THE ROLE OF INFLATION-ADJUSTED ACCOUNTING DATA IN CORPORATE RISK ANALYSIS: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION*

Both in the U.S. and abroad, certain large companies are required to report accounting data adjusted for the effect of changing prices. This study investigated the role of such adjusted accounting data in corporate risk analysis. Loan decision situations were constructed for a firm whose income from continuing operations reported in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 33 (SFAS 33) was drastically reduced. Questionnaires were mailed to 1,050 randomly selected bank lending officers (BLOs) in 240 banks in 40 states and the District of Columbia. A group of BLOs received no SFAS 33 data and served as a control. While most of the responding BLOs did not seem to use SFAS 33 data in making their decisions, those who reported that they used such data reached significantly different decisions from those of the control group. More specifically, the users evaluated the firm twice as risky and recommended significantly lower loans than the control group with respect to both short-term and long-term loans. Furthermore, the users spent significantly more time in data analysis and decision making than the control group.     

CHARITY ACCOUNTING: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF RECENT CHANGES

Since the early 1980s attempts have been made to reduce the diversity in accounting practice and improve the quality of the published financial statements of charities. Two major events in this process were the publication of the original Statement of Recommended Practice (SORP) 2 in 1988 and its revision in 1995. Changes have been predicated on the dominance of the user-needs model and it is argued that inconsistencies in the financial statements of charities and the adoption of dubious accounting practices make it difficult for users of charity accounts to understand (and therefore use) the information provided. This paper presents the results of an empirical analysis of 151 financial statements of large fund raising charities in England and Wales as a basis for identifying the impact of both the original SORP and the revised SORP. The study's main conclusion is that charity accounting has improved significantly since the 1980s (where improvement is seen in terms of increasing compliance with recommended practice) and it is suggested that the impact of the revised SORP, like the original SORP, is likely to be major although not immediately so.     

AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF STOCK MARKET VALUATION OF CORPORATE PROJECTED PENSION LIABILITIES

This study extends the work of Landsman (1986) by making use of the newly available projected benefit pension obligations (PBO) information. Our analysis documents that investors perceive pension assets and pension liabilities, respectively, as corporate assets and liabilities. We also developed and tested a decomposition model of pension obligations by examining the market valuation of the three components of PBO: vested, non-vested and future salary progression. Our results indicate that future salary progression is indeed considered by market participants as a liability of the firm. The results of the study have important implications for accounting policy making.     

PERCEPTIONS OF AUSTRALIAN FINANCE MANAGERS ON THE IMPACT OF ADVERTISING ON THE ACCOUNTING PROFESSION: SOME EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE

This study examines the perceptions and attitudes of finance managers to the removal of advertising restrictions by public accounting firms. Twelve null hypotheses which were formulated and tested regarding the perceptions of finance managers to a range of issues related to advertising by public accounting firms indicated that younger finance managers without a tertiary education and who had no previous public accounting experience perceived greater overall positive benefits from complete removal of advertising restrictions. Older finance managers believed that greater overall detrimental effects would result if advertising restrictions were completely removed.     

AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF THE IMPACT OF LIMITED REVIEW ON EQUITY PRICES

SEC Accounting Series Release No. 177 required independent auditors to make a limited review of summarized quarterly data included in annual reports. This paper examines the reaction of investors to earnings announcements based on financial statements subject to limited review relative to announcements when no auditor involvement was required. The reaction of market participants is measured by an abnormal daily return metric of the common stock surrounding the published earnings announcement in The Wall Street Journal. As hypothesized, no difference in investor reaction is observed for the sample of firms subject to limited review for the 1977 fiscal year, but exempt in the 1976 fiscal year.     

THE IMPACT OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH ON FINANCE

This paper assesses the impact of accounting research on finance using citational methods and content analysis. The data are 715 articles published in seven finance journals. In contrast to previous research of the influence of finance research on accounting, the results show relatively little impact of accounting research on finance. The limited impact of accounting on finance is principally provided by four accounting journals and a small group of accounting authors. The impact found is often the result of bridging papers, in which either finance articles have accounting authors, or vice versa. These results suggest a substantial disregard of ostensibly pertinent capital-markets accounting research by finance scholars. The reasons for finance’s disregard of this work, whether for reasons of perceived value, quality, or for other reasons, is unclear. However, it is apparent that accounting capital-markets research is not as influential in finance as might be expected.     

AN EMPIRICAL EVALUATION OF THE COMMUNICATION OF AUTHORITATIVE PRONOUNCEMENTS IN ACCOUNTING

The cloze procedure, a psycholinguistic technique, was used to empirically evaluate the communication of authoritative pronouncements in accounting. Three of the most recent pronouncements of five different authoritative bodies were tested via a random sample of 750 certified public accountants, 750 academic accountants, and 600 private accountants. Using the cloze procedure's 57% criterion level, evidence was found (contrary to expectations) that communication problems do not exist with either authoritative bodies or classes of accountants. However, evidence was found (as expected) that communication problems do exist with two of the fifteen authoritative pronouncements tested. I want to express my sincerest appreciation to the City University of New York PSC-BHE Research Award Program for the grant that made this project possible.     

ACCOUNTING FOR THE COST OF CAPITAL: AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION

One of accounting's oldest issues, accounting for interest costs, has become a subject of increased concern in recent years. This study empirically addresses the issue of whether the cost of equity capital should be charged against income. Fourteen measures of the cost of equity capital are examined. The empirical tests involve contemporaneous correlation of accounting betas for each income measure with market betas for a sample of 200 companies. The results of these association tests indicate that income measures, net of the cost of equity capital, may have greater information content than income as presently reported.