非货币交易的会计处理与所得税纳税调整

会计准则和税法对非货币交易的主要差异在于:其一,会计上一般不确认收入和收益(涉及补价时部分确认换出资产的转让利得),而税法则要求视同销售,确认资产转     

会计准则与税法中收入的差异分析

从根本上来说,会计准则与税法都是用来规范经济活动的,但就目前来看,两者对经济活动的规范中存在着一些差异,特别是在收入方面,这些差异尤其明显,会计准则与税法的差异性主要反映在收入确认的原则、确认的条件、确认的范围和确认的时间等几个方面。     

会计准则与税法对融资租赁的确认差异

<正>我国会计准则与税法都将租赁分为经营租赁和融资租赁两类。但是,税法和会计准则对经营租赁与融资租赁的确认标准却存在一定的差异。会计准则和营业税法对融资租赁的确认差异引起同一业务在会计工作和税务工作中的不同处理,以及在税务工作内部产生相互矛盾。     

税法视同销售会计上是否确认收入及纳税调整分析

税法上视同销售,哪些情况会计上应作为收入确认,哪些情况不确认收入,一直是颇存在争议的地方。本文重点分析了会计上什么情况下应该确认收入及其原因,并进一步分析税法上的规定及什么情况下进行纳税调整。     

浅谈会计收入与企业所得税收入的差异分析

长期以来,会计与税务差异困扰着许多企业财务税务人员,特别是收入的确认问题.按照企业会计准则所反映的企业实际经营成果不一定是企业所得税所要求的计算口径,纳税调整事项增多又需要更多的税法专业知识,完全按照税法口径确认企业的经营成果,又不符合会计信息的质量要求,特别是国有大中型企业以及上市公司.因此,尽可能弱化会计与税法处理差异也就成为企业财务人员非常关注的一个梦想,本文对收入准则和企业所得税关于收入的确认差异方面进行分析.     

“所得税会计核算”考点主观题解题思路点拨

◎所得税会计核算问题在金融资产中的运用 1.所得税会计核算和交易性金融资产相结合 交易性金融资产期末按照公允价值计量,公允价值和账面价值之间的差额会计核算上要确认增加或减少交易性金融资产的账面价值,但税法要求,交易性金融资产应按照初始取得成本确认,即对其公允价值变动税法上不确认纳税,从而会形成暂时性差异.     

论所得税会计

论所得税会计杨虹一、所得税会计的提出所得税应纳税金的计算，取决于两个因素：税率和税基。其中税率一经税法确认具有相对的稳定性，无需企业重新确认；而税基的确定，需要企业在会计核算的基础上，按照税法的规定重新确认和计量。这是由于税收法规和会计准则的目标、原...     

浅谈会计收入与企业所得税收入的差异分析

长期以来，会计与税务差异困扰着许多企业财务税务人员，特别是收入的确认问题。按照企业会计准则所反映的企业实际经营成果不一定是企业所得税所要求的计算口径，纳税调整事项增多又需要更多的税法专业知识，完全按照税法口径确认企业的经营成果，又不符合会计信息的质量要求，特别是国有大中型企业以及上市公司。因此，尽可能弱化会计与税法处理差异也就成为企业财务人员非常关注的一个梦想，本文对收入准则和企业所得税关于收入的确认差异方面进行分析。     

新会计准则与税法对收入确认中存在的差异分析

会计准则与税法由于制订主体不同,使得两者差异的客观存在.本文结合新会计准则和税法相关规定,从制度规定的角度进行了会税差异的分析,并对新会计准则与税法对收入确认差异的协调进行了思考.     

并购中关联资产交易的会计与税收问题探讨

对企业并购关联交易按会计处理规定确认的收益与税法规定不同的,则按会计处理规定确认的收益要按税法规定进行调整后纳税。为此,当并购中涉及关联交易时,必须特别注意并购中关联交易会计处理与税务处理上的差别。     

升值之言该如何听

自今年6月中国暗示将松动人民币汇率以来,人民币升值幅度仅为0．4％,这大大低于华盛顿的期待,因此,中美两国的关系日益紧张起来。随着失业率的膨胀,以及选举年即将到来,美国国会再一次将人民币汇率摆上了议事日程：9月6日,华盛顿两位高官为缓和中美关系前往北京,就人民币及其他重要问题进行高峰会晤,以期达成共识。     

商业银行如何应对利率市场化

最近,中国央行的利率政策传达出利率市场化步伐骤然加快的信号,沉浸在央行利率管制环境下的国内商业银行突然感到"利基"竞争的性质发生了重要变化。那么.在利率市场化环境下商业银行应采取怎样的风险偏好,才能使贷款定价覆盖风险溢价?这是银行管理者必须回答的问题。     

When to ally & when to acquire

Acquisitions and alliances are two pillars of growth strategy. But most businesses don't treat the two as alternative mechanisms for attaining goals. Consequently, companies take over firms they should have collaborated with, and vice versa, and make a mess of both acquisitions and alliances. It's easy to see why companies don't weigh the relative merits and demerits of acquisitions and alliances before choosing horses for courses. The two strategies differ in many ways: Acquisition deals are competitive, based on market prices, and risky; alliances are cooperative, negotiated, and not so risky. Companies habitually deploy acquisitions to increase scale or cut costs and use partnerships to enter new markets, customer segments, and regions. Moreover, a company's initial experiences often turn into blinders. If the firm pulls off an alliance or two, it tends to enter into alliances even when circumstances demand acquisitions. Organizational barriers also stand in the way. In many companies, an M&A group, which reports to the finance head, handles acquisitions, while a separate business development unit looks after alliances. The two teams work out of different locations, jealously guard turf, and, in effect, prevent companies from comparing the advantages and disadvantages of the strategies. But companies could improve their results, the authors argue, if they compared the two strategies to determine which is best suited to the situation at hand. Firms such as Cisco that use acquisitions and alliances appropriately grow faster than rivals do. The authors provide a framework to help organizations systematically decide between acquisition and alliance by analyzing three sets of factors: the resources and synergies they desire, the marketplace they compete in, and their competencies at collaborating.     

How to Tie Equity Compensation to Long-Term Results

Companies, investors, and regulators around the world are now seeking to tie executives' payoffs to long-term results and avoid rewarding executives for short-term gains. Focusing on equity-based compensation, the primary component of top executives' pay, the authors analyze how such compensation should best be structured to provide executives with incentives to focus on long-term value creation.
To improve the link between equity compensation and long-term results, the authors recommend that executives be prevented from unwinding their equity incentives for a significant time period after vesting. At the same time, however, the authors suggest that it would be counterproductive to require that executives hold their equity incentives until retirement, as some have proposed. Instead, the authors recommend that companies adopt a combination of "grant-based" and "aggregate" limitations on the unwinding of equity incentives.
Grant-based limitations would allow executives to unwind the equity incentives associated with a particular grant only gradually after vesting, according to a fixed, pre-specified schedule put in place at the time of the grant. Aggregate limitations on unwinding would prevent an executive from unloading more than a specified fraction of the executive's freely disposable equity incentives in any given year.
Finally, the authors emphasize the need for effective limitations on executives' use of hedging and derivative transactions that would weaken the connection between executive payoffs and long-term stock values that a well-designed equity arrangement should produce.     

NYSE execution quality subsequent to migration to hybrid

In October 2006, the NYSE began rolling-out phase three of a four-phase plan initiate its new Hybrid trading mechanism. The results show that this new trading platform introduced a much larger proportion of electronic transactions relative to floor auction transactions. This migration to electronic transactions is further evidenced by a mirror shift in price discovery from floor trades to trades marked for automatic electronic execution. In addition, the move to Hybrid trading introduced a significant decrease in inventory control costs, as well as a noticeable increase in trade persistence. Finally, the new trading platform has increased the speed with which orders are met, and has also decreased the proportion of executed shares which receive price improvement.

How to stop the race to the bottom

Standard tax multipliers are a widespread feature of fiscal equalization systems. A simple theoretical model shows that actual tax multipliers respond positively to changes in standard tax multipliers. This theoretical prediction is tested empirically using data on municipalities in Germany. A quasi-experiment in the state of North Rhine-Westphalia is exploited to identify the incentive effect. The empirical results confirm that local business tax policy is shaped by standard tax multipliers. They provide a straightforward practical tool to avoid a race to the bottom in local business tax rates.