The pricing of stock index futures spreads at contract expiration

This paper conducts an empirical analysis of the mispricing of calendar spreads for stock index futures. Using recent data drawn from the Sydney Futures Exchange, a sharp increase in the magnitude of spread mispricing immediately prior to maturity of the near contract is documented. This pattern in mispricing is related to a sharp decline in open interest in the near contract and an increase in open interest in the deferred contract. Further, the direction of mispricing of the near and deferred contracts are more likely to move in opposite directions as the near contract approaches maturity. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that traders seeking to roll‐over their positions from near to deferred futures contracts close to maturity increase the magnitude of spread mispricing. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 22:451–469, 2002     

Order imbalance and the pricing of index futures

This study examines whether the aggregate order imbalance for index stocks can explain the arbitrage spread between index futures and the underlying cash index. The study covers the period of the Asian financial crisis and includes wide variations in order imbalance and the indexfutures basis. The analysis controls for realistic trading costs and actual dividend payments. The results indicate that the arbitrage spread is positively related to the aggregate order imbalance in the underlying index stocks; negative order‐imbalance has a stronger impact than positive order imbalance. Violations of the upper no‐arbitrage bound are related to positive order imbalance; of the lower no‐arbitrage bound to negative order imbalance. Asymmetric response times to negative and positive spreads can be attributed to the difficulty, cost, and risk of short stock arbitrage when the futures are below their no‐arbitrage value. The significant relationship between order imbalance and arbitrage spread confirms that index arbitrageurs are important providers of liquidity in the futures market when the stock market is in disequilibrium. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 27:697–717, 2007     

Asset storability and price discovery in commodity futures markets: A new look

This article examines the price discovery performance of futures markets for storable and nonstorable commodities in the long run, allowing for the compounding factor of stochastic interest rates. The evidence shows that asset storability does not affect the existence of cointegration between cash and futures prices and the usefulness of future markets in predicting future cash prices. However, it may affect the magnitude of bias of futures markets’ estimates (or predictions) for future cash prices. These findings have several important implications for commodity production decision making, commodity hedging, and commodity price forecasting. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 21:279–300, 2001     

A further look at transaction costs,short sale restrictions,and futures market efficiency: The case of Korean stock index futures

Persistent underpricing in the Korean stock index futures market is documented and alternative explanations are examined. No-arbitrage pricing bands are computed using alternative sets of transaction costs and short sale restrictions faced by different investor groups. We find that a substantial portion of the mispricing can be explained by these factors, though a high incidence of mispricing remains after accounting for costs faced by the marginal trader group—the KSE exchange members. We also observe frequent underpricing of futures during periods of downward market trends. This is attributed in part because of unique restrictions on short sales and accounting conventions in the Korean market. In addition, tests of alternative futures pricing models are conducted that provide mixed results. Though we do not reject the standard cost-of-carry model, an equilibrium pricing model provides reasonable explanatory power. Further, use of the cost-of-carry model does not appear to be driving the findings of persistent underpricing. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 19: 153–174, 1999     

Stock index futures markets: stochastic volatility models and smiles

This study examined whether the inclusion of an appropriate stochastic volatility that captures key distributional and volatility facets of stock index futures is sufficient to explain implied volatility smiles for options on these markets. I considered two variants of stochastic volatility models related to Heston (1993). These models are differentiated by alternative normal or nonnormal processes driving log‐price increments. For four stock index futures markets examined, models including a negatively correlated stochastic volatility process with nonnormal price innovations performed best within the total sample period and for subperiods. Using these optimal stochastic volatility models, I determined the prices of European options. When comparing simulated and actual options prices for these markets, I found substantial differences. This suggests that the inclusion of a stochastic volatility process consistent with the objective process alone is insufficient to explain the existence of smiles. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 21:43–78, 2001     

A simplified pricing model for volatility futures

We develop a general model to price VIX futures contracts. The model is adapted to test both the constant elasticity of variance (CEV) and the Cox–Ingersoll–Ross formulations, with and without jumps. Empirical tests on VIX futures prices provide out‐of‐sample estimates within 2% of the actual futures price for almost all futures maturities. We show that although jumps are present in the data, the models with jumps do not typically outperform the others; in particular, we demonstrate the important benefits of the CEV feature in pricing futures contracts. We conclude by examining errors in the model relative to the VIX characteristics. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 31:307–339, 2011     

Digesting anomalies in emerging European markets: A comparison of factor pricing models

This study compares the performance of four popular factor pricing models—the capital asset-pricing model (Sharpe, 1964), the three-factor model of Fama and French (1993), the four-factor model of Carhart (1997), and the five-factor model of Fama and French (2015a)—testing their explanatory power over a broad range of cross-sectional return patterns in emerging European markets. We identify, classify, and replicate 100 anomalies documented in the financial literature. Only 20 (32) of the capitalization-weighted (equal-weighted) anomaly portfolios are significantly profitable. We show that the five-factor model best explains the returns of anomaly portfolios and verify its superiority over the other models.     

股指期货交易所保证金设置模型的比较与评价

本文以香港恒生指数期货为研究对象,采用EWMA、EGARCHGED、EVT-vaR和BPNN-GARCH四种模型在分级结算制度下分别计算交易所交易保证金水平,并选取谨慎性指数(CP)和机会成本指数(AOC),结合使用TOPSIS最优化决策方法,对四种保证金设置方法进行比较和评价,以期为我国沪深300股指期货保证金水平设置提供更科学合理的理论参考和实证依据.     

Intermediary asset pricing in commodity futures returns

This paper assesses the extent to which intermediary capital (IC) risk contributes toward explaining commodity futures returns. We find that the IC effect is substantially positive and continues to grow as the financialization of commodities deepens. Positive and negative IC risks play asymmetric roles, with the effect of negative IC strengthening in recent subperiods. We further confirm the heterogeneous roles of IC across individual commodities by cross-section analyses. Overall, the effect of the positive IC risk factor varies significantly. Portfolios with low basis, low open interest, low momentum, and low liquidity earn significantly higher returns than counterparty portfolios.