中国私募基金运作机制研究

私募基金是相对于公募的共同基金而言的一种基金类型，这种基金属于一种合伙人制的小型私人投资公司，主要投资于公开交易的证券和衍生金融产品，是一种高风线的投机基金。随着证券市场改革的深入，私募基金面临的环境发生了重大变换，本文从研究美国私募基金运作机制入手，探讨适合中国私募基金运作的机制，以规范和发展我国的私募基金。     

私募股权基金绩效的影响因素分析

私募股权基金(PE)是通过私募的形式对非上市企业进行的权益性投资.目前我国关于私募股权基金的研究还处于起步阶段,主要集中在私募股权基金的运作机制、组织结构及发展环境上,而对于私募股权基金绩效这一投资双方共同关注的重大问题却少有研究.为了让投资双方进一步了解私募股权基金绩效以及影响因素以便更好的优化绩效,本文首先对私募股权基金绩效给予了界定;然后结合已有的研究成果,提出了私募股权基金绩效的主要影响因素;最后,针对提高私募股权基金绩效提出了相关建议,对私募股权基金的发展具有重要意义.     

私募股权基金绩效的影响因素分析

私募股权基金（PE）是通过私募的形式对非上市企业进行的权益性投资。目前我国关于私募股权基金的研究还处于起步阶段,主要集中在私募股权基金的运作机制、组织结构及发展环境上,而对于私募股权基金绩效这一投资双方共同关注的重大问题却少有研究。为了让投资双方进一步了解私募股权基金绩效以及影响因素以便更好的优化绩效,本文首先对私募股权基金绩效给予了界定;然后结合已有的研究成果,提出了私募股权基金绩效的主要影响因素;最后,针对提高私募股权基金绩效提出了相关建议,对私募股权基金的发展具有重要意义。     

加快福建省私募股权投资基金发展的思考

私募股权基金是当前推动中国企业发展的一支重要力量。本文从国内外私募股权投资基金发展现状入手,阐述福建省发展私募股权基金的必要性和可行性,提出加快福建省私募股权基金发展的政策建议。     

美国私募基金运作机制及对我国的启示

私募基金是美国金融领域的一支重要投资力量，也是美国富裕阶层参与证券投资的重要途径。 20世纪 90年代爆发的全球性金融危机使美国的私募基金业成为世界关注的焦点。研究私募基金的运作机制，探讨对私募基金的监管措施成为一段时期人们议论的热门话题。重要的是如何规范和发展我国的私募基金。     

创业板发展下对我国私募股权基金的思考

私募股权基金作为一种重要的金融创新方式,对我国经济结构调整,产业升级,及中小企业融资方面发挥着重要的战略影响。近年来,私募股权基金在对传统产业加大投资的同时,也积极扩宽对创新型企业和民营企业的支持力度,把它作为提高效益的重要领域。文章重点分析我国创业板产生后,对私募股权基金发展的影响,分析两者之间的关系,提出私募基金应对挑战的策略,并进一步指出国家政策环境对私募股权发展的重要性。     

探讨世界私募基金的发展趋势极其在我国的发展前景

随着经济全球化趋势的不断发展,世界私募基金的出现的在一定程度上给整个金融市场带来了重要的影响,本文主要对全球私募基金的发展特点、发展历程以及发展趋势进行综合分析,并对中国私募基金市场的发展状况进行综合评价,阐述了私募基金在我国发展的未来前景。     

我国私募基金风险及防范分析

在我国,私募基金日益发展壮大,已成为资本市场的重要成员。目前,私募基金在法律地位、运作方式、监管手段等诸多方面都还存在问题。本文通过对私募基金的特征分析,揭示出其隐含的巨大风险。对如何规范发展私募基金、控制防范风险、充分利用其合理内核,本文提出了相关对策。     

中国私募股权基金的发展趋向——基于比较分析视角

现阶段,私募股权基金已经成为一种重要的企业融资手段,与传统金融行业相比,私募股权基金对经济增长的促进作用主要体现在刺激创新型企业发展。基于上述原因,国家初期往往直接介入私募股权基金,成立产业投资基金。该文分析了私募股权基金对经济增长的影响机理,回顾了中国第一家产业投资基金"中创公司"市场退出的教训,在此基础上判断了现阶段中国私募股权基金发展中的不利因素,并给出了政策建议。     

我国私募股权基金的运作机制浅析

私募基金是一种通过非公开方式面向社会特定投资者募集资金并以基金方式运作的集合投资制度.作为一种重要的民间投资力量,私募基金时我国整个资本市场乃至国民经济的发展有着不可替代的作用.本文主要从私募股权基金的资金来源、目标客户选择、主要盈利模式以及退出渠道等几个方面对我国私募股权基金的运作机制进行了较为详细的分析,通过以上的总结分析后,文章最后提出四点了对我国私募股权基金的建议.     

Regulating misinformation

Governments have responded to misleading advertising by banning it, engaging in counter-advertising and taxing and regulating the product. In this paper, we consider the welfare effects of those different responses to misinformation. While misinformation lowers consumer surplus, its effect on social welfare is ambiguous. Misleading advertising leads to over-consumption but that may be offsetting the underconsumption associated with oligopoly outputs. If all advertising is misinformation then a tax or quantity restriction on advertising maximizes welfare, and other policy interventions are inferior. If firms undertake quality improving investments that are complementary to misinformation, then combining taxes or bans on misleading advertising with other policies can increase welfare.     

Regulating environmental threats

Environmental consequences of natural resource exploitation often entail threats of future occurrences of detrimental abrupt events rather than (or in addition to) inflicting a damage gradually. The possibility of abrupt occurrence of climate-change related calamities is a case in mind. The uncertainty associated with the realization of these threats and their public-bad nature complicate the design of optimal economic response. We derive a Pigouvian hazard tax schedule that implements the socially optimal outcome. The tax is based on the expected cost of the hazard-generating activities and serves to reduce hazardous emissions well in advance of the catastrophic occurrence. A numerical example illustrates possible effects of the proposed regulation scheme. Implications for climate policy are discussed.      

Regulating monopoly price discrimination

There is a substantial literature assessing the impact of entry restrictions created by state certificate-of-need (CON) programs on hospital and nursing home markets, but comparatively little research has focused on CON for home health agencies (HHAs). We assessed the impact of state CON programs for HHAs, and for potential substitute service providers, on quality ratings for HHAs. HHA quality ratings were obtained from the Home Health Compare database developed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for the last quarter of 2010 through the last quarter of 2013. The HHA-level data were augmented with county-level area characteristics for each HHA in the CMS database. An ordered logit model was used to estimate the association between state CON restrictions and Low, Medium, and High quality categories, adjusted for HHA and area characteristics. The results indicated that HHAs in states with CON for HHAs were less likely to have High quality ratings, and more likely to have Medium quality ratings, compared to agencies in states without CON for home health. Additional research is needed to assess whether the apparent adverse impact of CON on HHA quality is related to diminished competition among HHAs in states with CON.     

Regulating a multi-product monopolist

The purpose of the present paper is to construct a regulatory scheme that serves to correct suboptimal behavior of a multi-product monopolist in a situation of doubly asymmetric information, where the regulator cannot observe the monopolist's cost structure and consumers' preference while the monopolist cannot identify consumer types. We construct a tax scheme that induces the monopolist to offer socially optimal qualities to all types of consumers and discuss some interesting features of the scheme.The authors gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments of two anonymous referees.     

Taxing and Regulating Vices*

We study the optimal taxation and regulation of sin goods – goods that are enjoyable to consume but also create future negative health consequences – within a setting in which individuals are time-inconsistent (and thus consume too much), regulation makes the consumption of sin goods less pleasurable, and taxation involves administrative and compliance costs. In contrast to previous literature, we find that regulation can be beneficial even when corrective taxes are available and individuals are homogeneous. Moreover, despite the inefficiencies associated with the use of both instruments, the consumption of the sin good might fall short of the first best. The results are robust to consumers’ heterogeneity.     

Regulating Availability with Demand Uncertainty

Abstract. I evaluate a new German regulation that requires retail discounters to guarantee the availability of their products in bargain sales. The regulation is meant to prevent loss leaders. Retailers undermine the regulation's rationale by claiming that rationing is due to demand uncertainty. This paper shows that under demand uncertainty the regulation has ambiguous welfare effects. Effectively, it raises production, which, under imperfect competition, tends to be beneficial. However, the regulation overshoots and decreases welfare if it requires availability for a state of high demand that is relatively unlikely. In this case more sophisticated regulation is required.