首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
The emergence of knowledge-intensive society has changed the nature of business competition. Knowledge management becomes an important managerial task and formulating a sound innovation strategy is an integral part of strategic management. Adopting an institution-based view, this article argues that the institutional environment in the Asia Pacific region plays a multi-faceted role behind firms’ knowledge management and innovation strategy. Specifically, institutions impose rules for legitimacy, serve as a source of knowledge, and allocate incentives and resources for innovation. We believe that future research drawing on the institution-based view has significant potential to advance our understanding of knowledge management and innovation strategy in Asia Pacific firms.
Mike W. PengEmail:

Yuan Lu   (PhD, University of Aston) is a professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong and works in the areas of corporate diversification, business groups, and institutional entrepreneurship. He is on the editorial board of the Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Eric W. K. Tsang   (PhD, University of Cambridge) is an associate professor at the University of Texas at Dallas. He is a Senior Editor of the Asia Pacific Journal of Management, and is on the editorial boards of five other journals, including the Academy of Management Journal and the Academy of Management Review. He has published over 50 journal articles. Mike W. Peng   (PhD, University of Washington) is the Provost’s Distinguished Professor of Global Strategy at the University of Texas at Dallas and Editor-in-Chief of the Asia Pacific Journal of Management. His market-leading text, Global Strategy (South-Western Thomson, 2006), has been translated into Chinese and Portuguese, and his new Global Business text (South-Western Cengage Learning, 2009) has recently been launched.  相似文献   

2.
Venture capital in China: Past,present, and future   总被引:8,自引:6,他引:2  
This article reviews the literature on venture capital in China and examines where China’s venture capital industry has been and where it is likely to go in the future. Since the 1980s, venture capital in China has grown steadily alongside the robust national economy. The future is likely to offer even greater opportunities, as entrepreneurs are encouraged and property rights improve. However, there will also be a period of transition as the market continues to mature and as new legal structures and commercial arrangements emerge. Venture capital in China has many interesting differences from that in Western countries. The venture capital industry is shaped by the institutional context and China is no exception to this. This article also examines some specific differences between the system in China and that of the United States. Future prospects for venture capital are also appraised as China continues its transition to a market economy.
Kuang S. YehEmail:

David Ahlstrom   (PhD, New York University) is a professor in the Management Department at The Chinese University of Hong Kong where he has taught for 11 years in international management and human resources. His research interests include international management and entrepreneurship in emerging economies. Professor Ahlstrom has published over 50 refereed articles in publications such as The Academy of Management Review, the Journal of Business Venturing, and Asia Pacific Journal of Management where he is currently a senior editor. Garry D. Bruton   (PhD, Oklahoma) is a professor of entrepreneurship at the Neeley School of Business at Texas Christian University. His research focuses on entrepreneurship in emerging markets. He has published over 50 academic articles in journals such as The Academy of Management Journal, Strategic Management Journal, and Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Professor Bruton has also co-authored two textbooks published by Thomson-Southwestern. He is currently an associate editor of the Academy of Management Perspectives and is a senior editor of the Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Kuang S. Yeh   (PhD, Carnegie Mellon) is a professor and chairman of the Department of Business Management at the National Sun Yat-Sen University in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. His areas of interest are in organization theory, corporate governance, business ethics, and entrepreneurship and venture capital. Professor Yeh has published in journals such as the Journal of World Business, International Business Review and a number of academic journals in Taiwan. He is currently studying issues of firm growth and change in China’s and Taiwan’s private enterprises.  相似文献   

3.
Real options and MNE strategies in Asia Pacific   总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0  
Asia Pacific offers a lot of promising growth opportunities, but it also presents high levels of uncertainty for multinational enterprises (MNEs). In this paper, we introduce real options theory as a theory of investment under uncertainty, and we discuss its implications for MNEs and their strategies with a focus on the emerging economies in Asia Pacific. We suggest that MNEs must recognize the various sources of uncertainty, as well as the various options embedded in their investments, and real options theory can help them structure and design their investments to benefit from uncertainty. In particular, MNEs need to develop the dynamic capabilities of managing real options in their investments to respond to the evolving economic and institutional environment in the region. This paper also provides several implications for policy makers in Asia Pacific to stimulate investment activities in the region and to help their firms venture successfully in the international market place.
Jing LiEmail:

Tony W. Tong   is an Assistant Professor of Strategic Management at the Leeds School of Business at the University of Colorado. He obtained his Ph.D. from The Ohio State University. His current research applies real options theory to study firms’ corporate development activities and growth initiatives. His research in these areas has been published or accepted in journals such as the Academy of Management Journal, the Journal of International Business Studies, and Organization Science. Jing Li   is an Assistant Professor of International Business at the Faculty of Business Administration at Simon Fraser University, Canada. Her research focuses on alliance activities in China, capability building of Chinese firms, and applications of real options theory to international strategy. Her research in these areas has appeared in the Journal of World Business, Advances in Strategic Management, and Managerial and Decision Economics.  相似文献   

4.
Change and continuity in Japanese corporate governance   总被引:7,自引:5,他引:2  
Previous studies on Japanese corporate governance were largely based on the agency theory framework, and can be seen as attempts to understand the unique monitoring mechanisms in the Japanese context. This paper briefly reviews prior research and then discusses the recent changes in the environment that have been affecting Japanese corporate governance. Our central argument is that there is both change and continuity in Japanese Corporate Governance. We also present emerging research from an institutional theory perspective. In this line of research, corporate governance is treated as part of a nation’s institutional framework and hence, researchers need to understand unique institutional arrangements that affect corporate governance practices and their change or continuity.
Jean McGuireEmail:

Toru Yoshikawa   (PhD, York University) is Associate Professor of International Business and Strategic Management at DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University. His main research interest is corporate governance, especially its relation to corporate strategy and performance in large publicly listed firms and in family-owned firms. His research has been published or is forthcoming in such journals as the Strategic Management Journal, Organization Science, Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Management, Journal of Business Venturing, and Asia Pacific Journal of Management. This is Professor Yoshikawa’s 4th contribution to APJM. Jean McGuire   (PhD, Cornell University) is the William Rucks IV Professor of Management at the E. J. Ourso College of Business, Louisiana State University. Her research interests are corporate governance, including executive compensation, transparency and disclosure, and patterns of ownership. Her research has appeared or is forthcoming in such journals as the Academy of Management Journal, Organization Science, Journal of International Business Studies, Journal of Management, and Asia Pacific Journal of Management. This is Professor McGuire’s 2nd contribution to APJM.  相似文献   

5.
Japanese horizontal keiretsu and the performance implications of membership   总被引:4,自引:2,他引:2  
Our study investigates the effect of Japanese horizontal keiretsu group membership on firm risk and return. Like prior studies, our results show that horizontal keiretsu membership has a negative effect on firm profitability. However, we find that horizontal keiretsu networks are likely to increase the gap between targeted and realized returns, which we call the outcome–aspiration gap. Moreover, in contrast to prior studies, our results indicate that keiretsu membership does not enable member firms to reduce risks by smoothing profitability. Instead, our findings provide evidence that is counter to the conventional notion that Japanese horizontal keiretsu allows their member firms to trade off profits for reduced risk.
Anthony GoerzenEmail:

Takehiko Isobe   is Professor of Management at the Research Institute for Economics and Business Administration, Kobe University. He received his PhD from Keio University. His research interests include the effects of search behavior and strategic changes on corporate performance. He has published his research in the Academy of Management Journal, Strategic Management Journal, and Journal of International Business Studies. His research received the 2004 Best Paper Awards from the Asia Academy of Management. Shige Makino   is Professor at the Department of Management in the Chinese University of Hong Kong. He received his PhD from the Richard Ivey School of Business, University of Western Ontario. His current research focuses on investigating the effects of non-economic factors on economic activities in international business practices. His research has appeared in leading journals such as Academy of Management Journal, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Journal of International Business Studies, Strategic Management Journal, and Organization Science among others. He is the vice president of the Association of Japanese Business Studies and has been serving as editorial board member in many international journals. Anthony Goerzen   earned his PhD from the Richard Ivey School of Business, University of Western Ontario. His research interests center on multinational enterprises, more specifically the organizational and performance effects of interfirm networks, cross-border alliances, and geographic locations. He has published his research in the Strategic Management Journal, Management International Review, Academy of Management Executive, and Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Aside from several book chapters, he has also written a book entitled Networks and Location based on his doctoral thesis which won the Udayan Rege Best Dissertation Award 2000–2002 (a biannual PhD thesis competition held by the Administrative Science Association of Canada) and was selected into the final four of the Gunnar Hedlund Best Dissertation Award 2002 (sponsored by the Institute of International Business and the European International Business Association) as well as the Barry Richman Best Dissertation Award 2002 (sponsored by the Academy of Management).  相似文献   

6.
This paper examines the impact of state shares on corporate innovation strategy and performance in the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Through an investigation of 541 publicly traded companies in five high-tech industries during the period between 2000 and 2005, we find that the presence of state shares have a positive effect on the corporate choice of a process innovation strategy over a product innovation one. However, this relationship is moderated by the overall ownership concentration ratio. Moreover, our findings suggest that companies with large state shares prefer to conduct innovations independently rather than collaboratively with others, and they usually achieve better innovation performance. These findings indicate that the government play a role as both an investor and a resource allocation coordinator and therefore complicate the relationship between ownership structure and corporate innovation activities.
Han Zhang (Corresponding author)Email:

Erming Xu   (PhD, Renmin University of China) is a professor of management at the School of Business in Renmin University of China. His research interests include corporate governance mechanisms and performance in China, state shares with corporate innovation strategy, Asian business strategy in the emerging markets. His work has appeared in premier journals such as Management World, China Industrial Economy, etc. He is editor of Management Review, Nankai Business Review, R&D Management, Chinese Journal of Management, and Economic Management. He serves as the associate chair of the Chinese Academy of Business Management, and also an independent director of China Telecom Corporation Limited. Han Zhang   (PhD, Capital University of Economics and Business) is a lecturer of management at School of Business Management in Capital University of Economics and Business. Her research interests include strategic management and innovation. Her work has appeared in Economic Theory and Business Management and Contemporary Finance & Economics.  相似文献   

7.
Venture capital in China: A view from Europe   总被引:2,自引:1,他引:1  
This article provides commentary on the analysis of venture capital in China by Ahlstrom, Bruton, and Yeh (Venture capital in China: Past, present, and future. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2007). The article considers issues relating to the scope of venture capital and private equity, the nature of venture capital and private equity organizations, the life-cycle process of VC investing, internationalization, and foreign venture capital firms. The paper identifies areas for future research and compares the Chinese VC context with those in Western Europe and Central and Eastern Europe.
Mike WrightEmail:
  相似文献   

8.
This commentary on Klaus Meyer’s article, “Asian Management Research Needs More Self-confidence,” in the Asia Pacific Journal of Management (2006), discusses the need for Asian management research to look beyond the pressures for publication in top-tier, Western scholarly academic journals. We reflect on our nearly two decades of research on Russian management to illustrate many of Meyer’s ideas and insights in a different transition economy. We support his call for more context-specific research that can also offer contributions to global management knowledge as well as indigenous management practice.
Daniel J. McCarthyEmail:

Sheila M. Puffer   (PhD, University of California, Berkeley) is Professor of International Business at Northeastern University, and a Fellow at the Davis Center for Russian Studies at Harvard University. A former editor of The Academy of Management Executive, her research and publications focus primarily on management in Russia’s transition economy. Her more than 150 publications include numerous journal articles, as well as books including The Russian Management Revolution, Business and Management in Russia, The Russian Capitalist Experiment, and Corporate Governance in Russia. She also holds a diploma from the Plekhanov Institute of the National Economy, Moscow. Daniel J. McCarthy   (DBA, Harvard University) is the Alan S. McKim and Richard A. D’Amore Distinguished Professor of Global Management and Innovation at Northeastern University, and is a Fellow at the Davis Center for Russian Studies at Harvard University. His research and publications center on strategic management, entrepreneurship, and corporate governance, particularly in Russia’s transition economy. He has more than 85 publications, including numerous journal articles, and four editions of Business Policy and Strategy, as well as Business and Management in Russia, The Russian Capitalist Experiment, and Corporate Governance in Russia.  相似文献   

9.
Building upon the market, institutional, and cultural perspectives, this paper identifies the major impetuses and impediments that affect the professionalization of Chinese family business at the environment, firm, and owner levels. Our integrative framework projects that whether a family business owner will adopt professional managers is largely determined by the relative strength of impetus factors and impediment factors. We then discuss the possible governance choices under different configuration of impetuses and impediments. This theoretical framework is expected to help set the momentum for further conceptual exploration and empirical study in this area.
Hao MaEmail:

Jianjun Zhang   (PhD, University of California at Berkeley) is an assistant professor at Guanghua School of Management, Peking University. His interests include entrepreneurship, firm governance, and political strategy of Chinese private firms. He is the author of Marketization and democracy in China and a number of articles. Hao Ma   (PhD, University of Texas at Austin) is a professor of management at University of Illinois at Springfield, and professor of management and director of Academic Committee at Beijing International MBA Program, China Center for Economic Research, Peking University. His research interests include the nature and cause of competitive advantage, competitive analysis, strategic decision making, leadership style, and the entrepreneurial process, especially the exploration of the above topics in international setting. He has published in Academy of Management Review, Journal of Business Venturing, Journal of International Management, and Organization Dynamics, among others.  相似文献   

10.
In commenting Meyer’s article “Asian management research needs more self-confidence” in APJM (2006), Yang and Terjesen (Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(4):497–507, 2007) described ground realities in Australia that may have inhibited the development of a robust management research community. As an Australia-trained and Australia-based Asian management scholar, I extend the “P” perspective by exploring how the formal and informal institutions interact in shaping Australia-based scholars’ publication strategies and research performance. Reflecting on my experience in Australia, I argue that like in any other businesses, institutions matter in our business of research and publication. They matter because they can shape the local “rule of the game” within which a country’s or a region’s scholars conduct and publish their research. A full institutional account of the current state of management research in the Asia Pacific region requires a deeper understanding of both formal and informal local institutions. From such an institutional perspective, this commentary concentrates on why Australian management research lags behind that in the US and Europe and yet leads the Asia Pacific region.
Yue WangEmail:
  相似文献   

11.
This paper explores several features of, and changes in, innovation capacity in Asia. The growth of technology-based industries has been a critically important element of Asian industrial development and has required extensive institutional support for the diffusion of innovation and technological learning. As a number of Asian countries reach the global technological frontier they need to develop new capabilities for creating “radical” innovations in order to sustain their international competitiveness. Using the analytical frameworks of national innovation systems and varieties of capitalism, the paper reviews some systemic and environmental factors encouraging and constraining these developments. By referring to illustrative case studies of institutional evolution within Taiwan’s national innovation system and technological entrepreneurship in Korea, the paper argues that whilst there are major developments in models of innovation support, emulating those found in liberal market economies, enduring cultural legacies can remain influential. It highlights the central importance of social as well as economic institutional adaptation. Some management and policy implications of this attribute are considered, and a future research agenda is proposed.
Mark DodgsonEmail:

Mark Dodgson   (PhD, Imperial College London) is Professor of Management and Director of the Technology and Innovation Management Centre at the University of Queensland Business School. The focus of his work over the past 25 years has been studying corporate strategies and government policies for technological innovation. He has produced ten books and over 100 academic articles on innovation. Mark is a member of the editorial boards of eight innovation journals and is Editor-in-Chief of Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice. He is a Visiting Professor at Imperial College London and an International Fellow at the UK’s Advanced Institute of Management Research. He is a Fellow of the Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia, the Royal Society of Arts, and the Australian Institute of Management. His current research addresses the impact of visualization technologies and playfulness on work and organization, and the dynamics of national innovation systems. He is regularly asked to speak at international conferences, and has done so in over 40 countries. His latest book is The Management of Technological Innovation (Dodgson, Gann and Salter, Oxford University Press, 2008).  相似文献   

12.
In this article we reflect on the adolescent years of Asia management research published in the Asia Pacific Journal of Management (APJM) by reviewing work published in the past 10 years (1997–2006). We report that during the last decade, APJM has published 223 research articles, written by 373 different authors, who are affiliated with 203 different institutions. Our discussion of the future of Asia management research is guided by Kuhn’s (Kuhn, T. S. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962) perspective on the nonlinear progression of science. We argue that as a growing community, Asia management research is finding its “identity” and establishing its presence in the larger worldwide management research community. Following our analysis, we conclude that the growth of Asia management research—as captured by APJM publications—throughout its “adolescent” years has set forth a challenging and exciting path for the future. All authors contributed equally. We thank Mike Peng (Editor-in-Chief) for his encouragement and advice. This work was completed when Yu-Shan Su was a Fulbright visiting scholar at the University of Texas at Dallas (UTD). She thanks the Fulbright Association and the Taiwanese Ministry of Education for partially funding this work.
Erin G. Pleggenkuhle-MilesEmail:
Ramya R. AroulEmail:
Sunny Li SunEmail:
Yu-Shan Su (Corresponding author)Email:

Erin G. Pleggenkuhle-Miles   is a PhD student in International Management Studies at the University of Texas at Dallas. Her research interests include institutional effects on firm strategies and rural entrepreneurship. Ramya R. Aroul   is a PhD student in International Management Studies at the University of Texas at Dallas. Her research interests include organization strategy and evolution of new industries in emerging economies and rural entrepreneurship. Sunny Li Sun   is a PhD student in International Management Studies at the University of Texas at Dallas. His research interests include strategy on internationalization, M&A, alliance network and innovation. Yu-Shan Su   (PhD, National Taiwan University) is Assistant Professor of International Business at Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan, Taiwan. During 2006–07, she was a Fulbright visiting scholar at the University of Texas at Dallas. Her research interests are innovation and knowledge management in organizations and R&D management in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industry.  相似文献   

13.
Despite the increasing recognition of the importance of the research mission of universities, no previous work has investigated the research productivity and research strategies of Asia Pacific business schools. This article fills this important gap by conducting the first study to rank the publication productivity of 130 Asia Pacific business schools. Drawing on data from the UTD Top 100 Business School Research Rankings™ and several additional sources, we rank Asia Pacific business schools’ research productivity in three areas: (1) twenty-four leading business journals, (2) seven top management journals, and (3) five Asia Pacific management journals. We also extend this analysis by documenting the distinct publishing strategies of various Asia Pacific business schools—global, local, or both.
David H. WengEmail:

Ram Mudambi   (PhD, Cornell University) is Professor and Perelman Senior Research Fellow at Temple University and Visiting Professor of International Business at the University of Reading. His research interests focus on knowledge/innovation management and international entrepreneurship. Mike W. Peng   (PhD, University of Washington) is the Provost’s Distinguished Professor of Global Strategy at the University of Texas at Dallas and Editor-in-Chief of the Asia Pacific Journal of Management. His research interests are global strategy, international business, and emerging economies. David H. Weng   is a PhD student at the University of Texas at Dallas. His research interests include institutional theory and international management.  相似文献   

14.
China’s business network structure during institutional transitions   总被引:4,自引:3,他引:1  
This study adopted a structural approach to examine the formation and characteristics of Chinese business networks via interlocking directorates during a stage in China’s institutional transitions. Analyses of the network structures of 949 listed companies revealed that: (1) Chinese business networks were smaller in scale and lower in density than their Western counterparts; (2) no nationwide network with a dominant center existed; (3) interlock occurred mainly in the form of smaller business groups which tended to be regionally fragmented; (4) ties were more prevalent among industrial peers than with financial institutions; and (5) government ownership was predominant. These findings therefore deepen our understanding about the pattern and extent of business interlock in China. Not only do these findings provide substantive implications to the notion and dimensionality of guanxi, but they also offer inspiration to managers and policy makers by illuminating key characteristics of network structure. Laying these foundations shall pave the way for future research in the structure of Chinese business networks.
Thomas A. BirtchEmail:

Bing Ren   (PhD, The Chinese University of Hong Kong) is an associate professor in the Department of Management, School of Business at Nankai University, China. Her main research areas include Chinese business network studies, institutional transition and firm strategic choices, entrepreneurship and corporate governance issues in China. Currently, she is undertaking two research projects funded by the natural science foundation of China. The first one relates to the intercorporate network of interlocking directorates and its influence on firm strategies during China’s institutional transition. The second relates to a legitimacy perspective of new venture growth and creation in China. Kevin Au   (PhD, University of British Columbia) is an associate professor of management at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, and serves as an associate director for the MBA programme and Centre for Entrepreneurship. His research interests span across micro and macro issues in global management, social network, entrepreneurship, and research methodology. He serves on the editorial boards of Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Journal of Organizational Behavior and conducts consulting projects for business and government organizations. This is Professor Au’s fourth contribution to APJM. Thomas A. Birtch   is a Senior Research Fellow (Centre for Economics and Policy) at the University of Cambridge. He has held an academic appointment at The Chinese University of Hong Kong, visited universities in Asia, Europe, and North America, and has affiliations with several research centres, including at MIT, Cambridge, and The Chinese University of Hong Kong. He has also held directorships and senior management positions in large scale organizations and government spanning three continents and consulted in over 30 countries. His current research interests include the performance of individuals, organizations, and markets, the transferability of management practices, FDI and post-merger integration strategy, rewards and incentives, entrepreneurship and innovative organizations, and business in China. His recent publications appear in journals such as Human Relations, Management International Review, International Journal of Hospitality Management, International Journal of Human Resource Management, and Journal of International Management.  相似文献   

15.
Economic upgrading in a state-coordinated,liberal market economy   总被引:2,自引:2,他引:0  
Well-established research into different models of capitalism has not been applied well to developing countries. Changing global conditions, institutional differences, and path-dependent histories have forced late developing countries to create models of their own. By and large, however, these models have been less than successful in fostering economic development through technological upgrading. A comparison of skills upgrading in several fast-growing economies in Southeast Asia suggests that perhaps there is a new “State Coordinated, Liberal Market Economy” developmental model that can successfully lead to upgrading-driven economic development. This model combines elements from the Developmental State, Coordinated Market, and Liberal Market Economy models while differing significantly from each.
Bryan K. RitchieEmail: URL: www.msu.edu/~ritchieb

Bryan K. Ritchie   (Ph.D. from Emory University) is associate professor of international relations and political economy at the James Madison College, Michigan State University. His research focuses on the political economy of innovation, entrepreneurship, technological development, skills education and training, and social capital, particularly in Southeast Asia. His research has been published by the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and journals such as International Organization, World Development, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, and Journal of East Asian Studies. He has received many awards and grants, including Michigan State’s Teacher-Scholar award, the Council of Graduate School’s Distinguished Dissertation in the Social Sciences award for 2002, and grants from the U.S. Department of Education, the Michigan Economic Development Corporation, and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Dr. Ritchie received an MBA from Brigham Young University and has had extensive experience in the computer industry, including management and consulting roles for firms such as Novell, Iomega, 3Com, USRobotics, and Megahertz. He is an entrepreneur who has started and managed multiple companies. He currently directs the external strategy for Michigan State University’s Office of Biobased Technologies and co-directs the operation of the Michigan Center for Innovation and Economic Prosperity.  相似文献   

16.
The regional character of Asian multinational enterprises   总被引:10,自引:6,他引:4  
In recent issues of this Journal a debate has raged concerning the appropriate nature of academic research in the Asia Pacific region. While we support the desire for both rigor and regional relevance in this research, we wish to demonstrate a strong commonality between the performance of large Asian firms and others from Europe and North America. This prompts us to question the need for a new theory of the MNE based on the experience of Asian firms. Like their counterparts elsewhere, the large Asian firms mostly operate on an intra-regional basis. While in the literature it has been assumed that the path to success for Asian firms is globalization, we show that the data supporting this is confined to a handful of unrepresentative case studies. We also present a bibliometric analysis which shows an overwhelming case study sample selection bias in academic studies towards this small number of unrepresentative cases.
Alan M. RugmanEmail: URL: http://www.kelley.indiana.edu/rugman

Simon Collinson   (D.Phil., SPRU, University of Sussex) is Associate Professor (Reader) of International Business at Warwick Business School and the Lead Ghoshal Fellow at the Advanced Institute of Management (AIM), UK. He has held visiting positions at NISTEP in Tokyo and AGSM at the University of Sydney, and was Visiting Professor at the Kelley School of Business, Indiana University. His research interests include global innovation strategies, knowledge management and adaptability in multinational firms, and FDI and collaborative innovation in Japan and China. He has published widely, such as in Organization Studies, the International Journal of Technology Management, Management International Review, R&D Management and Organizational Dynamics, and has received funding awards from the ESRC, EPSRC, DTI, Royal Society and CEC. With Professor Alan Rugman, Simon is also co-author of the FT Pearson International Business (4th Edition, 2006) textbook. Alan Rugman   holds the L. Leslie Waters Chair of International Business at the Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, where he serves as Professor of International Business and Professor of Business Economics and Public Policy. He is also Director of the IU CIBER. He was Thames Water Fellow in Strategic Management at Templeton College, University of Oxford where he remains an Associate Fellow. Dr. Rugman has published widely in leading refereed journals that deal with economic, managerial, and strategic aspects of multinational enterprises and with trade and investment policy. His forty plus books include: The End of Globalization (Random House 2000; AMACOM 2001); (co-ed) The Oxford Handbook of International Business (Oxford University Press 2001) and, The Regional Multinationals (Cambridge University Press 2005). He has served as a consultant to major private sector companies and as an outside advisor to two Canadian Prime Ministers. Dr. Rugman served as President of the Academy of International Business from 2004–2006.  相似文献   

17.
A growing number of Western-educated management PhD graduates are starting their academic career in Chinese business schools. While opportunities are abundant for these returnees, they also face the choice between developing internationally transferable assets and building locally embedded competences. Some possible solutions are discussed, at both personal and institutional levels.
Dean XuEmail:

Dean Xu   (PhD, York University) is an associate professor of strategy and international business at School of Business, the University of Hong Kong. Previously, he was on the faculty of Guanghua School of Management, Peking University. His research interests include multinational enterprises, Chinese firm strategy, and the competitive advantages of foreign and local firms in China. His research has been published or accepted at the Academy of Management Review, Journal of International Business Studies, Journal of Management, Strategic Management Journal, and other management journals.  相似文献   

18.
Indian business groups: Evolution and transformation   总被引:9,自引:8,他引:1  
Business groups are an important constituent of many emerging economies. In this paper, we focus on the evolution and transformation of Indian business groups (IBGs) over two economic eras — pre-reform era (pre 1991) and reform era (post 1991). To this end, we analyze IBG behavior during these periods, and explain the implications of such behavior on IBG value creation. Our conceptualization of IBG dynamics utilizes the perspectives of product relatedness and institutional relatedness, and undertakes a broad review of the extant literature.
Somnath LahiriEmail:

Ben L. Kedia   holds the Wang Chair of Excellence in International Business and is Director of the Wang Center for International Business Education and Research (CIBER) at The University of Memphis, USA. His research interests include cross-cultural and comparative management, and international business strategy. Dr. Kedia has served as Chair of the International Management Division of the Academy of Management and President of the Academy of International Business–U.S. Southwest. His research has been published in Academy of Management Review, Journal of World Business, Management International Review, etc. He received his PhD from Case Western Reserve University. Debmalya Mukherjee   is a doctoral candidate in strategic management at The University of Memphis, USA. His research interests include international business strategy, emerging economies and virtual organizations. Debmalya has presented research papers at various national and international conferences. He received his MBA from Ohio University. He has served in a team consulting project in Italy. Prior to coming to the United States, Debmalya worked as a lawyer at the Calcutta High Court, India. Somnath Lahiri   is a doctoral candidate in management at The University of Memphis, USA. His research interests include international outsourcing, emerging economies, and global business strategy. Somnath’s writings have appeared in European Business Forum and he has presented research papers at various conferences in the United States and abroad. He has also co-authored a book chapter on BRIC economies. Prior to coming to the United States, he served as a professional engineer for several years in India, both in the private- and government sector, where he specialized in contract handling and project monitoring.  相似文献   

19.
This commentary evaluates the problems associated with creating rankings of individuals and institutions in International Business. It argues that the many—potentially arbitrary—decisions involved make the creation of rankings a hazardous affair. I would like to thank the APJM Editor-in-Chief Mike Peng for inviting me to write this commentary, Shichun Xu, Goksel Yalcinkaya and Steven Seggie for providing me with the impetus to articulate some concerns that have been growing in my mind in the past years, and David Griffith for kindly responding to my email when I raised some of the concerns in this commentary. For a full discussion of the broader issue of academics rankings and evaluation, see “Everyone can be a winner: The sense and nonsense of academic rankings” [pending publication].
Anne-Wil HarzingEmail:

Anne-Wil Harzing   (PhD, University of Bradford) is professor in international management at the University of Melbourne, Australia. Her research interests include international HRM, expatriate management, HQ-subsidiary relationships, cross-cultural management and the role of language in international business. She has published about these topics in journals such as Journal of International Business Studies, Journal of Organizational Behaviour, Strategic Management Journal, Human Resource Management, and Organization Studies. Her books include Managing the Multinationals (Edward Elgar, 1999) and International Human Resource Management (Sage, 2004). Since 1999, she also maintains an extensive website () with resources for international and cross-cultural management as well as academic publishing and bibliometrics.  相似文献   

20.
This paper introduces competitive dynamics research, a body of work that has emerged in the strategic management field over the last two decades. I will focus on my scholarly pursuit—both the substance and the process—during the early years of my faculty career. I will use my twelve core publications written during this period to outline the entire research program, highlight the makeup of each of the four sub-streams of the program, and show how these streams are linked. I will also share my personal learning in the process of building this research program. The paper aims to convey some firsthand experience for researchers and scholars, especially those starting in their careers and international scholars who are interested in publishing in major U.S.-based journals, so they can construct their own research programs and cope with the manifold process challenges in research and publishing.
Ming-Jer ChenEmail:

Ming-Jer Chen   (PhD, University of Maryland) is the Leslie E. Grayson Professor of Business Administration at the Darden Graduate School of Business, University of Virginia. His research interests include business strategy and competitive dynamics. Dr. Chen’s articles have appeared in the Academy of Management Journal, Administrative Science Quarterly, and Management Science, and he has received the Best Paper Award from the Academy of Management's Business Policy and Strategy (BPS) Division and the Academy of Management Review Best Paper Award (1996). He is an associate editor of the Academy of Management Review and a member of the editorial boards of Organization Science and Strategic Management Journal.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号