关于深化对劳动和劳动价值理论的研究与认识之我见

本文系统讨论了马克思的劳动价值论中技术关系与社会关系之间的联系,表明如何以马克思的劳动价值论的基本观点为基础来分析技术关系的物质财富生产和生产率的变动与作为收入分配的社会关系之间的联系,并用以解释现实问题。     

劳动价值论嬗变的根据初探

纵观劳动价值论，从资产阶级古典经济学家创立到马克思的科学改造及其随后的发展，无论是创新抑或偏差，都取决于特定社会生产方式的状况和把握这种生产方式所使用的方法论。当今时代，经济的信息化和全球化要求拓展劳动价值论的视野，包括：劳动价值论的适用性问题、创造价值的劳动种类问题、价值的生产与分配问题。只有坚持历史唯物主义，才能确保马克思主义劳动价值论的传承相继。     

再论深化对劳动与劳动价值论的认识

本文对当前深化劳动与劳动价值论认识的一些基本问题做了有重点的分析。笔者认为 ,要使这种“深化认识”的讨论取得有效的进展 ,不仅要看到马克思的劳动与劳动价值论在现代经济社会条件下面临的新问题和新挑战 ,而且关键要在认识和分析问题上有一个科学的方法论 ,包括处理好“完整、准确把握”与“深化和发展”的关系、正确对待马克思批判过的理论和观点、对“划清界限”的方法进行必要的反思 ,并把握好从实际出发与理论和政策的关系。     

关于马克思价值创造问题的争议与再思考

文章探讨的是马克思劳动价值论中关于价值创造的问题。通过深入地剖析,以证明在当代社会生产中,活劳动仍然是创造价值的唯一源泉,马克思劳动价值论是科学的理论：同时。对马克思关于生产领域的劳动才创造价值的说法作了进一步的拓展。充分展现出马克思劳动价值论在现代社会中的继承和发展。     

十六大报告对劳动价值理论的创新

劳动价值论是马克思主义政治经济学的基础理论，其核心观点是，价值是由劳动者的活劳动创造的，人的活劳动是价值的唯一源泉，其他生产要素都不创造价值，都不能成为价值的源泉。以此为基础，马克思创立了剩余价值理论，揭示了资本家对雇佣工人的剥削。今天，我国在建设中国……     

劳动价值论既要坚持，也须发展

在新的历史条件下，我们需要全面地、准确地理解马克思的劳动价值论的科学性，并且结合新的实际，深化对马克思的科学劳动价值理论的研究，并使其与时俱进的发展。     

论马克思劳动价值论中的价值思想及当代启示

尽管国内外学者对马克思的劳动价值论争论不一,但马克思劳动价值中的价值思想应当是确定的。马克思的劳动价值论中包含着三个基本论断:劳动决定价值、活劳动创造价值、无差别的人类劳动凝结为价值。它们蕴含着丰富的价值思想:尊重劳动、尊重劳动者、尊重劳动群众。当下,坚持马克思劳动价值论中的价值思想就是要让劳动者实现体面劳动。为此,我们需要大力彰显劳动价值,深入探讨实现体面劳动的路径与对策,切实让广大劳动者共享发展的成果。     

坚持和发展劳动价值论及其重要的现实意义

坚持和发展马克思科学的劳动价值理论，仍然是一个关系重大、需要深入研究的基础理论问题。为此，要首先认清马克思创立科学的劳动价值论的历史出发点，全面把握理论的主要观点。结合现时国内外实际，说明劳动价值论的核心思想必须坚持，劳动价值论的一些内容需要发展。强调坚持和发展劳动价值论具有重要的理论和实践意义。     

重新认识劳动价值理论

党的“十五”计划建议及建党80周年江泽民同志的“七一”讲话,都提出要结合新的实际,深化对社会主义社会劳动和价值理论的研究和认识。所谓深化对劳动价值论的研究和认识,我理解就是对马克思原来在《资本论&;gt;中提出的劳动价值论,在社会主义社会新的历史条件下,应该深化研究和认识。劳动价值理论是马克思政治经济学中一个非常重要的理论问题,在理论上是一个伟大创举,具有划时代意义。第一,劳动价值论是马克思     

试析安徽利用外资的新思路

马克思劳动价值论是适应十九世纪无产阶级斗争需要而产生的。我国现阶段进行的社会主义现代化建设 ,与马克思主义创始人当时历史情况有很大不同。本文对马克思劳动价值论的形成 ,如何根据社会经济生活的变化发展马克思主义 ,使劳动价值论与时俱进谈了几点认识。     

“温 良 恭 俭 让”

选自于:<论语·学而> 解读:人要学会温和、善良、恭谨、简朴、谦让.即:做人一定要有美好的德行.其实这正也是自古以来的做人之本.     

经纪人、交易员、律师和间谍

金融危机过后，“华尔街阴谋论”逐渐盛行起来，可惜都是臆测居多，缺乏真凭实据。而本书的作者以真实的访谈入手，揭出CIA等情报机构与华尔街银行合作的种种细节，可谓匠心独具。     

Assessing black progress: employment,occupation, earnings,income, poverty

Farley discusses changes in employment, occupation, earnings, income, and poverty among US blacks. Among black men, there has been a persistent rise in unemployment since 1960. By the early 1980s, 1 black man out of 8 had dropped out of the labor force, compared to 1 in 20 white men. Some contend that many black men lack the skills to be employed or have personal habits and criminal records which make them unacceptable to employers. Others believe that the expansion of federal welfare programs offers attractive alternatives to men who have limited earnings potential. Still others stress that blacks are concentrated within cities, while the growth of employment is occurring in suburbs. Among those blacks over age 54, labor force participation has declined because of improved Social Security benefits, better private pensions, and the greater availability of Supplemental Security Income. The employment of young blacks compared to whites has deteriorated since 1960. For both races, there has been a steady rise in the employment of women. The recent increases, however, have been great for whites. By the early 1980s, white women caught up with black women in terms of employment. Unlike the indicators of employment itself, there is unambiguous evidence that the occupational distribution of employed blacks has been upgraded and is gradually becoming similar to that of whites. Findings from many studies show that blacks once earned much less than similar whites, but this racial difference has declined among men and has nearly disappeared among women. The proportion of blacks impoverished fell sharply in the 1960s, reaching a minimum of 30% in the early 1970s. Since the early 1970s, blacks have made few gains. The proportion impoverished actually increased and the ratio of black-to-white family income declined. The fact that the earnings of black males are no longer rising faster than those of whites and that there is no longer a migration from southern farms to cities plays a role, but changes in family structure are also important. At all dates, poverty rates have been high and income levels low in families headed by women. In 1984, for example, 52% of the black families with a woman as head of household were below the poverty line, compared to 15% of the black married-couple families. While similar trends are occurring in white families, there has been a sharper increase in the proportion of blacks living in these female-maintained families which have high poverty rates.