THE TESTING OF AUSTRALIAN STOCK MARKET INDICES FOR MEAN-VARIANCE EFFICIENCY

Three different market indices are tested for mean-variance efficiency using monthly data for leading Australian securities, and following the methodologies suggested in Roll (1979). The balance of the evidence is against index efficiency and against the two-parameter asset pricing theory. However, this could be influenced by imperfections in the tests, inadequate data, and sampling errors in the betas.     

TRADING OF NASDAQ STOCKS ON THE CHICAGO STOCK EXCHANGE

We use a linear programming model to form two portfolios with approximately equal levels of attributes such as financial leverage. One portfolio comprises stocks that trade exclusively on NASDAQ and the other, stocks that trade on both the Chicago Stock Exchange (CSE) and NASDAQ (CSE/NASDAQ). We find that spreads are lower for the CSE/NASDAQ portfolio, but so is the percentage of quotes at spreads of $0.125. In fact, the lower spreads observed for the CSE/NASDAQ portfolio arise from fewer quotes with spreads of more than $0.25.     

STOCK MARKET RETURNS AND INFLATIONARY EXPECTATIONS: ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE FOR 1975–1979

This research investigates the impacts that inflationary expectations and errors in those expectations had upon the stock market during 1975 to 1979. Expected rates of inflation were obtained via (1) Box-Jenkins time-series analysis and (2) naive extrapolation. Statistical analysis indicates only weak support for a Fisher effect in determining stock prices. However, the analysis consistently indicates that unanticipated changes in inflation are negatively related to stock market returns.     

TESTING THE PRESENT VALUE MODEL OF EQUITY PRICES FOR THE UK STOCK MARKET

This paper applies present value tests to the UK stock market. Using monthly data from 1965 to 1990 on real equity price and dividend indices, it is found that the restrictions imposed by the present value model on a vector autoregression comprised of the 'spread' between prices and dividends and the change in real dividends can be rejected both for the complete sample period and for a shorter sample which omits the early years of dividend control and the run up to and aftermath of the stock market 'Crash' of October 1987. These tests are supplemented by informal methods for evaluating the 'fit' of the present value model: the observed spread is found to move 'too much', so that deviations from the model are persistent and long-lasting.     

THE DEALER AND MARKET CONCEPTS OF BID-ASK SPREAD: A COMPARISON FOR NASDAQ STOCKS

Two models of bid-ask spread are estimated with a unique sample of matched observations of dealer spreads and market (inside) spreads for NASDAQ stocks. The estimates demonstrate that dealer and market spreads relate differently to their common determinants, indicating that the two measures are not interchangeable. Consequently, studies must select the spread concept that is appropriate to the hypothesis being tested to get unbiased estimates and correct interpretations of model parameters. In particular, the cost of immediacy to investors is measured directly by market spreads, while market-making costs and interdealer competition relate directly to dealer spreads.     

MARKET EXPECTATIONS AND THE VALUATION EFFECTS OF EQUITY ISSUANCE

We examine how the wealth effects of equity offers are influenced by investors' expectation of the equity type (public or private) to be issued. Firms deviating to the public market may be issuing when information asymmetry or agency costs are high, and their wealth effects are more negative than for firms that are anticipated to issue equity publicly. Firms deviating to the private market, however, may signal firm undervaluation or monitoring benefits and experience more positive wealth effects than firms that are expected to issue equity privately. For the private issues, public market accessibility appears to influence the wealth effects.