企业社会资本与企业绩效关系的元分析?

根据76篇关于企业社会资本与企业绩效关系的实证文献的研究结果,运用元分析技术,再研究企业社会资本与企业绩效之间的关系,以克服单一研究中存在的样本代表性不够或样本量不足等问题。首先汇总估计企业内部和外部社会资本在结构、关系、认知三个维度上与企业绩效之间的相关系数,进而运用回归分析,在控制社会资本不同维度的相关性后,检验不同维度的企业内、外部社会资本对企业绩效影响的相对强度,结果表明：企业内、外部社会资本的三个维度对企业绩效的影响均显著为正;在内部社会资本中,认知维度对企业绩效的影响明显大于结构维度和关系维度;企业外部社会资本的三个维度对企业绩效的影响无明显差别。     

企业社会资本对社会责任实践影响的实证研究

基于文献梳理,从企业社会责任实践的角度探究企业社会资本的作用。首先对企业社会责任实践与企业社会资本进行维度构建并设计理论模型,其次在数据整理的基础上对企业社会责任实践与企业社会资本影响机理进行实证分析,研究结论表明：网络关系维度显著促进企业外部社会责任实践,但对企业内部社会责任实践无明显影响;信任维度同时对企业内外部社会责任实践产生显著影响。最后,针对实证分析结果给出合理解释并提出相关政策建议。     

企业社会资本的国内研究进展与趋势展望

随着社会资本理论的发展,企业社会资本也引起国外学者们的重视.与此同时,国内的部分学者也对此表现出了极大的兴趣,研究的内容涉及概念、层次、形成与积累的路径和功效等方面,取得了一定的成果,但也存在着一些不足和缺陷.文章就目前研究的现状做一个简要的述评.     

企业社会资本作用的博弈分析

文章运用了博弈论中的模型对企业的社会资本作用进行分析,结果表明企业的外部社会资本可以降低企业的交易成本,企业的内部社会资本可以增强员工的合作,降低内耗。     

企业社会责任的经济社会学分析

企业是社会经济生活中最为活跃的组成部分,企业并不能单纯作为经济个体存在,而应平衡其经济与社会的双重属性,成为合格的企业公民。企业社会责任的提出是对其公民身份的明确和具体化。企业承担社会责任是基于维护利益共同体的需要;企业承担社会责任是基于维护组织稳定与社会和谐的需要;企业承担社会责任是实现其社会资本的需要。对于任何一个想要在市场竞争中有所作为的企业而言,必须认真的看待企业承担社会责任的问题,将其上升到一个战略的高度,充分挖掘企业的潜力,才能实现企业的成长与发展。     

社会资本创造:经济发展的新思维

反观发展经济学理论的演化进程和发展中国家“GDP”神话的破灭,建构在信任、互惠、规范、网络之上的社会资本这一分析工具出现在知识界的视域。社会资本这一新的发展思维意义重大。社会资本具有特定的概念和功用,其创造有赖于“公民社会”的生成与壮大。而社会资本的研究必须解决面临的问题。     

企业社会资本的测量问题初探——一个经验研究综述

社会资本的研究目前已经成为组织社会学、经济学和管理学等学科热门的话题,对于企业社会资本的概念内涵尽管有不同层次和角度的界定．但似乎逐渐在趋于一致。目前学术界对社会资本的研究往往侧重于概念、作用和功能等方面．而对于社会资本的来源、测量和积累却鲜有涉及。本文对国内部分进行社会资本测量的研究观点进行了回顾和总结,并提出了个人的观点。另外,在结论部分提出了在企业社会资本测量研究过程中不能回避的几个问题。     

企业社会资本的积累机制研究

分析社会资本对企业成长的作用,试图就企业社会资本的积累机制构建一个经济学的分析框架,即从微观角度(企业的产权结构、企业家权威、企业内部的互利合作、企业家的能力)以及宏观层面(社会的信用水平、法制环境、社团)分析企业的社会资本积累机制.     

构建我国社会救助中的社会资本系统

社会救助是应对贫困和失业问题的重要制度安排和社会政策，而社会资本可以帮助人们获得更多的资源。充分运用社会资本对社会救助的支持，能营造和谐稳定的社会氛围，提高政府救助的效率，更能促进我国社会救助事业的发展。本文通过阐述社会救助中社会资本的作用，并借鉴发达国家经验，提出了构建我国富含宏观社会资本、微观社会资本的社会救助系统的措施。     

企业社会资本与技术创新能力的关系研究

社会资本成为企业技术创新能力建设的重要视角.本文在对社会资本及技术创新的研究文献综述的基础上,分析了社会资本与企业技术创新能力的关系,并提出了基于社会资本提升企业技术创新能力的主要对策.     

社会资本研究综述

社会资本是近年来学术界研究的热潮,内容涉及微观、中观以及宏观各个层次,取得了一定的成果,但同时也存在一些不足,诸如概念不统一、缺乏有效的测量以及研究中忽视其消极功能等。与此同时,社会资本作为一个外来分析工具和理论模型,面临着研究的本土化问题。     

社会资本视角下的农村公共产品分类与供给主体责任研究

公共产品分类研究是明确其供给责任的前提,分类研究不足是我国公共产品供给责任不清的重要原因.对公共产品分类研究不仅从理论上全面明确反映了公共产品的内容与特征,而且在一定程度上确定了公共产品供给的主体责任.     

企业社会责任信息披露充分性研究

企业基于多重原因披露社会责任信息,而为保证自身利益,会有选择地传递有利信息并隐藏不利信息。这种行为使得利益相关者获得的信息不充分、不准确,导致其错误的判断和决策。因此,针对完善社会责任信息披露制度和保证社会责任信息质量进行研究有重要的理论和实际意义。通过对2012年-2014年深圳证券交易所和上海证券交易所上市公司社会责任信息披露内容进行统计分析,探究企业社会责任信息披露不足的现状及政策完善途径,为我国企业社会责任信息披露机制构建提供参考。     

The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment

This research relied on a field experiment involving a real-world instance of corporate philanthropy to shed light on both the scope and limitations of the strategic returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR). In particular, the authors demonstrate that the impact of CSR in the real world is not only less pervasive than has been previously acknowledged but also more multifaceted than has been previously conceptualized. The findings indicated that contingent on CSR awareness, which was rather low, stakeholders did react positively to the focal company not only in the consumption domain but in the employment and investment domains as well. Stakeholder attributions regarding the genuineness of the company’s motives moderated these effects. Sankar Sen (sankar_sen@baruch.cuny.edu) is a professor of marketing at the Zicklin School of Business, Baruch College, City University of New York. He received his Ph.D. in marketing in 1993 from the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. His research focuses on consumer decision making. He is interested, more specifically, in consumer reactions to company actions, particularly in the domain of CSR. His research has appeared inCalifornia Management Review, Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of Economic Theory, and others. C. B. Bhattacharya (cb@bu.edu) received his Ph.D. in marketing from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania in 1993 and his M.B.A. from the Indian Institute of Management in 1984. Prior to joining Boston University, he was on the faculty at the Goizueta Business School, Emory University. His specific expertise is in the areas of customer retention and the roles of CSR and organizational identification in designing marketing strategy. He served on the editorial review board of theJournal of Marketing from 2002 to 2005 and has published in journals such as theJournal of Marketing Research, theJournal of Marketing, Journal of Applied Psychology, andOrganization Science. He speaks frequently at many academic and business forums and won the William Novelli Best Paper Award at the Social Marketing Conference in 1997. Dr. Bhattacharya received the 2001 Broderick Prize for Research Excellence at Boston University and the Emory Williams Distinguished Teaching Award in 1995, the highest teaching award at Emory University. He is also part of the select group of faculty members onBusiness Week’s Outstanding Faculty list. Prior to his Ph.D., he worked for 3 years as a product manager for Reckitt Benkiser PLC. He has consulted for organizations such as the Hitachi Corporation, Procter & Gamble Company, Bell South, The Prudential Bank, Information Resources Inc., Airwick Industries, Silo Inc., and the High Museum of Art. Daniel Korschun (danielk@bu.edu) is a doctoral candidate in marketing at Boston University. His current research interests include brand management, CSR, and interorganizational relationships.     

Managing corporate identity: An internal perspective

Management plays a key role in the development and maintenance of corporate identity, including paying particular attention to the internal and controllable aspects of the process. The progression of research that examines corporate identity is contingent on clarification of the scope of corporate identity management (CIM) and development of generalizable and applicable measures of the construct. This study develops an interdisciplinary measure of the CIM construct by drawing on the literature and primary data, such as exploratory research, a survey, and a follow-up phase. Overall, CIM involves (1) the endorsement of consistent behavior through the diffusion of a company’s mission, values, and goals; (2) the expression and pursuit of brand and image consistency in the organization’s symbols and forms of communication; and (3) the implementation, support, and maintenance of visual systems. The results suggest that CIM includes the dissemination of mission and values, consistent image implementation, and visual identity implementation.     

从社会资本视角看社会主义和谐社会的构建

社会资本是和谐社会的内在特征,构建和谐社会需要有一定的社会资本为基础,对于社会资本缺乏的中国来说,和谐社会的构建,只能是在政府的引导下进行,同时还需要一定的民间社团加以支持。     

伦理视角下的商法构造--公司社会责任理论基础初探

传统公司法所保护的把追求股东利益最大化作为公司唯一的目标已不符合社会基本的公平、正义的价值目标。重构一部符合中国传统商业伦理精神、商业价值观,使公司承担相应社会责任的现代商法是建立健全社会主义市场经济的需要。     

农村合作组织、集体行动和公共水资源的供给——社会资本视角下的渭河流域农民用水者协会绩效分析

通过运用交易成本理论、社会资本理论等方法,对农民用水者协会这种制度创新的思路进行可行性分析和绩效评价,并论证了农民用水者协会作为一种农村合作组织,是一种有效的制度创新和制度安排.     

Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is often used as a key criterion in gauging corporate reputation. This research examined the influence of consumers’ attributions on corporate outcomes in response to CSR. Researchers and managers have considered consumers’ beliefs about CSR initiatives to be simplistic, serving either economic ends or reflecting sincere social concerns. The results of two studies established that consumers’ attributions were more complex than traditionally viewed, mirroring many of the motives ascribed to companies by managers and researchers. Rather than viewing corporate efforts along a self- or other-centered continuum, consumers differentiated four types of motives: self-centered motives that are strategic and egoistic and other-centered motives that are values driven and stakeholder driven. Consumers responded most positively to CSR efforts they judged as values driven and strategic while responding negatively to efforts perceived as stakeholder driven or egoistic. Attributions were shown to affect purchase intent as well as mediate the structure of an offer. Pam Scholder Ellen (pellen@gsu.edu) is an associate professor of marketing at the Robinson College of Business at Georgia State University. Her research focuses on perceptual biases in the way consumers respond to marketplace offers, particularly in the public policy arena. In addition to theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, her research has been published in theJournal of Consumer Research, theJournal of Public Policy & Marketing, theJournal of Consumer Affairs, and theJournal of Retailing. Deborah J. Webb (dwebb@westga.edu) is an assistant professor of marketing at the Richards College of Business at the University of West Georgia. Her research interests include consumers’ responses to prosocial corporate behaviors, marketing and society issues, and donation behavior. Her research has been published in theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, theJournal of Retailing, theJournal of Public Policy & Marketing, theJournal of Consumer Affairs, andMarketing Education Review, among others. Lois A. Mohr is a retired associate professor of marketing from the Robinson College of Business at Georgia State University. Her research interests focus on consumer responses to corporate social responsibility and services marketing. She has published in theJournal of Marketing, theJournal of Retailing, theJournal ofBusiness Research, the Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, theJournal of Consumer Affairs, and theJournal of Services Marketing.