反倾销之战——内部瓦解

近年来,中国产品出口频频遭受国外反倾销调查和诉讼,中国已经成为反倾销调查和诉讼最多的国家之一。我国学者纷纷提出应对策略。本文就内部瓦解策略进行了论述,包括争取进口商加盟;聘请反倾销提起国的知名律师;充分发动反倾销国的消费者;在国外建立反倾销预警机制。     

“世界工厂”遭遇“世界狙击”04’低价倾销七大案

2004年．中国的对外贸易遭遇了前所未有的．来自许多国家的（特别是美国与欧盟的）反倾销调查和反倾销诉讼，中国成为全球反倾销诉讼的头号目标国。     

中国非市场经济地位问题的制度渊源及危害浅析

国外对中国频繁发起反倾销,除了诉讼主客体双方的主客观诱因之外,反倾销诉讼制度本身的歧视性也为中国产品赢得反倾销诉讼制造了难以逾越的障碍。由于被多数国家视为“非市场经济”地位国,中国在面对反倾销诉讼裁决时将面对极其不公平的“替代国”制度,“替代国”选择的歧视性,计算“正常价值”方法的灵活性,为发起国借“公平贸易”之名行“贸易保护”提供了便利,也大大增加了我国败诉概率。将此制度研究透彻对于中国在以后的反倾销调查中合理利用相关规则维护自身权益以赢得反倾销诉讼具有非常重大的意义。     

对中国走出遭受反倾销困境的对策研究

目前,中国已成为遭受反倾销起诉最多的国家,从总体上看中国出口反倾销的承受指数成上升趋势.其原因是反倾销的不合理性以及中国自身存在的问题.中国应对反倾销的策略是:尽力建立"市场经济"国家的地位;实施"走出去"发展战略;学习运用WTO规则应对国外反倾销调查;建立反倾销的信息中心和反倾销调查案件的预警机制.     

我国企业反倾销会计应对策略——基于浙江台州企业的调查研究

本文在浙江台州企业应对反倾销情况的实地调查基础上,通过剖析浙江台州企业在应对反倾销诉讼过程中存在的问题与会计能力缺陷,并分析我国企业应诉国外反倾销失败原因,借鉴国际《反倾销协议》、反倾销调查有关条款与做法,提出我国企业反倾销的会计应对策略与建议。     

2004中国七大反倾销案纪事

2004年，中国对外贸易呈现出两大特点：一是2004年，中国对外贸易遭遇了前所未有的，来自许多国家的(特别是美国与欧盟的)反倾销调查和反倾销诉讼。中国成为全球反倾销诉讼的头号目标国；二是2004年，中国的对外贸易取得了同样前所未有的巨大成功，中国对外贸易的形势，比建国以来任何一年都好。     

国际直接投资与国际贸易的关联性

我国当前对外贸易面临的主要问题之一,就是出口商品屡屡遭到国外反倾销调查。自1979年欧共体对我国出口发起首次反倾销调查算起,截至2002年底,我国已遭受反倾销诉讼511起,给中国出口造成的直接损失超过160亿美元。中国已经成为国际上遭受反倾销最多的国家。从目     

F-35先进驾驶舱显示器的研制即将完成

中国目前已成为世界上出口商品受反倾销调查最多的国家,成为国际滥用反倾销措施最大的受害者。而且随着中国商品出口规模的进一步扩大,中国商品遭遇反倾销诉讼调查将更为频繁。我国企业必须寻找反倾销诉讼的应对之策。我国企业应对反倾销调查和诉讼,关键是要打好企业的会计基础。只要企业的会计基础扎实,就有可能赢得反倾销诉讼。     

谁能抗拒中国价廉物美的彩电

2004年，中国的对外贸易呈现出两大特点：一是2004年，中国的对外贸易遭遇了前所未有的，来自许多国家的(特别是美国与欧盟的)反倾销调查和反倾销诉讼，中国成为全球反倾销诉讼的头号目标国：二是2004年，中国的对外贸易取得了同样前所未有的巨大成功，中国对外贸易的形势，比建国以来任何一年都好。     

浅析对中国纺织品的反倾销

目前,越来越多的国家对中国出口的纺织品发起反倾销调查.中国是世界上遭受反倾销调查和被实施反倾销措施数量最多的国家之一.通常中国纺织品在国外被裁定为倾销,结果大多是被课征反倾销税,相关企业被迫退出该国市场.本文简要地分析了我国纺织品遭受反倾销的现状、原因,并在此基础上提出了一些应对策略.     

加入WTO后中国应对反倾销的几个关键问题

结合加入WTO后中国政府和企业参与国际反倾销斗争的实际,提出了清除针对我国的反倾销贸易壁垒应着重解决的几个关键问题,重点论述了否定“替代国”政策和发挥政府主导作用,建立以国内法为基础的诉讼对抗体制的依据和措施。     

Anti‐dumping Protection in a Liberalising Country: Mexico's Anti‐dumping Policy and Practice

The use of anti‐dumping policy has been steadily growing in recent decades, and so has the theoretical and empirical literature on anti‐dumping. However, while developing countries as a whole have become at least as active as the ‘traditional’ anti‐dumping regimes (the USA, the EU, Canada and Australia), the literature is almost exclusively concerned with the latter group. This article gives an overview of anti‐dumping policy and practice in Mexico, one of the leading ‘new’ anti‐dumping regimes. It assesses how anti‐dumping has expanded since the country began liberalising trade in the mid‐1980s, and discusses how the policy has been applied in a protectionist way that is not dissimilar to policy practice in the traditional user countries.     

产业损害成因及其对策的研究

加入WTO后,我国出口产品经常受到反倾销、技术壁垒和知识产权等问题的困扰,严重影响了我国产品的出口,而且国外一些产品的倾销也严重损害了我国相关产业的正常发展,这些问题对国民经济的健康发展产生了不良影响。从企业角度分析了反倾销、倾销、技术壁垒和知识产权保护等问题的成因,并在此基础上,提出了应对我国产业损害问题的政策建议。     

中国遭遇反倾销和对外反倾销的指数比较分析

反倾销作为世贸组织允许各国所采取的一种抵制外来不公平竞争的手段之一,目前已经成为世界各国贸易政策和贸易救济的一个重要组成部分。各国由于经济发展水平、法律体系等方面的因素,在反倾销和遭遇反倾销方面存在着较大的差异,在运用反倾销手段保护本国利益方面也有所不同。本文通过大量数据分析,并构建若干指数,对我国反倾销与遭遇反倾销的情况进行国际比较,说明我国在世界反倾销中的地位,深入分析其特点和原因,最后指出了我国强化反倾销的重要战略意义。     

Tariff Liberalisation and Increased Administrative Protection: Is There a Quid Pro Quo?

Theoretical models and intuition suggest that the amount of non‐traditional protection such as anti‐dumping duties will increase as more traditional forms such as tariffs are lowered under multilateral trade agreements. This paper is the first empirical study of the role of tariff liberalisation in the spread of anti‐dumping. Through both correlations and regression approaches we analyse the relationship between tariff concessions made during the Uruguay Round trade negotiations and the filing of anti‐dumping petitions, with particular interest in whether multilateral trade reductions have spurred the recent growth in new users of anti‐dumping policies. We find that, at least for developing economies, tariff reductions agreed to under the Uruguay Round not only increased the likelihood of a country using anti‐dumping protection but also the total number of anti‐dumping petitions filed by countries.     

An Analysis of Factors Influencing the Anti‐dumping Behaviour in India

The use of anti‐dumping measures as a trade protection tool, has increased phenomenally during the last decade. One significant aspect of this new trend is the increasing involvement of developing countries. India is one such country which has emerged as a very frequent user of anti‐dumping measures, surpassing even the traditional users. It had initiated more than 300 anti‐dumping cases by the end of 2002–03. Many of these cases are against developing countries. Most of the cases are concentrated in narrow range product groups, like chemicals and petrochemicals, iron and steel, pharmaceuticals and textiles. This study examines India's experience with anti‐dumping measures. The main objective of the study is to identify the factors which might have influenced the anti‐dumping behaviour in India. Discussion of these factors shows that imports have increased considerably. This is particularly true for a number of developing countries facing dumping charges in India. At the same time, many of the domestic producers of the like products have performed poorly during the last decade. Such trends may instigate the import‐competing industries to seek anti‐dumping protection and may also influence the authority to provide that. However, the results of our statistical exercise show that, although imports and performance of the domestic industry might have influenced the initiation of anti‐dumping cases, these factors did not seem to significantly influence the final decision of the authority. The results rather indicated a tendency on the part of the authority to provide anti‐dumping protection to industries, which are characterised by a large number of firms.     

THE DIFFERENCE OF LAW ON ANTIDUMPING BETWEEN CHINA AND U.S

According to the statistics, China＇s total volume of foreign trade has exceeded 1 billion dollars in 2004. From 1997 to 2004, China began the Anti - Dumping investigation against the foreign products. Now, China is the world＇s biggest injured state of anti -dumping investigations. With the continuous come down of China＇s tariff, there are more and more dumping of foreign products in China. With increasingly severe anti - dumping lawsuits, we must be conscientious and make a good job of studying the basis of anti - dumping law and practice of the western countries, especially the USA. So that we can speed up the improve of China＇s anti - dumping legislation.     

完善我国反规避立法构想

由倾销与反倾销冲突衍生的规避反倾销(简称规避)措施与反规避反倾销(简称反规避)措施正越来越受到各国的关注。所谓规避是指出口国对某项已被征收反倾销税的产品,通过改变出口方式或原产地等手段,继续向进口国倾销该产品的行为。反规避则是指进口国针对规避行为而实施的相应救济措施(仍是反倾销措施)的法律行为。我国在《反倾销和反补贴条例》中对反规避进行了规范,但与对此遥遥领先于世界各国的美国和欧盟的反规避立法相比尚有较大差距。因此应借鉴欧美反规避立法经验,完善我国反规避立法应提高对反规避措施科学的认识,明确规定规避行为的种类,健全实施反规避措施的程序和明确反规避规则的空间效力。     

美国对华反倾销中的非市场经济问题

非市场经济地位使我国外贸出口企业在国际贸易中处于非常不利的地位，虽然这一问题存在了很久，但至今还没有得到解决。这一问题在美国对华反倾销中表现尤为突出，当前要缓解这一问题，一方面，我国政府就应积极地与美国进行经济上、政治上的沟通和双边谈判；另一方面，要从根本上改变这一现状，只有加速经济体制转型，尽快实现经济的市场化。     

论中国遭遇反倾销制裁的原因和应对举措

随着中国加入世贸组织,我国的对外贸易也进入了一个新的发展阶段,反思中国遭受的外国反倾销制裁,令人痛心。结合反倾销的发展历史,分析我国所遭受的反倾销指控的原因,以及它的应对机制,目的在于建立一个集监测与预防,应对与反击于一体的反倾销机制,以便更好地维护我国对外贸易秩序,推动经济的发展。