提高国有企业领导者核心能力

随着经济全球化的迅猛发展和社会主义市场经济的深化完善，中国国有企业生存与发展的压力与日俱增。为应对国际市场竞争的严峻挑战，一些大公司、大集团纷纷把战略重点转移到打造和强化企业核心竞争力上。可是究竟从何处切入构筑培育核心竞争力，却众说纷纭。有强调技术的，也有强调管理的；有偏重文化建设的，也有偏重制度建设的。然而，国内外无数企业兴衰更迭和强弱变迁的事实证明，技术和管理、文化和制度在企业发展中的地位固然重要，却不是构成企业核心竞争力的关键，企业领导者核心能力才是构成企业核心竞争力的核心因素。     

关键员工的人本化管理

就企业人力资本的构成而言，大体可以分为四种类型：一是企业的关键员工或称核心人才；二是独特人才；三是通用性人才；四是辅助性人才。其中关键员工具有高度的劳动力稀缺性和高度的企业价值性，是企业人力资本构成的主导，为企业创造的价值远远大于普通的员工，是企业知识管理的重心，形成企业核心能力的关键要素，既可带来核心竞争力，也可以带走核心竞争力。     

基于核心竞争力导向的企业文化建设

随着企业间的竞争日趋激烈,主导企业成败的核心竞争力已由过去的资本、劳动力和自然资源升级为信息、知识和文化.企业文化成为企业核心竞争力的核心构成要素,为企业可持续发展提供动力之源.建设优秀的企业文化对企业核心竞争力的培育与提升起着决定性作用. 企业文化与核心竞争力的内在关系 企业核心竞争力是由多种能力要素构成的多位一体的综合能力系统.对于不同企业,关键的能力不尽相同,但各种能力必须作为一个有机整体才能真正成为企业的核心竞争力.这些能力要素,根据其内在机理可分为三个层面:产品层,主要包括技术、人才、设备、产品等核心资源;制度层,包括管理控制及学习和创新能力;核心层,包括企业文化、人力资源、企业创新能力,而在这三大要素之间,企业文化又是重中之重,在某种程度上决定着企业创新能力与人力资源.     

燕山石化:文化力提升竞争力

实践证明，优秀的企业文化对增强凝聚力、向心力，树立形象，扩大市场有着深刻的影响，是企业核心竞争力的重要组成部分。企业文化通常是由企业理念文化、企业制度文化、企业行为文化等多个层次构成。理念文化是形成行为文化和制度文化的思想基础，是企业文化的核心和灵魂；制度文化是理念文化的载体，同时又规范着行为文化；而行为文化则是理念文化和制度文化具体、外在的表现形式，反过来又促进着理念的深化和制度的创新发展。     

关系嵌入、知识整合能力与惯例更新——创新型企业文化的调节作用

创新驱动发展战略背景下，激发创新成为企业的重要目标，而组织惯例更新则是其中的重要先导因素。本文以新能源汽车企业为例，探讨关系嵌入对惯例更新的影响，讨论知识整合能力的中介作用及创新型企业文化的调节作用。结果表明：关系嵌入的信息共享和共同解决问题正向影响惯例更新；知识整合能力在信息共享、共同解决问题与惯例更新的关系中发挥中介作用；创新型企业文化在信任、信息共享与知识整合能力之间起显著正向调节作用。研究结果为企业进行有效的创新管理和实践提供了有益的启示。     

中小企业核心竞争力

我想阐述的是关于中小企业核心竞争力的问题，我们经很长时间研究，结果发现，影响企业核心竞争力主要四个方面的因素，这四个方面的因素会使企业竞争力受到很大影响。第一方面就是制度因素，也就是制度选择问题，有的企业就是因为企业制度选择要高人一筹；第二方面战略因素，在企业战略选择上，他有超人之处，最终导致企业拥有很强的竞争力；第三个方面就是所谓的文化因素，也就是企业文化的塑造，比别人要高人一筹，最终导致企业有很强的竞争力；第四就是技术因素。我们所偏重前三，；，个因素，一个是企业制度选择问题，一个企业战略选择…     

企业知识吸收能力对竞争优势影响的实证研究

本文以我国黑龙江地区企业为调查对象,对企业知识吸收能力是否以及如何影响企业竞争优势进行实证研究.结果表明,企业知识吸收能力对企业竞争优势有显著的直接影响,在企业知识吸收能力的4个构成维度中,企业知识利用能力与企业竞争优势存在直接的显著相关关系,企业知识获取能力、知识消化能力及企业知识整合能力等3个维度与企业竞争优势不存在显著的直接相关关系,而与企业知识利用能力存在显著的相关关系.本文结果为培育和提升面向企业竞争优势的企业知识吸收能力提供了有益的建议.     

基于知识联盟企业核心能力超越的内在机理

随着信息化和全球化浪潮的到来,人类社会已经迈入了知识经济时代.在这一新的经济形态下,知识发挥着越来越重要的作用,知识联盟在破除核心能力刚性方面能够发挥重要作用,成为企业核心能力提升的一条重要发展战略.本文在分析核心能力知识性的基础上,探讨了知识联盟中协同创新与核心能力、核心刚性的关系,从知识流的视角出发剖析了入盟企业核心能力提升的内在机理.     

企业文化建设要突出特色服务发展

近年来,吉林油田公司通信公司落实科学发展观,坚持人本理念,以社会主义核心价值体系为引领,突出行业特色抓企业文化建设,重点加强了行为、制度、形象、精神四个方面的文化建设,培育了独具匠心的文化体系,进一步弘扬了大庆精神铁人精神,引导员工树牢“我为祖国献石油”的核心价值观,构筑员工实现企业科学和谐发展的共同思想基础,提升了企业的核心竞争力。     

以信息化建设提升企业核心竞争力

在知识经济时代背景下,信息化作为一种以技术效率为核心的管理模式。是提升企业核心竞争力的重要手段。基于核心竞争力的企业信息化建设将在研发、设计、制造、营销、服务等环节产生巨大的优势,在这种技术效率向组织效率转化整合的过程中,知识管理、人力资源开发与制度环境将起到中介作用,促使企业的综合素质和核心能力得到有力地提升。     

A model of corporate innovation management: some recent high tech innovations in Japan

The various models of Japanese corporate innovation management reported in literature are reviewed to identify the major elements of the innovation process. An integrated model is presented examining the recent examples. The Japanese corporate innovation process is highly interactive and involves comprehensive organizational intelligence, quick organizational learning, rapid technology diffusion, horizontal information flow systems, fusion of different technologies to obtain innovations quickly, concurrent engineering and quick utilization of core competence for new business development. The innovation system is quick to respond to competition and concentrates on developing core competence that is used for commercializing new products quickly.     

企业社会资本与技术创新：基于吸收能力的实证研究

本文针对我国企业社会资本影响技术创新的机制问题展开分析,从企业社会资本的特征维度出发,引入吸收能力的视角,提出了基于吸收能力的企业社会资本与技术创新绩效的概念模型。在问卷调查的基础上,通过多元线性回归分析和结构方程模型分析,对我国企业社会资本如何影响技术创新的问题进行了实证研究。研究结果表明,在不考虑吸收能力作用的情况下,企业社会资本的结构、关系和认知等三个维度的水平对于我国企业技术创新绩效的提升均具有积极显著的作用;企业社会资本三个特征维度的水平通过提高吸收能力进而正向影响技术创新绩效;其中,认知维度在结构维度和关系维度发挥效应中承担中介变量的作用。为提高企业技术创新绩效,建议以知识的获取和利用为导向,注重企业社会资本三个维度水平的均衡提高。     

浅谈知识管理与企业文化创新

在全新知识经济时代,知识管理与企业文化建设成为保持企业核心竞争力的重要资源。围绕知识经济时代的知识管理与企业文化创新展开论述,使现代企业真正认识到知识管理与文化创新的时代意义。对现代企业管理具有一定的现实意义和参考价值。     

培育和发展具有核心竞争力的大公司和大企业集团

为了增强中国经济实力和对“入世”后面对的激烈竞争，必须发展大公司和大企业集团。从目前情况看，中国的大公司和大企业集团的核心竞争力还很弱，在技术创新能力，多样化经营能力，适应市场能力和赢利能力等方面都与发达国家的大企业存在很大差距，我们必须从体制，机制，技术创新，增加人力资本，改善外部环境等方面多做工作，促进大公司和大企业集团核心竞争力的提高。     

Competence and Governance in Strategic Collaboration: The Differential Effect of Network Structure on the Creation of Core and Noncore Technology

Whereas most of the literature on the benefits of alliances for learning and innovation has taken on a competence perspective, this paper provides an alternative integrated framework based on both a competence and governance point of view. The former focuses on the role of knowledge flows as means to access new knowledge, whereas the latter is centered around the core concepts of opportunism and freeridership in knowledge exchange situations. Although it has generally been acknowledged that competence‐based benefits of collaboration may come at a price of elevated risks due to knowledge spillovers and freeridership, such a governance view remains understudied. This paper explains how a firm's alliance network structure affects benefits as well as risks of collaboration in the context of the creation of core and noncore technology. In the case of core technology, firms attach more value to reducing governance‐based risks relative to obtaining competence‐based benefits. The opposite is found when firms develop noncore technology. This paper contributes to the existing literature by going beyond the common idea that competence and governance perspectives are either complementary or competing. Instead, this study shows that for technology‐based collaboration, they can both apply at the same time, implying a trade‐off in some cases and offering synergy in other cases. Based on an empirical test in three different industries (pharmaceuticals, chemicals, and automotive), there is support for most of our hypotheses. Direct ties have an inverted U‐shaped effect on both core and noncore technology, and the effect is relatively stronger for the former. The results furthermore show that indirect ties play a positive role in noncore technology development and that this effect is not hampered by the number of direct ties a firm has. In contrast, indirect ties seem to hamper core competence development when companies have a lot of direct ties. Finally, firms are found to benefit from nonredundancy in their alliance network in their efforts to strengthen their core technology. The joint effect of these three network characteristics leads to optimal results for core and noncore technologies under quite different alliance network structures. This poses a problem for the ambidexterity of companies, when they simultaneously try to strengthen core and noncore technologies.     

战略演进、能力提升与文化协同——尖峰集团可持续成长的分析

本文运用企业可持续成长的三维动态分析框架对尖峰集团近50年的成长过程进行了深入分析。基于分析,我们发现在经济制度环境和市场竞争环境剧烈变革的背景下,尖峰集团的持续成长过程既是一个战略演进、能力提升与文化协同的动态发展过程,同时还是战略、能力和文化三者之间协同互动发展的过程。追求环境和资源的和谐,实现战略演进与管理过程的和谐,奠定战略和能力和谐的价值观基础,就构成了尖峰集团持续成长的核心要义。     

Using users: When does external knowledge enhance corporate product innovation?

Prior research on corporate innovation highlights the importance of accessing external knowledge from other firms and universities. However, survey evidence indicates that product users are perhaps the most important source of external knowledge. We build on existing theory to identify the conditions under which user knowledge contributes to corporate innovation and when the benefits will be greatest. Using a panel dataset of medical device companies and their collaborative efforts with innovative physicians, we find evidence that inventive collaborations with users enhance corporate product innovation and that the benefits are greatest in new technology areas and in the generation of radical innovations. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

企业的异质性假设和企业竞争优势的内生性分析

与完全竞争模型的描述根本不同，现实企业之间普遍存在着利润差距在企业内质性假设条件下，无论是新古典经济、传统产业组织理论的SCP分析范式，还是企业竞争战略的产业分析方法，都把企业的利润归结为外在的市场结构因素，而动态地看，现实企业是异质的，它表现为企业长期发展过程中积累的核心知识和能力的差异。作为企业实施竞争战略的关键性要素，核心知识和能力是非竞争性的，难以模仿和替代。它构成了企业长期利润或竞争优势真正基础。在企业异质性假设条件下，企业的竞争行为及其竞争优势是内生性的。     

Global Outsourcing Relationships and Innovation: A Conceptual Framework and Research Propositions

Increasing globalization and the rapid growth of information technologies, including the Internet, have resulted in drastic changes in international activities of companies. Once limited to manufactured goods, currently, global outsourcing encompasses a wide variety of knowledge‐based services, such as accounting, financial services, taxation, customer service, information technology, engineering drawings, human resources, research and development (R&D), data processing, and sales. The domain of outsourcing knowledge‐based services is the focus of this paper. Moving beyond the inevitability of global outsourcing, this research takes the perspective of the outsourcer and focuses on managing its transition to providers in the context of innovation. In addition to delivering projected cost benefits to outsourcers, effective transition management can facilitate the generation of innovations. This research attempts to extend the current academic research on global outsourcing in three ways: (1) It offers a framework for understanding the transition process in outsourcing and its relationship to innovation; (2) it takes a broader perspective of outsourcing, including globalization, knowledge‐based services, and core activities of the firm; and (3) using a parsimonious set of theoretical concepts based on control theory, it develops several research propositions to clarify the linkages between variables. Based on our theorizing, outsourcing top management should ask two questions when planning outsourcing of knowledge‐based services to generate innovations in a globalized world. These two questions are: (1) How close is the task to our core competence? And (2) how much tacit knowledge is involved in doing the outsourced task? Next, managers must identify global providers and then spend considerable thought in operational execution of the transition of the task for that is the only time that both complete teams will work together. For tasks that are close to core competence, rigid‐explicit behavioral controls should be put in place; however, for tasks that have high tacit knowledge content, high norms‐based relational control would be more effective. These different types of controls would lead to different innovation outcomes. Rigid‐explicit behavioral controls would produce incremental innovation while relational norms‐based controls would encourage radical innovation.     

宝维士联盛——服务客户，善待员工

描述了全球著名承包商一宝维士联盛的总体运营情况,重点从艺术与文化建筑、商业建筑、教育机构以及卫生机构四个方面,对其专业化业务房屋建筑进行了代表性的分析。从其核心价值观以及长期的可持续理念,对其发展战略进行了全面的剖析。指出其真诚服务客户、引领行业“健康与安全”发展以及专业化业务,全面化发展,值得我们借鉴参考。