对滞后,无法有效指导评估实践。文章以专利资产在生命周期中价值实现的内在规律为基础,针对目前评估实务操作中存在的问题,提出了基于专利资产价值实现规律的收益法改进思路,并首次提出了动态收益分成率和动态折现率的理念,重点分析了收益法改进的两个关键参数动态收益分成率和折现率的计算思路和方法。 相似文献
3.
一、企业价值评估收益法涵义及常用公式(一)企业价值评估收益法涵义企业价值评估中的收益法,是指通过将被评估企业预期收益资本化或折现以确定评估对象价值的评估思路。收益法中常用的两种具体方法是收益资本化法和未来收益折现法。收益资本化法是将评估对象未来某一年的预期收益除以适当的资本化率或者乘以适当的收益乘数转换为价值的方法。其计算公式如下: 相似文献
4.
收益法评估是指通过估算被评估资产未来预期收益并折算成现值,借以确定被评估资产价值的一种资产评估方法。该方法确定的资产价值,是指为获得该项资产以取得预期收益的权利所支付的货币总额。资产的评估价值与资产的效用或有用程度密切相关。资产的价值取决于效用,即资产为其拥有者带来的收益。资产的效用越大,获利能力越强,它的价值也就越大,即收益法的理论基础—— 相似文献
5.
本文拟从同风险同收益的思路出发,以复合投资收益率法为基础。探讨采用收益法评估房产时折现率的选取方法。 相似文献
6.
7.
资产评估(包括有形资产和无形资产评估)的方法无外乎三类:成本计价法,市场计价法和收益现值法。对于专利技术开发中投入的各种物耗、人工费用,以及其他的耗费,一般缺少详细的记录和缺少可靠的计算依据,难以按成本计价;而采用市场法对专利技术评估也缺乏可操作性,这是因为专利技术商品是个别的,往往是一项技术一个价,难以选择合适的交易案例来进行比较。因而采用收益现价法评估专利技术的价格,是由专利技术的特殊性所决定的。一、收益现值评估法的原理和方法专利技术具有高度垄断性。它不是作为一般商品和生产资料来转让,而是以… 相似文献
8.
企业价值评估中的收益法,就是把被评估企业的预期收益加以折现来确定其价值的评估方法,主要应用于正常经营的企业。正确应用收益法,需要充分考虑被评估企业的经营历史、现时绩效,尤其是未来的经营稳定状况和收益的可预测性,以便合理确定被评估企业的预期收益、预测期间和折现率。 相似文献
9.
我国会计核算是以历史成本为计价基础,且入帐后一般不调整资产的帐面价值。历史成本法虽然具有客观性、可比性、可操作性等优点,但在市场条件下,资产的价格随时有可能变动,历史成本有时不能反映资产的真实价值,资产评估后的评估值与评估前的帐面值或多或少地存在,为使帐实相符,一般都需对评估产生差异额进行会计调整。对单项资产评估以及对外投资资产的评估其处理有明显的规定,但对整体资产和采用收益法评估如何处理,目前还没有较为明确的说法,在这里谈一点看法。 相似文献
10.
在当今以经济全球化为背景,知识经济为主流的时代,各国之间的经济竞争实质已经转变为知识技术的竞争。无形资产代替有形资产成为推动一国发展的核心动力,成为各国增强国力和提高国际地位的重要资源。近年来,我国政府也十分重视自主创新问题,并且在党的十七大上正式提出实施知识产权战略。在促进知识产权的发展与创新的过程中就必须提到资产评估,特别是无形资产的评估,因为在当今的市场经济体制中,对无形资产的正确、合理的评估是推动和维持产权创新的重要保证。 相似文献
11.
企业价值评估方法的比较及应用 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
文章详细分析了成本法和收益法两大类性质不同的评估方法,将各种具体的评估方式进行了正反两方面对比,界定了各自的适用范围。指出收益法占主导,成本法为补充,是我国企业价值评估业的发展方向。 相似文献
12.
13.
递延所得税会计信息的价值相关性研究 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
2007年开始实施的我国新会计准则要求上市公司按照资产负债表债务法确认所得税费用,由此产生了递延所得税会计信息。文章以Ohlson(1995)的价值相关性模型为基础,以2008年-2009年沪深A股上市公司为研究样本,检验了递延所得税会计信息在股票定价中的作用。结果发现:(1)递延所得税会计信息具有显著的价值相关性,能够提供额外的增量信息;(2)公司所得税税率的变化会削弱递延所得税的价值相关性。研究表明,递延所得税会计信息改善了投资者对公司资产价值质量和未来盈利能力的合理估计,提高了会计信息在股票定价中的作用。 相似文献
14.
基于顾客资产的资本资产定价模型 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
以夏普的资本资产定价模型为基础,指出顾客资产计量模型中应该考虑顾客信用因素的必要性,并将其导入资本资产定价模型是建立计量模型的必然要求,从而推导建立了顾客资产期望收益率模型。 相似文献
15.
《Socio》2019
Cost-benefit analysis is probably the most comprehensive method of economic evaluation for public projects. Social discount rate, which makes it possible to compare the social benefits and costs extended over a period of time, has a key role in the allocation of public resources between alternative ends via cost-benefit analysis. Public sector needs to use the correct social discount rate in order to achieve a fair allocation of the fiscal burden between generations. While a high social discount rate may place a heavy fiscal burden on future generations, a low social discount rate may cause unfeasible projects to be approved. However, although social discount rate is a crucial parameter for public project appraisals, there is a lack of updated social discount rate for Turkey. In this study, the social rate of time preference approach is used to estimate this social discount rate. To this aim, both the personal taxation and the food demand methods are employed in order to estimate the elasticity of the marginal utility of consumption, which is a critical determinant of the social rate of time preference based on the Ramsey formula. The overall results show that the social discount rate estimated using the personal tax method is 4.88%, whereas it is 4.41% using the food demand method. Since the level of tax evasion is very high in Turkey, we recommend that the value indicated by the food demand method should be used employing the autoregressive distributed lag cointegration procedure. 相似文献
16.
Asset Pricing with Observable Stochastic Discount Factors 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
The stochastic discount factor model provides a general framework for pricing assets. By specifying the discount factor suitably it encompasses most of the theories currently in use, including CAPM and consumption CAPM. The SDF model has been based on the use of single and multiple factors, and on latent and observed factors. In most situations, and especially for the term structure, single factor models are inappropriate, whilst latent variables require the somewhat arbitrary specification of generating processes and are difficult to interpret. In this paper we survey the principal different implementations of the SDF model for bonds, equity and FOREX and propose a new approach. This is based on the use of multiple factors that are observable and modelling the joint distribution of excess returns and the factors using a multi–variate GARCH–in–mean process. We argue that in general single equation and VAR models, although widely used in empirical finance, are inappropriate as they do not satisfy the no–arbitrage condition. Since risk premia arise from conditional covariation between the returns and the factors, both a multi–variate context and having conditional covariances in the conditional mean process, is essential. We explain how apparent exceptions, such as the CIR and Vasicek models, in fact meet this requirement — but at a price. We explain our new approach, discuss how it might be implemented and present some empirical evidence, mainly from our own researches. Partly, to enable comparisons to be made, the survey also includes evidence from recent empirical work using more traditional approaches. 相似文献
17.
JIANG Nan JIANG Xiao-meng 《现代会计与审计》2008,4(12):9-12
In the eighth edition of International Valuation Standards (IVS) published by International Valuation Standards Committee (IVSC), "Fair value" is introduced into the asset valuation standards as one specific kind of valuation beside the market value. This definition is not only quite different from the one in the accounting standards, but also difficult to explain in the perspective of asset valuation. This paper focuses on the "Fair Value" in order to make its relevant meaning and application scope clear in accounting and asset valuation respectively. The discussion helps to avoid the abuse and the misunderstanding of "Fair Value" for the sake of vague definition. 相似文献
18.
Sebastian Anesten Niclas Mller Kenth Skogsvik Stina Skogsvik 《Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting》2020,31(1):5-34
In many decision contexts, there is a need for benchmark equity valuations, based on simplified modeling and publicly available information. Prior research on U.S. data however shows that the accuracy of such valuation models can be low and sensitive to the choice of model specifications and value driver predictions. In this paper, we test the applicability and pricing accuracy of three fundamental valuation (dividend discount, residual income, and abnormal earnings growth) models, all based on forecasts of company dividends, earnings, and/or equity book values. Extending prior research, we apply these models to Scandinavian firms with accounting data from the period 2005–2014, explicitly testing two approaches for the prediction of the value drivers—exogenously forecasted numbers versus projected historical numbers. Given access to the forecasted value drivers, the dividend discount model comes out as the most accurate valuation model. In particular, this holds in a comparison between the most parsimonious model specifications. The residual income valuation model generates the best pricing accuracy given the prediction of value drivers based on historical financial numbers. Notably, we observe pricing errors that in general are lower than what has been reported in prior U.S.‐based research for the dividend discount and the residual income valuation models. The pricing accuracy of the abnormal earnings growth models is surprisingly weak in the Scandinavian setting. However, these models improve somewhat after a couple of complexity adjustments, in particular with value driver predictions based on the projected history setting. 相似文献
19.
关于会计要素几个问题的思考 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
杜兴强 《上海立信会计学院学报》2007,21(4):30-37
本文注意到会计要素的重要性及其在不同国家财务会计概念框架中的差异性,首先探讨了会计要素设置的决定因素,并分析了与此相关的一个典型问题——为什么现金流量表不设置会计要素。此外,本文还对收入与利得的区分及其经济后果进行了探讨,并分析了资产计价先于收益决定的逻辑基础。最后,本文还对资产的定义进行了综评。 相似文献
20.
One explanation for a positive correlation between environmental and financial performance at the firm level is a bias in firms' investment evaluation processes caused by systematic differences between environmental and other investment opportunities. One of these systematic differences, often hypothesized but still unverified, is that environmental costs occur farther in the future than other costs. We empirically test this hypothesis, and find statistically significant support for it. In our data set the mean time lag for environmental costs was more than ten years, compared with five years for the control set costs. Such a difference could induce managers to accept too much environmental liability if they evaluate investments using discounted cash flow methods with a discount rate based on the firm‐wide cost of capital. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment. 相似文献