共查询到2条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
Artur C. B. da Silva Lopes 《Empirical Economics》1999,24(2):341-359
Following recent work of Franses, Hylleberg and Lee (FHL), this paper analyses the consequences of fitting a deterministic seasonal model to a quarterly time series which can be (at least approximately) described by a seasonal unit root(s) model. Besides the distribution of the coefficient of determination, the empirical distributions of two commonly used statistics are also investigated through Monte Carlo experiments for small, moderately large and large samples. FHL's work is also extended allowing the possibility of residual autocorrelation corrections. The main conclusion that emerges from the results is that one should not try to measure the importance of deterministic seasonality nor test for its presence in the context of such (static) regression models, even when using some form of residual autocorrelation correction. A simple empirical application is provided to illustrate our results. First version received: July 1997/final version received: July 1998 相似文献
2.
Summary. Suppose a large economy with individual risk is modeled by a continuum of pairwise exchangeable random variables (i.i.d.,
in particular). Then the relevant stochastic process is jointly measurable only in degenerate cases. Yet in Monte Carlo simulation,
the average of a large finite draw of the random variables converges almost surely. Several necessary and sufficient conditions
for such “Monte Carlo convergence” are given. Also, conditioned on the associated Monte Carlo -algebra, which represents macroeconomic risk, individual agents' random shocks are independent. Furthermore, a converse to
one version of the classical law of large numbers is proved.
Received: October 29, 2001; revised version: April 24, 2002
RID="*"
ID="*" Part of this work was done when Yeneng Sun was visiting SITE at Stanford University in July 2001. An early version
of some results was included in a presentation to Tom Sargent's macro workshop at Stanford. We are grateful to him and Felix
Kübler in particular for their comments. And also to Marcos Lisboa for several discussions with Peter Hammond, during which
the basic idea of the paper began to take shape.
Correspondence to: P.J. Hammond 相似文献