股指期货的套利策略研究

股指期货即将推出,本文从套利的基本概念和特点出发,研究了股指期货的期现套利策略、构建及风险,并对股指期货的跨期套利策略、到期日套利策略进行了分析.     

股指期货套利交易研究

股指期货是一种重要的金融衍生产品,其具有价格发现、套期保值的基本功能,同时还具有投机、套利等资产配置功能。其中,利用股指期货进行套利交易不仅有利于股指期货功能的发挥,也是投资者运用股指期货进行套期保值、规避风险的前提条件。作为股指期货最重要的运用方式之一的期现货套利方法成为投资者极为关注的热点。实现套利对股指期货的定价就显得尤为重要,分析无套利条件下股指期货的定价,提出股指期货套利交易的策略。     

股指期货的套利交易研究

沪深300指数期货作为我国期货市场清理整顿以来上市的首个金融期货产品,其运行是否成功将对我国金融期货市场的发展产生深远的影响。因此,加强对股指期货交易风险的研究非常重要。文章首先阐述股指期货理论价格的形成,在此基础上,引入股指期货交易成本构建期价无套利区闻,进而分析股指期货套利交易规避风险的有效性。     

基于股指期货一分钟高频数据的跨期套利统计策略研究

根据某期货公司提供的股指期货同一商品的两份不同时期的合约(价格一般具有很强的相关性)一分钟的高频数据,根据跨期套利的统计原理,将协整理论应用于两个相关性很强的合约中,通过单位根检验和协整检验,最终得到这两份合约存在良好的协整关系,协整方程为:残差=收盘价1-0.982*收盘价2-37.392.最后根据协整方程制订出跨期套利的统计策略.     

关于股指期货定价及套利区间的研究

随着股指期货的即将推出,作为股指期货最重要的运用方式之一的期现货套利方法成为投资者极为关注的热点;而在期现货套利中,确定套利区间成为其中的关键。本文通过对股指期货定价的研究,在考虑到现实交易中的交易成本、冲击成本等基础上提出了确定套利区间的方法。     

沪深300股指期货期现套利研究

依据持有成本法和高频数据研究发现,沪深300股指期货上市后,期现货价格偏差度和期货定价偏离度越来越小,正向套利机会和反向套利机会从初期频繁出现演变为偶然出现。单次套利平均收益越来越小,套利持续时间也越来越短。沪深300股指期货逐渐进入成熟期,为推出上证50指数期货、股指期权等其它衍生品奠定了坚实的基础。     

运用沪深300股指期货进行期现套利

本文就股票市场与股指期货市场之间的套利机会与套利利润进行了研究,运用持有成本模型对股指期货进行定价,根据股指期货合约的理论价值与市场交易成本,测算无套利区间。本文完整地展现和实证了利用沪深300股指期货和ETF组合进行期现套利的全过程,发现目前模拟的股指期货合约走势基本运行在无套利区间之外,套利利润空间巨大。     

基于协整模型的股指期货套利实证研究

股指期货是以股票价格指数为标的的期货,它属于金融期货的一种。随着资本市场的不断发展,股指期货应运而生,它有着价格发现,套期保值,资产配置和风险管理等功能,对推动资本市场的良好发展起着重要作用。目前,我国已经推出了现货沪深300股指期货,本文利用协整模型对沪深300股指期货进行现货模拟,并运用ETF50和ETF100两种基金组合作为现货模拟组合,通过Johansen检验的结果,得出两个ETF组合与现货之间的协整关系,进而得出股指期货期现套利的模型。     

股指期货期现套利风险及控制

目前,股指期货成功推出的先例已经为我国带来了一种全新的盈利方式,已经受到许多投资者的青睐。为了发挥股指期货期现套利的功能,在将其推出时,必须对它带来的风险做好一定的准备。本文主要探讨了股指期货期现套利可能存在的风险,同时对应对风险提出了相应的控制措施。     

浅析我国股指期货无套利原因及后果

在对我国金融市场和金融制度现状分析的基础上,笔者得出即将开办的股指期货中将不存在套利交易,而缺乏套利交易的股指期货市场不仅不能降低整个金融市场的风险,反而会给整个金融市场带来更大的风险。由此笔者认为目前我国还不宜推出股指期货。     

中国推出股指期货的可行性分析

中国股票市场正在经历前所未有的变革，推出股指期货就是其中之一。推出股指期货可以完善证券市场的功能体系。有利于培育投资者的成熟度，进而促进股市与经济运行的关联程度，发挥股市经济“晴雨表”的功能。同时，中国已有17年股票市场和商品期货市场的管理经验，具备了发展股指期货的条件，只要能充分控制其潜在的风险，推出股指期货对整个股票市场是有利的。     

投资者与股市博弈模型

本文从个股的角度，运用博弈论剖析了投资者在股市上的投资战略。研究表明，投资者是选择“较小止损”战略还是选择“较大止损”战略取决于该股票下跌的幅度。     

The stock market and investment in the small and open Norwegian economy

The relationship between the stock market and investment is analyzed by utilizing a multivariate vector autoregressive model, which also includes fundamentals represented by production and the bank interest rate. Two important results appear on the basis of data from the small, open economy of Norway. The financial market has no lead effect on real activity, as neither the stock market nor the credit market can predict future investment or production. On the contrary, current stock returns correlate negatively with lagged growth in investment, and positively with current growth in production. In addition, changes in the bank interest rate have a positive effect on future stock returns, production leads investment positively, and both production and the bank interest rate become exogenous variables in our model. First version received: November 1997/Final version received: October 2000     

The colonization of the future: An alternative view of financialization and its portents

Financialization is generally interpreted by heterodox economists to be a dysfunctional and thus historically transient outgrowth of contemporary capitalism: dysfunctional because it is seen to be driven by attempts to escape production and profit realization constraints in the real economy, transient because these attempts are seen to be ultimately futile. This article proposes the contrary argument that financialization is a functionally useful feature of contemporary capitalism that is entirely in keeping with the latter’s continuing development as a commodity system. Specifically, it will be argued that just as globalization represents the extension of the commodity principle along the axis of geographical space, financialization represents the extension of this same principle along the axis of time: the future is being colonized so as to make it take the overspill of the pressures on organizations operating in the present.     

The stock market and investment: another look at the micro-foundations of q theory

This paper introduces a novel distinction between real q andfinancial q. The paper examines three versions of financialq developed by Brainard and Tobin, Minsky and Hayashi, respectively.These theories differ regarding the nature of stock market pricedetermination and their use of marginal productivity theory.It is shown that non-profit maximising behaviour by managersdoes not invalidate q theory. It is also shown that if managersand shareholders have different profit expectations, this leadsto an equilibrium value of q that differs from unity. Lastly,the implicit claims in q theory regarding the efficient roleof stock markets as regulators of capital accumulation are shownto depend on assumptions about stockholder behaviour.     

The effect of financial ratios, firm size, and cash flow from operating activities in the interim report to the stock return

The objective of this study is to examine the value relevance of accounting information in explaining stock return. The study uses profitability, liquidity, leverage, market ratio, size and cash flow as proxies of accounting information. Cumulative abnormal return and market adjusted return are used as stock return variables. The samples of the study are listed companies in manufacturing industries that actively trading between 2003-2006 in Indonesia Stock Market. The study finds that profitability, turnover and market ratio has significant impact to the stock return. The result consistent with previous studies Hobart （2006）, Utama and Santoso （1998） and Restraningsih （2007）.     

The hedging effectiveness of constant and time-varying hedge ratios using three Pacific Basin stock futures

This paper investigates the hedging effectiveness of Australian, Hong Kong, and Japanese stock futures markets. The traditional hedge and the minimum variance hedge ratios are all constant whereas the bivariate GARCH hedge ratio is time varying. The effectiveness of the hedge ratio is compared by investigating the out-of-sample performance of the three ratios. The whole sample consists of weekly returns from January 1990 to December 2000. Two 1-year, out-of-sample periods are used: January 1999 to December 1999 and January 2000 to December 2000. Results show that the time-varying GARCH hedge ratio outperforms the constant ratios in most of the cases. This is true using both out-of-sample periods.     

马克思主义城乡关系理论中国化的未来走向

在对马克思主义城乡关系理论的基本内容进行简要概括,并对新中国60年马克思主义城乡关系理论中国化历史进程简单回顾的基础上,从目标取向、基本要求、具体体现、必然选择、时代特色等几个方面指出了马克思主义城乡关系理论中国化的未来走向。