浅析我国的知识产权法律保护

本文总结了我国知识产权法律保护制度的现状,并分析了我国知识产权法律保护制度存在的问题.     

对我国知识产权边境保护制度的法律思考

知识产权边境保护是世贸组织法律制度中关于知识产权保护的一项极为重要的法律措施。我国现行的《知识产权海关保护条例》存在着诸多不足;理论界对于我国知识产权边境保护范围、反担保制度仍然存在一些疑问和争议。应借鉴欧美国家立法、结合我国实际,修改和完善相关规定,以维护公平竞争的社会经济秩序。     

论知识产权的法律保护

知识产权作为人们智慧的结晶,应该得到很好的保护,但是近年来越来越多的知识产权纠纷给我国的知识产权界带来了深刻的影响。随着我国伴随着世贸组织的发展,我国加入的国际贸易的相关活动也是越来越经常的发生,与此同时法院接受的知识产权的案子数量和不同的种类案件也是愈发的多,而且这其中的涉外案件也是较为频繁的,人民法院对此的案件压力也是越来越大的,这对于我国的知识产权的法律问题是受到了极大的威胁的,在此背景下本文对我国知识产权的法律保护进行研究是具有现实意义的,本文主要就是对知识产权的法律保护进行的研究分析。     

浅析数据库的知识产权保护及对我国的影响

本文分析了数据库知识产权保护体系——版权保护、特殊权利保护和反不正当竞争保护的现状及其趋势，并对这几种数据库保护方式的优缺点进行了评述，在此基础上提出了对我国数据库保护的积极和消极影响。     

浅析数据库的知识产权保护对我国的影响

本文分析了数据库知识产权保护体系--版权保护、特殊权利保护和反不正当竞争保护的现状及其趋势,并对这几种数据库保护方式的优缺点进行了评述,在此基础上提出了对我国数据库保护的积极和消极影响.     

中美软件知识产权保护的法律比较

随着知识经济的发展和信息技术的飞速进步,我国的软件产业在国民经济地位中越来越重要.保护知识产权对于信息经济的发展有着重要作用,本文比较中美在软件知识产权上的差异,通过对比探讨我国软件知识产权的发展.     

浅析数据库的知识产权保护及对我国的影响

本文分析了数据库知识产权保护体系——版权保护、特殊权利保护和反不正当竞争保护的现状及其趋势,并对这几种数据库保护方式的优缺点进行了评述,在此基础上提出了对我国数据库保护的积极和消极影响。     

知识产权国际保护的法律嬗变及我国的策略

知识产权国际保护法律从19世纪产生发展至今经历了双边安排到多边国际条约的形成过程,其中发达国家和发展中国家在立法问题上的角色和地位都在不断变化之中。文章以1994年签订的TRIPS为分界线,系统地分析知识产权国际保护法律在TRIPS前后的产生原因、发展特点和未来的嬗变趋势,基于我国在知识产权国际保护进程中所处于的实际情况,就知识产权国际保护规则的嬗变对发展中国家带来的不利因素,提出若干完善和应对建议。     

俄罗斯知识产权文化与法律保护

从历史角度而言,俄罗斯缺乏知识产权保护文化。俄罗斯后社会主义时期知识产权保护问题仍然普遍存在。西方发达国家和WTO知识产权文化与法律保护显然对俄罗斯产生潜移默化的影响。俄罗斯已公开表达了保护知识产权的意愿,但对于一些非本土知识产权规则或保护标准,则倾向于根据本土标准和文化作出有选择性的灵活解释。由于WTO体制能力有限及俄罗斯知识产权保护观念的缺乏、糟糕的经济状况和体制障碍问题,俄罗斯对知识产权保护的实际效果不可能完全为西方社会所认同。在现行经济体制下,俄罗斯联邦没有能力确保地方协调一致地遵守知识产权保护标准,即便将来整个俄罗斯协调努力,在一段相对长的时期内成功希望也不大。     

人工智能经济对知识产权法律保护的挑战

随着新时代科技的迅速发展,人工智能在我国逐渐崛起,国内科研组织对人工智能的研究越来越深入,各领域都对人工智能的应用率也越来越高。时至今日,由人工智能主导的经济时代已经来临,人们对人工智能的理解一直存在争议,人工的理解较简单,但是关于智能的说法却一直难以统一,实际上人工智能是计算机科学的相关学科,通过人类的智慧研发创造出类似人类智慧的智能机器,其主要研究对象就是智能机器人,人工智能的研究范围较为广泛,当然也包括语音识别、图像识别、语音处理等方面。人工智能在我国创新发展的过程中必然会起到至关重要的作用。     

有关知识产权保护的新思考

知识产权的制度经济学派从不同角度论证了知识产权保护可以提高资源配置效率.知识产权应该保护毋庸置疑,但是知识财产本身的特性决定了知识产权保护具有两面性.     

Business strategies for multinational intellectual property protection

Intellectual property protection and management (IPPM) are important operational and strategic issues especially for global companies. Most prior discussions of this topic focus heavily on the legal aspects of this topic. However, by the time legal action becomes necessary, the stakes and costs have risen to very high levels for all parties. This article argues that the nonlegal aspects of IPPM are perhaps more important in practice and can be designed to forestall or limit more expensive legal action. This article provides some guidelines and practical advice for companies that would like to improve their IPPM processes. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Innovation and intellectual property protection: : The software industry perspective

Digital commerce does not yet exist in a widely available, commercially viable form. Substantial amounts of innovation will be required to improve and customize existing technology and to create necessary new technologies for the digital marketplace. Recent months have witnessed the establishment of a broad array of new enterprises, joint ventures and business alliances aimed at preparing for a digital future. Driven by consumer demand, this trend will accelerate over the coming years. The author points out that a number of factors will be critical, however, in order for electronically harnessed information to become an established norm. For the software industry, the most important factor is strong protection of intellectual property rights. This is essential to the promotion and development of new applications and services. The author views the emergence of a digital marketplace as dependent on the combined advancements in technological safeguards and encryption techniques, and strong national and international legal safeguards for copyrighted materials.     

The importance of intellectual property protection to the American research-intensive pharmaceutical industry

The American research-intensive pharmaceutical industry is the world's most successful and competitive and one of the crown jewels of the U.S. industrial base. Among the principal reasons for its success is an unparalleled commitment to research and development, which in turn yields an impressive array of advanced biomedical therapies. Intellectual property protection is a cornerstone of the industry's existence. Like other industries, such as computer software and audio/video recordings, a major portion of the industry's cost of production is incurred in the development stage, rendering unauthorized copying both easy and profitable. The GATT Uruguay Round and the North American Free Trade Agreement have set high standards for pharmaceutical and other industries' intellectual property protection. Unfortunately, there will be delays until numerous countries implement these standards. These delays harm both the industry worldwide and individual countries where patent protection would attract investment and stimulate research and development.     

Trends in worldwide intellectual property protection: The case of the pharmaceutical patent

The protection of intellectual property is of growing concern as an issue in international trade. Both the NAFTA and the TRIPS provide chapters on intellectual property, a subject matter included in multilateral trade agreements for the first time. These provisions were designed to reassure owners of such property that their rights would be protected in participating countries. Few industries are as dependent on adequate protection than the patent protected segment of the pharmaceutical industry. It is only through enforceable patent policies that drug companies can generate sufficient revenues to undertake the costly research and development that make the introduction of new products possible. This article examines recent trends in intellectual property protection on a global basis, focusing on differences and similarities within the pharmaceutical industry both in the European Community and the United States. Despite the focus on the pharmaceutical industry, the trends discussed should be of interest to any firm that utilizes intellectual property in its overseas activities. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

奥运会埋伏营销与奥林匹克知识产权保护警示分析

1984年洛杉矶奥运会富士公司耗费巨资成为该届奥运会的全球赞助商,柯达公司则首开奥运会埋伏营销先河。奥运会埋伏营销愈演愈烈的主要原因一是在于奥运的全球赞助＂TOP＂计划昂贵的入门费用,二是奥运会赞助计划运作体系的复杂。目前奥运会埋伏营销形态五花八门,包括直接侵害奥运标志、赞助赛事转播的主要媒体、赞助次类项目、赞助杰出的运动员、发动与赛事相关的广告战、进行与赛事相仿的促销活动、与没有竞争关系的赞助商合作、策划与赛事相仿的活动、利用赞助商尚未想到或无法涵盖的空白点等,世界各国奥林匹克知识产权保护意识也在不断强化,我国也出台了多项奥林匹克知识产权保护的相关规章,奥林匹克知识产权保护对埋伏营销的警示主要表现在：一是我国埋伏营销侵权法律规制还存在缺陷,二是应当建立清晰全面的赛事品牌保护计划,三是建立公众和企业的知识产权意识。     

Trade dress: The increasing importance of an ancient yet new form of intellectual property protection

Trade dress is a means of identifying and differentiating the product of a vendor by visual (and very occasionally auditory) cues of a form other than written language. The use of trade dress certainly goes back into pre-Roman times, and was very likely used well before then. Trade dress remains important in societies both highly literate and substantially illiterate, and in some respects has increased in importance in both.     

完善知识产权保护体系促进对外贸易健康发展

作为世贸组织三大支柱之一的与贸易有关的知识产权,正越来越多地成为国际贸易摩擦的焦点。为履行加入世贸的义务,中国正在逐步加大知识产权保护的力度,但同时,中国也面临着前所未有、来势汹涌的知识产权维权浪潮。毋庸质疑,知识产权是一把双刃剑。中国的企业只有经历它所带来的磨砺和阵痛,才能明白自我约束和自我保护的益处,也只有这样,中国的企业才能适应和学会在国际市场上用规则对话。