伯南克的经济思想述评

本文简要评述了伯南克的经济思想，以及如果以他的经济思想为指导制定的经济政策将会对美国经济和中国经济产生的影响。     

中国经济增长放缓，经济转型继续

世界银行发布的《中国经济简报》称,随着中国继续推进经济再平衡,中国的经济增长速度在中期将会放慢。中国的经济增速预计将从2013年的7.7%放缓到2014年的7.6%和2015年的7.5%。     

中国“后奥运经济”面临挑战：“后奥运效应”——历史的镜子

所谓中国的“后奥运经济”,实际上指的是在奥运会这个时间节点之后中国经济的发展和变化情况。 世界历史上有“奥运魔咒”之说,指的是历史上许多国家的经济在奥运会之后部出现下滑。今年中国办了奥运会,奥运会后,中国经济会面临哪些挑战？发生哪些变化？高扬的风帆会不会因为风云变幻而受到重挫？坚强的中国将如何应对经济领域的云谲波诡？本刊这期策划将和广大读者一起去探讨。     

浅议口岸经济对我国经济的影响

口岸经济是以口岸为依托,围绕口岸物流、人流、资金流、信息流等形成的多行业、多部门、多层次、多环节、多功能的复合经济体系,通过将相关产业和资源融入到口岸,为口岸经济参与者提供便利的服务,促进口岸经济主体协调运作,是中国外向型经济发展的重要保证。本文从沿海口岸、内陆口岸和边境口岸三个角度探讨了口岸经济对中国经济的影响。     

中国经济持续增长的动力来源

本文结合近代各国经济高速增长周期的数据记录,提出目前我国经济增长所面临的主要制约因素,并从中国经济增长的传统动力、新动力和经济结构三个层面分析未来20年中国经济持续增长的动力来源。     

中国经济与世界经济的融合互动

改革开放以来，中国经济逐渐从封闭走向开放，与世界经济的联系不断加强。中国经济与世界经济的同步波动，或者说中国经济开始融人到全球经济体系，是从2001年中国加入世界贸易组织（WTO）开始的，而近年来，中国已经成为经济全球化的重要推动者，中国经济与世界经济之间开始进入到相互影响阶段，在贸易、金融等方面的关系不断深化。     

浅议口岸经济对我国经济的影响

口岸经济是以口岸为依托,围绕口岸物流、人流、资金流、信息流等形成的多行业、多部门、多层次、多环节、多功能的复合经济体系,通过将相关产业和资源融入到口岸,为口岸经济参与者提供便利的服务,促进口岸经济主体协调运作,是中国外向型经济发展的重要保证。本文从沿海口岸、内陆口岸和边境口岸三个角度探讨了口岸经济对中国经济的影响。     

将速度的留恋尽快转为对质量的钟情

<正>自改革开放以来,中国经济在资源、劳动力、全球化和体制改革等后发优势因素推动下实现了快速增长。根据IMF的测算,1980年至2010年期间,全球经济平均增速为3.3%,发达经济体经济平均增速为2.5%,新兴市场经济体经济平均增速为4.5%,而中国经济的平均增速则高达10%,如今中国     

经济全球化对中国经济的影响

经济全球化自21世纪90年代以来发展迅猛,表现为生产、市场贸易及金融等全球化。经济全球化为中国经济提供了前所未有的发展机遇,同时也给中国带来了巨大的挑战。经济全球化是社会斌予我国经济快速发展的一次契机,我们要抓住这一契机,积极制定应对策略,实现中国经济的跨越式发展。     

中国经济增长与波动的分析研究

应用宏观经济学的经济增长理论,对中国经济近30年的经济增长和波动进行了研究分析。中国经济近30年的较快增长与总量资本、总量劳动和技术进步的贡献推动了经济增长因素的持续加强呈正相关,也与社会发展阶段和经济结构、增长动力有关。近几年经济增速放缓与总量资本、总量劳动的下降以及结构转型、技术贡献率相关,但是这是中国经济发展到新常态的正常结果,符合经济发展的规律。在未来,中国经济将会在新的经济增长动力下持续增长。     

跨行查询收费:替银行说几句话

银行卡跨行查询收费一经推出即遭到铺天盖地的反对,有的消费者甚至诉诸法庭。银行收取跨行查询费的行为究竟是出于对市场化原则的尊重还是蔑视?     

微笑传递快乐 激情奉献奥运

前言：在2008年北京奥运会上,奥运志愿者成为了一道亮丽的风景线,他们用自己最美的微笑和热情的服务给世界留下了深刻的印象。在这个充满青春朝气的群体中,也活跃着财政青年的身影,他们以40天辛勤付出和无私奉献,圆满完成使命,为北京奥运的成功举办贡献了力量,也留下人生中美好的回忆。现刊载中评协奥运志愿者——李念辰和崔新园的文章,将他们辛苦工作的经历再现,让他们的欢乐与广大读者共享。     

Managing for efficiency, managing for equity

It is a truism that not all managers do the same things in the same ways. Less often recognized, however, is the fact that the essential tasks and goals of management are not everywhere the same. Indeed, so unlike each other are the two primary systems of management--the "technocratic" and the "political"--that they consistently vary in the implicit contract offered to participants, the career path of members, the use of organizational structure, the choice of purpose, and the allocation of resources, but also provides a conceptual framework for understanding why they happen and what can be done to prevent their happening in the future.     

寿险产品评价体系研究

中国保险市场的发展,迫切需要建立保险评价体系.保险产品的评价体系是保险评价的核心,其主要目标是以保险产品相对透明为目的进行的.在所有的保险产品中,人身保险产品与社会大众关系最为密切,人身保险在保险业的保费收入中也占有决定性地位.所以,当务之急是首先建立人身保险产品的评价体系.寿险保单的保障程度、投资价值以及附带的服务水平是寿险产品的核心问题,应当成为寿险产品评价的主要内容.本文重点从寿险产品保障程度进行评价研究.     

Trust for accounting and accounting for trust

This paper combines insights from the sociology of knowledge and the emerging practice-based literature on learning and knowing to extend the institutional framework of accounting change developed by Burns and Scapens [Burns, J., Scapens, R.W., 2000. Conceptualising management accounting change: an institutional framework. Manage. Acc. Res., 11, 3–25]. In particular, it explores how management accounting systems (MAS) can be implicated in processes of learning and culture change, and used to identify ‘trustworthy’ solutions in the face of organisational crises. A case study of an Italian company, which was subject to massive change following its acquisition by General Electric, is used to discuss how, when crises arise and organisation members find themselves under intense pressure for change, their rationales and routinised behaviour, which are driven by the existing knowledge and cultural assumptions, are challenged. The case illustrates how MAS can act as sources of trust for the processes of change – i.e., accounting for trust; while at the same time being socially constructed objects of trust – i.e., trust for accounting. Drawing on the concept of personal trust and the notion of roles as access points to organisational (expert) systems, the paper discusses how, in this case, finance experts facilitated the acceptance and progressive sharing of new rationales and routines. Clearly, this does not guarantee that change will occur or occur in some ‘desired’ direction in other cases, but it increases the possibility of replacing trust in the predictability of routines with feelings of trust for change.     

Accounting for decisions and decisions for accounting

Behavioral decision theory (BDT) is concerned with “accounting for decisions”. The development of this interdisciplinary field is traced from the appearance of several key publications in the 1950s to the present. Whereas the 1960s saw increasing theoretical and empirical work, the field really started to flourish in the 1970s with the appearance of the review by Slovic & Lichtenstein (Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, pp. 549–744, 1971), and key papers on probabilistic judgment (Tversky & Kahneman, Science, pp. 1124–1131, 1974), and choice (Kahneman & Tversky, Econometrica, pp. 263–291, 1979). From the early 1980s to the present, BDT has seen considerable consolidation and expansion and its influence now permeates many fields of enquiry. After this brief history, eight major ideas or findings are discussed. These are: (1) that judgment can be modeled; (2) bounded rationality; (3) to understand decision making, understanding the task is more important than understanding the people; (4) levels of aspiration/reference points; (5) use of heuristic rules; (6) the importance of adding; (7) search for confirmation; and (8) thought as construction. Next, comments are addressed to differences between BDT and problem solving/cognitive science. It is argued that whereas many substantive differences are artificial, two distinct communities of researchers do exist. This is followed by a discussion of some major shortcomings currently facing BDT that include questions about the robustness of findings as well as overconcern with a few specific, “paradoxial” results. On the other hand, there are many interesting issues that BDT could address and several specific suggestions are made. Moreover, these issues represent opportunities for accounting research and several are enumerated. Finally, BDT presents “decisions for accounting” in the sense that scarce resources need to be allocated to different types of research that could illuminate accounting issues. The argument is made that BDT is one research metaphor or paradigm that has proved useful in accounting and that should be supported. Such support, however, may mean that some researchers may work on issues that, at first blush, might seem distant from accounting per se.     

关于《以财务报告为目的的评估指南（试行）》的起草说明

为适应新兴评估市场领域的发展,规范注册资产评估师执行以财务报告为目的的评估业务,保证评估执业质量,维护社会公共利益和资产评估各方当事人合法权益,中评协在财政部有关司局的帮助和指导下,组织有关专家起草了《以财务报告为目的的评估指南（试行）》（以下简称《指南》）。为便于评估机构和注册资产评估师以及相关部门、人士全面理解《指南》,现将有关起草情况说明如下。