我国贷款转让市场发展面临的制度性障碍分析

本文从法学角度论述贷款转让的基本法学原理,分析目前我国贷款转让市场发展中面临的主要法律障碍．指出银监会有关信贷资产转让的“102号规章”在立法精神上倒退到30年前的计划经济时代,成为目前信贷资产转让市场停滞不前的制度障碍,有必要加以修订。     

信贷资产交易的国际经验及启示

贷款转让平台的上线,标志着银行信贷资产从此有了全国性统一规范的公共交易平台。文章借鉴信贷资产交易的国际经验,结合起步中的我国信贷转让市场所面临的不足,提出通过推动信贷转让流程标准化、开发定价服务信息平台、引入并培育市场投资者以及促进评级、法律等中介机构发挥作用等途径,不断完善贷款转让市场建设,并建议有关部门加强政策扶持与引导,渐进完善市场后续的监管制度。     

我国信贷资产转让业务模式初探及风险防范措施

本文总结了信贷资产转让业务的发展背景,介绍了信贷资产转让的四种主要业务模式,并结合监管部门对信贷资产转让业务的相关规定,提出信贷资产转让将来可能采用的模式,在此基础上分析了信贷资产转让业务潜在的风险以及银行和监管部门的防范措施。     

浅析银行信贷资产转让

得益于实体经济的支撑,我国信贷资产转让业务正在蓬勃发展,并且信贷资产转让也促进了实体经济发展,但目前因为经项业务仍存在不少问题需要进一步探讨。文章介绍了我国信贷资产转让市场发展和现状,以及对实体经济的作用,并分析了我国信贷资产转让存在的问题,提出发展我国信贷资产转让业务的相关建议。     

国际信贷二级市场发展对构建我国信贷二级市场的启示

信贷二级市场是银行分散贷款风险、调整贷款结构、缓解流动性风险的有效渠道,研究和借鉴国际信贷二级市场发展的特点对于构建和发展我国信贷二级市场有一定的启示。当前阶段,我国应该通过鼓励贷款资源较丰富、经营效率较高的银行向存款资金相对丰富的银行、邮政储蓄等非银行金融机构转让优质贷款资产,探索二级市场贷款定价机制,引入国际评级机构参与贷款评级,统一交易规则,逐步丰富交易产品,扩大交易规模,逐步建设全国统一的信贷二级市场。     

我国贷款转让市场研究(二):中国贷款转让业务的发展

<正>三、中国贷款转让业务的发展3.1我国贷款转让业务的发端在我国,信贷资产转让业务是商业银行业务领域中一项重要的金融创新。1998年7月,中国银行上海分行和广东发展银行上海分行签订了转让银行贷款债权的协议,这是国内第一笔贷款转让业务。2002年8月,中国人民银行批准民生银行开展贷款转让业务,随后民生银行上海分行率先与锦江财务公司开展了2亿元的贷款受让业务。2003年7月,中国银监会批准光大银行开办贷款转让业务。随后,贷款转让业务在我国银行间开展起来。国家开发银行成为积极开展贷款转让业务中的转出银行。从2002年国家开发银行以间接银团贷款的方式率先向民生银行转让20亿元贷款以来,国家开发银行已经与多家商业银     

值得关注的信贷资产转让业务

信贷资产转让是国内商业银行近年发展起来的一项资产业务创新。它是指银行与其他金融机构(如银行、信托投资公司、资产管理公司、财务公司等)之间,根据协议约定相互转让在其经营范围内自主、合规发放的尚未到期信贷资产的融资业务。信贷资产转让业务分为回购型信贷资产转让业务     

商业银行规避贷款规模管制的四种业务模式探析

文章通过对当前商业银行信贷行为的调查,总结出商业银行为规避监管或争取最大利益,通过信托贷款、信贷资产转让、委托贷款、同业代付等四种模式将表内资产转移表外.文章详细分析了四种模式的流程、会计处理的特点及风险特征,提出了相关对策和建议.     

从国际市场实践看信贷资产跨境转让业务机遇

<正>国际信贷资产流转市场经过多年发展,积累了丰富的实践经验,对我国跨境资产转让业务的发展具有借鉴和参考价值。信贷资产转让是国际市场开办较为成熟的金融业务,有利于优化银行业信贷结构,提高银行服务实体经济和对外开放的能力。近年来,我国信贷资产跨境转让业务试点取得一定进展,但由于国内法律体系、业务规则、市场环境等与国际市场发展仍有差距,建议相关监管部门和商业银行合理借鉴国际经验,构建符合我国国情的信贷资产跨境转让制度和业务体系。     

关于实现贷款市场交易的探讨

贷款是一种有价格的信用资产,在二级市场上进行转让和买卖存在着可能和必要。按照历史发展进程,贷款交易一般可分为转让、出售、证券化和衍生产品等类型。实现信贷资产从持有到期走向市场交易、从存量管理走向流量管理有利于降低商业银行整体风险水平,有利于提高商业银行风险管理和经营能力,也有利于推进利率市场化。推进我国贷款走向市场交易要从监管政策、制度体系、中介机构、人才队伍建设等方面下工夫,同时要注意循序渐进。     

信贷调控力度加强背景下商业银行经营的新特点

该文分析了2010年以来在信贷调控力度加强的背景下,国内商业银行经营出现的新特点,指出信贷调控政策的变化在促进商业银行调整信贷投向结构、转变经营方式的同时,也对商业银行完善经营管理水平提出了新的要求。下一阶段,商业银行在优化资产结构、提高贷款定价水平和发展中间业务等方面还有待提高。     

商标专用权质押贷款契入茶产业发展的分析

茶叶中小企业融资难,一直是茶产业发展的一大障碍。谋求银行信贷资金支持,除信用、担保贷款外,必须要有自身资产进行抵押、质押。茶叶商标专用权是茶叶企业的自有知识产权,是企业可以运用的无形资产。本文通过分析案例茶叶商标质押贷款,探索分析茶叶质押贷款的路径,并从中分析出茶叶商标贷款的问题和风险,并提出了一些针对性的对策建议。     

上市银行信贷资产及信用风险信息披露分析

商业银行信贷资产及信用风险的充分披露是有效监管的基础.论文通过对我国风险披露制度演进和四家上市银行2000-2003年的信贷资产及信用风险披露情况的具体分析,揭示了信用风险披露制度存在的缺陷和四家上市银行在披露中存在的问题,最后提出简要的政策建议.     

十二五期间如何优化商业银行信贷结构

为了应对国际金融危机,2009年中国政府采取了投资拉动政策,商业银行也加大了信贷投放,信贷资产规模急剧增加,存量资产和新增资产的结构发生了一些变化。尽管股改以来商业银行信贷结构趋于优化,但是仍存在房地产业、地方政府融资平台、部分风险较高行业的贷款规模偏大等问题,未来商业银行调整信贷结构应从以下六方面着手:科学配置信贷资源;通过信贷增量优化带动存量优化;创新中间业务,带动传统业务发展;依托产业价值链,引导信贷资金投向;关注金融生态变化,明确信贷优先投放区域;紧紧围绕"十二五"规划,把握贷款行业投向。     

The Determinants of Corporate Trade Credit Policies in a Bank‐dominated Financial Environment: the Case of Finnish Small Firms

This paper examines trade credit policies of small firms operating in a bank‐dominated environment (Finland). We find that creditworthiness and access to capital markets are important determinants of trade credit extended by sellers. The level of purchases is positively correlated with the level of accounts payable. Larger and older firms and firms with strong internal financing are less likely to use trade credit, whereas firms with a high ratio of current assets to total assets, and firms subject to loan restructurings use it more. Negative loan decisions by financial intermediaries increase and a close bank‐borrower relationship decreases the probability that a firm does not take advantage of trade credit discounts.     

利率市场化与银行资产配置选择 —基于45家商业银行的面板数据分析

本文在对商业银行资产配置进行理论分析的基础上,构建利率市场化对商业银行 资产配置影响的实证模型,利用45家商业银行2003-2014年的面板数据进行实证检验,实证结 果表明：利率市场化对信贷资产的增长没有产生激励效应,商业银行并未在利率市场化进程中 加速信贷扩张;利率市场化对商业银行资产配置结构产生了显著影响,随着利率市场化程度的 加深,信贷资产和证券资产在总资产中的占比都增大;利率市场化对信贷资产内部配置结构也 产生了显著影响,促进零售信贷资产占比提升,而对公司信贷资产占比和前十大客户信贷资产 占比的影响为负,这验证了在利率市场化的推进过程中,商业银行将信贷资源向个人客户和中 小企业客户倾斜,利率市场化发挥了一定的积极效应。     

信贷资产转让的法律风险分析与防范

信贷资产转让对于我国构建信贷资产二级市场和资产证券化市场都具有重要的意义。在我国现行法律体系和监管制度下,信贷资产转让业务面临三大法律风险：债权转让风险、债权归属风险和担保权益转让风险。这三大风险严重影响信贷资产的流动性,需要通过立法加以解决。     

Which Creditors’ Rights Drive Financial Deepening and Economic Development?

Since the 1990s financial economists have documented the essential role of creditors' rights in encouraging lenders to provide credit. This article demonstrates the central importance of creditors' ability to use movable assets such as inventories and accounts receivable (as distinct from immovable assets like real estate) as collateral when lending to business enterpriseses. Using a unique cross‐country, micro‐level loan data set that contains loan‐to‐value ratios for different assets, the authors found that the loan‐to‐values of loans that are collateralized with movable assets were lower in countries with weak collateral laws for movable assets, and that lending in such countries was biased toward the use of immovable assets. Using sector‐level data, the authors also found that weak movable collateral laws were associated with distortions in the allocation of resources that favored immovable‐based production and investment. The effects of resources that favored immovable‐based production and investment. The effects of the collateral law reform enacted in Slovakia in 2003 were held up as providing support for the authors' findings. The authors also investigated which aspects of movable assets collateralization regimes are most important for facilitating the use of movable assets as collateral. They concluded that the two critical features of such regimes are the registration of collateral interests—which facilitates monitoring of collateral and avoids double pledging—and the ability of creditors to avoid lengthy court proceedings when taking possession of collateral. These findings suggest that it would be relatively easy for many countries to increase their supply of credit because reforming these aspects of legal regimes is fairly straightforward with few political obstacles.     

FINANCIAL INNOVATIONS IN LEVERAGED COMMERCIAL LOAN MARKETS

In the last decade, three innovations in commercial loan-based securities and derivative have enabled institutional investors to access commercial loan markets on leveraged terms : collateralized loan obligations (CLOs); loan-based total return swaps; and leveraged loan-based structured notes (LLSNs). These innovations have been driven by a combination of structural changes in the banking industry, enhanced technology for securitizations, reformed banking regulations, and the advent of credit derivatives.
Besides providing new investment opportunities for institutional investors, these recent innovations in loan markets also promise to reinforce the existing trend in banking away from financial intermediation and toward information intermediation. Such a trend, the authors argue, is helping to ensure the long-run viability of commercial banks. By transforming loan assets in the ways described in this article, banks can generate fee income instead of interest income (thus limiting their capital requirements and interest rate and credit exposures) while still exploiting their comparative advantage in credit analysis and monitoring.