共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 62 毫秒
1.
以陕西省24家孵化器274家在孵企业为样本,运用层级递归模型,验证在孵企业创业导向、社会资本对孵化网络协调绩效的影响。结果表明:①在孵企业创业导向、内外部社会资本对孵化网络协调绩效均具有显著正向影响;②在孵企业内部社会资本在其创业导向对网络协调绩效的影响中具有显著正向调节作用,外部社会资本调节效应不显著;③在孵企业内、外部社会资本具有显著的正向混合调节作用,即当在孵企业同时具有高内部社会资本(高中心性)和高外部社会资本(高外部桥接水平)时,其创业导向对孵化网络协调绩效的影响更显著,而当外部社会资本(外部桥接水平)较低时,低内部社会资本(低中心性)在孵企业创业导向对网络协调绩效具有更强作用。 相似文献
2.
以孵化网络为背景,研究在孵企业如何在网络资源共享环境下有效获取资源,并通过网络化嵌入积累关系社会资本,提升创新绩效。构建了资源获取、关系社会资本与创新绩效关系的理论模型,以天津市206家在孵企业为样本,采用回归分析和结构方程模型对理论假设进行检验。结果表明:在孵企业资源获取对创新效果和创新效率具有显著正向影响;在孵企业资源获取对关系社会资本的信任和承诺维度具有显著正向影响;在孵企业关系社会资本中信任对创新绩效具有显著正向影响,承诺对创新绩效无显著影响;关系社会资本在资源获取和创新绩效间起部分中介作用。 相似文献
3.
《科技进步与对策》2016,(10)
以陕西省24家孵化器274家在孵企业为样本,运用层级递归模型,验证在孵企业创业导向、社会资本对孵化网络协调绩效的影响。结果表明:1在孵企业创业导向、内外部社会资本对孵化网络协调绩效均具有显著正向影响;2在孵企业内部社会资本在其创业导向对网络协调绩效的影响中具有显著正向调节作用,外部社会资本调节效应不显著;3在孵企业内、外部社会资本具有显著的正向混合调节作用,即当在孵企业同时具有高内部社会资本(高中心性)和高外部社会资本(高外部桥接水平)时,其创业导向对孵化网络协调绩效的影响更显著,而当外部社会资本(外部桥接水平)较低时,低内部社会资本(低中心性)在孵企业创业导向对网络协调绩效具有更强作用。 相似文献
4.
5.
6.
7.
网络多元性对企业绩效的作用关系仍存在争论。将外部知识整合(广度和深度)作为权变产生的企业因素、孵化支持情境(网络支持和制度支持)作为权变产生的环境因素,构建以外部知识整合为中介变量、孵化支持情境为调节变量的理论模型。实证结果显示,网络多元性对在孵企业孵化绩效具有正向作用,外部知识整合广度与深度在网络多元性和在孵企业孵化绩效中起部分中介作用,孵化支持情境能够有效调节网络多元性对外部知识整合深度的影响作用,并通过外部知识整合深度的中介效应正向调节在孵企业孵化绩效。 相似文献
8.
孵化能力不仅是企业孵化器生存和发展的决定性因素,也是企业孵化器高质量发展的重要体现.探知企业孵化器孵化能力的影响因素,促进孵化能力的提高已成为一个亟待解决的重要课题.选取4家企业孵化器和10家在孵企业作为调研对象,应用扎根理论对半结构化访谈获得的资料进行分析,探究孵化能力的深层次影响因素和作用机制.研究结果发现,企业孵化器与在孵企业的协同、孵化网络的健全、在孵企业集群的管理、孵化情境4个主范畴对孵化能力存在显著影响,但它们影响孵化能力的方式和作用并不一致.相关研究结论,为孵化能力后续研究的开展提供了分析框架和思路指引.在实践中,为孵化能力的提高和企业孵化器的健康可持续发展提供对策建议. 相似文献
9.
我国各城市孵化器协会相继成立,使得区域科技孵化网络由地方政府和孵化器二级治理模式,发展为地方政府、区域孵化器协会和孵化器的多中心治理模式。主要研究多中心治理区域科技孵化网络社会资本的本质、表现形式及其对网络产出的影响。结论表明:社会资本主要通过信任、网络和规范对多中心治理区域科技孵化网络的产出产生影响,以增强网络社会关系广泛性、创新资源流动性及信息共享程度。从社会资本角度提升网络产出的主要建议有:通过提升网络整体形象来拓展网络范围;充分实现区域孵化器协会对在孵企业所需资源的动态整合;及时调整和细化区域孵化器协会的有关规范;加强区域科技孵化网络主体之间的互动和合作。 相似文献
10.
11.
12.
13.
文章从消费心理学的角度,通过问卷调查的方式,对影响绿色食品购买行为的因素进行了分析;基于计划行为理论,构建了揭示购买行为态度与行为关系的理论假设模型。研究结果显示,消费者对购买绿色食品的态度、主观规范、知觉困难等心理因素对购买绿色食品的意向有重要影响,消费者购买绿色食品的意向对其购买行为具有预测作用。 相似文献
14.
This paper investigates trust behavior in situations where decision‐makers are large groups and the decision mechanism is collective. Theories from behavioral economics and psychology suggest that trust in such situations may differ from interindividual trust. The experimental results here reveal a large difference in trust but not in trustworthiness between the individual and collective setting. Furthermore, a field experiment captures the determinants of collective trust behavior among two Swedish cohorts. Beliefs about the other group and one's own group are strongly associated with collective trustworthiness and trust behavior. 相似文献
15.
16.
《Review of Economic Dynamics》2000,3(3):486-522
This paper explores the determinants of hiring at the macroeconomic level. It treats the hiring decision as an investment decision, similar to the one taken for physical capital or for financial assets. At its core is a present value relation which defines the worker's “asset value” for the firm and determines optimal hiring. The paper validates this relation using volatility tests and infers the unobserved asset values by estimating it. Hiring and asset values are found to be weakly correlated with the business cycle and much more volatile. The paper also demonstrates the links between models employed and issues examined in finance and the labor market. 相似文献
17.
Gordon Tullock 《Journal of Bioeconomics》2002,4(2):99-107
The simple economic approach to human behavior is inconsistent with many human actions. Firstly we engage in very considerable
charitable gifts to strangers, people who are not related to us. We also risk our lives, or some of us do, sometimes for the
benefit of collective entities like nations. This is not only a deviation from simple maximization for the individual and
hence uneconomic, but would appear to contradict the general principles of evolution. At first glance these traits should
have been selected out. Looking back to primitive times it can be seen that both of these activities had evolutionary value
then and hence have been preserved, although maybe they will be eliminated after a number of generations of modern society.
Hamiltonian altruism led to gifts to people who were members of tribal groups and to neighboring tribes. With the improvement
in communication, these gifts, albeit small gifts, are much more widely distributed. The preservation of the territory of
a tribe also had evolutionary value and hence the willingness of individuals to take risk to that end.
This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date. 相似文献
18.
19.