AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF STOCK DIVIDENDS-IN-KIND

We investigate share price reactions to announcements of dividends payable in the common stock of corporations different from the issuing firm. We find that firms that declare these dividends (typically investment companies) experience positive abnormal returns upon announcement. We also find that such dividends are more likely to be declared when the shares to be distributed have peaked in value. Consistent with this finding, we document negative announcement-period abnormal returns for firms having their shares distributed. Additional tests reveal that prices respond more negatively when the information signal is strongest, when outside ownership is more dispersed, and when management is more entrenched.     

INTERNALIZATION AND MARKET QUALITY: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION

We explore the relation between market quality and internalization through a pre- and postenactment analysis of the implementation of the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSE) Price Improvement Rule on October 26, 1998. We find that the rule revision is accompanied by falls in the bid–ask spread and the variance of the pricing error and by rising internalization rates. This study informs proponents of market concentration, brokers, dealers, exchange administrators, and market regulators that a judicious regime of regulated internalization may be associated with superior market effectiveness.     

AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF FINANCIAL LIBERALIZATION AND THE EFFICIENCY OF EMERGING MARKET STOCK PRICES

The efficient markets hypothesis in finance suggests that as equity markets are liberalized and made more open to the public, equity prices should reflect the increased availability of information and be more efficiently priced. In this paper, we examine whether emerging market equity prices have become more efficient after financial liberalization. Using two sets of financial liberalization dates, a battery of econometric tests, and data from sixteen countries and three composite portfolios, we find that in spite of theory suggesting the opposite, liberalization does not seem to have improved the efficiency of emerging markets. In fact, most of our statistical tests indicate that the markets were already efficient before the actual liberalization.     

市场有效理论及我国股票市场有效性的实证检验

我国股票市场近年来出现的一系列事件引发了人们的深刻思考,而传统的资本市场理论已无法圆满地解释我国股票市场现有的发展程度、发展阶段及有效性等问题.为此,本文提出了市场有效性理论.利用该理论,作者通过抽样统计,对我国股票市场的有效性进行了实证分析.本文的重点在于研究我国股票市场的发展层次即其有效性层次.首先通过随机游程和股价自回归检验方法得出了我国股票市场处于弱型有效的结论,然后针对目前关于有效性层次方面的争论,用事件研究法阐述了如下观点:我国股票市场目前正处于弱型有效市场层次,但并不具有半强型有效市场的特点.     

AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE EXTENT AND NATURE OF BRAND VALUATION ACTIVITY IN NEW ZEALAND

An empirical study concerned with investigating the prevalence and nature of brand valuation activity in strongly-branded New Zealand based companies is reported. Analysis of data provided by 60 companies responding to a questionnaire mailed to all New Zealand companies identified as owning recognisable brand names revealed that 15 (25%) had been involved in brand valuation activity. Support for a hypothesised relationship between the acquisitive orientation of companies and the propensity to value brands has been provided. The extent to which brand valuation is conducted as an information service to management suggests that the financial accounting orientation that has characterised much of the brand valuation debate may be somewhat inappropriate.     

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE VARIABILITY OF INFLATION AND STOCK RETURNS: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION

Several researchers find a negative correlation between the rate of inflation and stock returns. This phenomenon may be explained by the variability hypothesis, which posits that the negative correlation is caused by the combination of a positive relation between the rate of inflation and the variability of inflation and a negative relation between the variability of inflation and stock returns. An autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic model of inflation is used to measure the variability of inflation. Empirical results do not support the ability of the variability hypothesis to explain the negative correlation between stock returns and inflation.     

VALUATION EFFECTS OF OPEN MARKET STOCK REPURCHASES FOR FINANCIALLY WEAK FIRMS

We test the proposition that announcements of open market stock repurchases improve the flow of positive information regarding the firm's prospects, particularly for financially weak firms. For financially strong firms with already good prospects for cash flows, the role of stock repurchases is less important. We provide evidence for an inverse relationship between financial risk, measured by bond rating, and the magnitude of stock repurchase-induced abnormal returns. Results also suggest that the value of information implied by announcements of open market repurchases about increases in cash flows and leverage, is more important for financially weak firms than for financially strong firms.     

THE ROLE OF INFLATION-ADJUSTED ACCOUNTING DATA IN CORPORATE RISK ANALYSIS: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION*

Both in the U.S. and abroad, certain large companies are required to report accounting data adjusted for the effect of changing prices. This study investigated the role of such adjusted accounting data in corporate risk analysis. Loan decision situations were constructed for a firm whose income from continuing operations reported in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 33 (SFAS 33) was drastically reduced. Questionnaires were mailed to 1,050 randomly selected bank lending officers (BLOs) in 240 banks in 40 states and the District of Columbia. A group of BLOs received no SFAS 33 data and served as a control. While most of the responding BLOs did not seem to use SFAS 33 data in making their decisions, those who reported that they used such data reached significantly different decisions from those of the control group. More specifically, the users evaluated the firm twice as risky and recommended significantly lower loans than the control group with respect to both short-term and long-term loans. Furthermore, the users spent significantly more time in data analysis and decision making than the control group.