论虚拟企业及其管理创新

<正>全球市场的形成加剧了当前的市场竞争,以泰罗制、福特制为标志的传统企业模式已很难适应新的市场环境。在高科技蓬勃发展的今天,市场竞争更加激烈, 顾客的需求趋于多样化和个性化。企业的     

基于SCP框架的中国物流业市场结构分析

文章基于SCP的研究框架,以2013～2017年中国排名前50的物流企业的物流业务收入数据为基础,通过行业集中度、赫芬达尔—赫希曼指数和熵指数等方法,对物流业市场集中度进行测度,分析我国物流业市场结构。研究结果表明,目前中国物流业市场集中度较低,属于垄断竞争型的市场结构,物流业市场竞争相对激烈,市场集中度有升高趋势。最后,针对当前我国物流业的市场结构,提出了相应的建议,以期提高物流业的市场绩效。     

生产企业物流管理流程对财务核算的影响

随着当前市场经济的逐步发展,社会主义市场经济体制的逐步完善,大多数生产企业在日益激烈的市场竞争条件下积极寻求新的市场竞争优势,以期在市场竞争中赢得主动,而物流管理流程的控制的重要性以及物流管理流程对财务核算的重要的影响,正逐渐为广大的生产企业所认识,生产企业通过利用企业物流管理流程对财务核算的影响,加强物流管理流程控制,从而形成企业的新的竞争优势,已经成为大多数生产企业的共识。文章通过分析生产企业物流管理流程对财务核算的影响,提出了自己的见解和建议。     

物流企业营销策略研究

物流企业要想在激烈的市场竞争中取得优势,就要综合运用各种营销手段,制定营销策略。文章结合物流企业的市场特点,讨论网络营销、"一对一"营销、游击营销以及绿色营销等四种营销战略在物流企业中的应用。     

基于聚类分析的航线运输市场细分研究

中国航空运输市场发展强劲,已跻身全球第二,国内客运业务市场竞争日益激烈。中国各大航空公司如何在激烈的市场竞争中制定适合自身特色的发展战略,开辟新市场新航线是其需要深入思考的重要问题。选取成熟的中国-北美航线市场为例,结合具体数据利用SPSS软件进行聚类分析,选取适当的指标进行量化分析,将中国-北美航线进行市场细分得出三类航线,分别阐述了其特征要素。进一步结合实际情况,对我国现有市场情况进行分析,并给与航空公司以建议,帮助其更好地进行市场定位。     

我国保险市场竞争格局的主要特点及其演变趋势

当前我国保险市场竞争格局呈现五大特点：一是市场竞争主体日趋增多，市场集中度不断下降。二是寿险市场高度集中，意外险、健康险、车险市场竞争激烈。三是中资公司依然占据绝对优势，但外资公司发展迅速，中资公司面临着日益严峻的竞争挑战。四是东部发达地区竞争激烈，中西部地区竞争相对平缓。五是市场规模越大、经营历史越长的公司，经营效率较高，竞争力较强。未来市场竞争主体会迅速增加，市场竞争将日趋深化。     

企业如何留住人才

知识经济时代的到来,使本已激烈的市场竞争呈现白热化的态势,更使全球紧张的就业市场和似乎非常繁荣的经济激烈动荡。面对新的形势,我国企业人力资源管理中的最大危机就是人力资源的流失。如何留住人才,是每一个企业管理者不得不思考的现实问题。     

需求创新——企业生存之本

在经济全球化的今天,市场竞争已是异常激烈,如何能够立稳脚跟并获得长足发展,是各个企业必须思考的问题.企业的生存与发展离不开市场这个舞台,因此满足消费者的需求和不断满足消费者新的需求是企业制胜的关键.     

打造中国服饰名城

芦淞有“富矿”,芦淞可“掘金”。面对中国入世后国际商贸流通巨鳄带来的激烈的市场竞争,面对众多新的经营理念和经营方式的营销挑战,面对我国消费结构升级换代的需求考验,作为“全国十大服装市场”和“中南地区最大的服饰物流中心”之一的湖南省株洲市芦淞服饰市场群,坚持科学     

我国发展第三方物流初探

自上世纪80年代以来，市场竞争日益激烈，在激烈的市场竞争面前，为取得市场竞争优势，企业不得不集中其人、财、物到主营业务上来。对于工商企业来说，物流量不是太大，而物流设施都是高投资项目，这些事实使它们觉得与其自己营运物流，还不如将它外包给物流企业划算。这样，一方面物流业务的需求方寻求物流外包，另一方面以提供专业化物流管理和服务为核心竞争力的供给方愿意承接物流业务，第三方物流服务业便应运而生了。     

Coexistence of large firms and less efficient small firms under price competition with free entry

This study constructs a game of technology selection and Bertrand-like price competition in a market with free entry. It demonstrates the existence of a Nash equilibrium in which a small number of firms adopting a large-scale technology coexist with, and charge a lower price than, a large number of firms adopting a small-scale technology. In this equilibrium, both available technologies and resources are allocated efficiently. This result provides a new economic rationale for antitrust law in general and, in particular, the US Sherman Act, wchich regards free entry and price competition as of foremost importance for maintaining market quality.     

Competition between branded and nonbranded firms and its impact on welfare

We examine a quantity competition among branded and nonbranded firms. The market comprises two consumer segments: one purchases only branded products (the high-end market), while the other segment's consumers purchase less expensive products (the low-end market). When branded firms take actions sequentially, we show that the branded leader has an incentive to restrict its quantity to avoid entering the low-end market. As the follower recognizes this incentive, it can restrict the leader by implementing a quantity constraint, which is affected by the number of nonbranded firms. We find that both the branded leader and follower could benefit from the nonbranded firms and that the leader prefers to have more nonbranded firms in the market than the follower does. Furthermore, we show that the free entry of nonbranded firms could negatively affect total surplus as well as consumer surplus even without any costs, because of the premium pricing of branded products.     

论我国中小物流企业的发展策略

我国的中小物流企业虽然发展迅速,但普遍存在服务质量、创新意识、品牌形象、营销手段、客户关系等一系列问题,阻碍了企业的发展。为此,必须在营销策略方面努力树立客户至上的服务理念,打造独具特色的物流服务,推广高附加值的增值服务,大力培养物流人才;在集团化方面确立适合的集团化经营模式和经营战略,这样才能够增强企业竞争能力,确保企业的顺利发展。     

家族涉入方式的差异如何影响企业双元创新意愿?

文章以2012-2017 年中国上市家族企业的数据,基于社会情感财富理论,分析了家族在股权与管理层两种不同涉入方式下的战略偏好与目标导向,进而探究出其对于双元创新的影响,并结合产品市场竞争环境下的情形,进一步分析了市场竞争的加剧对于股权涉入和管理层涉入与双元创新关系的调节效应。结果发现：家族在股权涉入与利用式创新呈显著的正相关,但与开发式创新呈负相关,而家族管理层涉入与利用式创新和开发式创新均呈现显著的正相关;产品市场环境的竞争能够加强家族股权涉入与利用式创新的正向关系和家族管理层涉入与开发式创新的正向关系。     

中小企业物流管理对策研究

加强中小企业物流管理工作,建立高效物流管理系统,不仅可以降低成本,改善服务,增加效益,而且可以提高企业的市场竞争能力。良好的企业物流管理不仅能帮助企业实现生产成本和价值优势,同时也是竞争性市场营销的有力工具。     

委托代理问题与经理控制权效率

在经理控制型企业中,尽管＂疏忽和浪费＂等委托代理问题必然存在,但是职业支薪经理的出现,适应了公司经营的专业性和复杂性,促进经营职能和承担风险职能的分离。文章从董事会授权、决策文化、选举机制等方面揭示经理控制权膨胀的制度安排,最后针对我国上市公司经理控制存在的突出问题,从股权结构的改善、经理市场的建设和股票市场治理功能构建三个方面提出治理建议。     

产品市场竞争动态与公司财务保守行为:实证研究述评

得益于产业组织理论与资本结构理论的交叉渗透,企业融资管理更加强调财务灵活性,即须基于产品市场竞争动态、公司战略、公司治理结构以及资本市场环境等因素进行综合权衡,财务保守由此作为一种能够适应企业当前情况及未来投资机会的投融资战略选择行为,而在当代资本结构研究中颇受关注。文章基于资本市场时机、行业竞争、公司治理结构及债务契约分析等四个视角对产品市场竞争与公司财务保守行为关系的经验研究予以述评。     

初始领先优势和协同效应对企业竞争的影响研究

初始领先优势和协同效应对企业在市场竞争中的演化结果具有重要影响.文章通过建立企业间的协同演化动力学模型,既考虑企业与消费者之间的协同效应,又考虑企业与企业之间的协同效应,分析了企业的初始领先优势和协同效应对企业竞争的影响,结果表明企业在市场竞争中胜出或被淘汰并不取决于它是强者或是弱者,而取决于初始领先优势和协同效应,充分说明了市场竞争的复杂性和初始领先优势与协同效应的重要意义.在此基础上,根据初始领先优势和协同效应对企业的影响机理,提出企业在市场竞争的对策建议.     

Market competition,differences in technology,and productivity improvement: An empirical analysis based on Japanese manufacturing firm data

In this paper we examine empirically the effect of market competition on firm productivity improvements using data drawn from the Japanese manufacturing sector. We find that a non-linear relationship between competition and productivity growth induced by R&D activity as suggested by Aghion et al. (2005) holds for Japanese manufacturing firms. We also show that greater market competition widens technology differences across firms, and firms facing more intense competition are more productive than other firms. Our empirical results imply that productivity improvement through R&D activity depends on not only a competitive environment but also technological differences between firms.     

An Economic Analysis of Audit and Nonaudit Services: The Trade‐off between Competition Crossovers and Knowledge Spillovers*

In this paper, I present a model in which both markets for audit services and nonaudit services (NAS) are oligopolistic. Accounting firms providing both audit services and NAS will employ oligopolistic competition in each of these markets. In addition to auditors' gaining “knowledge spillovers” from auditing to consulting or vice versa, oligopolistic competition in one market will influence the counterpart in the other market ‐ what I call “competition crossovers”. Although scope economies due to knowledge spillovers (for example, cost savings) are always beneficial to auditors, such benefits can entice accounting firms to adopt strategies (for example, price reductions) to compete aggressively in the audit market so that some, or all, firms become worse off. A trade‐off arises between these two economic forces in the two oligopolistic markets. Given the trade‐off between competition crossovers and knowledge spillovers, accounting firms may not reduce their audit prices, even though supplying NAS enables firms to decrease auditing costs — a nontrivial impact of oligopolistic competition in two markets on audit pricing. The empirical implication of my results is that because of competition‐crossover effects between the auditing and consulting service markets, finding empirical evidence for knowledge‐spillover benefits is likely to be difficult. Control variables for “audit‐market concentration” concerned with competition‐crossover effects and “auditor expertise” concerned with knowledge‐spillover benefits should be included in audit‐fee regressions to increase the power of empirical tests. With regard to policy implications, my analyses help explain the impact of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act on “market segmentation” and, hence, the profitability of accounting firms.